How to skip "Loose Object" popup when running 'git gui'

GitGarbage CollectionRebaseGit GuiGit Gc

Git Problem Overview


When I run 'git gui' I get a popup that says

This repository currently has approximately 1500 loose objects.

It then suggests compressing the database. I've done this before, and it reduces the loose objects to about 250, but that doesn't suppress the popup. Compressing again doesn't change the number of loose objects.

Our current workflow requires significant use of 'rebase' as we are transitioning from Perforce, and Perforce is still the canonical SCM. Once Git is the canonical SCM, we will do regular merges, and the loose objects problem should be greatly mitigated.

In the mean time, I'd really like to make this 'helpful' popup go away.

Git Solutions


Solution 1 - Git

Since nobody had yet an answer, I looked into the code to see how to remove the code which shows up that dialog. I found the hint_gc procedure which does it and the place where it is called. At the same time I noticed that late 2011 there was added a configuration option for disabling the dialog. This change (part of git-gui 0.16.0) was merged to Git's mainline on 2011-12-14.

So if you use Git v1.7.9 or newer, you can disable the warning dialog with the following command:

git config --global gui.gcwarning false

If you are using an older version, then you can edit /lib/git-core/git-gui and remove the after 1000 hint_gc line, or edit /usr/share/git-gui/lib/database.tcl and remove the body of the hint_gc procedure. (These file paths are on Cygwin - on other environments the files might be in a different locations. For Windows it is c:\Program Files\Git\mingw64\libexec\git-core\git-gui.tcl)

Solution 2 - Git

Update: git prune would "solve" the issue, in that it will remove those loose objects
(git gc calls git prune, but only for loose objects older than two weeks, by default).
However, as the OP Michael Donohue mentions in the comments:

> I do like the safety aspect of keeping the loose objects around for two weeks, should I want to go back and look at some old revisions, so I don't really like this solution.
I am not having any trouble with the size or performance of git, it is just 'git gui' that insists on asking me to compress the database, even when compressing the database would have no effect.


Original answer:

The problem of "git gc" not removing all loose objects has been reported before (late 2008, ""git gc" doesn't seem to remove loose objects any more"

> git gc only removes loose objects older than two weeks, if you really want to remove them now, run git prune.
But make sure no other git process can be active when you run it, or it could possibly step on something.

> "git gc" will unpack objects that have become unreachable and were currently in packs.
As a result, the amount of disk space used by a git repository can actually go up dramatically after a "git gc" operation, which could be surprising for someone who is running close to full on their filesystem, deletes a number of branches from a tracking repository, and then does a "git gc" may get a very unpleasant surprise.

> [Example:] Old branches are reserved via a tag such as next-20081204.
If you update the your local copy of the linux-next repository every day, you will accumulate a large number of these old branch tags.
If you then delete a whole series of them, and run git-gc, the operation will take quite a while, and the number of blocks and inodes used will grow significantly.

> They will disappear after a "git prune", but when I do this housekeeping operation, I've often wished for a --yes-I-know-what-I-am-doing-and-it's-unsafe-but-just-drop-the-unreachable-objects-cause-this-is-just-a-tracking-repository option to "git gc".

So in your case, would a "git prune" be helpful?

(possibly with using "now" in the gc.pruneexpire config variable, needed for the above behavior to happen).


You also have (from the same thread):

repack -a -d -l

> Notice the lowercase 'a'.

> git-gc calls repack with uppercase 'A' which is what causes the unreachable objects to be unpacked. Little 'a', is for people who know what they are doing, and want git to just drop unreachable objects.

Solution 3 - Git

When "Loose Object" popup I know it's time to run git's garbage collector:

git gc

After that the popup goes away.

Update: (due to T.E.D.'s suggestion)

I extracted the below routine from git/share/git-gui/lib/database.tcl
You can modify it to meet your needs.

proc hint_gc {} {
	set object_limit 8
	if {[is_Windows]} {
		set object_limit 1
	}

	set objects_current [llength [glob \
		-directory [gitdir objects 42] \
		-nocomplain \
		-tails \
		-- \
		*]]

	if {$objects_current >= $object_limit} {
		set objects_current [expr {$objects_current * 256}]
		set object_limit    [expr {$object_limit    * 256}]
		if {[ask_popup \
			[mc "This repository currently has approximately %i loose objects.

To maintain optimal performance it is strongly recommended that you compress the database when more than %i loose objects exist.

Compress the database now?" $objects_current $object_limit]] eq yes} {
			do_gc
		}
	}
}

Solution 4 - Git

Hmmmm....I don't see a command-line argument for that in the docs.

I suppose you could always pull down its source, take out the code for the dialog, and rebuild.

Solution 5 - Git

To add to the answers and explanations:

If you want to continue monitoring the loose objects, but not want the popup to disappear completely (it pops all the time for larger projects), you can modify database.tcl which is probably in this folder:

C:\Program Files\Git\mingw64\share\git-gui\lib\

In the function proc hint_gc {}

proc hint_gc {} {

set ndirs 1
set limit 8
if {[is_Windows]} {
	set ndirs 8
	set limit 1
}

You can change the

set ndirs 8

to

set ndirs 32

for example.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionMichael DonohueView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - GitEsko LuontolaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - GitVonCView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - GitNick DandoulakisView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - GitT.E.D.View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - GitValmondView Answer on Stackoverflow