Parsing JSON from XmlHttpRequest.responseJSON

JavascriptJsonFirefox Addonbit.ly

Javascript Problem Overview


I'm trying to parse a bit.ly JSON response in javascript.

I get the JSON via XmlHttpRequest.

var req = new XMLHttpRequest;  
req.overrideMimeType("application/json");  
req.open('GET', BITLY_CREATE_API + encodeURIComponent(url)
          + BITLY_API_LOGIN, true);  
var target = this;  
req.onload  = function() {target.parseJSON(req, url)};  
req.send(null);

parseJSON: function(req, url) {  
if (req.status == 200) {  
    var jsonResponse = req.responseJSON;  
    var bitlyUrl = jsonResponse.results[url].shortUrl;  
}

I do this in a firefox addon. When I run I get the error "jsonResponse is undefined" for the line var bitlyUrl = jsonResponse.results[url].shortUrl;. Am I doing anything wrong in parsing JSON here? Or what is wrong with this code?

Javascript Solutions


Solution 1 - Javascript

New ways I: fetch

TL;DR I'd recommend this way as long as you don't have to send synchronous requests or support old browsers.

A long as your request is asynchronous you can use the Fetch API to send HTTP requests. The fetch API works with promises, which is a nice way to handle asynchronous workflows in JavaScript. With this approach you use fetch() to send a request and ResponseBody.json() to parse the response:

fetch(url)
  .then(function(response) {
    return response.json();
  })
  .then(function(jsonResponse) {
    // do something with jsonResponse
  });

Compatibility: The Fetch API is not supported by IE11 as well as Edge 12 & 13. However, there are polyfills.

New ways II: responseType

As Londeren has written in his answer, newer browsers allow you to use the responseType property to define the expected format of the response. The parsed response data can then be accessed via the response property:

var req = new XMLHttpRequest();
req.responseType = 'json';
req.open('GET', url, true);
req.onload  = function() {
   var jsonResponse = req.response;
   // do something with jsonResponse
};
req.send(null);

Compatibility: responseType = 'json' is not supported by IE11.

The classic way

The standard XMLHttpRequest has no responseJSON property, just responseText and responseXML. As long as bitly really responds with some JSON to your request, responseText should contain the JSON code as text, so all you've got to do is to parse it with JSON.parse():

var req = new XMLHttpRequest();
req.overrideMimeType("application/json");
req.open('GET', url, true);
req.onload  = function() {
   var jsonResponse = JSON.parse(req.responseText);
   // do something with jsonResponse
};
req.send(null);

Compatibility: This approach should work with any browser that supports XMLHttpRequest and JSON.

JSONHttpRequest

If you prefer to use responseJSON, but want a more lightweight solution than JQuery, you might want to check out my JSONHttpRequest. It works exactly like a normal XMLHttpRequest, but also provides the responseJSON property. All you have to change in your code would be the first line:

var req = new JSONHttpRequest();

JSONHttpRequest also provides functionality to easily send JavaScript objects as JSON. More details and the code can be found here: http://pixelsvsbytes.com/2011/12/teach-your-xmlhttprequest-some-json/.

Full disclosure: I'm the owner of Pixels|Bytes. I thought that my script was a good solution for the original question, but it is rather outdated today. I do not recommend to use it anymore.

Solution 2 - Javascript

You can simply set xhr.responseType = 'json';

const xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhr.open('GET', 'https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
xhr.responseType = 'json';
xhr.onload = function(e) {
  if (this.status == 200) {
    console.log('response', this.response); // JSON response  
  }
};
xhr.send();
  

Documentation for responseType

Solution 3 - Javascript

Note: I've only tested this in Chrome.

it adds a prototype function to the XMLHttpRequest .. XHR2,

in XHR 1 you probably just need to replace this.response with this.responseText

Object.defineProperty(XMLHttpRequest.prototype,'responseJSON',{value:function(){
 return JSON.parse(this.response);
},writable:false,enumerable:false});

to return the json in xhr2

xhr.onload=function(){
 console.log(this.responseJSON());
}

EDIT

If you plan to use XHR with arraybuffer or other response types then you have to check if the response is a string.

in any case you have to add more checks e.g. if it's not able to parse the json.

Object.defineProperty(XMLHttpRequest.prototype,'responseJSON',{value:function(){
 return (typeof this.response==='string'?JSON.parse(this.response):this.response);
},writable:false,enumerable:false});

Solution 4 - Javascript

I think you have to include jQuery to use responseJSON.

Without jQuery, you could try with responseText and try like eval("("+req.responseText+")");

UPDATE:Please read the comment regarding eval, you can test with eval, but don't use it in working extension.

OR

use json_parse : it does not use eval

Solution 5 - Javascript

Use nsIJSON if this is for a FF extension:

var req = new XMLHttpRequest;
req.overrideMimeType("application/json");
req.open('GET', BITLY_CREATE_API + encodeURIComponent(url) + BITLY_API_LOGIN, true);
var target = this;
req.onload = function() {target.parseJSON(req, url)};
req.send(null);

parseJSON: function(req, url) {
if (req.status == 200) {
  var jsonResponse = Components.classes["@mozilla.org/dom/json;1"]
      .createInstance(Components.interfaces.nsIJSON.decode(req.responseText);
  var bitlyUrl = jsonResponse.results[url].shortUrl;
}

For a webpage, just use JSON.parse instead of Components.classes["@mozilla.org/dom/json;1"].createInstance(Components.interfaces.nsIJSON.decode

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionchanuxView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - JavascriptTorbenView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - JavascriptLonderenView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - JavascriptcoccoView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - JavascriptYOUView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - JavascripterikvoldView Answer on Stackoverflow