Ruby plug-in that you have linked is designed for IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate only, it will not work with PhpStorm. See [this answer](https://stackoverflow.com/a/13829907/104891) for more details.

However, it&#39;s possible to get the basic syntax highlighting for Ruby files in PhpStorm using the **TextMate bundles support** plug-in. It&#39;s already included with PhpStorm 6.0.1 and you don&#39;t need to install it, just make sure it&#39;s enabled in `Settings` | `Plugins`.

  1. Git clone [Ruby.tmbundle](https://github.com/textmate/ruby.tmbundle) into some directory.

  2. Add this directory in `Settings` | `TextMate Bundles`:

![Ruby bundle][1]

&lt;s&gt;For some reason PhpStorm TextMate Bundles support will not recognize `*.rb` files as supported by this bundle. To fix this problem open `Ruby.tmbundle\Syntaxes\Ruby.plist` file in some text editor, find `&lt;key&gt;fileTypes&lt;/key&gt;` section, add `&lt;string&gt;rb&lt;/string&gt;` under `&lt;array&gt;`&lt;/s&gt;

(the above should be fixed in the latest Ruby bundle version, so the editing the bundle is no longer needed, but if you are adding some other language bundle, it&#39;s something you may need to adjust)

Restart PhpStorm, verify that `*.rb` is now associated correctly:

![association][2]

Now you get Ruby syntax highlighting in PhpStorm:

![Ruby syntax][3]


----------

If you need full support for both Ruby and PHP (plus much more) in a single IDE, consider using [IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate](http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/download/index.html).

  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/RFmgy.png
  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/NMiY0.png
  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/INXl8.png

CrazyCoder&#39;s git repo doesn&#39;t work in windows systems, as a large number of the filenames are invalid in Windows.

I have, however, found the official repo for ruby for textmate:

https://github.com/textmate/ruby.tmbundle

I actually copied over my PhpStorm theme to RubyMine with no issue, so it should go both ways.

I went as far as to create a TextMate keymap for PhpStorm as well, you can take a look here: http://tentaclecms.com/blog/2013/08/textmate-keymap-for-phpstorm/ 

&gt; QSA means that if there&#39;s a query string passed with the original URL,
&gt; it will be appended to the rewrite (olle?p=1 will be rewritten as
&gt; index.php?url=olle&amp;p=1.
&gt; 
&gt; L means if the rule matches, don&#39;t process any more RewriteRules below
&gt; this one.

Hi, what are some easy examples to explain the use of L?
I can&#39;t seem to grasp this explanation above. Any help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks. 

What is L in [QSA, L] in htaccess

I want to evaluate a string with a switch but when I read the string entered by the user throws me the following error.

    #include&lt;iostream&gt;
    using namespace std;
    
        int main() {
        	string a;
        	cin&gt;&gt;a;
        	switch (string(a)) {
        	case &quot;Option 1&quot;:
        		cout&lt;&lt;&quot;It pressed number 1&quot;&lt;&lt;endl;
        		break;
        	case &quot;Option 2&quot;:
        		cout&lt;&lt;&quot;It pressed number 2&quot;&lt;&lt;endl;
        		break;
        	case &quot;Option 3&quot;:
        		cout&lt;&lt;&quot;It pressed number 3&quot;&lt;&lt;endl;
        		break;
        	default:
        		cout&lt;&lt;&quot;She put no choice&quot;&lt;&lt;endl;
        		break;
        	}
        	return 0;
        }

&gt; error: invalid cast from type &#39;std::string {aka std::basic_string&lt;char&gt;}&#39; to type &#39;int


Evaluate a string with a switch in C++

I found [this](http://plugins.jetbrains.com/plugin?pr=&amp;pluginId=1293) but honestly not sure how to install it or whether it applies. Thanks!

Is it possible to get Ruby syntax highlighting in PHPStorm?

<p>I found <a href="http://plugins.jetbrains.com/plugin?pr=&#x26;pluginId=1293" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this</a> but honestly not sure how to install it or whether it applies. Thanks!</p>


I have a PHP script that deals with a wide variety of languages. Unfortunately, whenever I try to use `json_encode`, any Unicode output is converted to hexadecimal entities. Is this the expected behavior? Is there any way to convert the output to UTF-8 characters?

Here&#39;s an example of what I&#39;m seeing:

INPUT

    echo $text;

OUTPUT

    База данни грешка.

INPUT

    json_encode($text);

OUTPUT

    &quot;\u0411\u0430\u0437\u0430 \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u0438 \u0433\u0440\u0435\u0448\u043a\u0430.&quot;

Why does the PHP json_encode function convert UTF-8 strings to hexadecimal entities?

I&#39;m developing a Laravel 4 app that will make the same CRUD operations on my data set available through a JSON REST API and a Web UI. It seems that to prevent breaking the DRY principle that my UI should consume my own API by routing all requests from the UI back to the API. I&#39;m unsure though about the best approach to making this work. Presumably I would have separate UI and API controllers and somehow route the requests through. Or should I be looking at a different approach altogether?

How Follow the Don&#39;t Repeat Yourself Principle When Consuming My Own Laravel API?

I have a few different project with the same `core`.

All I need is to mark all not current projects as `excluded` to avoid searching through them (simple search, shift + cmd + n etc.)

In other words I want to have a search results from the `core` + `current project`.

Is there are any way do `close` some projects but have them available in the `projects list` and `open` it so easy as it was closed? Or probably you have another experience?

![enter image description here][1]


  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/bmOQM.png

Exclude folder from search but not from the project list

I am using symfony and doctrine as my ORM.

For available types I have:

 - **array**
 - **simple_array**
 - **json_array**

I am wondering what the difference is between each of them: when do I use one or the other? 

Can I have a demonstration for each of them to illustrate the differences?

I already use simple_array in some applications but I find I don&#39;t understand formType... (Or maybe I&#39;m not using it well!? )

*To illustrate my question*, here is an example:

I have an Task that I have to run on specific days
So I created **TaskEntity** with **days** attribute

Days would be:

    $days = array(
        1=&gt;true,
        2=&gt;true,
        3=&gt;true,
        4=&gt;true,
        5=&gt;true,
        6=&gt;false,
        7=&gt;false
    );

But I have no idea which of the above types to choose ...

Doctrine array vs simple_array vs json_array

The last week I read a lot articles about password hashing and Blowfish seems to be (one of) the best hashing algorithm right now - but that&#39;s not the topic of this question!

#The 72 character limit#

Blowfish only consider the first 72 characters in the entered password:

&lt;!-- language: lang-php --&gt;
    
    &lt;?php
    $password = &quot;Wow. This is a super secret and super, super long password. Let&#39;s add some special ch4r4ct3rs a#d everything is fine :)&quot;;
    $hash = password_hash($password, PASSWORD_BCRYPT);
    var_dump($password);
    
    $input = substr($password, 0, 72);
    var_dump($input);
    
    var_dump(password_verify($input, $hash));
    ?&gt;

The output is:

    string(119) &quot;Wow. This is a super secret and super, super long password. Let&#39;s add some special ch4r4ct3rs a#d everything is fine :)&quot;
    string(72) &quot;Wow. This is a super secret and super, super long password. Let&#39;s add so&quot;
    bool(true)

As you can see only the first 72 characters matter. Twitter is using blowfish aka bcrypt to store their passwords (https://shouldichangemypassword.com/twitter-hacked.php) and guess what: change your twitter password to a long password with more than 72 characters and you can login to your account by entering only the first 72 characters.

#Blowfish and Pepper#

There are a lot different opinions about &quot;peppering&quot; passwords. Some people say it&#39;s unnecessary, because you have to assume that the secret pepper-string is also known/published so it doesn&#39;t enhance the hash. I have a separate database server so it&#39;s quite possible that only the database is leaked and not the constant pepper.

In this case (pepper not leaked) you make an attack based on a dictionary more difficult (correct me if this isn&#39;t right). If your pepper-string is also leaked: not that bad - you still have the salt and it&#39;s as good protected as a hash without pepper.  
  
So I think peppering the password is at least no bad choice.

#Suggestion#

My suggestion to get a Blowfish hash for a password with more than 72 characters (and pepper) is:

&lt;!-- language: lang-php --&gt;
    
    &lt;?php
    $pepper = &quot;foIwUVmkKGrGucNJMOkxkvcQ79iPNzP5OKlbIdGPCMTjJcDYnR&quot;;
    
    // Generate Hash
    $password = &quot;Wow. This is a super secret and super, super long password. Let&#39;s add some special ch4r4ct3rs a#d everything is fine :)&quot;;
    $password_peppered = hash_hmac(&#39;sha256&#39;, $password, $pepper);
    $hash = password_hash($password_peppered, PASSWORD_BCRYPT);
    
    // Check
    $input = substr($password, 0, 72);
    $input_peppered = hash_hmac(&#39;sha256&#39;, $input, $pepper);
    
    var_dump(password_verify($input_peppered, $hash));
    ?&gt;

This is based on [this question](https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/21263/how-to-apply-a-pepper-correctly-to-bcrypt): `password_verify` return `false`.  

#The Question#

What is the safer way? Getting an SHA-256 hash first (which returns 64 characters) or consider only the first 72 characters of the password?  
  
##Pros##

- The user can&#39;t login by entering just the first 72 characters
- You can add the pepper without exceeding the character-limit
- The output of hash_hmac would probably have more entropy than the password itself
- The password is hashed by two different functions

##Cons##

- Only 64 characters are used to build the blowfish hash
  
&lt;br/&gt;
  
**Edit 1:** This question adresses only the PHP integration of blowfish/bcrypt. Thank&#39;s for the comments!

How to hash long passwords (&gt;72 characters) with blowfish

In rails &gt;4.0.0 generators creates CRUD operations with ```before_action``` not ```before_filter```. It seems to do the same thing. So what&#39;s the difference between these two? 

Rails 4: before_filter vs. before_action

On my Debian server I have a user called &quot;deployer&quot; that does not have `sudo` access, and has RVM installed.

When installing Ruby using &quot;deployer&quot;, like 1.9.3, it triggers a task to install dependencies

    &quot;Installing requirements for debian, might require sudo password.&quot;

which fails and stops installation because &quot;deployer&quot; can not sudo.

I don&#39;t want to add &quot;deployer&quot; into the sudoers list, and don&#39;t want to install RVM for some other user just for a one-time use for installing dependencies.

What is the correct way to install that dependencies? Or how do I list them to install manually?


How to install RVM system requirements without giving sudo access for RVM user

From Ruby Koans `about_hashes.rb`:

Why might you want to use `#fetch` instead of `#[]` when accessing hash keys?

fetch vs. [] when working with hashes?

&lt;!-- language-all: ruby --&gt;

Yes, I know, that testing private methods it&#39;s not a good idea (and I
read this thread - http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/197346 - and some
others)

But how can I test the following code?

I use xmpp4r. In my public method `#listen` I start receive jabber
messages like so:

    def listen
      @client.add_message_callback do |m|
        do_things_with_message(m)
      end
    end

    private
    def do_things_with_message(m)
      #
    end

`#add_message_callback` - runs block, when message come (in different thread)

So, testing `#listen` method it&#39;s difficult and it more testing xmpp4r
than my `#do_things_with_message`

How to do all right and test `#do_things_with_message`?:)
(http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/197346#859664)

*Refactor private methods to a new object* essentialy would be as I making them a public (and class with one method - it&#39;s senselessly

**EDIT:**
This is more a theoretical question about clean code and the correct tests.
In my first link people argue that the test private methods poorly.
I don&#39;t want cheat with `#send`, but also I don&#39;t see any viable ways to refactor

Testing private method in Ruby (rspec)

After using `jekyll serve` on one machine, a WEBrick server is set up and the site can be accessed from `localhost:4000` on this particular PC.

However, I&#39;m wondering how to access this web server from other machines in the LAN, especially for mobile devices? I&#39;m trying to test the jekyll site on mobile devices before pushing the code to Github.

Connect to a locally built Jekyll Server using mobile devices in the LAN

I&#39;m working on some legacy code that has a class that is 10,000+ lines of code and has 100s of methods. Is there a shortcut for any JetBrains IDE (since the shortcut would likely be shared across all of them) to collapse all the methods / functions so that only the method signatures are shown? 

Something like this: 

    public String myMethod(String arg1, int arg2){...}
    
    public String mySecondMethod(String arg1, int arg2){...}

JetBrains / IntelliJ keyboard shortcut to collapse all methods

In a class, I quickly want to navigate to, let&#39;s say, the indexAction method. In SublimeText I could press cmd + R, type &#39;inde&#39;, and hit enter on the dropdown that shows all the results from my search. 

I haven&#39;t found this in PhpStorm, is this functionality available?

PhpStorm - Navigate to method

[Updated question : PhpStorm | WebMatrix (IISExpress) | Xdebug.remote_port | — Which Port(s) to put where?](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17130931/phpstorm-webmatrix-iisexpress-xdebug-remote-port-which-ports-to-put)

---

I&#39;m running localhost web server on my Windows machine with WebMatrix and IISExpress. I&#39;ve installed PHP and Xdebug in it and they both are working.


I have a local WordPress install.



I&#39;m now trying to get PhpStorm to debug it using Xdebug.


When I run PhpStorm it launches the web app in the browser with relevant debugging parameters in the browser.

**IDE KEY is matching**

![ide][1]

`xdebug.remote_port` is configured correctly. (Later I found that this is wrong, but not erroneous. It should be port 9000)

![xdebug.remote_port][2]    

But it seems Xdebug never gets to communicate with PhpStorm. PhpStorm keeps listening, and the execution runs completely without stopping at any  break-points.

![PhpStorm][3]
![PhpStorm][4]


  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/ozmI5.png
  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Wijaa.png
  [3]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/NIyi8.png
  [4]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/58WCC.png

PhpStorm debugger not stopping at BreakPoints; keeps waiting for xdebug _SESSION_

I have this text

    $test1 = &#39;testing1&#39;;
    $test1test1 = &#39;testing1&#39;;
    $test1test1test1 = &#39;testing1&#39;;
    $test1 = &#39;testing1&#39;;

and I would like to align it like this, using tabs, 

    $test1           = &#39;testing1&#39;;
    $test1test1      = &#39;testing1&#39;;
    $test1test1test1 = &#39;testing1&#39;;
    $test1           = &#39;testing1&#39;;


is there a way of doing this in phpstorm or webstorm ?

Content Type	Original Author	Original Content on Stackoverflow
Question	jcroll	View Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - Php	CrazyCoder	View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - Php	Populus	View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - Php	Adam Patterson	View Answer on Stackoverflow

Is it possible to get Ruby syntax highlighting in PHPStorm?

Php Problem Overview

Php Solutions

Solution 1 - Php

Solution 2 - Php

Solution 3 - Php

Evaluate a string with a switch in C++

What is L in [QSA, L] in htaccess

Attributions