How to update an "array of objects" with Firestore?

JavascriptArraysObjectFirebaseGoogle Cloud-Firestore

Javascript Problem Overview


I'm currently trying Firestore, and I'm stuck at something very simple: "updating an array (aka a subdocument)".

My DB structure is super simple. For example:

proprietary: "John Doe",
sharedWith:
  [
    {who: "[email protected]", when:timestamp},
    {who: "[email protected]", when:timestamp},
  ],

I'm trying (without success) to push new records into shareWith array of objects.

I've tried:

// With SET
firebase.firestore()
.collection('proprietary')
.doc(docID)
.set(
  { sharedWith: [{ who: "[email protected]", when: new Date() }] },
  { merge: true }
)

// With UPDATE
firebase.firestore()
.collection('proprietary')
.doc(docID)
.update({ sharedWith: [{ who: "[email protected]", when: new Date() }] })

None works. These queries overwrite my array.

The answer might be simple, but I could'nt find it...

Javascript Solutions


Solution 1 - Javascript

Firestore now has two functions that allow you to update an array without re-writing the entire thing.

Link: https://firebase.google.com/docs/firestore/manage-data/add-data, specifically https://firebase.google.com/docs/firestore/manage-data/add-data#update_elements_in_an_array

> Update elements in an array > > If your document contains an array field, you can use arrayUnion() and > arrayRemove() to add and remove elements. arrayUnion() adds elements > to an array but only elements not already present. arrayRemove() > removes all instances of each given element.

Solution 2 - Javascript

Edit 08/13/2018: There is now support for native array operations in Cloud Firestore. See Doug's answer below.


There is currently no way to update a single array element (or add/remove a single element) in Cloud Firestore.

This code here:

firebase.firestore()
.collection('proprietary')
.doc(docID)
.set(
  { sharedWith: [{ who: "[email protected]", when: new Date() }] },
  { merge: true }
)

This says to set the document at proprietary/docID such that sharedWith = [{ who: "[email protected]", when: new Date() } but to not affect any existing document properties. It's very similar to the update() call you provided however the set() call with create the document if it does not exist while the update() call will fail.

So you have two options to achieve what you want.

Option 1 - Set the whole array

Call set() with the entire contents of the array, which will require reading the current data from the DB first. If you're concerned about concurrent updates you can do all of this in a transaction.

Option 2 - Use a subcollection

You could make sharedWith a subcollection of the main document. Then adding a single item would look like this:

firebase.firestore()
  .collection('proprietary')
  .doc(docID)
  .collection('sharedWith')
  .add({ who: "[email protected]", when: new Date() })

Of course this comes with new limitations. You would not be able to query documents based on who they are shared with, nor would you be able to get the doc and all of the sharedWith data in a single operation.

Solution 3 - Javascript

Here is the latest example from the Firestore documentation:

firebase.firestore.FieldValue.ArrayUnion

var washingtonRef = db.collection("cities").doc("DC");

// Atomically add a new region to the "regions" array field.
washingtonRef.update({
    regions: firebase.firestore.FieldValue.arrayUnion("greater_virginia")
});

// Atomically remove a region from the "regions" array field.
washingtonRef.update({
    regions: firebase.firestore.FieldValue.arrayRemove("east_coast")
});

Solution 4 - Javascript

You can use a transaction (https://firebase.google.com/docs/firestore/manage-data/transactions) to get the array, push onto it and then update the document:

    const booking = { some: "data" };
    const userRef = this.db.collection("users").doc(userId);

    this.db.runTransaction(transaction => {
        // This code may get re-run multiple times if there are conflicts.
        return transaction.get(userRef).then(doc => {
            if (!doc.data().bookings) {
                transaction.set({
                    bookings: [booking]
                });
            } else {
                const bookings = doc.data().bookings;
                bookings.push(booking);
                transaction.update(userRef, { bookings: bookings });
            }
        });
    }).then(function () {
        console.log("Transaction successfully committed!");
    }).catch(function (error) {
        console.log("Transaction failed: ", error);
    });

Solution 5 - Javascript

Sorry Late to party but Firestore solved it way back in aug 2018 so If you still looking for that here it is all issues solved with regards to arrays.

https://firebase.googleblog.com/2018/08/better-arrays-in-cloud-firestore.html[Official blog post]1

array-contains, arrayRemove, arrayUnion for checking, removing and updating arrays. Hope it helps.

Solution 6 - Javascript

To build on [Sam Stern's answer][1], there is also a 3rd option which made things easier for me and that is using what Google call a Map, which is essentially a dictionary.

I think a dictionary is far better for the use case you're describing. I usually use arrays for stuff that isn't really updated too much, so they are more or less static. But for stuff that gets written a lot, specifically values that need to be updated for fields that are linked to something else in the database, dictionaries prove to be much easier to maintain and work with.

So for your specific case, the DB structure would look like this:

proprietary: "John Doe"
sharedWith:{
  whoEmail1: {when: timestamp},
  whoEmail2: {when: timestamp}
}

This will allow you to do the following:

var whoEmail = '[email protected]';

var sharedObject = {};
sharedObject['sharedWith.' + whoEmail + '.when'] = new Date();
sharedObject['merge'] = true;

firebase.firestore()
.collection('proprietary')
.doc(docID)
.update(sharedObject);

The reason for defining the object as a variable is that using 'sharedWith.' + whoEmail + '.when' directly in the set method will result in an error, at least when using it in a Node.js cloud function.

[1]: https://stackoverflow.com/a/46773121/6224698 "Sam Stern's answer"

Solution 7 - Javascript

#Edit (add explanation :) ) say you have an array you want to update your existing firestore document field with. You can use set(yourData, {merge: true} ) passing setOptions(second param in set function) with {merge: true} is must in order to merge the changes instead of overwriting. here is what the official documentation says about it

> An options object that configures the behavior of set() calls in DocumentReference, WriteBatch, and Transaction. These calls can be configured to perform granular merges instead of overwriting the target documents in their entirety by providing a SetOptions with merge: true.

you can use this

const yourNewArray = [{who: "[email protected]", when:timestamp}
{who: "[email protected]", when:timestamp}]    


collectionRef.doc(docId).set(
  {
    proprietary: "jhon",
    sharedWith: firebase.firestore.FieldValue.arrayUnion(...yourNewArray),
  },
  { merge: true },
);

hope this helps :)

Solution 8 - Javascript

Other than the answers mentioned above. This will do it. Using Angular 5 and AngularFire2. or use firebase.firestore() instead of this.afs

  // say you have have the following object and 
  // database structure as you mentioned in your post
  data = { who: "[email protected]", when: new Date() };

  ...othercode


  addSharedWith(data) {
    
    const postDocRef = this.afs.collection('posts').doc('docID');

    postDocRef.subscribe( post => {

      // Grab the existing sharedWith Array
      // If post.sharedWith doesn`t exsit initiated with empty array
      const foo = { 'sharedWith' : post.sharedWith || []};

      // Grab the existing sharedWith Array
      foo['sharedWith'].push(data);
    
      // pass updated to fireStore
      postsDocRef.update(foo);
      // using .set() will overwrite everything
      // .update will only update existing values, 
      // so we initiated sharedWith with empty array
    });
 }  

Solution 9 - Javascript

addToCart(docId: string, prodId: string): Promise<void> {
    return this.baseAngularFirestore.collection('carts').doc(docId).update({
        products:
        firestore.FieldValue.arrayUnion({
            productId: prodId,
            qty: 1
        }),
    });
}

Solution 10 - Javascript

We can use arrayUnion({}) method to achive this.

Try this:

collectionRef.doc(ID).update({
    sharedWith: admin.firestore.FieldValue.arrayUnion({
       who: "[email protected]",
       when: new Date()
    })
});

Documentation can find here: https://firebase.google.com/docs/firestore/manage-data/add-data#update_elements_in_an_array

Solution 11 - Javascript

Consider John Doe a document rather than a collection

Give it a collection of things and thingsSharedWithOthers

Then you can map and query John Doe's shared things in that parallel thingsSharedWithOthers collection.

proprietary: "John Doe"(a document)

things(collection of John's things documents)

thingsSharedWithOthers(collection of John's things being shared with others):
[thingId]:
    {who: "[email protected]", when:timestamp}
    {who: "[email protected]", when:timestamp}

then set thingsSharedWithOthers

firebase.firestore()
.collection('thingsSharedWithOthers')
.set(
{ [thingId]:{ who: "[email protected]", when: new Date() } },
{ merge: true }
)

Solution 12 - Javascript

If You want to Update an array in a firebase document. You can do this.

    var documentRef = db.collection("Your collection name").doc("Your doc name")

    documentRef.update({
yourArrayName: firebase.firestore.FieldValue.arrayUnion("The Value you want to enter")});

Solution 13 - Javascript

Although firebase.firestore.FieldValue.arrayUnion() provides the solution for array update in firestore, at the same time it is required to use {merge:true}. If you do not use {merge:true} it will delete all other fields in the document while updating with the new value. Here is the working code for updating array without loosing data in the reference document with .set() method:


const docRef = firebase.firestore().collection("your_collection_name").doc("your_doc_id");

docRef.set({yourArrayField: firebase.firestore.FieldValue.arrayUnion("value_to_add")}, {merge:true});

Solution 14 - Javascript

If anybody is looking for Java firestore sdk solution to add items in array field:

List<String> list = java.util.Arrays.asList("A", "B");
Object[] fieldsToUpdate = list.toArray();
DocumentReference docRef = getCollection().document("docId");
docRef.update(fieldName, FieldValue.arrayUnion(fieldsToUpdate));

To delete items from array user: FieldValue.arrayRemove()

Solution 15 - Javascript

If the document contains a nested object in the form of an array, .dot notation can be used to reference and update nested fields. Node.js example:

const users = {
  name: 'Tom',
  surname: 'Smith',
  favorites: {
    sport: 'tennis',
    color: 'red',
    subject: 'math'
  }
};

const update = await db.collection('users').doc('Tom').update({
  'favorites.sport': 'snowboard'
});

or Android sdk example:

db.collection("users").document("Tom")
        .update(
               'favorites.sport': 'snowboard'
        );

Solution 16 - Javascript

There is a simple hack in firestore:

use path with "." as property name:

propertyname.arraysubname.${id}:

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestioncharnouldView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - JavascriptDoug GalanteView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - JavascriptSam SternView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - JavascriptVeeresh DevireddyView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - JavascriptGabriel McCallinView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - JavascriptGuruView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - JavascriptHoreaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - JavascriptBenyamView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - JavascriptJassiView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - JavascriptBlazetView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - JavascriptIndView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 11 - JavascriptRichard Taylor-KennyView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 12 - JavascriptVijaykumar GutalaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 13 - JavascriptTradeCoderView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 14 - JavascriptA_01View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 15 - JavascriptMGLabsView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 16 - JavascriptBoris MikhailovskiView Answer on Stackoverflow