Null check in an enhanced for loop

JavaSyntaxLoopsFor Loop

Java Problem Overview


What is the best way to guard against null in a for loop in Java?

This seems ugly :

if (someList != null) {
    for (Object object : someList) {
        // do whatever
    }
}

Or

if (someList == null) {
    return; // Or throw ex
}
for (Object object : someList) {
    // do whatever
}

There might not be any other way. Should they have put it in the for construct itself, if it is null then don't run the loop?

Java Solutions


Solution 1 - Java

You should better verify where you get that list from.

An empty list is all you need, because an empty list won't fail.

If you get this list from somewhere else and don't know if it is ok or not you could create a utility method and use it like this:

for( Object o : safe( list ) ) {
   // do whatever 
 }

And of course safe would be:

public static List safe( List other ) {
    return other == null ? Collections.EMPTY_LIST : other;
}

Solution 2 - Java

You could potentially write a helper method which returned an empty sequence if you passed in null:

public static <T> Iterable<T> emptyIfNull(Iterable<T> iterable) {
    return iterable == null ? Collections.<T>emptyList() : iterable;
}

Then use:

for (Object object : emptyIfNull(someList)) {
}

I don't think I'd actually do that though - I'd usually use your second form. In particular, the "or throw ex" is important - if it really shouldn't be null, you should definitely throw an exception. You know that something has gone wrong, but you don't know the extent of the damage. Abort early.

Solution 3 - Java

It's already 2017, and you can now use Apache Commons Collections4

The usage:

for(Object obj : ListUtils.emptyIfNull(list1)){
    // Do your stuff
}

You can do the same null-safe check to other Collection classes with CollectionUtils.emptyIfNull.

Solution 4 - Java

With Java 8 Optional:

for (Object object : Optional.ofNullable(someList).orElse(Collections.emptyList())) {
    // do whatever
}

Solution 5 - Java

Use ArrayUtils.nullToEmpty from the commons-lang library for Arrays

for( Object o : ArrayUtils.nullToEmpty(list) ) {
   // do whatever 
}

This functionality exists in the commons-lang library, which is included in most Java projects.

// ArrayUtils.nullToEmpty source code 
public static Object[] nullToEmpty(final Object[] array) {
	if (isEmpty(array)) {
    	return EMPTY_OBJECT_ARRAY;
    }
    return array;
}

// ArrayUtils.isEmpty source code
public static boolean isEmpty(final Object[] array) {
	return array == null || array.length == 0;
}

This is the same as the answer given by @OscarRyz, but for the sake of the DRY mantra, I believe it is worth noting. See the commons-lang project page. Here is the nullToEmpty API documentation and source

Maven entry to include commons-lang in your project if it is not already.

<dependency>
    <groupId>org.apache.commons</groupId>
    <artifactId>commons-lang3</artifactId>
    <version>3.4</version>
</dependency>

Unfortunately, commons-lang doesn't provide this functionality for List types. In this case you would have to use a helper method as previously mentioned.

public static <E> List<E> nullToEmpty(List<E> list)
{
    if(list == null || list.isEmpty())
    {
		return Collections.emptyList();
	}
	return list;
}

Solution 6 - Java

If you are getting that List from a method call that you implement, then don't return null, return an empty List.

If you can't change the implementation then you are stuck with the null check. If it should't be null, then throw an exception.

I would not go for the helper method that returns an empty list because it may be useful some times but then you would get used to call it in every loop you make possibly hiding some bugs.

Solution 7 - Java

I have modified the above answer, so you don't need to cast from Object

public static <T> List<T> safeClient( List<T> other ) {
		    return other == null ? Collections.EMPTY_LIST : other;
}

and then simply call the List by

for (MyOwnObject ownObject : safeClient(someList)) {
    // do whatever
}

Explaination: MyOwnObject: If List<Integer> then MyOwnObject will be Integer in this case.

Solution 8 - Java

For anyone uninterested in writing their own static null safety method you can use: commons-lang's org.apache.commons.lang.ObjectUtils.defaultIfNull(Object, Object). For example:

    for (final String item : 
    (List<String>)ObjectUtils.defaultIfNull(items, Collections.emptyList())) { ... }

ObjectUtils.defaultIfNull JavaDoc

Solution 9 - Java

Another way to effectively guard against a null in a for loop is to wrap your collection with Google Guava's Optional<T> as this, one hopes, makes the possibility of an effectively empty collection clear since the client would be expected to check if the collection is present with Optional.isPresent().

Solution 10 - Java

Use, CollectionUtils.isEmpty(Collection coll) method which is Null-safe check if the specified collection is empty.

for this import org.apache.commons.collections.CollectionUtils.

Maven dependency

<dependency>
    <groupId>org.apache.commons</groupId>
    <artifactId>commons-collections4</artifactId>
    <version>4.0</version>
</dependency>

Solution 11 - Java

for (Object object : someList) {

   // do whatever
}  throws the null pointer exception.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionfastcodejavaView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - JavaOscarRyzView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - JavaJon SkeetView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - JavaFred PymView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - Javaholmis83View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - JavasdcView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - JavaLomboView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - JavaHaris IltifatView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - JavaJacob BriscoeView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - JavaNico de WetView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - JavaSwadeshiView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 11 - Javauser6315386View Answer on Stackoverflow