Java: How to test methods that call System.exit()?

JavaMultithreadingUnit TestingJunitTestability

Java Problem Overview


I've got a few methods that should call System.exit() on certain inputs. Unfortunately, testing these cases causes JUnit to terminate! Putting the method calls in a new Thread doesn't seem to help, since System.exit() terminates the JVM, not just the current thread. Are there any common patterns for dealing with this? For example, can I subsitute a stub for System.exit()?

[EDIT] The class in question is actually a command-line tool which I'm attempting to test inside JUnit. Maybe JUnit is simply not the right tool for the job? Suggestions for complementary regression testing tools are welcome (preferably something that integrates well with JUnit and EclEmma).

Java Solutions


Solution 1 - Java

Indeed, Derkeiler.com suggests:

  • Why System.exit() ?

> Instead of terminating with System.exit(whateverValue), why not throw an unchecked exception? In normal use it will drift all the way out to the JVM's last-ditch catcher and shut your script down (unless you decide to catch it somewhere along the way, which might be useful someday).

> In the JUnit scenario it will be caught by the JUnit framework, which will report that such-and-such test failed and move smoothly along to the next.

  • Prevent System.exit() to actually exit the JVM:

> Try modifying the TestCase to run with a security manager that prevents calling System.exit, then catch the SecurityException.

public class NoExitTestCase extends TestCase 
{

	protected static class ExitException extends SecurityException 
	{
		public final int status;
		public ExitException(int status) 
		{
			super("There is no escape!");
			this.status = status;
		}
	}

	private static class NoExitSecurityManager extends SecurityManager 
	{
		@Override
		public void checkPermission(Permission perm) 
		{
			// allow anything.
		}
		@Override
		public void checkPermission(Permission perm, Object context) 
		{
			// allow anything.
		}
		@Override
		public void checkExit(int status) 
		{
			super.checkExit(status);
			throw new ExitException(status);
		}
	}

	@Override
	protected void setUp() throws Exception 
	{
		super.setUp();
		System.setSecurityManager(new NoExitSecurityManager());
	}

	@Override
	protected void tearDown() throws Exception 
	{
		System.setSecurityManager(null); // or save and restore original
		super.tearDown();
	}

	public void testNoExit() throws Exception 
	{
		System.out.println("Printing works");
	}

	public void testExit() throws Exception 
	{
		try 
		{
			System.exit(42);
		} catch (ExitException e) 
		{
			assertEquals("Exit status", 42, e.status);
		}
	}
}

Update December 2012:

Will proposes in the comments using System Rules, a collection of JUnit(4.9+) rules for testing code which uses java.lang.System.
This was initially mentioned by Stefan Birkner in his answer in December 2011.

System.exit(…)

> Use the ExpectedSystemExit rule to verify that System.exit(…) is called.
You could verify the exit status, too.

For instance:

public void MyTest {
	@Rule
	public final ExpectedSystemExit exit = ExpectedSystemExit.none();

	@Test
	public void noSystemExit() {
		//passes
	}

	@Test
	public void systemExitWithArbitraryStatusCode() {
		exit.expectSystemExit();
		System.exit(0);
	}

	@Test
	public void systemExitWithSelectedStatusCode0() {
		exit.expectSystemExitWithStatus(0);
		System.exit(0);
	}
}

Solution 2 - Java

The library System Lambda has a method catchSystemExit.With this rule you are able to test code, that calls System.exit(...):

public class MyTest {
	@Test
	public void systemExitWithArbitraryStatusCode() {
		SystemLambda.catchSystemExit(() -> {
		    //the code under test, which calls System.exit(...);
        });
	}


	@Test
	public void systemExitWithSelectedStatusCode0() {
		int status = SystemLambda.catchSystemExit(() -> {
		    //the code under test, which calls System.exit(0);
        });

        assertEquals(0, status);
	}
}

For Java 5 to 7 the library System Rules has a JUnit rule called ExpectedSystemExit. With this rule you are able to test code, that calls System.exit(...):

public class MyTest {
	@Rule
	public final ExpectedSystemExit exit = ExpectedSystemExit.none();

	@Test
	public void systemExitWithArbitraryStatusCode() {
		exit.expectSystemExit();
		//the code under test, which calls System.exit(...);
	}

	@Test
	public void systemExitWithSelectedStatusCode0() {
		exit.expectSystemExitWithStatus(0);
		//the code under test, which calls System.exit(0);
	}
}

Full disclosure: I'm the author of both libraries.

Solution 3 - Java

How about injecting an "ExitManager" into this Methods:

public interface ExitManager {
    void exit(int exitCode);
}

public class ExitManagerImpl implements ExitManager {
    public void exit(int exitCode) {
        System.exit(exitCode);
    }
}

public class ExitManagerMock implements ExitManager {
    public bool exitWasCalled;
    public int exitCode;
    public void exit(int exitCode) {
        exitWasCalled = true;
        this.exitCode = exitCode;
    }
}

public class MethodsCallExit {
    public void CallsExit(ExitManager exitManager) {
        // whatever
        if (foo) {
            exitManager.exit(42);
        }
        // whatever
    }
}

The production code uses the ExitManagerImpl and the test code uses ExitManagerMock and can check if exit() was called and with which exit code.

Solution 4 - Java

You actually can mock or stub out the System.exit method, in a JUnit test.

For example, using http://jmockit.github.io">JMockit</a> you could write (there are other ways as well):

@Test
public void mockSystemExit(@Mocked("exit") System mockSystem)
{
// Called by code under test:
System.exit(); // will not exit the program
}

EDIT: Alternative test (using latest JMockit API) which does not allow any code to run after a call to System.exit(n):

@Test(expected = EOFException.class)
public void checkingForSystemExitWhileNotAllowingCodeToContinueToRun() {
    new Expectations(System.class) {{ System.exit(anyInt); result = new EOFException(); }};

    // From the code under test:
    System.exit(1);
    System.out.println("This will never run (and not exit either)");
}

Solution 5 - Java

One trick we used in our code base was to have the call to System.exit() be encapsulated in a Runnable impl, which the method in question used by default. To unit test, we set a different mock Runnable. Something like this:

private static final Runnable DEFAULT_ACTION = new Runnable(){
  public void run(){
    System.exit(0);
  }
};

public void foo(){ 
  this.foo(DEFAULT_ACTION);
}

/* package-visible only for unit testing */
void foo(Runnable action){   
  // ...some stuff...   
  action.run(); 
}

...and the JUnit test method...

public void testFoo(){   
  final AtomicBoolean actionWasCalled = new AtomicBoolean(false);   
  fooObject.foo(new Runnable(){
    public void run(){
      actionWasCalled.set(true);
    }   
  });   
  assertTrue(actionWasCalled.get()); 
}

Solution 6 - Java

I like some of the answers already given but I wanted to demonstrate a different technique that is often useful when getting legacy code under test. Given code like:

public class Foo {
  public void bar(int i) {
    if (i < 0) {
      System.exit(i);
    }
  }
}

You can do a safe refactoring to create a method that wraps the System.exit call:

public class Foo {
  public void bar(int i) {
    if (i < 0) {
      exit(i);
    }
  }

  void exit(int i) {
    System.exit(i);
  }
}

Then you can create a fake for your test that overrides exit:

public class TestFoo extends TestCase {

  public void testShouldExitWithNegativeNumbers() {
    TestFoo foo = new TestFoo();
    foo.bar(-1);
    assertTrue(foo.exitCalled);
    assertEquals(-1, foo.exitValue);
  }

  private class TestFoo extends Foo {
    boolean exitCalled;
    int exitValue;
    void exit(int i) {
      exitCalled = true;
      exitValue = i;
    }
}

This is a generic technique for substituting behavior for test cases, and I use it all the time when refactoring legacy code. It not usually where I'm going to leave thing, but an intermediate step to get the existing code under test.

Solution 7 - Java

For VonC's answer to run on JUnit 4, I've modified the code as follows

protected static class ExitException extends SecurityException {
	private static final long serialVersionUID = -1982617086752946683L;
	public final int status;

	public ExitException(int status) {
		super("There is no escape!");
		this.status = status;
	}
}

private static class NoExitSecurityManager extends SecurityManager {
	@Override
	public void checkPermission(Permission perm) {
		// allow anything.
	}

	@Override
	public void checkPermission(Permission perm, Object context) {
		// allow anything.
	}

	@Override
	public void checkExit(int status) {
		super.checkExit(status);
		throw new ExitException(status);
	}
}

private SecurityManager securityManager;

@Before
public void setUp() {
	securityManager = System.getSecurityManager();
	System.setSecurityManager(new NoExitSecurityManager());
}

@After
public void tearDown() {
	System.setSecurityManager(securityManager);
}

Solution 8 - Java

Create a mock-able class that wraps System.exit()

I agree with EricSchaefer. But if you use a good mocking framework like Mockito a simple concrete class is enough, no need for an interface and two implementations.

Stopping test execution on System.exit()

Problem:

// do thing1
if(someCondition) {
	System.exit(1);
}
// do thing2
System.exit(0)

A mocked Sytem.exit() will not terminate execution. This is bad if you want to test that thing2 is not executed.

Solution:

You should refactor this code as suggested by martin:

// do thing1
if(someCondition) {
	return 1;
}
// do thing2
return 0;

And do System.exit(status) in the calling function. This forces you to have all your System.exit()s in one place in or near main(). This is cleaner than calling System.exit() deep inside your logic.

Code

Wrapper:

public class SystemExit {

    public void exit(int status) {
        System.exit(status);
    }
}

Main:

public class Main {

    private final SystemExit systemExit;


    Main(SystemExit systemExit) {
        this.systemExit = systemExit;
    }


    public static void main(String[] args) {
        SystemExit aSystemExit = new SystemExit();
        Main main = new Main(aSystemExit);

        main.executeAndExit(args);
    }


    void executeAndExit(String[] args) {
        int status = execute(args);
        systemExit.exit(status);
    }


    private int execute(String[] args) {
        System.out.println("First argument:");
        if (args.length == 0) {
            return 1;
        }
        System.out.println(args[0]);
        return 0;
    }
}

Test:

public class MainTest {

    private Main       main;

    private SystemExit systemExit;


    @Before
    public void setUp() {
        systemExit = mock(SystemExit.class);
        main = new Main(systemExit);
    }


    @Test
    public void executeCallsSystemExit() {
        String[] emptyArgs = {};

        // test
        main.executeAndExit(emptyArgs);

        verify(systemExit).exit(1);
    }
}

Solution 9 - Java

A quick look at the api, shows that System.exit can throw an exception esp. if a securitymanager forbids the shutdown of the vm. Maybe a solution would be to install such a manager.

Solution 10 - Java

You can use the java SecurityManager to prevent the current thread from shutting down the Java VM. The following code should do what you want:

SecurityManager securityManager = new SecurityManager() {
	public void checkPermission(Permission permission) {
		if ("exitVM".equals(permission.getName())) {
			throw new SecurityException("System.exit attempted and blocked.");
		}
	}
};
System.setSecurityManager(securityManager);

Solution 11 - Java

You can test System.exit(..) with replacing Runtime instance. E.g. with TestNG + Mockito:

public class ConsoleTest {
    /** Original runtime. */
    private Runtime originalRuntime;

    /** Mocked runtime. */
    private Runtime spyRuntime;

    @BeforeMethod
    public void setUp() {
        originalRuntime = Runtime.getRuntime();
        spyRuntime = spy(originalRuntime);

        // Replace original runtime with a spy (via reflection).
        Utils.setField(Runtime.class, "currentRuntime", spyRuntime);
    }

    @AfterMethod
    public void tearDown() {
        // Recover original runtime.
        Utils.setField(Runtime.class, "currentRuntime", originalRuntime);
    }

    @Test
    public void testSystemExit() {
        // Or anything you want as an answer.
        doNothing().when(spyRuntime).exit(anyInt());

        System.exit(1);

        verify(spyRuntime).exit(1);
    }
}

Solution 12 - Java

System Stubs - https://github.com/webcompere/system-stubs - is also able to solve this problem. It shares System Lambda's syntax for wrapping around code that we know will execute System.exit, but that can lead to odd effects when other code unexpectedly exits.

Via the JUnit 5 plugin, we can provide insurance that any exit will be converted to an exception:

@ExtendWith(SystemStubsExtension.class)
class SystemExitUseCase {
    // the presence of this in the test means System.exit becomes an exception
    @SystemStub
    private SystemExit systemExit;

    @Test
    void doSomethingThatAccidentallyCallsSystemExit() {
        // this test would have stopped the JVM, now it ends in `AbortExecutionException`
        // System.exit(1);
    }

    @Test
    void canCatchSystemExit() {
        assertThatThrownBy(() -> System.exit(1))
            .isInstanceOf(AbortExecutionException.class);

        assertThat(systemExit.getExitCode()).isEqualTo(1);
    }
}

Alternatively, the assertion-like static method can also be used:

assertThat(catchSystemExit(() -> {
   //the code under test
   System.exit(123);
})).isEqualTo(123);

Solution 13 - Java

There are environments where the returned exit code is used by the calling program (such as ERRORLEVEL in MS Batch). We have tests around the main methods that do this in our code, and our approach has been to use a similar SecurityManager override as used in other tests here.

Last night I put together a small JAR using Junit @Rule annotations to hide the security manager code, as well as add expectations based on the expected return code. http://code.google.com/p/junitsystemrules/

Solution 14 - Java

Most solutions will

  • terminate the test (method, not the entire run) the moment System.exit() is called
  • ignore an already installed SecurityManager
  • Sometimes be quite specific to a test framework
  • restrict to be used at max once per test case

Thus, most solutions are not suited for situations where:

  • Verification of side-effects are to be performed after the call to System.exit()
  • An existing security manager is part of the testing.
  • A different test framework is used.
  • You want to have multiple verifications in a single test case. This may be strictly not recommended, but can be very convenient at times, especially in combination with assertAll(), for example.

I was not happy with the restrictions imposed by the existing solutions presented in the other answers, and thus came up with something on my own.

The following class provides a method assertExits(int expectedStatus, Executable executable) which asserts that System.exit() is called with a specified status value, and the test can continue after it. It works the same way as JUnit 5 assertThrows. It also respects an existing security manager.

There is one remaining problem: When the code under test installs a new security manager which completely replaces the security manager set by the test. All other SecurityManager-based solutions known to me suffer the same problem.

import java.security.Permission;

import static java.lang.System.getSecurityManager;
import static java.lang.System.setSecurityManager;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.fail;

public enum ExitAssertions {
    ;

    public static <E extends Throwable> void assertExits(final int expectedStatus, final ThrowingExecutable<E> executable) throws E {
        final SecurityManager originalSecurityManager = getSecurityManager();
        setSecurityManager(new SecurityManager() {
            @Override
            public void checkPermission(final Permission perm) {
                if (originalSecurityManager != null)
                    originalSecurityManager.checkPermission(perm);
            }

            @Override
            public void checkPermission(final Permission perm, final Object context) {
                if (originalSecurityManager != null)
                    originalSecurityManager.checkPermission(perm, context);
            }

            @Override
            public void checkExit(final int status) {
                super.checkExit(status);
                throw new ExitException(status);
            }
        });
        try {
            executable.run();
            fail("Expected System.exit(" + expectedStatus + ") to be called, but it wasn't called.");
        } catch (final ExitException e) {
            assertEquals(expectedStatus, e.status, "Wrong System.exit() status.");
        } finally {
            setSecurityManager(originalSecurityManager);
        }
    }

    public interface ThrowingExecutable<E extends Throwable> {
        void run() throws E;
    }

    private static class ExitException extends SecurityException {
        final int status;

        private ExitException(final int status) {
            this.status = status;
        }
    }
}

You can use the class like this:

    @Test
    void example() {
        assertExits(0, () -> System.exit(0)); // succeeds
        assertExits(1, () -> System.exit(1)); // succeeds
        assertExits(2, () -> System.exit(1)); // fails
    }

The code can easily be ported to JUnit 4, TestNG, or any other framework, if necessary. The only framework-specific element is failing the test. This can easily be changed to something framework-independent (other than a Junit 4 Rule

There is room for improvement, for example, overloading assertExits() with customizable messages.

Solution 15 - Java

Use Runtime.exec(String command) to start JVM in a separate process.

Solution 16 - Java

There is a minor problem with the SecurityManager solution. Some methods, such as JFrame.exitOnClose, also call SecurityManager.checkExit. In my application, I didn't want that call to fail, so I used

Class[] stack = getClassContext();
if (stack[1] != JFrame.class && !okToExit) throw new ExitException();
super.checkExit(status);

Solution 17 - Java

A generally useful approach that can be used for unit and integration testing, is to have a package private (default access) mockable runner class that provides run() and exit() methods. These methods can be overridden by Mock or Fake test classes in the test modules.

The test class (JUnit or other) provides exceptions that the exit() method can throw in place of System.exit().

package mainmocked;
class MainRunner {
    void run(final String[] args) {
        new MainMocked().run(args);    
    }
    void exit(final int status) {
        System.exit(status);
    }
}

the class with main() below, also has an altMain() to receive the mock or fake runner, when unit or integration testing:

package mainmocked;

public class MainMocked {
    private static MainRunner runner = new MainRunner();

    static void altMain(final String[] args, final MainRunner inRunner) {
        runner = inRunner;
        main(args);
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        try {
          runner.run(args);
        } catch (Throwable ex) {
            // Log("error: ", ex);
            runner.exit(1);
        }
        runner.exit(0);
    } // main


    public void run(String[] args) {
        // do things ...
    }
} // class

A simple mock (with Mockito) would be:

@Test
public void testAltMain() {
    String[] args0 = {};
    MainRunner mockRunner = mock(MainRunner.class);
    MainMocked.altMain(args0, mockRunner);

    verify(mockRunner).run(args0);
    verify(mockRunner).exit(0);
  }

A more complex test class would use a Fake, in which run() could do anything, and an Exception class to replace System.exit():

private class FakeRunnerRuns extends MainRunner {
    @Override
    void run(String[] args){
        new MainMocked().run(args);
    }
    @Override
    void exit(final int status) {
        if (status == 0) {
            throw new MyMockExitExceptionOK("exit(0) success");
        }
        else {
            throw new MyMockExitExceptionFail("Unexpected Exception");
        } // ok
    } // exit
} // class

Solution 18 - Java

Another technique here is to introduce additional code into the (hopefully small number of) places where the logic does the System.exit(). This additional code then avoids doing the System.exit() when the logic is being called as part of unit test. For example, define a package private constant like TEST_MODE which is normally false. Then have the unit test code set this true and add logic to the code under test to check for that case and bypass the System.exit call and instead throw an exception that the unit test logic can catch. By the way, in 2021 and using something like spotbugs, this problem can manifest itself in the obscure error that "java.io.IOException: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host".

Solution 19 - Java

Calling System.exit() is a bad practice, unless it's done inside a main(). These methods should be throwing an exception which, ultimately, is caught by your main(), who then calls System.exit with the appropriate code.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionChris ConwayView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - JavaVonCView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - JavaStefan BirknerView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - JavaEricSchaeferView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - JavaRogérioView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - JavaScott BaleView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - JavaJeffrey FredrickView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - JavaJeow Li HuanView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - JavaArend v. ReinersdorffView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - JavafloloView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - JavaMarc NovakowskiView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 11 - JavaursaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 12 - JavaAshley FriezeView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 13 - JavaDan WattView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 14 - JavaChristian HujerView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 15 - JavaAlexeiView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 16 - JavacayhorstmannView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 17 - JavaJoolView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 18 - JavatmurphyView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 19 - JavamartinView Answer on Stackoverflow