How to use Reflection to Invoke an Overloaded Method in .NET

.NetReflection.Net 2.0InvokeOverloading

.Net Problem Overview


Is there a way to Invoke an overloaded method using reflection in .NET (2.0). I have an application that dynamically instantiates classes that have been derived from a common base class. For compatibility purposes, this base class contains 2 methods of the same name, one with parameters, and one without. I need to call the parameterless method via the Invoke method. Right now, all I get is an error telling me that I'm trying to call an ambiguous method.

Yes, I could just cast the object as an instance of my base class and call the method I need. Eventually that will happen, but right now, internal complications will not allow it.

Any help would be great! Thanks.

.Net Solutions


Solution 1 - .Net

You have to specify which method you want:

class SomeType 
{
    void Foo(int size, string bar) { }
    void Foo() { }
}

SomeType obj = new SomeType();
// call with int and string arguments
obj.GetType()
    .GetMethod("Foo", new Type[] { typeof(int), typeof(string) })
    .Invoke(obj, new object[] { 42, "Hello" });
// call without arguments
obj.GetType()
    .GetMethod("Foo", new Type[0])
    .Invoke(obj, new object[0]);

Solution 2 - .Net

Yes. When you invoke the method pass the parameters that match the overload that you want.

For instance:

Type tp = myInstance.GetType();

//call parameter-free overload
tp.InvokeMember( "methodName", BindingFlags.InvokeMethod, 
   Type.DefaultBinder, myInstance, new object[0] );

//call parameter-ed overload
tp.InvokeMember( "methodName", BindingFlags.InvokeMethod, 
   Type.DefaultBinder, myInstance, new { param1, param2 } );

If you do this the other way round(i.e. by finding the MemberInfo and calling Invoke) be careful that you get the right one - the parameter-free overload could be the first found.

Solution 3 - .Net

Use the GetMethod overload that takes a System.Type[], and pass an empty Type[];

typeof ( Class ).GetMethod ( "Method", new Type [ 0 ] { } ).Invoke ( instance, null );

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionWes PView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - .NetHallgrimView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - .NetKeithView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - .NetbarettaView Answer on Stackoverflow