Is it possible to exclude files from git language statistics?

Github

Github Problem Overview


Silly question and not on something that is so necessary, but is it possible to exclude files from Github's language statistics aggregation on top?

I have checked some external CSS and JavaScript frameworks to be compressed along with the rest of the source code. They get measured as part of the project although they have not been contributed from a team member. This means that the status bar does not reflect the exact state of the project.

Github Solutions


Solution 1 - Github

GitHub uses the Linguist library for source code detection; Linguist treats all of the paths defined in its' vendor.yml as vendored and won't include them in the language statistics for a repository.

Update:

From comments below, currrent instructions are here: <https://github.com/github/linguist/blob/master/docs/overrides.md>

Original answer:

You can specify something different for your repo by editing your repo's .gitattributes file. To treat a path as a vendored file, add the path followed by linguist-vendored:

special-vendored-path/* linguist-vendored

To treat an otherwise vendored path as unvendored, use linguist-vendored=false:

jquery.js linguist-vendored=false

Source

Solution 2 - Github

From the Github Help page My repository is marked as the wrong language:

> Linguist excludes certain file names and paths from statistics. Check out the vendor.yml file for a list of these exclusions. > > Pull requests with new exclusion patterns are always welcome.

So if your javascsript/css files match a regexp in that Yaml file they shouldn’t be included in the stats. If they don’t, you could add them and create a pull-request.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionDimitrios MistriotisView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - GithubEugene FidelinView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - GithubmattView Answer on Stackoverflow