In docker-Context here are the important informations you need.

 1. **Alpine**  
Url: https://alpinelinux.org/  
Imagename: `alpine`  
Shorty: Its very small.  
Packagemanger: `apk`  
Shells: `/bin/sh`  
Size: Few MBs - current tag needs 2.7MB

 2. **Jessie** aka Debian 8  
Url: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianJessie  
Imagename: `debian:jessie`  
Shorty: [No LTS anymore](https://wiki.debian.org/LTS)  
Packagemanager: `apt`  
Shells: `/bin/bash`  
Size: ~50mb

 3. **Stretch** aka Debian 9  
Url: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianStretch  
Imagename: `debian:stretch`  
Shorty:  LTS is running out  
Packagemanager: `apt`  
Shells: `/bin/bash` and [many more](https://packages.debian.org/stretch/shells/)  
Size: ~40mb

 4. **Buster** aka Debian 10  
Url: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianBuster  
Imagename: `debian:buster`  
Shorty:  All what you need, but newer  
Packagemanager: `apt`  
Shells: `/bin/bash` and [many more](https://packages.debian.org/buster/shells/)  
Size: ~50mb

5. **Bullseye** aka Debian 11  
Url: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianBullseye  
Imagename: `debian:bullseye`  
Shorty: Newest debian  
Shells: `/bin/bash` and [many more](https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/shells/)  
Size: ~50mb

 6. **Ubuntu** based on debain  
Url: https://hub.docker.com/_/ubuntu  
Imagename: `ubuntu`  
Shorty:  All what you need  
Packagemanager: `apt`  
Shells: `/bin/bash` and more  
Size: ~25mb

Those are the names of the OS in the container in which Node will be running.

Alpine is for Alpine Linux, Jessie and Stretch are versions of Debian. If you scroll down on the documentation link you provided, you&#39;ll find a section describing what Alpine is and why you might want to use it.

I don&#39;t understand why we have plugins and extends. What is the difference between them and do I need one or the other? 

What&#39;s the difference between plugins and extends in eslint?

I am building a simple React Native app with create-react-native-app using only react-navigation and base-64(base 64 encode/decode) as dependencies. Over time starting the app became slower and now sometimes it is getting stuck(waiting for about 30min) on &quot;Starting packager...&quot; after running NPM start.

I&#39;ve tried starting it with &quot;npm start -- --reset-cache&quot; but nothing changed

Once it is up and running I don&#39;t get any error or warning in DevTools or terminal. Also there are no issues with the performance of the app

What can I do to make NPM start smooth and quickly as before? Are there any general steps I can take to troubleshoot this issue?

Here is my package.json

    {
      &quot;name&quot;: &quot;test&quot;,
      &quot;version&quot;: &quot;0.1.0&quot;,
      &quot;private&quot;: true,
      &quot;devDependencies&quot;: {
        &quot;jest-expo&quot;: &quot;~27.0.0&quot;,
        &quot;react-devtools&quot;: &quot;^3.2.3&quot;,
        &quot;react-native-scripts&quot;: &quot;1.14.0&quot;,
        &quot;react-test-renderer&quot;: &quot;16.3.1&quot;
      },
      &quot;main&quot;: &quot;./node_modules/react-native-scripts/build/bin/crna-entry.js&quot;,
      &quot;scripts&quot;: {
        &quot;start&quot;: &quot;react-native-scripts start&quot;,
        &quot;eject&quot;: &quot;react-native-scripts eject&quot;,
        &quot;android&quot;: &quot;react-native-scripts android&quot;,
        &quot;ios&quot;: &quot;react-native-scripts ios&quot;,
        &quot;test&quot;: &quot;jest&quot;
      },
      &quot;jest&quot;: {
        &quot;preset&quot;: &quot;jest-expo&quot;
      },
      &quot;dependencies&quot;: {
        &quot;base-64&quot;: &quot;^0.1.0&quot;,
        &quot;expo&quot;: &quot;^27.0.1&quot;,
        &quot;react&quot;: &quot;16.3.1&quot;,
        &quot;react-native&quot;: &quot;~0.55.2&quot;,
        &quot;react-navigation&quot;: &quot;^2.11.2&quot;
      }
    }

How can I clean (reset cache) of React Native using Expo. Not sure if it is cache issue

I am just looking at docker images in https://hub.docker.com/_/node/

For every version, the images are categorized into Alpine, Jessie, Stretch, Buster etc. What&#39;s their meaning?

In Docker image names what is the difference between Alpine, Jessie, Stretch, and Buster?

<p>I am just looking at docker images in <a href="https://hub.docker.com/_/node/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://hub.docker.com/_/node/</a></p>
<p>For every version, the images are categorized into Alpine, Jessie, Stretch, Buster etc. What's their meaning?</p>


If you use the Coreutils tail command in Linux, you have a -f option that lets you follow a log file from the log&#39;s current position (it does not go to the very beginning of the file and display everything).

Is this functionality available in docker logs without waiting for it to traverse the whole log?

I have tried:

    docker logs --since 1m somecontainer
and

    docker logs -f --since 1m somecontainer

It appears that it actually traverses the entire log file (which can take a long time) and then starts echoing to the screen once it reaches the time frame you specify.  

Is there a way to start tailing from the current point without waiting?
Is my best option to always log out to some external file and tail that with the Coreutils tail command?

Tail docker logs to see recent records, not all

In the Kubernetes [minikube tutorial][1] there is this command to use Minikube Docker daemon :

    $ eval $(minikube docker-env)

What exactly does this command do, that is, what exactly does `minikube docker-env` mean? 



  [1]: https://kubernetes.io/docs/tutorials/hello-minikube/#create-your-node-js-application

What does minikube docker-env mean?

**TL;DR :** How can I pass env variable when building the image with `docker-compose` and have `docker run image command` recognize them ?

I have this Dockerfile :

    FROM mhart/alpine-node:10
    ADD . /app
    WORKDIR /app
    RUN apk --no-cache add --virtual builds-deps build-base python &amp;&amp;\
        yarn global add nodemon &amp;&amp;\
        yarn &amp;&amp;\
        apk del builds-deps build-base python

and this docker-compose.yml :

    version: &quot;3.3&quot;
    services:
    
      api:
        build:
          context: .
          dockerfile: Dockerfile-preprod
        image: registry.git.louis-girones.fr:4567/make-your-night/back:preprod
        environment:
          - NODE_ENV=development
        env_file:
          - .env
        volumes:
          - .:/app
        ports:
          - &quot;${PORT_PREPROD}:${PORT_PREPROD}&quot;
        command: sh -c &quot;mkdir -p dist &amp;&amp; touch ./dist/app.js &amp;&amp; yarn run start&quot;
    
      mongo:
        image: mongo:4.0
        ports:
          - &quot;${MONGO_PREPROD}&quot;
        command: mongod
        volumes:
          - ./data:/data/db
    
      elasticsearch:
        image: docker.elastic.co/elasticsearch/elasticsearch:6.1.1
        volumes:
          - ./esdata:/usr/share/elasticsearch/data
        environment:
          - bootstrap.memory_lock=true
          - &quot;ES_JAVA_OPTS=-Xms512m -Xmx512m&quot;
          - discovery.type=single-node
        ports:
          - &quot;9300:9300&quot;
          - &quot;9200:9200&quot;
    
    volumes:
      esdata:



With this .env file (which is in the root folder, like docker-compose.yml and Dockerfile) :

    #!/usr/bin/env bash

    NODE_ENV=development
    PORT=9000
    SECRET_SESSION=superSecr3t
    APP_NAME=Night Vision
    API_VERSION=/api/v0/
    DEFAULT_TZ=Europe/Paris
    ASSETS_URI=http://localhost:9000/public/img/
    BCRYPT_WORKFACTOR=1
    ES_PORT=9200
    ES_LOG_LEVEL=trace

And this code in the node server startup :

    // Export the config object based on the NODE_ENV
    // ==============================================
    const config: IConfig = commonConfig
    
    if (commonConfig.env === &#39;development&#39;) {
        _.merge(config, developmentConfig)
    } else if (commonConfig.env === &#39;test&#39;) {
        _.merge(config, testConfig)
    } else if (commonConfig.env === &#39;preproduction&#39;) {
        _.merge(config, preproductionConfig)
    } else if (commonConfig.env === &#39;production&#39;) {
        _.merge(config, productionConfig)
    } else {
        throw new Error(&#39;Please set an environment&#39;)
    }

When I run the `docker-compose build` command, everything is fine, but for instance If I try `docker run myimage yarn run test` the Error &quot;Please set an environment&quot; is thrown. 

I would expect that 

    env_file:
      - .env

makes the env variables of this file accessible in my image but that is not the case, that&#39;s why I tried to add 

     environment:
      - NODE_ENV=development

But still no success, I have also tried to pass my env variable as command line argument when I run the build :

`docker-compose build --build-arg  NODE_ENV=development api`

But it gives me this message :

    [Warning] One or more build-args [NODE_ENV] were not consumed
    Successfully built 9b14dd5abc3f


And I would really prefer to use the first or second methods

docker version : 18.06.1-ce
docker-compose version : 1.19.0



docker-compose build environment variable

After freshly installing Ubuntu 18 I am receiving the following error when trying to launch a docker container that has a bind to a LVM (ext4) partition:

    mkdir /storage: read-only file system

I have tried reinstalling the OS, reinstalling Docker and forcing the drive to mount as RW (everything that isn&#39;t docker can write to the drive).

The directory that is being bound is currently set to 777 permissions.

There seems to be almost no information available for this error.

Docker - mkdir read-only file system

How can I specify multi-stage build with in a `docker-compose.yml`?


For each variant (e.g. dev, prod...) I have a multi-stage build with 2 docker files:

  - dev: `Dockerfile.base` + `Dockerfile.dev`
  - or prod: `Dockerfile.base` + `Dockerfile.prod`


File `Dockerfile.base` (common for all variants):

    FROM python:3.6
    RUN apt-get update &amp;&amp; apt-get upgrade -y
    RUN pip install pipenv pip
    COPY Pipfile ./
    # some more common configuration...

File `Dockerfile.dev`:

    FROM flaskapp:base
    RUN pipenv install --system --skip-lock --dev
    ENV FLASK_ENV development
    ENV FLASK_DEBUG 1

File `Dockerfile.prod`:

    FROM flaskapp:base
    RUN pipenv install --system --skip-lock
    ENV FLASK_ENV production


Without docker-compose, I can build as:

    # Building dev
    docker build --tag flaskapp:base -f Dockerfile.base .
    docker build --tag flaskapp:dev -f Dockerfile.dev .
    # or building prod
    docker build --tag flaskapp:base -f Dockerfile.base .
    docker build --tag flaskapp:dev -f Dockerfile.dev .



According to the [compose-file doc](https://docs.docker.com/compose/compose-file/#build), I can specify a Dockerfile to build.

    # docker-compose.yml
    version: &#39;3&#39;
    services:
      webapp:
        build:
          context: ./dir
          dockerfile: Dockerfile-alternate

But how can I specify 2 Dockerfiles in `docker-compose.yml` (for multi-stage build)?




multi-stage build in docker compose?

If I&#39;m using Alpine 3.8, how can I add a specific package from the Alpine Edge repository? Is this even supported? There is no equivalent of backports, from what I can see.

I want to add the new version of this: https://pkgs.alpinelinux.org/package/edge/community/armhf/librdkafka

And not the older version in the 3.8 repo:
https://pkgs.alpinelinux.org/package/v3.8/community/s390x/librdkafka

Alpine Add Package from Edge repository

Java 11 is announced to be the most recent LTS version. So, we&#39;re trying to start new services based on this Java version.

However, the base Docker image for Java 11 is much larger than the equivalent  for Java 8:

  - [`openjdk:8-jre-alpine`][1]: 84 MB
  
  - [`openjdk:11-jre-slim`][2]: **283** MB

(I&#39;m considering only the [***official OpenJDK***][3] and ***the most lightweight*** images for each Java version.)

Deeper digging uncovered the following &quot;things&quot;:

  - the [`openjdk:11-jre-slim`][2] image uses the base image `debian:sid-slim`. This brings 2 issues: 

    - this is 60 MB larger than `alpine:3.8`
   
    - the [Debian `sid`][4] versions are unstable

  - the `openjdk-11-jre-headless` package installed in the image is **3 times larger** than `openjdk8-jre` (inside running Docker container):

    - `openjdk:8-jre-alpine`: 
  
      &gt;     / # du -hs /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8-openjdk/jre/lib/
      &gt;     57.5M	/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8-openjdk/jre/lib/

    - `openjdk:11-jre-slim`:

      &gt;     # du -sh /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64/lib/
      &gt;     179M	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64/lib/

      Going deeper I discovered the &quot;root&quot; of this heaviness - it&#39;s the `modules` file of the JDK:

      &gt;     # ls -lhG /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64/lib/modules
      &gt;     135M    /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64/lib/modules

So, now the questions which came:

  - Why is `alpine` not used any more as a base image for Java 11 slim images?

  - Why is the unstable _sid_ version used for LTS Java images?

  - Why is the slim/headless/JRE package for OpenJDK 11 so large compared to the similar OpenJDK 8 package? 
    
    - What is this _modules_ file which brings 135 MB in OpenJDK 11?

**UPD**: as a solutions for these challenges one could use this answer: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53669151/java-11-application-as-docker-image/53669152#53669152


  [1]: https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk/blob/master/8/jre/alpine/Dockerfile
  [2]: https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk/blob/master/11/jre/slim/Dockerfile
  [3]: https://hub.docker.com/_/openjdk/
  [4]: https://www.debian.org/releases/sid/

Why is the Java 11 base Docker image so large? (openjdk:11-jre-slim)

Inspired by question [Why is the Java 11 base Docker image so large? (openjdk:11-jre-slim)][1] I found that this topic in Java world is still not settled.

As for `07 Dec 2018` there are common issues/pitfalls (discussed in the ticket above):

  - JRE is not distributed as a separate &quot;package&quot;. Modules from JDK should be used instead

  - [Oracle OpenJDK 11][2] doesn&#39;t support [Linux Alpine][3], so _lightweight_ images can&#39;t be easily created

    - In the same time current stable Debian versions still doesn&#39;t have [Java 11 packages][4] ([Ubuntu has Java 10 installed][5] under openjdk-11 packages), that&#39;s why unstable sid versions are used for base docker images

  - currently available Oracle openjdk-11 images build unstripped `libjvm.so` module, which has hundreds megabyte and must be stripped separately:
  
    - [jlink runtime image size (specifically libjvm.so) created from openjdk is huge. Expected it to be much smaller.][6]
    - Solution: https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk/issues/217#issuecomment-436079779

As a result of these issues even _slim_ Oracle Java 11 base images are quite heavy and considered to be unstable: https://hub.docker.com/_/openjdk/

So the question is: 

**what are _optimized_ or _recommended_ ways to build and deliver Java 11 applications as docker images**?


  [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53375613/
  [2]: https://jdk.java.net/11/
  [3]: https://openjdk.java.net/projects/portola/
  [4]: https://packages.debian.org/stable/java/
  [5]: https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/java/
  [6]: https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk/issues/217

Java 11 application as lightweight docker image

I&#39;m installing aws-cli on a docker swarm manager node running alpine (Linux 0317632a4ad9 4.9.59-moby #1 SMP Thu Mar 1 20:54:00 UTC 2018 x86_64 Linux).  The aws-cli package for Alpine is currently listed in the community repo on the edge branch (1.18.55.r0).  I modified `/etc/apk/repositories` to target this repo.

The install blew up looking for py3-urllib3, but I got around that and finally got a clean install with no errors, as below:

      ~ $ sudo apk add aws-cli@edge-comm
        fetch http://dl-cdn.alpinelinux.org/alpine/edge/community/x86_64/APKINDEX.tar.gz
        ERROR: unsatisfiable constraints:
          py3-urllib3-1.25.9-r0:
            masked in: @edge
            satisfies: py3-botocore-1.16.12-r0[py3-urllib3&lt;1.26]
    
        ~ $ sudo apk add py3-urllib3@edge aws-cli@edge-comm Installing aws-cli@edge-comm (1.18.55-r0)
        Executing busybox-1.26.2-r11.trigger
        OK: 576 MiB in 81 packages
   
The binary is created at /usr/bin/aws, but crashes looking for an awscli module:

    ~ $ aws
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File &quot;/usr/bin/aws&quot;, line 19, in &lt;module&gt;
        import awscli.clidriver
    ModuleNotFoundError: No module named &#39;awscli&#39;

Thanks!


How to install aws-cli on alpine?

I have a pipeline which deploys my container from GitLab. Last deployment was 5 days ago and went without any problems. Today I deploy it and get the following error:

    $ apk add --no-cache curl python py-pip
     fetch http://dl-cdn.alpinelinux.org/alpine/v3.12/main/x86_64/APKINDEX.tar.gz
     fetch http://dl-cdn.alpinelinux.org/alpine/v3.12/community/x86_64/APKINDEX.tar.gz
     ERROR: unsatisfiable constraints:
       python (missing):
         required by: world[python]

My job definition is:

    my-deploy:
      type: my-deploy
      image: docker:stable
      script:
        - apk update
        - apk add --no-cache curl python py-pip &lt;-- Here the erorr happens
        ...




Docker Alpine Linux python (missing)

I had multiple stopped containers and images in my machine.  
I wanted to clean up and removed all containers:  
`docker ps -a` returns nothing.  
I run `docker rmi $(docker images -q)` to remove the cached images but I get:  

&gt; Error response from daemon: conflict: unable to delete ...
&gt; (must be forced) - image is referenced in multiple repositories  

What repositories is it talking about?  

Can not remove images even though no container is running

I am trying to start a docker container with the below command.

    docker run -it -p 50070:50070 -p 8088:8088 -p 8080:8080 suhothayan/hadoop-spark-pig-hive:2.9.2 bash

It ended up with the following error.

&gt; docker: error response from daemon: Ports are not available: listen tcp 0.0.0.0/50070: bind: An attempt was made to access a socket in a way forbidden by its access permissions.

As I understand, the error has occurred as the port 50070 is used by another process. I&#39;ve tried to identify the process in order to kill that with the below command in the command prompt, but it does not give an output nor an error.

    netstat -ano | findstr :50080



Ports are not available: listen tcp 0.0.0.0/50070: bind: An attempt was made to access a socket in a way forbidden by its access permissions

Since i installed certbot on Debian 10, it always shows this error:
```
root@HypeTime:/home/sinusbot# apt update
Hit:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates InRelease
Hit:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster InRelease
Hit:3 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster-updates InRelease
Ign:4 http://ppa.launchpad.net/certbot/certbot/ubuntu focal InRelease
Err:5 http://ppa.launchpad.net/certbot/certbot/ubuntu focal Release
  404  Not Found [IP: 2001:67c:1560:8008::15 80]
Reading package lists... Done
E: The repository &#39;http://ppa.launchpad.net/certbot/certbot/ubuntu focal Release&#39; does not have a Release file.
N: Updating from such a repository can&#39;t be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.
```
Does someone know how to fix this error?

E: The repository &#39;http://ppa.launchpad.net/certbot/certbot/ubuntu focal Release&#39; does not have a Release file

Some of my GitHub Actions workflows started recently to return this error when installing Chromedriver:

```lang-none
Get:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates InRelease [65.4 kB]
Get:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster InRelease [122 kB]
Get:3 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster-updates InRelease [51.9 kB]
Reading package lists...
E: Repository &#39;http://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates InRelease&#39; changed its &#39;Suite&#39; value from &#39;stable&#39; to &#39;oldstable&#39;
E: Repository &#39;http://deb.debian.org/debian buster InRelease&#39; changed its &#39;Suite&#39; value from &#39;stable&#39; to &#39;oldstable&#39;
E: Repository &#39;http://deb.debian.org/debian buster-updates InRelease&#39; changed its &#39;Suite&#39; value from &#39;stable-updates&#39; to &#39;oldstable-updates&#39;
Error: Process completed with exit code 100.
```

Here is my step implementation:

```yaml
jobs:
  build:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    container:
        image: docker://guillaumefalourd/ritchiecli:py-3.8
    steps:
      - name: Install Chrome Driver
        run: |
            sudo apt-get update
            sudo apt-get install -y unzip xvfb libxi6 libgconf-2-4 gnupg2
            sudo curl -sS -o - https://dl-ssl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub | apt-key add
            sudo echo &quot;deb https://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable main&quot; &gt;&gt; /etc/apt/sources.list.d/google-chrome.list
            sudo apt-get -y update
            sudo apt-get -y install google-chrome-stable
            wget -N https://chromedriver.storage.googleapis.com/89.0.4389.23/chromedriver_linux64.zip -P ~/
            unzip ~/chromedriver_linux64.zip -d ~/
            rm ~/chromedriver_linux64.zip
            sudo mv -f ~/chromedriver /usr/local/bin/chromedriver
            sudo chown root:root /usr/local/bin/chromedriver
            sudo chmod 0755 /usr/local/bin/chromedriver
```

Docker Image Implementation: [docker://guillaumefalourd/ritchiecli:py-3.8](https://github.com/GuillaumeFalourd/ritchie-docker-images/blob/master/py-3.8/Dockerfile)

## What I tried

1. I read from [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/debian/comments/ca3se6/for_people_who_gets_this_error_inrelease_changed/) and [here](https://superuser.com/questions/1456989/how-to-configure-apt-in-debian-buster-after-release) that adding `sudo apt-get --allow-releaseinfo-change update` or `sudo apt-get dist-upgrade` could resolve the problem, but even adding those to my workflow didn&#39;t resolve it.

2. I tried using this action [setup-chromedriver](https://github.com/marketplace/actions/setup-chromedriver) but it returned the same error when following the documentation:

    ```yaml
    steps:
    - uses: actions/checkout@v2
    - uses: nanasess/setup-chromedriver@master
      with:
        # Optional: do not specify to match Chrome&#39;s version
        chromedriver-version: &#39;88.0.4324.96&#39;
    - run: |
        export DISPLAY=:99
        chromedriver --url-base=/wd/hub &amp;
        sudo Xvfb -ac :99 -screen 0 1280x1024x24 &gt; /dev/null 2&gt;&amp;1 &amp; # optional
    ```

3. As it seems to be related to _[Debian 10][1] (Buster)_ (?) I also tried to use another Ubuntu runner version as a runner (`ubuntu-18.04` instead of `ubuntu-latest`), but nothing changed, same error.

### How can I resolve this issue?

* * *

&lt;hr/&gt;

### Answer

*I observed afterwards that the problem was happening at the first command : `sudo apt-get update` (and I was adding the other command after...).*

*Substituting it for `sudo apt-get --allow-releaseinfo-change update` resolved my problem.*

*Therefore the answer was not to add the `sudo apt-get --allow-releaseinfo-change update` to the step executed commands, but **substituting** the `sudo apt-get update` command for it.*

```yaml
jobs:
  build:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    container:
        image: docker://guillaumefalourd/ritchiecli:py-3.8
    steps:
      - name: Install Chrome Driver
        run: |
            sudo apt-get --allow-releaseinfo-change update
            sudo apt-get install -y unzip xvfb libxi6 libgconf-2-4 gnupg2
            sudo curl -sS -o - https://dl-ssl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub | apt-key add
            sudo echo &quot;deb https://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable main&quot; &gt;&gt; /etc/apt/sources.list.d/google-chrome.list
            sudo apt-get -y update
            sudo apt-get -y install google-chrome-stable
            wget -N https://chromedriver.storage.googleapis.com/89.0.4389.23/chromedriver_linux64.zip -P ~/
            unzip ~/chromedriver_linux64.zip -d ~/
            rm ~/chromedriver_linux64.zip
            sudo mv -f ~/chromedriver /usr/local/bin/chromedriver
            sudo chown root:root /usr/local/bin/chromedriver
            sudo chmod 0755 /usr/local/bin/chromedriver
```

  [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian_version_history#Debian_10_(Buster)



Repository &#39;http://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates InRelease&#39; changed its &#39;Suite&#39; value from &#39;stable&#39; to &#39;oldstable&#39;

Content Type	Original Author	Original Content on Stackoverflow
Question	Muthukumar	View Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - Docker	akop	View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - Docker	mkasberg	View Answer on Stackoverflow

In Docker image names what is the difference between Alpine, Jessie, Stretch, and Buster?

Docker Problem Overview

Docker Solutions

Solution 1 - Docker

Solution 2 - Docker

How can I clean (reset cache) of React Native using Expo. Not sure if it is cache issue

What's the difference between plugins and extends in eslint?

Attributions