Parsing boolean values with argparse

PythonBooleanArgparseCommand Line-Arguments

Python Problem Overview


I would like to use argparse to parse boolean command-line arguments written as "--foo True" or "--foo False". For example:

my_program --my_boolean_flag False

However, the following test code does not do what I would like:

import argparse
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="My parser")
parser.add_argument("--my_bool", type=bool)
cmd_line = ["--my_bool", "False"]
parsed_args = parser.parse(cmd_line)

Sadly, parsed_args.my_bool evaluates to True. This is the case even when I change cmd_line to be ["--my_bool", ""], which is surprising, since bool("") evalutates to False.

How can I get argparse to parse "False", "F", and their lower-case variants to be False?

Python Solutions


Solution 1 - Python

I think a more canonical way to do this is via:

command --feature

and

command --no-feature

argparse supports this version nicely:

Python 3.9+:

parser.add_argument('--feature', action=argparse.BooleanOptionalAction)

Python < 3.9:

parser.add_argument('--feature', action='store_true')
parser.add_argument('--no-feature', dest='feature', action='store_false')
parser.set_defaults(feature=True)

Of course, if you really want the --arg <True|False> version, you could pass ast.literal_eval as the "type", or a user defined function ...

def t_or_f(arg):
    ua = str(arg).upper()
    if 'TRUE'.startswith(ua):
       return True
    elif 'FALSE'.startswith(ua):
       return False
    else:
       pass  #error condition maybe?

Solution 2 - Python

Yet another solution using the previous suggestions, but with the "correct" parse error from argparse:

def str2bool(v):
    if isinstance(v, bool):
        return v
    if v.lower() in ('yes', 'true', 't', 'y', '1'):
        return True
    elif v.lower() in ('no', 'false', 'f', 'n', '0'):
        return False
    else:
        raise argparse.ArgumentTypeError('Boolean value expected.')

This is very useful to make switches with default values; for instance

parser.add_argument("--nice", type=str2bool, nargs='?',
                        const=True, default=False,
                        help="Activate nice mode.")

allows me to use:

script --nice
script --nice <bool>

and still use a default value (specific to the user settings). One (indirectly related) downside with that approach is that the 'nargs' might catch a positional argument -- see this related question and this argparse bug report.

Solution 3 - Python

If you want to allow --feature and --no-feature at the same time (last one wins)

This allows users to make a shell alias with --feature, and overriding it with --no-feature.

Python 3.9 and above
parser.add_argument('--feature', default=True, action=argparse.BooleanOptionalAction)
Python 3.8 and below

I recommend mgilson's answer:

parser.add_argument('--feature', dest='feature', action='store_true')
parser.add_argument('--no-feature', dest='feature', action='store_false')
parser.set_defaults(feature=True)

If you DON'T want to allow --feature and --no-feature at the same time

You can use a mutually exclusive group:

feature_parser = parser.add_mutually_exclusive_group(required=False)
feature_parser.add_argument('--feature', dest='feature', action='store_true')
feature_parser.add_argument('--no-feature', dest='feature', action='store_false')
parser.set_defaults(feature=True)

You can use this helper if you are going to set many of them:

def add_bool_arg(parser, name, default=False):
    group = parser.add_mutually_exclusive_group(required=False)
    group.add_argument('--' + name, dest=name, action='store_true')
    group.add_argument('--no-' + name, dest=name, action='store_false')
    parser.set_defaults(**{name:default})

add_bool_arg(parser, 'useful-feature')
add_bool_arg(parser, 'even-more-useful-feature')

Solution 4 - Python

Here is another variation without extra row/s to set default values. The boolean value is always assigned, so that it can be used in logical statements without checking beforehand:

import argparse
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Parse bool")
parser.add_argument("--do-something", default=False, action="store_true",
                    help="Flag to do something")
args = parser.parse_args()

if args.do_something:
     print("Do something")
else:
     print("Don't do something")

print(f"Check that args.do_something={args.do_something} is always a bool.")

Solution 5 - Python

oneliner:

parser.add_argument('--is_debug', default=False, type=lambda x: (str(x).lower() == 'true'))

Solution 6 - Python

There seems to be some confusion as to what type=bool and type='bool' might mean. Should one (or both) mean 'run the function bool(), or 'return a boolean'? As it stands type='bool' means nothing. add_argument gives a 'bool' is not callable error, same as if you used type='foobar', or type='int'.

But argparse does have registry that lets you define keywords like this. It is mostly used for action, e.g. `action='store_true'. You can see the registered keywords with:

parser._registries

which displays a dictionary

{'action': {None: argparse._StoreAction,
  'append': argparse._AppendAction,
  'append_const': argparse._AppendConstAction,
...
 'type': {None: <function argparse.identity>}}

There are lots of actions defined, but only one type, the default one, argparse.identity.

This code defines a 'bool' keyword:

def str2bool(v):
  #susendberg's function
  return v.lower() in ("yes", "true", "t", "1")
p = argparse.ArgumentParser()
p.register('type','bool',str2bool) # add type keyword to registries
p.add_argument('-b',type='bool')  # do not use 'type=bool'
# p.add_argument('-b',type=str2bool) # works just as well
p.parse_args('-b false'.split())
Namespace(b=False)

parser.register() is not documented, but also not hidden. For the most part the programmer does not need to know about it because type and action take function and class values. There are lots of stackoverflow examples of defining custom values for both.


In case it isn't obvious from the previous discussion, bool() does not mean 'parse a string'. From the Python documentation:

> bool(x): Convert a value to a Boolean, using the standard truth testing procedure.

Contrast this with

>int(x): Convert a number or string x to an integer.

Solution 7 - Python

A quite similar way is to use:

feature.add_argument('--feature',action='store_true')

and if you set the argument --feature in your command

 command --feature

the argument will be True, if you do not set type --feature the arguments default is always False!

Solution 8 - Python

Simplest & most correct way is:

from distutils.util import strtobool

parser.add_argument('--feature', dest='feature', 
                    type=lambda x: bool(strtobool(x)))

Do note that True values are y, yes, t, true, on and 1; false values are n, no, f, false, off and 0. Raises ValueError if val is anything else.

Solution 9 - Python

I was looking for the same issue, and imho the pretty solution is :

def str2bool(v):
  return v.lower() in ("yes", "true", "t", "1")

and using that to parse the string to boolean as suggested above.

Solution 10 - Python

This works for everything I expect it to:

add_boolean_argument(parser, 'foo', default=True)
parser.parse_args([])                   # Whatever the default was
parser.parse_args(['--foo'])            # True
parser.parse_args(['--nofoo'])          # False
parser.parse_args(['--foo=true'])       # True
parser.parse_args(['--foo=false'])      # False
parser.parse_args(['--foo', '--nofoo']) # Error

The code:

def _str_to_bool(s):
    """Convert string to bool (in argparse context)."""
    if s.lower() not in ['true', 'false']:
        raise ValueError('Need bool; got %r' % s)
    return {'true': True, 'false': False}[s.lower()]

def add_boolean_argument(parser, name, default=False):                                                                                               
    """Add a boolean argument to an ArgumentParser instance."""
    group = parser.add_mutually_exclusive_group()
    group.add_argument(
        '--' + name, nargs='?', default=default, const=True, type=_str_to_bool)
    group.add_argument('--no' + name, dest=name, action='store_false')

Solution 11 - Python

In addition to what @mgilson said, it should be noted that there's also a ArgumentParser.add_mutually_exclusive_group(required=False) method that would make it trivial to enforce that --flag and --no-flag aren't used at the same time.

Solution 12 - Python

Simplest. It's not flexible, but I prefer simplicity.

  parser.add_argument('--boolean_flag',
                      help='This is a boolean flag.',
                      type=eval, 
                      choices=[True, False], 
                      default='True')

EDIT: If you don't trust the input, don't use eval.

Solution 13 - Python

This is actually outdated. For Python 3.7+, Argparse now supports boolean args (search BooleanOptionalAction).

The implementation looks like this:

import argparse

ap = argparse.ArgumentParser()

# List of args
ap.add_argument('--foo', default=True, type=bool, help='Some helpful text that is not bar. Default = True')

# Importable object
args = ap.parse_args()

One other thing to mention: this will block all entries other than True and False for the argument via argparse.ArgumentTypeError. You can create a custom error class for this if you want to try to change this for any reason.

Solution 14 - Python

A simpler way would be to use as below.

parser.add_argument('--feature', type=lambda s: s.lower() in ['true', 't', 'yes', '1'])

Solution 15 - Python

After previously following @akash-desarda 's excellence answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/59579733/315112 , to use strtobool via lambda, later, I decide to use strtobool directly instead.

import argparse
from distutils import util
parser.add_argument('--feature', type=util.strtobool)

Yes you're right, strtobool is returning an int, not a bool. But strtobool will not returning any other value except 0 and 1, and python will get them converted to a bool value seamlessy and consistently.

>>> 0 == False
True
>>> 0 == True
False
>>> 1 == False
False
>>> 1 == True
True

While on receiving a wrong input value like

python yours.py --feature wrong_value

An argparse.Action with strtobool compared to lambda will produce a slightly clearer/comprehensible error message:

yours.py: error: argument --feature: invalid strtobool value: 'wrong_value'

Compared to this code,

parser.add_argument('--feature', type=lambda x: bool(util.strtobool(x))

Which will produce a less clear error message:

yours.py: error: argument --feature: invalid <lambda> value: 'wrong_value'

Solution 16 - Python

Simplest way would be to use choices:

parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
parser.add_argument('--my-flag',choices=('True','False'))

args = parser.parse_args()
flag = args.my_flag == 'True'
print(flag)

Not passing --my-flag evaluates to False. The required=True option could be added if you always want the user to explicitly specify a choice.

Solution 17 - Python

As an improvement to @Akash Desarda 's answer, you could do

import argparse
from distutils.util import strtobool

parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
parser.add_argument("--foo", 
    type=lambda x:bool(strtobool(x)),
    nargs='?', const=True, default=False)
args = parser.parse_args()
print(args.foo)

And it supports python test.py --foo

(base) [costa@costa-pc code]$ python test.py
False
(base) [costa@costa-pc code]$ python test.py --foo 
True
(base) [costa@costa-pc code]$ python test.py --foo True
True
(base) [costa@costa-pc code]$ python test.py --foo False
False

Solution 18 - Python

I think the most canonical way will be:

parser.add_argument('--ensure', nargs='*', default=None)

ENSURE = config.ensure is None

Solution 19 - Python

Quick and easy, but only for arguments 0 or 1:

parser.add_argument("mybool", default=True,type=lambda x: bool(int(x)))
myargs=parser.parse_args()
print(myargs.mybool)

The output will be "False" after calling from terminal:

python myscript.py 0

Solution 20 - Python

class FlagAction(argparse.Action):
    # From http://bugs.python.org/issue8538

    def __init__(self, option_strings, dest, default=None,
                 required=False, help=None, metavar=None,
                 positive_prefixes=['--'], negative_prefixes=['--no-']):
        self.positive_strings = set()
        self.negative_strings = set()
        for string in option_strings:
            assert re.match(r'--[A-z]+', string)
            suffix = string[2:]
            for positive_prefix in positive_prefixes:
                self.positive_strings.add(positive_prefix + suffix)
            for negative_prefix in negative_prefixes:
                self.negative_strings.add(negative_prefix + suffix)
        strings = list(self.positive_strings | self.negative_strings)
        super(FlagAction, self).__init__(option_strings=strings, dest=dest,
                                         nargs=0, const=None, default=default, type=bool, choices=None,
                                         required=required, help=help, metavar=metavar)

    def __call__(self, parser, namespace, values, option_string=None):
        if option_string in self.positive_strings:
            setattr(namespace, self.dest, True)
        else:
            setattr(namespace, self.dest, False)

Solution 21 - Python

Similar to @Akash but here is another approach that I've used. It uses str than lambda because python lambda always gives me an alien-feelings.

import argparse
from distutils.util import strtobool

parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
parser.add_argument("--my_bool", type=str, default="False")
args = parser.parse_args()

if bool(strtobool(args.my_bool)) is True:
    print("OK")

Solution 22 - Python

just do the following , you can make --test = True by using

python filename --test

parser.add_argument("--test" , default=False ,help="test ?", dest='test', action='store_true')

Solution 23 - Python

Convert the value:

def __arg_to_bool__(arg):
    """__arg_to_bool__

        Convert string / int arg to bool
    :param arg: argument to be converted
    :type arg: str or int
    :return: converted arg
    :rtype: bool
    """
    str_true_values = (
        '1',
        'ENABLED',
        'ON',
        'TRUE',
        'YES',
    )
    str_false_values = (
        '0',
        'DISABLED',
        'OFF',
        'FALSE',
        'NO',
    )

    if isinstance(arg, str):
        arg = arg.upper()
        if arg in str_true_values:
            return True
        elif arg in str_false_values:
            return False

    if isinstance(arg, int):
        if arg == 1:
            return True
        elif arg == 0:
            return False

    if isinstance(arg, bool):
        return arg

    # if any other value not covered above, consider argument as False
    # or you could just raise and error
    return False

[...]


args = ap.parse_args()
my_arg = options.my_arg
my_arg = __arg_to_bool__(my_arg)

Solution 24 - Python

Expanding on gerardw's answer

The reason parser.add_argument("--my_bool", type=bool) doesn't work is that bool("mystring") is True for any non-empty string so bool("False") is actually True.

What you want is

my_program.py

import argparse

parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="My parser")

parser.add_argument(
        "--my_bool",
        choices=["False", "True"],
        )

parsed_args = parser.parse_args()

my_bool = parsed_args.my_bool == "True"

print(my_bool)
$ python my_program.py --my_bool False
False

$ python my_program.py --my_bool True
True

$ python my_program.py --my_bool true
usage: my_program.py [-h] [--my_bool {False,True}]
my_program.py: error: argument --my_bool: invalid choice: 'true' (choose from 'False', 'True')

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionSuperElectricView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - PythonmgilsonView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - PythonMaximView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - PythonfnkrView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - PythonSchakiView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - PythonEvalds UrtansView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - PythonhpauljView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - Pythondl.meteoView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - PythonAkash DesardaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - PythonsusundbergView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - PythonStumpy Joe PeteView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 11 - PythonfooView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 12 - PythonRussellView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 13 - PythonZach RieckView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 14 - PythonarunkumarreddyView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 15 - PythonIndra GinanjarView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 16 - PythongerardwView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 17 - PythonCosta HuangView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 18 - PythonAndreas MaertensView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 19 - PythonFEMengineerView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 20 - PythonRobert T. McGibbonView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 21 - PythonYoungjaeView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 22 - PythondelanView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 23 - PythonscorpionipxView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 24 - PythonFiddleStixView Answer on Stackoverflow