How to suppress `warning: linking against dylib not safe for use in application extensions`?

IosIos FrameworksLinker WarningIos Extensions

Ios Problem Overview


I have a dynamic framework that is shared between an iOS application and an extension. There is some code in that framework that references UIApplication, that is of course, not usable in an extension. Those calls are completely isolated and so I am not worried about them causing problems with my extension.

Since there isn't a flag specified in the warning message, perhaps there isn't way to do it, but how do I suppress warning: linking against dylib not safe for use in application extensions when building my project?

Ios Solutions


Solution 1 - Ios

For your watch/today-widget extension target (so not your app or libray target), go into the project settings and change the build setting APPLICATION_EXTENSION_API_ONLY / Require Only App-Extension-Safe API to NO.

Solution 2 - Ios

I think you can use embedded framework to share code between your app extension and its containing app. But you have to be careful that your framework doesn't contain apis which are unavailable to extensions. See Some APIs Are Unavailable to App Extensions and Using an Embedded Framework to Share Code.

If your framework doesn't contain such apis don't forget to set Require Only App-Extension-Safe API to YES in your framework target's Build Settings.

enter image description here

As a second way to share source files between application and extension, you don't have to create a separate framework target. You can just share source files by targeting both two projects.

enter image description here

Solution 3 - Ios

My framework didn't use any restricted API and I was still getting the warning...this solved it for me. enter image description here

Solution 4 - Ios

Short answer: there isn't really a way to do.

What I ended up doing was refactoring my code to pull out the pieces that were common to my extension on and my dynamic frame so that my extension could safely reference those pieces independent of the phone-specific code.

I ended up doing this because sometime in the future I will need to submit this to the App Store and Apple's guidelines seem pretty clear that referencing UIApplication is a pretty big no-no.

Solution 5 - Ios

Sometimes 'Nanny' doesn't know best.

You can avoid linking to UIApplication.shared and just call the methods dynamically in your framework.

class Application {
    static var shared: UIApplication {
        let sharedSelector = NSSelectorFromString("sharedApplication")
        guard UIApplication.responds(to: sharedSelector) else {
            fatalError("[Extensions cannot access Application]")
        }
        
        let shared = UIApplication.perform(sharedSelector)
        return shared?.takeUnretainedValue() as! UIApplication
    }
}

This allows you to effectively call UIApplication.shared (just call Application.Shared ) without making the linker freak out.

You will get a crash if you try to call this from an extension.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionWayne HartmanView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - IosOliver PearmainView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - IosabdullahselekView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - IosLioView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - IosWayne HartmanView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - IosConfused VorlonView Answer on Stackoverflow