Add attribute `tools:node` with a value of `remove` to your manifest:

&lt;!-- language: lang-xml --&gt;

    &lt;manifest ... xmlns:tools=&quot;http://schemas.android.com/tools&quot;&gt;
        ...
        &lt;uses-permission android:name=&quot;android.permission.ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION&quot; tools:node=&quot;remove&quot; /&gt;
        ...
    &lt;/manifest&gt;

See https://developer.android.com/studio/build/manage-manifests#node_markers

Don&#39;t forget to add the `tools` namespace to the root element of your manifest.

This is the code I have now, taken from an answer to a similar question. 

    @IBAction func GoogleButton(sender: AnyObject) {
        if let url = NSURL(string: &quot;www.google.com&quot;){
            UIApplication.sharedApplication().openURL(url)
        }
    }

The button is called Google Button and its text is www.google.com

How do I make it open the link when I press it?



Make button open link - Swift

I&#39;m using the python logging module.

I update the logging config using logging.dictConfig().

I would like a way to read the current configuration (e.g. level) used by each logger and print it.

How can I get and print this information?

How to print current logging configuration used by the python logging module?

Recently Google auto merge permission from Google Service to final release apk.
Some one ask here https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30658439/why-are-permissions-being-automatically-added-to-my-androidmanifest-when-includi

My problem is some permission don&#39;t need and I don&#39;t want some sensitive permission in my app. So how to remove permission like **android.permission.ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION** ?
With gradle build, I don&#39;t want to disable Manifest Merger. I read some where that can config Merger to remove permission from external lib, but I can&#39;t find how to do it.


How to remove specific permission when build Android app with gradle?

Recently Google auto merge permission from Google Service to final release apk.
Some one ask here <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30658439/why-are-permissions-being-automatically-added-to-my-androidmanifest-when-includi" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30658439/why-are-permissions-being-automatically-added-to-my-androidmanifest-when-includi</a>
My problem is some permission don't need and I don't want some sensitive permission in my app. So how to remove permission like android.permission.ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION ?
With gradle build, I don't want to disable Manifest Merger. I read some where that can config Merger to remove permission from external lib, but I can't find how to do it.

I&#39;m a little confused about Java&#39;s *varargs* methods:

    public static int sum(int ...a) {
        return 0;
    }
    
    public static double sum(double ...a) {
        return 0.0;
    }

When I tried to invoke `sum()` without passing any argument, then the `int` version of method was invoked. I don&#39;t understand why; normally the compiler must raise an error.

By contrast, the following piece of code generates a compiler error when I try to invoke `sum` without any argument:

    public static int sum(int ...a) {
        return 0;
    }
    
    public static boolean sum(boolean ...a) {
        return true;
    }

Varargs Java Ambiguous Call

Could you please explain why Spring is creating two objects for the configuration of beans shown below, since by default spring default scope is singleton?
    
The Spring configuration is here:

    &lt;bean id=&quot;customer&quot; class=&quot;jp.ne.goo.beans.Customer&quot;&gt; 
        &lt;property name=&quot;custno&quot; value=&quot;100&quot;&gt;&lt;/property&gt;
        &lt;property name=&quot;custName&quot; value=&quot;rajasekhar&quot;&gt; &lt;/property&gt;
    &lt;/bean&gt;
    &lt;bean id=&quot;customer2&quot; class=&quot;jp.ne.goo.beans.Customer&quot;&gt; 
        &lt;property name=&quot;custno&quot; value=&quot;200&quot;&gt;&lt;/property&gt; 
        &lt;property name=&quot;custName&quot; value=&quot;siva&quot;&gt;&lt;/property&gt; 
    &lt;/bean&gt;



Is spring default scope singleton or not?

As far as I can understand when you want custom authentication in Spring Security you can either implement a custom `AuthenticationProvider` or custom `UserDetailsService`.

    @Autowired
        public void configureGlobal(AuthenticationManagerBuilder auth) throws Exception {
            auth	
                //.authenticationProvider(authProvider)  // option 1
                .userDetailsService(userDetailsService); // option 2
    
        }


In the AuthenticationProvider you can check the username and password and return `Authentication` with your custom object in it. 


    public Authentication authenticate(Authentication authentication){
            if (checkUsernameAndPassword(authentication)) {
                CustomUserDetails userDetails = new CustomUserDetails();
                //add whatever you want to the custom user details object
                return new UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken(userDetails, password, grantedAuths);
            } else {
                throw new BadCredentialsException(&quot;Unable to auth against third party systems&quot;);
            }
        }


In the `UserDetailsService` you get only the username and when you return the custom UserDeatails, the framework performs a check on the password.

	

    public UserDetails loadUserByUsername(String username) throws UsernameNotFoundException {
    		CustomUserDetails user = new CustomUserDetails();
    		//add whatever you want to the custom user details object
    		return user;
    	}


Looks like both can produce similar results. So the question is what is the difference? When to user one vs the other? 

Spring Security Custom Authentication - AuthenticationProvider vs UserDetailsService

What is the best way to blur background images like the image below? I saw some code and libraries but their are a couple of years old or like BlurBehind library, but it doesn&#39;t give the same effect. Thanks in advance!

[![enter image description here][1]][1]


  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/9hKc5.png

How to blur background images in Android

I have a class used for navigating back and forth through a list of ordered pages. The pages are generally but not always accessed sequentially. Sometimes one or more pages may be skipped based on certain rules.

To manage this, I maintain two stacks, forward and backward, to track which pages have previously been visited in either direction.

As far as the functionality of this class is concerned, there is no reason for it to expose these stacks. However, when unit testing the navigation methods, `first()`, `next()`, `previous()` and `last()`, which all reorganize the stacks and return the appropriate page, I need to check that the stacks are in the right &quot;state&quot; at the end of the process.

For example, calling `first()` should cause the forward stack to be cleared and every other page that has previously been visited to be pushed into the backward stack.

Is this alone a good enough reason to provide getters for the forward and backward stacks? One reason I am hesitant to do so is that I worry that this also exposes them to (perhaps inadvertent) outside manipulation that might cause the class to malfunction. What if a client clears a stack for example?

**UPDATE**

Some people have suggested that this question is a duplicate of the one posted [here][1]. I think the 2 questions aren&#39;t quite the same. The other question discusses the idea of **refactoring a private method to make it public in order to be able to test it**. This question, on the other hand, is specifically about **testing public methods by examining the internal state of the object under tes**t. I think there is a subtle but significant difference there, and the accepted answer clearly shows how to test the very same public methods without examining internal state.


  [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7075938/making-a-private-method-public-to-unit-test-it-good-idea

Is unit testing alone ever a good reason to expose private instance variables via getters?

Im using the `FloatingActionButton` from the `android.support.design.widget` package:

    &lt;android.support.design.widget.FloatingActionButton
        android:layout_width=&quot;wrap_content&quot;
        android:layout_height=&quot;wrap_content&quot;
        android:layout_alignParentBottom=&quot;true&quot;
        android:layout_alignParentEnd=&quot;true&quot;
        android:layout_marginBottom=&quot;20dp&quot;
        android:layout_marginEnd=&quot;16dp&quot;
        android:clickable=&quot;true&quot;
        android:backgroundTint=&quot;@color/primaryColor&quot;
        android:src=&quot;@drawable/ic_search_white_24dp&quot;
        app:borderWidth=&quot;0dp&quot;
        app:elevation=&quot;6dp&quot;
        app:backgroundTint=&quot;@color/primaryColorDark&quot;
        app:rippleColor=&quot;@color/accentColor&quot; /&gt;

Is it possible to configure that button to hide with an animation when the listview is scrolling down and to show it again when listview is scrolling up to the top?

FloatingActionButton hide on list scroll

After using the Android Design Support Library&#39;s [`TextInputLayout`](https://developer.android.com/reference/android/support/design/widget/TextInputLayout.html) to place a floating label above an [`EditText`](http://developer.android.com/reference/android/widget/EditText.html) component, I was wondering if there is a way to add a floating label to the [`Spinner`](http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/ui/controls/spinner.html) component (not necessarily using the Design Library).

By this, I mean something like a [`TextView`](http://developer.android.com/reference/android/widget/TextView.html) placed above the `Spinner` (obviously no animations like the `TextInputLayout`), but I want the **text size, font and colour to match that of the `TextInputLayout`&#39;s floating label**.

For example, it would look something like this (see the labels above the `Spinner`s):

[![enter image description here][1]][1]

As I mentioned before, my main aim is to have a label above the `Spinner`, just as in the `TextInputLayout` - so text size, font, colour, and distances between the label and the component would be the same.

On the [Google Design page about floating label text fields](https://www.google.com/design/spec/components/text-fields.html#text-fields-floating-labels), there is a diagram showing dimensions of the label relative to the component, but there is no indication of the label text colour or size:

[![enter image description here][2]][2]


  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/0z4cl.png
  [2]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/P8ZyH.png


**So, to summarise, I am asking:**   
- If there is a special component to achieve what I am asking or a custom view I can use, what would it be, and how can I use it.   
- If not, what is the floating label text size, colour and font, so that I can place a `TextView` above my `Spinner` with the layout dimensions shown in the above image.

   
   
---


**EDIT:**
=

From the [Google Design guidelines for text fields](https://www.google.co.uk/design/spec/components/text-fields.html#text-fields-floating-labels), it has the following for floating labels:

&gt;Hint and input font: Roboto Regular 16sp  
&gt;Label font: Roboto Regular 12sp  
&gt;Tile height: 72dp  
&gt;Text top and bottom padding: 16dp  
&gt;Text field divider padding: 8dp  

as well as the images shown above. 

So the floating label font is: _**Roboto Regular 12sp**_. You can therefore use a `TextView` to display the `Spinner` label as I do not know of any custom `View`s or special components you could use.

**However**, after trying it out, it does not look quite as good as the example shown in the image. A **custom view may be better for this**, as it could look nicer, but the solution above is just one way of achieving something close to what I originally wanted.


How to add floating label on Spinner

I am using a toolbar in place of actionbar and i am also using a navigation drawer.My toolbar colour is black and i want my navigation drawer indicator colour to be white.So how to change the colour of the navigation drawer indicator or put a custom navigation indicator in v7.Can any one please help me?

Change the color of Navigation Drawer indicator icon

###Configuration:


- Windows 8.1
- ADB version: 1.0.32
- Smartphone: Oneplus One

###Problem

I installed the Samsung drivers as it is said to do. When I run the ADB devices command, it said **unauthorized**.

###Already tried:

1. I&#39;ve done everything that&#39;d been said on this post: *https://stackoverflow.com/a/25546300/1848376*

    But the problem is that I don&#39;t get a prompt on the phone to tell me I must accept the connection.

2. When I run the command `adb shell`, here is the answer:

        error: device unauthorized.
        This adbd&#39;s $ADB_VENDOR_KEYS is not set; try &#39;adb kill-server&#39; if that seems wrong.
        Otherwise check for a confirmation dialog on your device.

I did &quot;adb kill-server&quot;, but it didn&#39;t change anything. Why?



Android ADB devices unauthorized

I have a Huawei P8 with Android 5.0 that I&#39;m using for testing an app. The app needs to be running in the background, as it tracks BLE regions.  

I&#39;ve discovered that Huawei has built in a &quot;feature&quot; called Protected Apps, that can be accessed from the phone settings (Battery Manager &gt; Protected Apps). This allows elected apps to keep running after the screen is turned off.   

Sensibly for Huawei, but unfortunately for me, it looks like it&#39;s opt-in, i.e. apps are out by default, and you have to manually put them in.
This isn&#39;t a showstopper, as I can advise users in an FAQ or printed documentation about the fix, but I recently installed Tinder (for research purposes!), and noticed that it was put in the protected list automatically.  

Does anyone know how I can do this for my app? Is it a setting in the manifest? Is it something Huawei has enabled for Tinder because it&#39;s a popular app?

&quot;Protected Apps&quot; setting on Huawei phones, and how to handle it

_What I want to do is build a docker image for my Java application but the following considerations should be true for most compiled languages._

# problem
On my build server I want to produce a docker image for my application as the deliverable. For this I have to compile the application using some build tool (typically Gradle, Maven or Ant) and then add the created JAR file to the docker image. As I want the docker image to just execute the JAR file I will of course start from a base image with Java already installed.

# There are three ways of doing this:

## let the build tool control the process
In this case my build tool controls the whole process. So it prepares the JAR file and after the JAR is created it calls Docker to create the image. This works as the JAR is created beforehand and Docker can be  oblivious of the build process needed to create the JAR.

But my Dockerfile is no longer standalone. It depends on steps to happen outside of Docker for it work. In my Dockerfile I will have a `COPY` or `ADD` statement that is supposed to copy the JAR file to the image. This statement will fail when the jar is not created beforehand. So just executing the Dockerfile might not work. This becomes a problem if you want to integrate with services that just build using the present Dockerfile like the auto-build feature on DockerHub.

## let Docker control the build
In this case all necessary steps to create the image are added to the Dockerfile so the image can be created by just executing the Docker build.

The main problem with this approach is that there is no way to add to a Dockerfile commands that should be executed outside the docker image being created. This means I have to add my source code and my build tools to the docker image and build my JAR file inside the image. This will result in my image being bigger than it has to be due to all the files added that will be unnecessary at runtime. This will also add extra layers to my image.

### Edit:
As @adrian-mouat pointed out if I would add the sources, build the application and deleted the sources in one RUN statement I could avoid adding unnecessary files and layers to the Docker image. This would mean creating some insane chained command. 

## two separate builds
In this case we split our build in two: first we create the JAR file using our build tool and upload it to a repository (Maven or Ivy repository). We then trigger a separate Docker build that just adds the JAR file from the repository.

# conclusion
In my opinion the better way would be _letting the build tool control the process_. This is will result in a clean docker image and as the image is what we want to deliver this is of importance. To avoid having a potentially not working Dockerfile lying around this should be created as part of the build. So no one would accidentally use it to start a broken build.

But this will not allow me to integrate with DockerHub.

# question
Is there another way I am missing?

# update June 2020
In the years since I first created this question a lot of stuff has changed. At this point I would advocate using [Googel&#39;s JIB Tool](https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/jib). It integrates with the most common Java Build Tools (Maven and Gradle) and allows you to create container directly from your build. This is much more concise than any of the old approaches I considered all these years ago.

# update February 2021
I found this blog post and video from James Ward that reflects better what is currently state of the art.
https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/developers-practitioners/comparing-containerization-methods-buildpacks-jib-and-dockerfile

How to build a docker container for a Java application

What does Gradle `transitive = true` do exactly? It is not clear from the [Gradle documentation][1]. This is in the context of `compile` within `build.gradle`. In my case I&#39;m depending Android&#39;s crashlytics.

    compile(&#39;com.crashlytics.sdk.android:crashlytics:2.2.2@aar&#39;) {
        transitive = true;
    }

Several Gradle docs ([here][2] and [here][3]) imply that &quot;transitive&quot; defaults to true. Yet removing `transitive = true` results in transitive dependencies not being brought in (in particular `KitGroup`).

    class file for io.fabric.sdk.android.KitGroup not found

The docs say it defaults to true, yet the actual behavior seems to be the opposite.

I am running Gradle 2.2.1. Perhaps the behavior changed between 2.2 and 2.4?

**Edit**: Related https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22795455

  [1]: https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/dependency_management.html
  [2]: https://docs.gradle.org/current/dsl/org.gradle.api.artifacts.Configuration.html#org.gradle.api.artifacts.Configuration:transitive
  [3]: https://docs.gradle.org/current/javadoc/org/gradle/api/artifacts/dsl/DependencyHandler.html

What does transitive = true in Gradle exactly do (w.r.t. crashlytics)?

After upgrading Android Studio to 1.3, I can&#39;t compile my project anymore. I am getting `Unexpected lock protocol found in lock file. Expected 3, found 0.`. I have tried with deleting my `.gradle` folder but that does not solve the problem. Anything else I can do? 

Error:Unexpected lock protocol found in lock file. Expected 3, found 0

I try to change `minSdkVersion` in `build.gradle` (Module: app) in `Android Studio` and get next error:

    Error:Timeout waiting to lock buildscript class cache for build file &#39;E:\pathtoproject\app\build.gradle&#39; (C:\Users\Administrator\.gradle\caches\2.2.1\scripts\build_f00bwdji3qxl7urq5chsbakgv\ProjectScript\buildscript). It is currently in use by another Gradle instance.
    Owner PID: unknown
    Our PID: 4592
    Owner Operation: unknown
    Our operation: Initialize cache
    Lock file: C:\Users\Administrator\.gradle\caches\2.2.1\scripts\build_f00bwdji3qxl7urq5chsbakgv\ProjectScript\buildscript\cache.properties.lock

**What is it error? How to change `minSdkVersion` ?**

Error:Timeout waiting to lock buildscript class cache for build file when change minSdkVersion

I really got an &#39;overflow&#39; trying to make these things to work together. I followed instruction from here: http://docs.sonarqube.org/display/PLUG/Android+Lint+Plugin and finally got a SonarQube 5.1.1 server with Android Lint plugin 1.1 installed. Then I configured my multi-module Gradle build to work with SonarQube plugin: see code fragment from root config below.

    plugins {
        id &#39;org.sonarqube&#39; version &#39;1.0&#39;
    }

    sonarqube {
        properties {

            property &#39;sonar.host.url&#39;, &#39;sonarqube-server:9000&#39;
            property &#39;sonar.jdbc.url&#39;, &#39;jdbc:mysql://sonarqube-db:3306/sonar?useUnicode=true&amp;amp;characterEncoding=utf8&#39;
            property &#39;sonar.jdbc.driverClassName&#39;, &#39;com.mysql.jdbc.Driver&#39;
            property &#39;sonar.jdbc.username&#39;, &#39;sonar&#39;
            property &#39;sonar.jdbc.password&#39;, &#39;sonar&#39;
            property &#39;sonar.sourceEncoding&#39;, &#39;UTF-8&#39;
            property &#39;sonar.login&#39;, &#39;admin&#39;
            property &#39;sonar.password&#39;, &#39;admin&#39;

            property &#39;sonar.profile&#39;, &#39;Android Lint&#39;

            property &#39;sonar.import_unknown_files&#39;, true
            property &#39;sonar.android.lint.report&#39;, &#39;build/outputs/lint-results.xml&#39;
        }
    }


And after that I ran `lint sonarqube`task to execute the analysis. As a result I got a bulk of Lint errors regarding &#39;retrolambda&#39; project (`java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Unknown ASTNode child: LambdaExpression`), which is quite normal, and `lint-results.xml` (accompanied with HTML version) files per each module containing descriptions of issues discovered. The report said that there were 8 errors and 434 warnings found. But things went wrong when sonarqube plugin tried to upload the results to SonarQube server. The log was full of &#39;Unable to find file&#39; and &#39;Unable to find rule&#39; messages. And when the processing was over, then there were no issues reported for my project on SonarQube server.

And I am wondering, what did went wrong? I checked the paths, and all files were there. I looked through all discussions I could reach, and it seems like my config is correct and I do everything right. Does anybody have any clue, what I missed and what needs to be checked? Any suggestions or ideas are welcome.

I will be also happy if there is a way to import lint data using external SonarQube Runner, since this tool seems to be more predictable and stable then a Gradle plugin.

Analyzing Android Project with Lint and SonarQube

I&#39;m currently trying to adapt my application to the new permissions model of Android M.

I&#39;m collecting all the permissions I require, then run

    Log.i(&quot;Permissions&quot;, &quot;Requesting permissions: &quot; + permissions);
    requestPermissions(requiredPermissions.toArray(new String[requiredPermissions.size()]), requestCodeForPermissions);

requiredPermissions holds the permissions I need like `android.permission.WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE`.

That routine is definitely executed as I have the Log line in the logcat:

    08-07 12:52:46.469: I/Permissions(1674): Requesting permissions: android.permission.RECEIVE_BOOT_COMPLETED; android.permission.WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE

But the permissions dialog never shows, let alone is onRequestPermissionsResult() called.

What am I doing wrong? Based on some tutorials I found I&#39;m not missing anything.
I only have the emulator for testing, no physical device. This is the about screen from settings:
[Image][1]

It might be worth mentioning something else: If I try to open the overview of installed apps from the home screen I only get `launcher3 has exited`. I&#39;m not sure if that might be related.

Does anybody have an idea why it&#39;s not showing?


  [1]: http://www.pic-upload.de/view-27930397/EmulatorVersion.png.html

Android M permission dialog not showing

I was going through the official doc about the new Permissions model in Android M. It talks about the `shouldShowRequestPermissionRationale()` function which returns `true` if the app has requested this permission previously and the user denied the request. If the user turned down the permission request in the past and chose the Don&#39;t ask again option, this method returns `false`. 

 
But how can we differentiate between the following two cases?

&lt;b&gt;Case 1&lt;/b&gt;: The app doesn&#39;t have a permission and the user has not been asked for the permission before. In this case, shouldShowRequestPermissionRationale() will return false because this is the first time we&#39;re asking the user.

&lt;b&gt;Case 2&lt;/b&gt;: The user has denied the permission and selected &quot;Don&#39;t ask again&quot;, in this case too shouldShowRequestPermissionRationale() will return false. 

I would want to send the user to the App&#39;s settings page in Case 2. How do i go about differentiating these two cases?﻿

Android M Permissions : Confused on the usage of shouldShowRequestPermissionRationale() function

I&#39;m updating our app to use the new M runtime permissions system.
It&#39;s all working except for onRequestPermissionsResult(). I need to check a permission on a button press, and if it&#39;s successful, send a text message. When I grant permission to do it, the dialog closes, but it doesn&#39;t trigger the Send Text until I press the button again.

I&#39;ve debugged and set breakpoints in the onRequestPermissionsResult() method but it never goes into it.

This method gets called first:

        private void askForPermission() {
        String[] permissions = new String[]{Manifest.permission.SEND_SMS};
        ActivityCompat.requestPermissions(getActivity(), permissions, PERMISSIONS_CODE);
    }

And then my callback looks like this:

        @Override
    public void onRequestPermissionsResult(int requestCode, String[] permissions, int[] grantResults) {
        super.onRequestPermissionsResult(requestCode, permissions, grantResults);

        if (requestCode == PERMISSIONS_CODE) {
            for (int i = 0; i &lt; permissions.length; i++) {
                String permission = permissions[i];
                int grantResult = grantResults[i];

                if (permission.equals(Manifest.permission.SEND_SMS)) {
                    if (grantResult == PackageManager.PERMISSION_GRANTED) {
                        onPPSButtonPress();
                    } else {
                        requestPermissions(new String[]{Manifest.permission.SEND_SMS}, PERMISSIONS_CODE);
                    }
                }
            }
        }
    }

Has anybody run into a similar issue?
Appreciate any help with this.
Thanks

Android M Permissions: onRequestPermissionsResult() not being called

Is there an Intent to go to my Application&#39;s &quot;App Permissions&quot; screen in Android-M?

I am making my App ready for Android-M and with the new permissions model. I have followed all the steps mentioned in the link

https://developer.android.com/training/permissions/requesting.html

Everything is set and all is good accept that if the user has checked the &quot;Never ask again&quot; button and denied permission, on next launch I want to give the user an option to go to the Application&#39;s &quot;App Permissions&quot; and change the permission himself, if he ever changes his mind. I wanted to make it a bit easier for the non-tech savvy user by providing a button which would take the user straight to my application&#39;s &quot;App Permissions&quot; screen. Is there a way? (It would be much better than giving the user instructions like `Menu` &amp;rarr; `Settings` &amp;rarr; `Applications` &amp;rarr; `Manage Applications` &amp;rarr; select application)

Thank you for helping out!
 

Go to My app&#39;s App Permission screen

In Lollipop, the download functionality works fine in my app, but when I upgraded to Marshmallow, my app crashes and gives this error when I try to download from the internet into the SD card: 

    Neither user  nor current process has android.permission.WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE


It complains about this line of code: 

    DownloadManager manager = (DownloadManager) getSystemService(Context.DOWNLOAD_SERVICE);
    manager.enqueue(request);

I have the permissions in the manifest outside application:

    &lt;uses-permission android:name=&quot;android.permission.INTERNET&quot; /&gt;
    &lt;uses-permission android:name=&quot;android.permission.WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE&quot; /&gt;
    &lt;uses-permission android:name=&quot;android.permission.WAKE_LOCK&quot; /&gt;

I cleaned and rebuilt the project, but it still crashes.

Content Type	Original Author	Original Content on Stackoverflow
Question	DzungPV	View Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - Java	Johan Stuyts	View Answer on Stackoverflow

How to remove specific permission when build Android app with gradle?

Java Problem Overview

Java Solutions

Solution 1 - Java

How to print current logging configuration used by the python logging module?

Make button open link - Swift

Attributions