Is it possible in Java to catch two exceptions in the same catch block?

JavaException HandlingTry Catch

Java Problem Overview


I need to catch two exceptions because they require the same handling logic. I would like to do something like:

catch (Exception e, ExtendsRuntimeException re) {
    // common logic to handle both exceptions
}

Is it possible to avoid duplicating the handler code in each catch block?

Java Solutions


Solution 1 - Java

Java 7 and later

Multiple-exception catches are supported, starting in Java 7.

The syntax is:

try {
     // stuff
} catch (Exception1 | Exception2 ex) {
     // Handle both exceptions
}

The static type of ex is the most specialized common supertype of the exceptions listed. There is a nice feature where if you rethrow ex in the catch, the compiler knows that only one of the listed exceptions can be thrown.


Java 6 and earlier

Prior to Java 7, there are ways to handle this problem, but they tend to be inelegant, and to have limitations.

Approach #1

try {
     // stuff
} catch (Exception1 ex) {
     handleException(ex);
} catch (Exception2 ex) {
     handleException(ex);
}

public void handleException(SuperException ex) {
     // handle exception here
}

This gets messy if the exception handler needs to access local variables declared before the try. And if the handler method needs to rethrow the exception (and it is checked) then you run into serious problems with the signature. Specifically, handleException has to be declared as throwing SuperException ... which potentially means you have to change the signature of the enclosing method, and so on.

Approach #2

try {
     // stuff
} catch (SuperException ex) {
     if (ex instanceof Exception1 || ex instanceof Exception2) {
         // handle exception
     } else {
         throw ex;
     }
}

Once again, we have a potential problem with signatures.

Approach #3

try {
     // stuff
} catch (SuperException ex) {
     if (ex instanceof Exception1 || ex instanceof Exception2) {
         // handle exception
     }
}

If you leave out the else part (e.g. because there are no other subtypes of SuperException at the moment) the code becomes more fragile. If the exception hierarchy is reorganized, this handler without an else may end up silently eating exceptions!

Solution 2 - Java

Java <= 6.x just allows you to catch one exception for each catch block:

try {

} catch (ExceptionType name) {

} catch (ExceptionType name) {

}

Documentation: > Each catch block is an exception handler and handles the type of > exception indicated by its argument. The argument type, ExceptionType, > declares the type of exception that the handler can handle and must be > the name of a class that inherits from the Throwable class.

For Java 7 you can have multiple Exception caught on one catch block:

catch (IOException|SQLException ex) {
    logger.log(ex);
    throw ex;
}

Documentation: > In Java SE 7 and later, a single catch block can handle more than one > type of exception. This feature can reduce code duplication and lessen > the temptation to catch an overly broad exception.

Reference: http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions/catch.html

Solution 3 - Java

If you aren't on java 7, you can extract your exception handling to a method - that way you can at least minimize duplication

try {
   // try something
}
catch(ExtendsRuntimeException e) { handleError(e); }
catch(Exception e) { handleError(e); }

Solution 4 - Java

For Java < 7 you can use if-else along with Exception:

try {
    // common logic to handle both exceptions
} catch (Exception ex) {
    if (ex instanceof Exception1 || ex instanceof Exception2) {

    }
    else {
        throw ex;
        // or if you don't want to have to declare Exception use
        // throw new RuntimeException(ex);
    }
}

Edited and replaced Throwable with Exception.

Solution 5 - Java

Before the launch of Java SE 7 we were habitual of writing code with multiple catch statements associated with a try block. A very basic Example:

 try {
  // some instructions
} catch(ATypeException e) {
} catch(BTypeException e) {
} catch(CTypeException e) {
}

But now with the latest update on Java, instead of writing multiple catch statements we can handle multiple exceptions within a single catch clause. Here is an example showing how this feature can be achieved.

try {
// some instructions
} catch(ATypeException|BTypeException|CTypeException ex) {
   throw e;
}

So multiple Exceptions in a single catch clause not only simplifies the code but also reduce the redundancy of code. I found this article which explains this feature very well along with its implementation. Improved and Better Exception Handling from Java 7 This may help you too.

Solution 6 - Java

http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions/catch.html covers catching multiple exceptions in the same block.

 try {
     // your code
} catch (Exception1 | Exception2 ex) {
     // Handle 2 exceptions in Java 7
}

I'm making study cards, and this thread was helpful, just wanted to put in my two cents.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
Questionuser710818View Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - JavaStephen CView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - JavaFrancisco SpaethView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - JavajeffView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - JavaSarel BothaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - JavaSaurab ParakhView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - JavaEliView Answer on Stackoverflow