Is there a "git pull --dry-run" option in Git?

GitGit Pull

Git Problem Overview


Is there such a thing as git pull --dry-run to see how stuff will be merged before it messes up my working tree?

Right now I am doing:

git fetch origin && git merge --no-commit --no-ff

I did not see anything in the man page for 'git-pull' related to it.

To clarify, I just need it in an Ant script for deployment to see if there are conflicts when doing git pull, then back off exit out of build, fail deployment and leave that directory tree the same it was before git pull.

Git Solutions


Solution 1 - Git

I have always relied on the inherent abilities of Git to get me back if a merge fails.

To estimate how the merge might occur, you can start like you did with:

$ git fetch origin branch  # Fetch changes, but don't merge
$ git diff HEAD..origin/branch # Diff your current head to the fetched commit

... personal judgement of potential merge conflicts ...

$ git merge origin/branch # merge with the fetched commit

If things did not go as planned, look at your reflog and reset back to your desired state:

$ git reflog
...
abc987  HEAD@{0}: merge activity
b58aae8 HEAD@{1}: fetch origin/branch
8f3a362 HEAD@{2}: activity before the fetch
...
$ git reset --hard HEAD{2}

Solution 2 - Git

You will need to fetch first to update your local origin/master

git fetch origin

Then you can do:

git diff --name-only origin/master

Will list the files that have changed.

git diff origin/master directory_foo/file_bar.m

Will list the line by line diff of file directory_foo/file_bar.m.

Solution 3 - Git

You can get the effect you want by creating a new throw-away branch from your current one and doing the git pull there. If you're unhappy with the results, the original branch is intact.

Solution 4 - Git

# fetch new commits from origin
$ git fetch

# check what are the differences and judge if safe to apply
$ git diff origin/master

# actually merge the fetched commits 
$ git pull

Solution 5 - Git

Since v2.27.0 there is a dry-run flag

Solution 6 - Git

Since pulling implies merging, I'd go with running git merge --abort if your script detects there were any conflicts and merging failed.

Solution 7 - Git

See my answer in this similar question:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/180272/how-to-preview-git-pull-without-doing-fetch/48784435#48784435

this goes to the ~/.gitconfig file:

[alias]
        diffpull=!git fetch && git diff HEAD..@{u}

Solution 8 - Git

OliverE is spot-on: git pull has a dry-run option, so I recommend git pull --dry-run -v to achieve the OP's purpose -- simple and direct. pull did not always have a dry-run option but in previous (and current) versions of git, fetch did (and does) have a dry-run option. Thus, an alternative approach is to do a git fetch --dry-run -v before you do your pull. Always better to check on an action before executing it, than having to spend time reverting.

Solution 9 - Git

Without pulling:

[ "$(git fetch;git diff | wc -l)" != "0" ] && (
echo there are updates
echo do your stuff here
)

or without touching anything:

[ "$(git pull --dry-run | wc -l)" != "0" ] && (
echo there are updates
echo do your stuff here
)

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionDanila LadnerView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - GitrynmrtnView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - GitGayleDDSView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - GitgcbenisonView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - GitrantoniukView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - GitOliverEView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - GitkostixView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - GitAndy PView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - Gitrob_7ccView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - GitZibriView Answer on Stackoverflow