Java generics void/Void types

I am implementing a ResponseHandler for the apache HttpClient package, like so:

new ResponseHandler<int>() {
    public int handleResponse(...) {
        // ... code ...
        return 0;
    }
}

but I'd like for the handleResponse function to return nothing, i.e. void. Is this possible? The following does not compile, since void is not a valid Java type:

new ResponseHandler<void>() {
        public void handleResponse(...) {
            // ... code ...
        }
}

I suppose I could replace void with Void to return a Void object, but that's not really what I want. Question: is it possible to organize this callback situation in such a way that I can return void from handleResponse?

The Void type was created for this exact situation: to create a method with a generic return type where a subtype can be "void". Void was designed in such a way that no objects of that type can possibly be created. Thus a method of type Void will always return null (or complete abnormally), which is as close to nothing as you are going to get. You do have to put return null in the method, but this should only be a minor inconvenience.

In short: Do use Void.

Generics only handles object classes. void and primitive types are not supported by Generics and you cannot use these as a parameterized type. You have to use Void instead.

Can you say why you don't want to use Void?

When you need to return java.lang.Void, just return null.

You can't have primitives in generics so that int is actually an Integer. The object Void is analogous with the keyword void for generics.

Alas it's not possible. You can set the code to return Void as you say, however you can never instanciate a Void so you can't actually write a function which conforms to this specification.

Think of it as: The generic function says "this function returns something, of type X", and you can specify X but you can't change the sentence to "this function returns nothing". (I'm not sure if I agree with these semantics, but that's the way they are.)

In this case, what I always do, is just make the function return type Object, and in fact always return null.

This java.lang.Void implementation in Java kind of speaks for itself. Also, I wrote an article that ties this into generics. It took a bit of thought before I started understanding this: http://www.siteconsortium.com/h/D00006.php. Notice TYPE = Class.getPrimitiveClass("void");

package java.lang;

public final class Void {

	public static final Class<Void> TYPE = Class.getPrimitiveClass("void");

	private Void() {}
}