How to print a number with commas as thousands separators in JavaScript

JavascriptFormattingNumbersInteger

Javascript Problem Overview


I am trying to print an integer in JavaScript with commas as thousands separators. For example, I want to show the number 1234567 as "1,234,567". How would I go about doing this?

Here is how I am doing it:

function numberWithCommas(x) {
    x = x.toString();
    var pattern = /(-?\d+)(\d{3})/;
    while (pattern.test(x))
        x = x.replace(pattern, "$1,$2");
    return x;
}

Is there a simpler or more elegant way to do it? It would be nice if it works with floats also, but that is not necessary. It does not need to be locale-specific to decide between periods and commas.

Javascript Solutions


Solution 1 - Javascript

I used the idea from Kerry's answer, but simplified it since I was just looking for something simple for my specific purpose. Here is what I have:

function numberWithCommas(x) {
    return x.toString().replace(/\B(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, ",");
}

function numberWithCommas(x) {
    return x.toString().replace(/\B(?<!\.\d*)(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, ",");
}

function test(x, expect) {
    const result = numberWithCommas(x);
    const pass = result === expect;
    console.log(`${pass ? "✓" : "ERROR ====>"} ${x} => ${result}`);
    return pass;
}

let failures = 0;
failures += !test(0,        "0");
failures += !test(100,      "100");
failures += !test(1000,     "1,000");
failures += !test(10000,    "10,000");
failures += !test(100000,   "100,000");
failures += !test(1000000,  "1,000,000");
failures += !test(10000000, "10,000,000");
if (failures) {
    console.log(`${failures} test(s) failed`);
} else {
    console.log("All tests passed");
}

.as-console-wrapper {
    max-height: 100% !important;
}


The regex uses 2 lookahead assertions:

  • a positive one to look for any point in the string that has a multiple of 3 digits in a row after it,
  • a negative assertion to make sure that point only has exactly a multiple of 3 digits. The replacement expression puts a comma there.

For example, if you pass it 123456789.01, the positive assertion will match every spot to the left of the 7 (since 789 is a multiple of 3 digits, 678 is a multiple of 3 digits, 567, etc.). The negative assertion checks that the multiple of 3 digits does not have any digits after it. 789 has a period after it so it is exactly a multiple of 3 digits, so a comma goes there. 678 is a multiple of 3 digits but it has a 9 after it, so those 3 digits are part of a group of 4, and a comma does not go there. Similarly for 567. 456789 is 6 digits, which is a multiple of 3, so a comma goes before that. 345678 is a multiple of 3, but it has a 9 after it, so no comma goes there. And so on. The \B keeps the regex from putting a comma at the beginning of the string.

@neu-rah mentioned that this function adds commas in undesirable places if there are more than 3 digits after the decimal point. If this is a problem, you can use this function:

function numberWithCommas(x) {
    var parts = x.toString().split(".");
    parts[0] = parts[0].replace(/\B(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, ",");
    return parts.join(".");
}

function numberWithCommas(x) {
    var parts = x.toString().split(".");
    parts[0] = parts[0].replace(/\B(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, ",");
    return parts.join(".");
}

function test(x, expect) {
    const result = numberWithCommas(x);
    const pass = result === expect;
    console.log(`${pass ? "✓" : "ERROR ====>"} ${x} => ${result}`);
    return pass;
}

let failures = 0;
failures += !test(0              , "0");
failures += !test(0.123456       , "0.123456");
failures += !test(100            , "100");
failures += !test(100.123456     , "100.123456");
failures += !test(1000           , "1,000");
failures += !test(1000.123456    , "1,000.123456");
failures += !test(10000          , "10,000");
failures += !test(10000.123456   , "10,000.123456");
failures += !test(100000         , "100,000");
failures += !test(100000.123456  , "100,000.123456");
failures += !test(1000000        , "1,000,000");
failures += !test(1000000.123456 , "1,000,000.123456");
failures += !test(10000000       , "10,000,000");
failures += !test(10000000.123456, "10,000,000.123456");
if (failures) {
    console.log(`${failures} test(s) failed`);
} else {
    console.log("All tests passed");
}

.as-console-wrapper {
    max-height: 100% !important;
}

@t.j.crowder pointed out that now that JavaScript has lookbehind (support info), it can be solved in the regular expression itself:

function numberWithCommas(x) {
    return x.toString().replace(/\B(?<!\.\d*)(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, ",");
}

function numberWithCommas(x) {
    return x.toString().replace(/\B(?<!\.\d*)(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, ",");
}

function test(x, expect) {
    const result = numberWithCommas(x);
    const pass = result === expect;
    console.log(`${pass ? "✓" : "ERROR ====>"} ${x} => ${result}`);
    return pass;
}

let failures = 0;
failures += !test(0,               "0");
failures += !test(0.123456,        "0.123456");
failures += !test(100,             "100");
failures += !test(100.123456,      "100.123456");
failures += !test(1000,            "1,000");
failures += !test(1000.123456,     "1,000.123456");
failures += !test(10000,           "10,000");
failures += !test(10000.123456,    "10,000.123456");
failures += !test(100000,          "100,000");
failures += !test(100000.123456,   "100,000.123456");
failures += !test(1000000,         "1,000,000");
failures += !test(1000000.123456,  "1,000,000.123456");
failures += !test(10000000,        "10,000,000");
failures += !test(10000000.123456, "10,000,000.123456");
if (failures) {
    console.log(`${failures} test(s) failed`);
} else {
    console.log("All tests passed");
}

.as-console-wrapper {
    max-height: 100% !important;
}

(?<!\.\d*) is a negative lookbehind that says the match can't be preceded by a . followed by zero or more digits. The negative lookbehind is faster than the split and join solution (comparison), at least in V8.

Solution 2 - Javascript

I'm surprised nobody mentioned Number.prototype.toLocaleString. It's implemented in JavaScript 1.5 (which was introduced in 1999) so it's basically supported across all major browsers.

var n = 34523453.345;
console.log(n.toLocaleString());    // "34,523,453.345"

It also works in Node.js as of v0.12 via inclusion of Intl

If you want something different, Numeral.js might be interesting.

Solution 3 - Javascript

Below are two different browser APIs that can transform Numbers into structured Strings. Keep in mind that not all users' machines have a locale that uses commas in numbers. To enforce commas to the output, any "western" locale may be used, such as en-US

let number = 1234567890; // Example number to be converted

⚠️ Mind that javascript has a maximum integer value of 9007199254740991


toLocaleString

// default behaviour on a machine with a local that uses commas for numbers
let number = 1234567890;
number.toLocaleString(); // "1,234,567,890"

// With custom settings, forcing a "US" locale to guarantee commas in output
let number2 = 1234.56789; // floating point example
number2.toLocaleString('en-US', {maximumFractionDigits:2}) // "1,234.57"

NumberFormat

let number = 1234567890;
let nf = new Intl.NumberFormat('en-US');
nf.format(number); // "1,234,567,890"

From what I checked (Firefox at least) they are both more or less same regarding performance.

Live demo: https://codepen.io/vsync/pen/MWjdbgL?editors=1000

Solution 4 - Javascript

I suggest using phpjs.org 's number_format()

function number_format(number, decimals, dec_point, thousands_sep) {
    // http://kevin.vanzonneveld.net
    // +   original by: Jonas Raoni Soares Silva (http://www.jsfromhell.com)
    // +   improved by: Kevin van Zonneveld (http://kevin.vanzonneveld.net)
    // +     bugfix by: Michael White (http://getsprink.com)
    // +     bugfix by: Benjamin Lupton
    // +     bugfix by: Allan Jensen (http://www.winternet.no)
    // +    revised by: Jonas Raoni Soares Silva (http://www.jsfromhell.com)
    // +     bugfix by: Howard Yeend
    // +    revised by: Luke Smith (http://lucassmith.name)
    // +     bugfix by: Diogo Resende
    // +     bugfix by: Rival
    // +      input by: Kheang Hok Chin (http://www.distantia.ca/)
    // +   improved by: davook
    // +   improved by: Brett Zamir (http://brett-zamir.me)
    // +      input by: Jay Klehr
    // +   improved by: Brett Zamir (http://brett-zamir.me)
    // +      input by: Amir Habibi (http://www.residence-mixte.com/)
    // +     bugfix by: Brett Zamir (http://brett-zamir.me)
    // +   improved by: Theriault
    // +   improved by: Drew Noakes
    // *     example 1: number_format(1234.56);
    // *     returns 1: '1,235'
    // *     example 2: number_format(1234.56, 2, ',', ' ');
    // *     returns 2: '1 234,56'
    // *     example 3: number_format(1234.5678, 2, '.', '');
    // *     returns 3: '1234.57'
    // *     example 4: number_format(67, 2, ',', '.');
    // *     returns 4: '67,00'
    // *     example 5: number_format(1000);
    // *     returns 5: '1,000'
    // *     example 6: number_format(67.311, 2);
    // *     returns 6: '67.31'
    // *     example 7: number_format(1000.55, 1);
    // *     returns 7: '1,000.6'
    // *     example 8: number_format(67000, 5, ',', '.');
    // *     returns 8: '67.000,00000'
    // *     example 9: number_format(0.9, 0);
    // *     returns 9: '1'
    // *    example 10: number_format('1.20', 2);
    // *    returns 10: '1.20'
    // *    example 11: number_format('1.20', 4);
    // *    returns 11: '1.2000'
    // *    example 12: number_format('1.2000', 3);
    // *    returns 12: '1.200'
    var n = !isFinite(+number) ? 0 : +number, 
        prec = !isFinite(+decimals) ? 0 : Math.abs(decimals),
        sep = (typeof thousands_sep === 'undefined') ? ',' : thousands_sep,
        dec = (typeof dec_point === 'undefined') ? '.' : dec_point,
        toFixedFix = function (n, prec) {
            // Fix for IE parseFloat(0.55).toFixed(0) = 0;
            var k = Math.pow(10, prec);
            return Math.round(n * k) / k;
        },
        s = (prec ? toFixedFix(n, prec) : Math.round(n)).toString().split('.');
    if (s[0].length > 3) {
        s[0] = s[0].replace(/\B(?=(?:\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, sep);
    }
    if ((s[1] || '').length < prec) {
        s[1] = s[1] || '';
        s[1] += new Array(prec - s[1].length + 1).join('0');
    }
    return s.join(dec);
}

UPDATE 02/13/14

People have been reporting this doesn't work as expected, so I did a JS Fiddle that includes automated tests.

Update 26/11/2017

Here's that fiddle as a Stack Snippet with slightly modified output:

function number_format(number, decimals, dec_point, thousands_sep) {
    // http://kevin.vanzonneveld.net
    // +   original by: Jonas Raoni Soares Silva (http://www.jsfromhell.com)
    // +   improved by: Kevin van Zonneveld (http://kevin.vanzonneveld.net)
    // +     bugfix by: Michael White (http://getsprink.com)
    // +     bugfix by: Benjamin Lupton
    // +     bugfix by: Allan Jensen (http://www.winternet.no)
    // +    revised by: Jonas Raoni Soares Silva (http://www.jsfromhell.com)
    // +     bugfix by: Howard Yeend
    // +    revised by: Luke Smith (http://lucassmith.name)
    // +     bugfix by: Diogo Resende
    // +     bugfix by: Rival
    // +      input by: Kheang Hok Chin (http://www.distantia.ca/)
    // +   improved by: davook
    // +   improved by: Brett Zamir (http://brett-zamir.me)
    // +      input by: Jay Klehr
    // +   improved by: Brett Zamir (http://brett-zamir.me)
    // +      input by: Amir Habibi (http://www.residence-mixte.com/)
    // +     bugfix by: Brett Zamir (http://brett-zamir.me)
    // +   improved by: Theriault
    // +   improved by: Drew Noakes
    // *     example 1: number_format(1234.56);
    // *     returns 1: '1,235'
    // *     example 2: number_format(1234.56, 2, ',', ' ');
    // *     returns 2: '1 234,56'
    // *     example 3: number_format(1234.5678, 2, '.', '');
    // *     returns 3: '1234.57'
    // *     example 4: number_format(67, 2, ',', '.');
    // *     returns 4: '67,00'
    // *     example 5: number_format(1000);
    // *     returns 5: '1,000'
    // *     example 6: number_format(67.311, 2);
    // *     returns 6: '67.31'
    // *     example 7: number_format(1000.55, 1);
    // *     returns 7: '1,000.6'
    // *     example 8: number_format(67000, 5, ',', '.');
    // *     returns 8: '67.000,00000'
    // *     example 9: number_format(0.9, 0);
    // *     returns 9: '1'
    // *    example 10: number_format('1.20', 2);
    // *    returns 10: '1.20'
    // *    example 11: number_format('1.20', 4);
    // *    returns 11: '1.2000'
    // *    example 12: number_format('1.2000', 3);
    // *    returns 12: '1.200'
    var n = !isFinite(+number) ? 0 : +number, 
        prec = !isFinite(+decimals) ? 0 : Math.abs(decimals),
        sep = (typeof thousands_sep === 'undefined') ? ',' : thousands_sep,
        dec = (typeof dec_point === 'undefined') ? '.' : dec_point,
        toFixedFix = function (n, prec) {
            // Fix for IE parseFloat(0.55).toFixed(0) = 0;
            var k = Math.pow(10, prec);
            return Math.round(n * k) / k;
        },
        s = (prec ? toFixedFix(n, prec) : Math.round(n)).toString().split('.');
    if (s[0].length > 3) {
        s[0] = s[0].replace(/\B(?=(?:\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, sep);
    }
    if ((s[1] || '').length < prec) {
        s[1] = s[1] || '';
        s[1] += new Array(prec - s[1].length + 1).join('0');
    }
    return s.join(dec);
}

var exampleNumber = 1;
function test(expected, number, decimals, dec_point, thousands_sep)
{
    var actual = number_format(number, decimals, dec_point, thousands_sep);
    console.log(
        'Test case ' + exampleNumber + ': ' +
        '(decimals: ' + (typeof decimals === 'undefined' ? '(default)' : decimals) +
        ', dec_point: "' + (typeof dec_point === 'undefined' ? '(default)' : dec_point) + '"' +
        ', thousands_sep: "' + (typeof thousands_sep === 'undefined' ? '(default)' : thousands_sep) + '")'
    );
    console.log('  => ' + (actual === expected ? 'Passed' : 'FAILED') + ', got "' + actual + '", expected "' + expected + '".');
    exampleNumber++;
}

test('1,235',    1234.56);
test('1 234,56', 1234.56, 2, ',', ' ');
test('1234.57',  1234.5678, 2, '.', '');
test('67,00',    67, 2, ',', '.');
test('1,000',    1000);
test('67.31',    67.311, 2);
test('1,000.6',  1000.55, 1);
test('67.000,00000', 67000, 5, ',', '.');
test('1',        0.9, 0);
test('1.20',     '1.20', 2);
test('1.2000',   '1.20', 4);
test('1.200',    '1.2000', 3);

.as-console-wrapper {
  max-height: 100% !important;
}

Solution 5 - Javascript

This is a variation of @mikez302's answer, but modified to support numbers with decimals (per @neu-rah's feedback that numberWithCommas(12345.6789) -> "12,345.6,789" instead of "12,345.6789"

function numberWithCommas(n) {
	var parts=n.toString().split(".");
	return parts[0].replace(/\B(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, ",") + (parts[1] ? "." + parts[1] : "");
}

Solution 6 - Javascript

function formatNumber (num) {
    return num.toString().replace(/(\d)(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, "$1,")
}

print(formatNumber(2665));      // 2,665
print(formatNumber(102665));    // 102,665
print(formatNumber(111102665)); // 111,102,665

Solution 7 - Javascript

Using Regular expression

function toCommas(value) {
    return value.toString().replace(/\B(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, ",");
}
console.log(toCommas(123456789)); // 123,456,789

console.log(toCommas(1234567890)); // 1,234,567,890
console.log(toCommas(1234)); // 1,234

Using toLocaleString()

var number = 123456.789;

// request a currency format
console.log(number.toLocaleString('de-DE', { style: 'currency', currency: 'EUR' }));
// → 123.456,79 €

// the Japanese yen doesn't use a minor unit
console.log(number.toLocaleString('ja-JP', { style: 'currency', currency: 'JPY' }))
// → ¥123,457

// limit to three significant digits
console.log(number.toLocaleString('en-IN', { maximumSignificantDigits: 3 }));
// → 1,23,000

ref MDN:Number.prototype.toLocaleString()

Using Intl.NumberFormat()

var number = 123456.789;

console.log(new Intl.NumberFormat('de-DE', { style: 'currency', currency: 'EUR' }).format(number));
// expected output: "123.456,79 €"

// the Japanese yen doesn't use a minor unit
console.log(new Intl.NumberFormat('ja-JP', { style: 'currency', currency: 'JPY' }).format(number));
// expected output: "¥123,457"

// limit to three significant digits
console.log(new Intl.NumberFormat('en-IN', { maximumSignificantDigits: 3 }).format(number));

// expected output: "1,23,000"

ref Intl.NumberFormat

DEMO AT HERE

<script type="text/javascript">
  // Using Regular expression
  function toCommas(value) {
    return value.toString().replace(/\B(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, ",");
  }

  function commas() {
    var num1 = document.myform.number1.value;

    // Using Regular expression
    document.getElementById('result1').value = toCommas(parseInt(num1));
    // Using toLocaleString()

    document.getElementById('result2').value = parseInt(num1).toLocaleString('ja-JP', {
      style: 'currency',
      currency: 'JPY'
    });

    // Using Intl.NumberFormat()
    document.getElementById('result3').value = new Intl.NumberFormat('ja-JP', {
      style: 'currency',
      currency: 'JPY'
    }).format(num1);
  }
</script>
<FORM NAME="myform">
  <INPUT TYPE="text" NAME="number1" VALUE="123456789">
  <br>
  <INPUT TYPE="button" NAME="button" Value="=>" onClick="commas()">
  <br>Using Regular expression
  <br>
  <INPUT TYPE="text" ID="result1" NAME="result1" VALUE="">
  <br>Using toLocaleString()
  <br>
  <INPUT TYPE="text" ID="result2" NAME="result2" VALUE="">
  <br>Using Intl.NumberFormat()
  <br>
  <INPUT TYPE="text" ID="result3" NAME="result3" VALUE="">

</FORM>

Performance

Performance http://jsben.ch/sifRd

Solution 8 - Javascript

Intl.NumberFormat

Native JS function. Supported by IE11, Edge, latest Safari, Chrome, Firefox, Opera, Safari on iOS and Chrome on Android.

var number = 3500;

console.log(new Intl.NumberFormat().format(number));
// → '3,500' if in US English locale

Solution 9 - Javascript

I am quite impressed by the number of answers this question has got. I like the answer by uKolka:

n.toLocaleString()

But unfortunately, in some locales like Spanish, it does not work (IMHO) as expected for numbers below 10,000:

Number(1000).toLocaleString('ES-es')

Gives 1000 and not 1.000.

See https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57628055/tolocalestring-not-working-on-numbers-less-than-10000-in-all-browsers to know why.

So I had to use the answer by Elias Zamaria choosing the right thousands separator character:

n.toString().replace(/\B(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, Number(10000).toLocaleString().substring(2, 3))

This one works well as a one-liner for both locales that use , or . as the thousands separator and starts working from 1,000 in all cases.

Number(1000).toString().replace(/\B(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, Number(10000).toLocaleString().substring(2, 3))

Gives 1.000 with a Spanish locale context.

Should you want to have absolute control over the way a number is formatted, you may also try the following:

let number   = 1234.567
let decimals = 2
let decpoint = '.' // Or Number(0.1).toLocaleString().substring(1, 2)
let thousand = ',' // Or Number(10000).toLocaleString().substring(2, 3)

let n = Math.abs(number).toFixed(decimals).split('.')
n[0] = n[0].split('').reverse().map((c, i, a) =>
  i > 0 && i < a.length && i % 3 == 0 ? c + thousand : c
).reverse().join('')
let final = (Math.sign(number) < 0 ? '-' : '') + n.join(decpoint)

console.log(final)

Gives 1,234.57.

This one does not need a regular expression. It works by adjusting the number to the desired amount of decimals with toFixed first, then dividing it around the decimal point . if there is one. The left side is then turned into an array of digits which is reversed. Then a thousands separator is added every three digits from the start and the result reversed again. The final result is the union of the two parts. The sign of the input number is removed with Math.abs first and then put back if necessary.

It is not a one-liner but not much longer and easily turned into a function. Variables have been added for clarity, but those may be substituted by their desired values if known in advance. You may use the expressions that use toLocaleString as a way to find out the right characters for the decimal point and the thousands separator for the current locale (bear in mind that those require a more modern Javascript.)

Solution 10 - Javascript

Thanks to everyone for their replies. I have built off of some of the answers to make a more "one-size-fits-all" solution.

The first snippet adds a function that mimics PHP's number_format() to the Number prototype. If I am formatting a number, I usually want decimal places so the function takes in the number of decimal places to show. Some countries use commas as the decimal and decimals as the thousands separator so the function allows these separators to be set.

Number.prototype.numberFormat = function(decimals, dec_point, thousands_sep) {
    dec_point = typeof dec_point !== 'undefined' ? dec_point : '.';
    thousands_sep = typeof thousands_sep !== 'undefined' ? thousands_sep : ',';
    
    var parts = this.toFixed(decimals).split('.');
    parts[0] = parts[0].replace(/\B(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, thousands_sep);

    return parts.join(dec_point);
}

You would use this as follows:

var foo = 5000;
console.log(foo.numberFormat(2)); // us format: 5,000.00
console.log(foo.numberFormat(2, ',', '.')); // european format: 5.000,00

I found that I often needed to get the number back for math operations, but parseFloat converts 5,000 to 5, simply taking the first sequence of integer values. So I created my own float conversion function and added it to the String prototype.

String.prototype.getFloat = function(dec_point, thousands_sep) {
    dec_point = typeof dec_point !== 'undefined' ? dec_point : '.';
    thousands_sep = typeof thousands_sep !== 'undefined' ? thousands_sep : ',';

    var parts = this.split(dec_point);
    var re = new RegExp("[" + thousands_sep + "]");
    parts[0] = parts[0].replace(re, '');

    return parseFloat(parts.join(dec_point));
}

Now you can use both functions as follows:

var foo = 5000;
var fooString = foo.numberFormat(2); // The string 5,000.00
var fooFloat = fooString.getFloat(); // The number 5000;

console.log((fooString.getFloat() + 1).numberFormat(2)); // The string 5,001.00

Solution 11 - Javascript

I think this is the shortest regular expression that does it:

/\B(?=(\d{3})+\b)/g

"123456".replace(/\B(?=(\d{3})+\b)/g, ",")

I checked it on a few numbers and it worked.

Solution 12 - Javascript

Number.prototype.toLocaleString() would have been awesome if it was provided natively by all browsers (Safari).

I checked all other answers but noone seemed to polyfill it. Here is a poc towards that, which is actually a combination of first two answers; if toLocaleString works it uses it, if it doesn't it uses a custom function.

var putThousandsSeparators;

putThousandsSeparators = function(value, sep) {
  if (sep == null) {
    sep = ',';
  }
  // check if it needs formatting
  if (value.toString() === value.toLocaleString()) {
    // split decimals
    var parts = value.toString().split('.')
    // format whole numbers
    parts[0] = parts[0].replace(/\B(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, sep);
    // put them back together
    value = parts[1] ? parts.join('.') : parts[0];
  } else {
    value = value.toLocaleString();
  }
  return value;
};

alert(putThousandsSeparators(1234567.890));

Solution 13 - Javascript

The thousands separator can be inserted in an international-friendly manner using the browser's Intl object:

Intl.NumberFormat().format(1234);
// returns "1,234" if the user's locale is en_US, for example

See MDN's article on NumberFormat for more, you can specify locale behavior or default to the user's. This is a little more foolproof because it respects local differences; many countries use periods to separate digits while a comma denotes the decimals.

Intl.NumberFormat isn't available in all browsers yet, but it works in latest Chrome, Opera, & IE. Firefox's next release should support it. Webkit doesn't seem to have a timeline for implementation.

Solution 14 - Javascript

You can either use this procedure to format your currency needing.

var nf = new Intl.NumberFormat('en-US', {
  style: 'currency',
  currency: 'USD',
  minimumFractionDigits: 2,
  maximumFractionDigits: 2
});
nf.format(123456.789); // ‘$123,456.79’

For more info you can access this link.

https://www.justinmccandless.com/post/formatting-currency-in-javascript/

Solution 15 - Javascript

if you are dealing with currency values and formatting a lot then it might be worth to add tiny accounting.js which handles lot of edge cases and localization:

// Default usage:
accounting.formatMoney(12345678); // $12,345,678.00

// European formatting (custom symbol and separators), could also use options object as second param:
accounting.formatMoney(4999.99, "€", 2, ".", ","); //4.999,99

// Negative values are formatted nicely, too:
accounting.formatMoney(-500000, "£ ", 0); // £ -500,000

// Simple `format` string allows control of symbol position [%v = value, %s = symbol]:
accounting.formatMoney(5318008, { symbol: "GBP",  format: "%v %s" }); // 5,318,008.00 GBP

Solution 16 - Javascript

var number = 2561556862056.12;

console.log(new Intl.NumberFormat().format(number));

This is the easiest way I found

Solution 17 - Javascript

Here's a simple function that inserts commas for thousand separators. It uses array functions rather than a RegEx.

/**
 * Format a number as a string with commas separating the thousands.
 * @param num - The number to be formatted (e.g. 10000)
 * @return A string representing the formatted number (e.g. "10,000")
 */
var formatNumber = function(num) {
    var array = num.toString().split('');
    var index = -3;
    while (array.length + index > 0) {
	    array.splice(index, 0, ',');
	    // Decrement by 4 since we just added another unit to the array.
	    index -= 4;
    }
    return array.join('');
};

CodeSandbox link with examples: https://codesandbox.io/s/p38k63w0vq

Solution 18 - Javascript

The following code uses char scan, so there's no regex.

function commafy( num){
  var parts = (''+(num<0?-num:num)).split("."), s=parts[0], L, i=L= s.length, o='';
  while(i--){ o = (i===0?'':((L-i)%3?'':',')) 
                  +s.charAt(i) +o }
  return (num<0?'-':'') + o + (parts[1] ? '.' + parts[1] : ''); 
}

It shows promising performance: http://jsperf.com/number-formatting-with-commas/5

2015.4.26: Minor fix to resolve issue when num<0. See https://jsfiddle.net/runsun/p5tqqvs3/

Solution 19 - Javascript

Use This code to handle currency format for india. Country code can be changed to handle other country currency.

let amount =350256.95
var formatter = new Intl.NumberFormat('en-IN', {
  minimumFractionDigits: 2,
});

// Use it.

formatter.format(amount);

output:

3,50,256.95

Solution 20 - Javascript

You can also use the Intl.NumberFormat constructor. Here is how you can do it.

 resultNumber = new Intl.NumberFormat('en-IN', { maximumSignificantDigits: 3 }).format(yourNumber); 

Solution 21 - Javascript

var formatNumber = function (number) {
  var splitNum;
  number = Math.abs(number);
  number = number.toFixed(2);
  splitNum = number.split('.');
  splitNum[0] = splitNum[0].replace(/\B(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, ",");
  return splitNum.join(".");
}

EDIT: The function only work with positive number. for exmaple:

var number = -123123231232;
formatNumber(number)

Output: "123,123,231,232"

But to answer the question above toLocaleString() method just solves the problem.

var number = 123123231232;
    number.toLocaleString()

Output: "123,123,231,232"

Cheer!

Solution 22 - Javascript

My answer is the only answer that completely replaces jQuery with a much more sensible alternative:

function $(dollarAmount)
{
	const locale = 'en-US';
	const options = { style: 'currency', currency: 'USD' };
	return Intl.NumberFormat(locale, options).format(dollarAmount);
}

This solution not only adds commas, but it also rounds to the nearest penny in the event that you input an amount like $(1000.9999) you'll get $1,001.00. Additionally, the value you input can safely be a number or a string; it doesn't matter.

If you're dealing with money, but don't want a leading dollar sign shown on the amount, you can also add this function, which uses the previous function but removes the $:

function no$(dollarAmount)
{
    return $(dollarAmount).replace('$','');
}

If you're not dealing with money, and have varying decimal formatting requirements, here's a more versatile function:

function addCommas(number, minDecimalPlaces = 0, maxDecimalPlaces = Math.max(3,minDecimalPlaces))
{
	const options = {};
	options.maximumFractionDigits = maxDecimalPlaces;
	options.minimumFractionDigits = minDecimalPlaces;
	return Intl.NumberFormat('en-US',options).format(number);
}

Oh, and by the way, the fact that this code does not work in some old version of Internet Explorer is completely intentional. I try to break IE anytime that I can catch it not supporting modern standards.

Please remember that excessive praise, in the comment section, is considered off-topic. Instead, just shower me with up-votes.

Solution 23 - Javascript

Universal, fast, accurate, simple function
  • Using RegEx (Fast & Accurate)
  • Support Numbers(Float/Integer)/String/Multiple numbers in a string
  • Smart well (Not grouping decimals - Compatible with different types of grouping)
  • Support all browsers specially 'Safari' & 'IE' & many older browsers
  • [Optional] Respecting non-English (Persian/Arabic) digits (+ Pre-fix)
TL;DR - Full version function (minified):

// num: Number/s (String/Number),
// sep: Thousands separator (String) - Default: ','
// dec: Decimal separator (String) - Default: '.' (Just one char)
// u: Universal support for languages characters (String - RegEx character set / class) - Example: '[\\d\\u0660-\\u0669\\u06f0-\\u06f9]' (English/Persian/Arabic), Default: '\\d' (English)

function formatNums(num,sep,dec,u){sep=sep||',';u=u||'\\d';if(typeof num!='string'){num=String(num);if(dec&&dec!='.')num=num.replace('.',dec);}return num.replace(RegExp('\\'+(dec||'.')+u+'+|'+u+'(?=(?:'+u+'{3})+(?!'+u+'))','g'),function(a){return a.length==1?a+sep:a})}

text='100000000 English or Persian/Arabic ۱۲۳۴۵۶۷۸۹/٠١٢٣٤٥٦٧٨٩ this is 123123123.123123123 with this -123123 and these 10 100 1000 123123/123123 (2000000) .33333 100.00 or any like 500000Kg';

console.log(formatNums(10000000.0012));
console.log(formatNums(10000000.0012,'.',',')); // German
console.log(formatNums(text,',','.','[\\d\\u0660-\\u0669\\u06f0-\\u06f9]')); // Respect Persian/Arabic digits

<input oninput="document.getElementById('result').textContent=formatNums(this.value)" placeholder="Type a number here">
<div id="result"></div>

Why NOT satisfied with other answers?
  • Number.prototype.toLocaleString() / Intl.NumberFormat (Right answer)
    • If no well arguments, we can't expect same result. Also with arguments options we still can't be sure what can be the result because it will use local settings and possible client modifications effect on it or the browser/device not support it.
    • >~2016 browsers support and still in 2021 some reports that in some cases like Safari or IE/Edge do not return as expected.
    • toLocaleString() Work with numbers, Intl.NumberFormat Work with String/Numbers; Strings will be/have to be parsed and also rounded if necessary, so:
      • If we already have a localized string with non-English digits we have to replace numbers with the English one, then parse it, then use it again with the local options. (If it return what we expect)
      • Generally while parsing we cant expect not missing decimal zeros or details in big numbers or respecting other languages numeral characters
    • Decimal / Thousand separator characters can not be customized more than language options, except with post-fixings with replace() + RegEx again. (For example in Persian usually we don't use the suggested Arabic comma and also sometime we use Fraction/Division slash as decimal separator)
    • Slow performance in loops
  • Not so good RegEx ways (Fastest & One-liner ways)
    • /\B(?=(\d{3})+\b)/ it will group decimals too. // 123,123.123,123 !!!
    • /(?<!\.\d+)\B(?=(\d{3})+\b)/ used look-behind that not supported well yet. Please check:
      https://caniuse.com/js-regexp-lookbehind
      https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/RegExp#browser_compatibility
      Note: Generally lookbehind can be against of original RegEx structure (because of how the analyzer should work like do not buffer the raw behind as a parser) and actually it can make the performance seriously low (In this case ~30%). I think it pushed inside over the time by requests.
    • /\B(?=(?=\d*\.)(\d{3})+(?!\d))/ just work with float numbers and ignore integers.
    • .replace(/(?:[^.\d]|^)\d+/g,function(a){return a.replace(/\B(?=(?:\d{3})+\b)/g,',');}) (My old idea) Using 2 RegEx. First one find the integer parts, second one put separator. Why 2 functions, when it can be mixed?
    • /(\..*)$|(\d)(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g (Good idea by @djulien - i voted up) but when the RegEx is global, (\..*)$ it can make a mistake even with a space in end.
      Also using capturing groups (Example: (\d)) will make the performance low so if it possible, use non-capturing groups (Example: (?:\d)) or if an statement already exist in our function let's mix it.
      In this case, not using capturing groups improve performance about ~20% and in case of /\B(?=(\d{3})+\b)/g vs /\B(?=(?:\d{3})+\b)/g, the second one is ~8% faster.
      About regex performances: https://jsben.ch/HUmDA Note: Sure different methods, browsers, hardware, system status, cases and even changes on ECMAScript will effect on result of checking performance. But some changes logically should effect result and i used this one just as visual example.
  • Using library's like Numeral.js so much not necessary functions for a simple task.
  • Heavy code / Not accurate functions that used .split('.') or .toFixed() or Math.floor() ...

Final result:

There is no best of all and it should be chosen based on the need. My priority of sorting;

  1. Compatibility
  2. Capability
  3. Universality
  4. Ease of use
  5. Performance
toLocaleString() (Compatibility - Universality) [Native function]
  • If you have to change digits and grouping from English to another language
  • If you are not sure about your client language
  • If you don't need to have exact expected result
  • If you don't care about older version of Safari
// 1000000.2301
parseFloat(num) // (Pre-fix) If the input is string
    .toLocaleString('en-US', {
        useGrouping: true // (Default is true, here is just for show)
    });
// 1,000,000.23

Read more: https://www.w3schools.com/jsref/jsref_tolocalestring_number.asp

Intl.NumberFormat() (Capability - Universality - Compatibility) [Native function]

Almost same as toLocaleString() +

  • Great capability of supporting currency, units, etc... any language (Modern browsers)
// 1000000.2301
new Intl.NumberFormat('en-US', { // It can be 'fa-IR' : Farsi - Iran
    numberingSystem: 'arab'
}).format(num)
// ١٬٠٠٠٬٠٠٠٫٢٣

Read more: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Intl/NumberFormat/NumberFormat

With these much options of the native functions, we still can not expect:

  • Exact result (+ Not parsing the input / Not rounding / Not converting big numbers)
  • Accepting other languages digits as input
  • Customizing separators
  • Trusting browsers support
  • Performance

So you maybe need a function like any of these:

formatNums() (Compatibility - Ease of use)

Full version (Capability) (Not faster than toLocaleString) - Explain:

function formatNums(num, sep, dec, u) {
    // Setting defaults
    sep = sep || ','; // Seperator
    u = u || '\\d'; // Universal character set \d: 0-9 (English)
    // Mixing of Handeling numbers when the decimal character should be changed + Being sure the input is string
    if (typeof num != 'string') {
        num = String(num);
        if (dec && dec != '.') num = num.replace('.', dec); // Replacing sure decimal character with the custom
    }
    //
    return num.replace(RegExp('\\' + (dec || '.') + u + '+|' + u + '(?=(?:' + u + '{3})+(?!' + u + '))', 'g'),
        // The RegEx will be like /\.\d+|\d(?=(?:\d{3})+(?!\d))/g if not be customized 
        // RegEx explain:
        // 1) \.\d+  :  First try to get any part that started with a dot and followed by any much of English digits, one or more (For ignoring it later)
        // 2) |  :  Or
        // 3) \d  :  Get any 1 char digit
        // 3.1) (?=...)  :  That the next of that should be
        // 3.2) (?:\d{3})  :  3 length digits
        // 3.2.1) +  :  One or more of the group
        // 3.3) (?!\d)  :  ...till any place that there is no digits
        function(a) { // Any match can be the decimal part or the integer part so lets check it
            return a.length == 1 ? a + sep : a // If the match is one character, it is from the grouping part as item (3) in Regex explain so add the seperator next of it, if not, ignore it and return it back.
        })
}

function formatNums(num,sep,dec,u) {
    sep=sep||',';
    u=u||'\\d';
    if(typeof num!='string') {
        num=String(num);
        if( dec && dec!='.') num=num.replace('.',dec);
    }
    return num.replace(RegExp('\\'+(dec||'.')+u+'+|'+u+'(?=(?:'+u+'{3})+(?!'+u+'))','g'),function(a) {return a.length==1 ? a+sep : a})
}
console.log(formatNums(1000000.2301));
console.log(formatNums(100.2301));
console.log(formatNums(-2000.2301));
console.log(formatNums(123123123,' , '));
console.log(formatNums('0000.0000'));
console.log(formatNums('5000000.00'));
console.log(formatNums('5000000,00',' ',','));
console.log(formatNums(5000000.1234,' ',','));
console.log(formatNums('۱۲۳۴۵۶۷۸۹/۹۰۰۰',',','/','[\\d\\u0660-\\u0669\\u06f0-\\u06f9]'));

Play with the examples here: https://jsfiddle.net/PAPIONbit/198xL3te/

Light version (Performance) (~30% faster than toLocaleString)

function formatNums(num,sep) {
    sep=sep||',';
    return String(num).replace(/\.\d+|\d(?=(?:\d{3})+(?!\d))/g,
        function(a) {
            return a.length==1?a+sep:a
        }
    );
}
console.log(formatNums(1000000.2301));
console.log(formatNums(100.2301));
console.log(formatNums(-2000.2301));
console.log(formatNums(123123123,' '));

Check the RegEx (Without the necessary function) : https://regexr.com/66ott

(num+'').replace(/\B(?=(?:\d{3})+\b)/g,','); (Performance - Compatibility)

Best choose if The input is Specified / Predefined. (Like usual prices that sure will not have more than 3 decimals) (~65% faster than toLocaleString)

num=1000000;
str='123123.100';
console.log((num+'').replace(/\B(?=(?:\d{3})+\b)/g,','));
console.log(str.replace(/\B(?=(?:\d{3})+\b)/g,','));

+

For Persian/Arabic local clients:

If your client going to use Persian/Arabic numbers for input as what is usual in Iran, I think the best way is instead of keeping the original characters, convert them to English before you deal with, to you can calculate it.

// ۱۲۳۴۵۶۷۸۹۰
function toEnNum(n) { // Replacing Persian/Arabic numbers character with English
    n.replace(/[\u0660-\u0669\u06f0-\u06f9]/g, // RegEx unicode range Persian/Arabic numbers char
        function(c) {
            return c.charCodeAt(0) & 0xf; // Replace the char with real number by getting the binary index and breaking to lowest using 15
        }
    );
}
// 1234567890

And for still showing them as original looking there is 2 ways:


My Old-school function on this post: (~15% Faster than toLocalString)

// 10000000.0012
function formatNums(n, s) {
    return s = s || ",", String(n).
    replace(/(?:^|[^.\d])\d+/g, // First this RegEx take just integer parts
        function(n) {
            return n.replace(/\B(?=(?:\d{3})+\b)/g, s);
        })
}
// 10,000,000.0012

Solution 24 - Javascript

I Wrote this one before stumbling on this post. No regex and you can actually understand the code.

$(function(){
  
  function insertCommas(s) {

    // get stuff before the dot
    var d = s.indexOf('.');
    var s2 = d === -1 ? s : s.slice(0, d);

    // insert commas every 3 digits from the right
    for (var i = s2.length - 3; i > 0; i -= 3)
      s2 = s2.slice(0, i) + ',' + s2.slice(i);

    // append fractional part
    if (d !== -1)
      s2 += s.slice(d);

    return s2;

  }
  
  
  $('#theDudeAbides').text( insertCommas('1234567.89012' ) );
  
  
});

<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.11.1/jquery.min.js"></script>

<div id="theDudeAbides"></div>

Solution 25 - Javascript

For anyone who likes 1-liners and a single regex, but doesn't want to use split(), here is an enhanced version of the regex from other answers that handles (ignores) decimal places:

    var formatted = (x+'').replace(/(\..*)$|(\d)(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, (digit, fract) => fract || digit + ',');

The regex first matches a substring starting with a literal "." and replaces it with itself ("fract"), and then matches any digit followed by multiples of 3 digits and puts "," after it.

For example, x = 12345678.12345678 will give formatted = '12,345,678.12345678'.

Solution 26 - Javascript

An alternative way, supporting decimals, different separators and negatives.

var number_format = function(number, decimal_pos, decimal_sep, thousand_sep) {
	var ts 		= ( thousand_sep == null ? ',' : thousand_sep )
		, ds 	= ( decimal_sep  == null ? '.' : decimal_sep )
		, dp    = ( decimal_pos  == null ? 2   : decimal_pos )

		, n     = Math.floor(Math.abs(number)).toString()

		, i     = n.length % 3 
		, f     = ((number < 0) ? '-' : '') + n.substr(0, i)
	;

	for(;i<n.length;i+=3) {
		if(i!=0) f+=ts;
		f+=n.substr(i,3);
	}

	if(dp > 0) 
		f += ds + parseFloat(number).toFixed(dp).split('.')[1]

	return f;
}

Some corrections by @Jignesh Sanghani, don't forget to upvote his comment.

Solution 27 - Javascript

Let me try to improve [uKolka][1]'s [answer][2] and maybe help others save some time.

Use [Numeral.js][3].

document.body.textContent = numeral(1234567).format('0,0');

<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/numeral.js/1.4.5/numeral.min.js"></script>

You should go with [Number.prototype.toLocaleString()][4] only if its [browser compatibilty][5] is not an issue.

[1]: https://stackoverflow.com/users/1286601/ukolka "uKolka" [2]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2901102/how-to-print-a-number-with-commas-as-thousands-separators-in-javascript/17663871#17663871 "answer" [3]: http://numeraljs.com/ "Numeral.js" [4]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Number/toLocaleString "Number.prototype.toLocaleString()" [5]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Number/toLocaleString#AutoCompatibilityTable "browser compatibilty"

Solution 28 - Javascript

Just for future Googlers (or not necessarily 'Googlers'):

All of solutions mentioned above are wonderful, however, RegExp might be awfully bad thing to use in a situation like that.

So, yes, you might use some of the options proposed or even write something primitive yet useful like:

const strToNum = str => {

   //Find 1-3 digits followed by exactly 3 digits & a comma or end of string
   let regx = /(\d{1,3})(\d{3}(?:,|$))/;
   let currStr;

   do {
	   currStr = (currStr || str.split(`.`)[0])
		   .replace( regx, `$1,$2`)
   } while (currStr.match(regx)) //Stop when there's no match & null's returned

   return ( str.split(`.`)[1] ) ?
		   currStr.concat(`.`, str.split(`.`)[1]) :
		   currStr;

};

strToNum(`123`) // => 123
strToNum(`123456`) // => 123,456
strToNum(`-1234567.0987`) // => -1,234,567.0987

The regexp that's used here is fairly simple and the loop will go precisely the number of times it takes to get the job done.

And you might optimize it far better, "DRYify" code & so on.

Yet,

(-1234567.0987).toLocaleString();

(in most situations) would be a far better choice.

The point is not in the speed of execution or in cross-browser compatibility.

In situations when you'd like to show the resulting number to user, .toLocaleString() method gives you superpower to speak the same language with the user of your website or app (whatever her/his language is).

This method according to ECMAScript documentation was introduced in 1999, and I believe that the reason for that was the hope that the Internet at some point will connect people all around the world, so, some "internalization" tools were needed.

Today the Internet does connect all of us, so, it is important to remember that the world is a way more complex that we might imagine & that (/almost) all of us are here, in the Internet.

Obviously, considering the diversity of people, it is impossible to guarantee perfect UX for everybody because we speak different languages, value different things, etc. And exactly because of this, it is even more important to try to localize things as much as it's possible.

So, considering that there're some particular standards for representation of date, time, numbers, etc. & that we have a tool to display those things in the format preferred by the final user, isn't that rare and almost irresponsible not to use that tool (especially in situations when we want to display this data to the user)?

For me, using RegExp instead of .toLocaleString() in situation like that sounds a little bit like creating a clock app with JavaScript & hard-coding it in such a way so it'll display Prague time only (which would be quite useless for people who don't live in Prague) even though the default behaviour of

new Date();

is to return the data according to final user's clock.

Solution 29 - Javascript

I think this function will take care of all the issues related to this problem.

function commaFormat(inputString) {
    inputString = inputString.toString();
    var decimalPart = "";
    if (inputString.indexOf('.') != -1) {
        //alert("decimal number");
        inputString = inputString.split(".");
        decimalPart = "." + inputString[1];
        inputString = inputString[0];
        //alert(inputString);
        //alert(decimalPart);

    }
    var outputString = "";
    var count = 0;
    for (var i = inputString.length - 1; i >= 0 && inputString.charAt(i) != '-'; i--) {
        //alert("inside for" + inputString.charAt(i) + "and count=" + count + " and outputString=" + outputString);
        if (count == 3) {
            outputString += ",";
            count = 0;
        }
        outputString += inputString.charAt(i);
        count++;
    }
    if (inputString.charAt(0) == '-') {
        outputString += "-";
    }
    //alert(outputString);
    //alert(outputString.split("").reverse().join(""));
    return outputString.split("").reverse().join("") + decimalPart;
}

Solution 30 - Javascript

If you're looking for a short and sweet solution:

const number = 12345678.99;

const numberString = String(number).replace(
    /^\d+/,
    number => [...number].map(
        (digit, index, digits) => (
            !index || (digits.length - index) % 3 ? '' : ','
        ) + digit
    ).join('')
);

// numberString: 12,345,678.99

Solution 31 - Javascript

I think your solution is one of the shorter ones I've seen for this. I don't think there are any standard JavaScript functions to do this sort of thing, so you're probably on your own.

I checked the CSS 3 specifications to see whether it's possible to do this in CSS, but unless you want every digit in its own <span>, I don't think that's possible.

I did find one project on Google Code that looked promising: flexible-js-formatting. I haven't used it, but it looks pretty flexible and has unit tests using JsUnit. The developer also has a lot of posts (though old) about this topic.

Be sure to consider international users: lots of nations use a space as the separator and use the comma for separating the decimal from the integral part of the number.

Solution 32 - Javascript

I added tofixed to Aki143S's solution. This solution uses dots for thousands separators and comma for the precision.

function formatNumber( num, fixed ) { 
 	var decimalPart;

	var array = Math.floor(num).toString().split('');
	var index = -3; 
	while ( array.length + index > 0 ) { 
		array.splice( index, 0, '.' );  			
		index -= 4;
	}

	if(fixed > 0){
 		decimalPart = num.toFixed(fixed).split(".")[1];
 		return array.join('') + "," + decimalPart; 
 	}
 	return array.join(''); 
};

Examples;

formatNumber(17347, 0)  = 17.347
formatNumber(17347, 3)  = 17.347,000
formatNumber(1234563.4545, 3)  = 1.234.563,454

Solution 33 - Javascript

Lots of good answers already. Here's another, just for fun:

function format(num, fix) {
    var p = num.toFixed(fix).split(".");
    return p[0].split("").reduceRight(function(acc, num, i, orig) {
        if ("-" === num && 0 === i) {
            return num + acc;
        }
        var pos = orig.length - i - 1
        return  num + (pos && !(pos % 3) ? "," : "") + acc;
    }, "") + (p[1] ? "." + p[1] : "");
}

Some examples:

format(77.03453, 2); // "77.03"
format(78436589374); // "78,436,589,374"
format(784, 4);      // "784.0000"
format(-123456);     // "-123,456"

Solution 34 - Javascript

My true regular-expressions-only solution for those love one-liners

You see those enthusiastic players above? Maybe you can golf out of it. Here’s my stroke.

n => `${n}`.replace(/(?<!\.\d+)\B(?=(\d{3})+\b)/g, " ").replace(/(?<=\.(\d{3})+)\B/g, " ")

Uses a THIN SPACE (U+2009) for a thousands separator, as the International System of Units said to do in the eighth edition(2006) of their publication “SI Brochure: The International System of Units (SI) (See §5.3.4.). The ninth edition(2019) suggests to use a space for it (See §5.4.4.). You can use whatever you want, including a comma.


See.

const integer_part_only = n => ${n}.replace(/(? ${n}.replace(/(?<=.(\d{3})+)\B/g, " F "); const both = n => fractional_part_only(integer_part_only(n));

function demo(number) { // I’m using Chrome 74.
	console.log(`${number}
		→ "${integer_part_only(number)}" (integer part only)
		→ "${fractional_part_only(number)}" (fractional part only)
		→ "${both(number)}" (both)
	`);
}
demo(Math.random() * 10e5);
demo(123456789.01234567);
demo(123456789);
demo(0.0123456789);


How does it work?

For an integer part
.replace(/(?<!\.\d+)\B(?=(\d{3})+\b)/g, " I ")
  • .replace(……, " I ") Put “ I ”
    • /……/g at each of
      • \B the in-between of two adjacent digits
        • (?=……)POSITIVE LOOKAHEAD whose right part is
          • (\d{3})+ one or more three-digit chunks
          • \b followed by a non-digit, such as, a period, the ending of the string, et cetera,
        • (?<!……)NEGATIVE LOOKBEHIND excluding ones whose left part
          • \.\d+ is a dot followed by digits (“has a decimal separator”).
For a decimal part
.replace(/(?<=\.(\d{3})+)\B/g, " F ")
  • .replace(……, " F ") Put “ F ”
    • /……/g at each of
      • \B the in-between of two adjacent digits
        • (?<=……)POSITIVE LOOKBEHIND whose left part is
          • \. a decimal separator
          • (\d{3})+ followed by one or more three-digit chunks.

Character classes and boundaries

> ### \d > > Matches any digit (Arabic numeral). Equivalent to [0-9]. > > For example, > > - /\d/ or /[0-9]/ matches 2 in B2 is the suite number.

> ### \b > > Matches a word boundary. This is the position where a word character is not followed or preceded by another word-character, such as between a letter and a space. Note that a matched word boundary is not included in the match. In other words, the length of a matched word boundary is zero. > > Examples: > > - /\bm/ matches the m in moon ; > - /oo\b/ does not match the oo in moon, because oo is followed by n which is a word character; > - /oon\b/ matches the oon in moon, because oon is the end of the string, thus not followed by a word character; > - /\w\b\w/ will never match anything, because a word character can never be followed by both a non-word and a word character.

> ### \B > > Matches a non-word boundary. This is a position where the previous and next character are of the same type: either both must be words, or both must be non-words. Such as between two letters or between two spaces. The beginning and end of a string are considered non-words. Same as the matched word boundary, the matched non-word boundary is also not included in the match. > > For example, > > - /\Bon/ matches on in at noon; > - /ye\B/ matches ye in possibly yesterday. >


Browser compatibility

Solution 35 - Javascript

The solution from @user1437663 is great.

Who really understands the solution is being prepared to understand complex regular expressions.

A small improvement to make it more readable:

function numberWithCommas(x) {
    var parts = x.toString().split(".");
    return parts[0].replace(/\B(?=(\d{3})+(?=$))/g, ",") + (parts[1] ? "." + parts[1] : "");
}

The pattern starts with \B to avoid use comma at the beginning of a word. Interestingly, the pattern is returned empty because \B does not advance the "cursor" (the same applies to $).

O \B is followed by a less known resources but is a powerful feature from Perl's regular expressions.

            Pattern1 (? = (Pattern2) ).

The magic is that what is in parentheses (Pattern2) is a pattern that follows the previous pattern (Pattern1) but without advancing the cursor and also is not part of the pattern returned. It is a kind of future pattern. This is similar when someone looks forward but really doesn't walk!

In this case pattern2 is

\d{3})+(?=$)

It means 3 digits (one or more times) followed by the end of the string ($)

Finally, Replace method changes all occurrences of the pattern found (empty string) for comma. This only happens in cases where the remaining piece is a multiple of 3 digits (such cases where future cursor reach the end of the origin).

Solution 36 - Javascript

After not finding a modern and comprehensive solution here, I have written an arrow function (without regex) to solve the formatting problem and it allows the caller to provide number of fraction digits as well as the period and thousand separator for Europe and rest of the world.

> Examples: > > numberFormatter(1234567890.123456) => 1,234,567,890 > numberFormatter(1234567890.123456, 4) => 1,234,567,890.1235 > numberFormatter(1234567890.123456, 4, '.', ',') => 1.234.567.890,1235 Europe

Here is the function written in ES6 (modern syntax):

const numberFormatter = (number, fractionDigits = 0, thousandSeperator = ',', fractionSeperator = '.') => {
    if (number!==0 && !number || !Number.isFinite(number)) return number
    const frDigits = Number.isFinite(fractionDigits)? Math.min(Math.max(fractionDigits, 0), 7) : 0
    const num = number.toFixed(frDigits).toString()

    const parts = num.split('.')
    let digits = parts[0].split('').reverse()
    let sign = ''
    if (num < 0) {sign = digits.pop()}
    let final = []
    let pos = 0

    while (digits.length > 1) {
        final.push(digits.shift())
        pos++
        if (pos % 3 === 0) {final.push(thousandSeperator)}
    }
    final.push(digits.shift())
    return `${sign}${final.reverse().join('')}${frDigits > 0 ? fractionSeperator : ''}${frDigits > 0 && parts[1] ? parts[1] : ''}`
}

It has been tested for negative, bad input and NaN cases. If the input is NaN then it simply returns it.

Solution 37 - Javascript

Related to @elias-zamaria and @t.j.crowder

A negative lookbehind for Safari browser is can't use <. So, it would be (?!\.\d*)

function numberWithCommas(n) {
  return n.toString().replace(/\B(?!\.\d*)(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, ",");
}

It works for Safari and Firefox

Solution 38 - Javascript

Here is good solution with less coding...

var y = "";
var arr = x.toString().split("");
for(var i=0; i<arr.length; i++)
{
    y += arr[i];
    if((arr.length-i-1)%3==0 && i<arr.length-1) y += ",";
}

Solution 39 - Javascript

I've adapted your code to work in TextBox (Input type="text") so we can enter and delete digits in real time without losing cursor. It's works also if you select range when you delete. And you can use arrows and home/end buttons freely.
Thanks for saving my time!

//function controls number format as "1,532,162.3264321"
function numberWithCommas(x) {
    var e = e || window.event;
   	if (e.keyCode >= '35' && e.keyCode <= '40') return; //skip arrow-keys
    var selStart = x.selectionStart, selEnd = x.selectionEnd; //save cursor positions
    var parts = x.value.toString().split(".");
    var part0len = parts[0].length; //old length to check if new ',' would be added. Need for correcting new cursor position (+1 to right).

    //if user deleted ',' - remove previous number instead (without selection)
    if (x.selectionLength == 0 && (e.keyCode == 8 || e.keyCode == 46)) {//if pressed 8-backspace or 46-delete button
        var delPos = parts[0].search(/\d{4}/);
        if (delPos != -1) {//if found 4 digits in a row (',' is deleted)
            if (e.keyCode == 8) {//if backspace flag
				parts[0] = parts[0].slice(0, selStart - 1) + parts[0].slice(selEnd, parts[0].length);
                selEnd--;
                if (selStart > selEnd) selStart = selEnd;
            } else {
                parts[0] = parts[0].slice(0, selStart) + parts[0].slice(selEnd + 1, parts[0].length);
                selStart++;
                if (selEnd < selStart) selEnd = selStart;
            }
        }
    }

   var hasMinus = parts[0][0] == '-';
   parts[0] = (hasMinus ? '-' : '') + parts[0].replace(/[^\d]*/g, ""); //I'd like to clear old ',' to avoid things like 1,2,3,5,634.443216
   parts[0] = parts[0].replace(/\B(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, ","); //sets ',' between each 3 digits
   if (part0len < parts[0].length) { //move cursor to right if added new ','
       selStart++;
       selEnd++;
   } else if (part0len > parts[0].length) { //..or if removed last one ','
       selStart--;
       selEnd--;
   }
   x.value = parts.join(".");
   x.setSelectionRange(selStart, selEnd); //restoring cursor position
}
function saveSelectionLength(x) {
    x.selectionLength = x.selectionEnd - x.selectionStart;
}

To use this just added two events - onKeyUp and onKeyDown

<asp:TextBox runat="server" ID="val" Width="180px" onKeyUp="numberWithCommas(this);" onKeyDown="saveSelectionLength(this);"/>

Solution 40 - Javascript

If you happen to be using AngularJS, there's this currency filter that may definitely help: http://www.w3schools.com/angular/ng_filter_currency.asp

Solution 41 - Javascript

I've found an approach that works in every situation. CodeSandbox example

function commas(n) {
  if (n < 1000) {
    return n + ''
  } else {
    // Convert to string.
    n += ''

    // Skip scientific notation.
    if (n.indexOf('e') !== -1) {
      return n
    }

    // Support fractions.
    let i = n.indexOf('.')
    let f = i == -1 ? '' : n.slice(i)
    if (f) n = n.slice(0, i)

    // Add commas.
    i = n.length
    n = n.split('')
    while (i > 3) n.splice((i -= 3), 0, ',')
    return n.join('') + f
  }
}

This is like Noah Freitas' answer, but with support for fractions and scientific notation.

I think toLocaleString is the best choice, if performance is not a concern.

edit: Here's a CodeSandbox with some examples: https://codesandbox.io/s/zmvxjpj6x

Solution 42 - Javascript

let formatNumber = (number) => {
    let str = String(number)

    return str.split('').reduce(
        (a, b, i) => a + (i && !((str.length - i) % 3) ? ',' : '') + b,
        ''
    )
}

Solution 43 - Javascript

function processNumbers(x) {
   // For large numbers to avoid getting results like 6.096,347,109,971,357e+27
   x = BigInt(x);
   return x.toString().replace(/\B(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, ',');
}

Solution 44 - Javascript

For Integers I used a very simple method:

var myNumber = 99999,
    myString = myNumber + "";

myString.length > 3 ? return myString.substring(0, myString.length - 3) + "," + 
    myString.substring(myString.length - 3) : return myString;

Solution 45 - Javascript

Yet another..(for int's as the question asks)

function insertCommas(str)
{
    var a = str.split("");
 	a.reverse();

    var t, i = 0, arr = Array();
    
    while (t = a.shift())
    {
       if (((i++ % 3) == 0) && arr.length > 0)
           arr.unshift(",");
       arr.unshift(t);
    }
    
    return arr.join("");
}

Solution 46 - Javascript

For indian numeric system

var number = "323483.85"
var decimal = number.split(".");
var res = (decimal[0].length>3? numberWithCommas(decimal[0].substring(0,decimal[0].length-3))+ ',' :decimal[0]) + (decimal[0].length>3?decimal[0].substring(decimal[0].length-3,decimal[0].length):'') + '.' + decimal[1];

Output: 3,23,483.85

Solution 47 - Javascript

I thought I'd share a little trick which I'm using for large number formatting. Instead of inserting commas or spaces, I insert an empty but visible span in between the "thousands". This makes thousands easily visible, but it allows to copy/paste the input in the original format, without commas/spaces.

// This function accepts an integer, and produces a piece of HTML that shows it nicely with 
// some empty space at "thousand" markers. 
// Note, these space are not spaces, if you copy paste, they will not be visible.
function valPrettyPrint(orgVal) {
  // Save after-comma text, if present
  var period = orgVal.indexOf(".");
  var frac = period >= 0 ? orgVal.substr(period) : "";
  // Work on input as an integer
  var val = "" + Math.trunc(orgVal);
  var res = "";
  while (val.length > 0) {
    res = val.substr(Math.max(0, val.length - 3), 3) + res;
    val = val.substr(0, val.length - 3);
    if (val.length > 0) {
    	res = "<span class='thousandsSeparator'></span>" + res;
    }
  }
  // Add the saved after-period information
  res += frac;
  return res;
}

With this CSS:

.thousandsSeparator {
  display : inline;
  padding-left : 4px;
}

See an example JSFiddle.

Solution 48 - Javascript

Here's my try:

EDIT: Added in decimals

function splitMille(n, separator = ',') {
  // Cast to string
  let num = (n + '')

  // Test for and get any decimals (the later operations won't support them)
  let decimals = ''
  if (/\./.test(num)) {
    // This regex grabs the decimal point as well as the decimal numbers
    decimals = num.replace(/^.*(\..*)$/, '$1')
  }
  
  // Remove decimals from the number string
  num = num.replace(decimals, '')
    // Reverse the number string through Array functions
    .split('').reverse().join('')
    // Split into groups of 1-3 characters (with optional supported character "-" for negative numbers)
    .match(/[0-9]{1,3}-?/g)
    // Add in the mille separator character and reverse back
    .join(separator).split('').reverse().join('')

  // Put the decimals back and output the formatted number
  return `${num}${decimals}`
}

let testA = splitMille(1234)
let testB = splitMille(-1234)
let testC = splitMille(123456.789)
let testD = splitMille(9007199254740991)
let testE = splitMille(1000.0001)

console.log('Results!\n\tA: %s\n\tB: %s\n\tC: %s\n\tD: %s\n\tE: %s', testA, testB, testC, testD, testE)

Solution 49 - Javascript

Here is a one line function with int & decimal support. I left some code in to convert the number to a string as well.

    function numberWithCommas(x) {
		return (x=x+'').replace(new RegExp('\\B(?=(\\d{3})+'+(~x.indexOf('.')?'\\.':'$')+')','g'),',');
	}

Solution 50 - Javascript

You can create a function on the Number prototype

Number.prototype.format = function (s, d) {
  return (
    this.toString()
      .split(".")
      .map((n, i) =>
        i
          ? n
          : n
              .split("")
              .map((n, i) => (i % 3 || !i ? n : s + n))
              .join("")
      )
      .join(d)
  );
};

console.log((8800.00).format(',', '.'))
// 8,880.00

// French notation
console.log((8800.00).format(' ', ','))
// 8 880,00

Solution 51 - Javascript

Use this for german layout with points as thousand separator and comma as decimal separator:

function numberWithCommas(x)
{
    var parts = x.toString().split(".");
    parts[0] = parts[0].replace(/\B(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, ".");
    return parts.join(",");
}

Full usage example:

function show()
{
  var val = jQuery("#number").val();
  jQuery("#output").htmlNumber(val);
}

function numberWithCommas(x)
{
    var parts = x.toString().split(".");
    parts[0] = parts[0].replace(/\B(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, ".");
    return parts.join(",");
}

jQuery.fn.extend({
    htmlNumber: function(value) {
        this.html(numberWithCommas(value));
        return this;
    }
});

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script>

Enter value: <input id="number" type="number">
<p id="output">{{x}}</p>
<button onclick="show()" id="calc">Show</button>

Solution 52 - Javascript

<input type="text" onKeyup="CommaWithDecimal(this.value, this.id)" class="form-control" id="number_format" placeholder="0.00" size="8" value="">

> This function used for number formatting as well as decimal upto two value. > In this function handle all scenario for the input number.

function CommaWithDecimal(x,fid,valuetoAdd = 0) {

x = x.replace(/[^0-9.,]/g, "");
x = x.trim();
var isValueAdded = 0;
if(x == '' && valuetoAdd != 0){
  x = valuetoAdd.toString();
  isValueAdded = 1;
}

if(x != ''){
    if(parseInt(x) <= 0){
        $('input[id$="'+fid+'"]').val(''); //not allow zero
    }else if((x.indexOf(".") != -1 || x.indexOf(",") != -1) && x.length == 1){ //not allowed ,  and .
        $('input[id$="'+fid+'"]').val('');
    }else{

        var isPoint = x.indexOf(".");
        x = x.replace(/^0+/, ''); //remove leading zeros
        x = x.replace(/\,/g,''); //remove comma
        x = x.replace('.00',''); //remove .00 from last
        var pointArr = x.split('.');
        var lastPointValue = 0;

        if(pointArr.length > 1){
            lastPointValue = pointArr[1];
            if(lastPointValue != '' && lastPointValue.length >= 1){
                lastPointValue = lastPointValue.substr(0, 2);

            }
        }

        var x = pointArr[0];
        if(x == ''){
          x = 0;
        }
        if(isValueAdded == 0){
          x = parseInt(x)+valuetoAdd;
        }
        x = x.toString();
        var lastThree = x.substring(x.length-3);
        var otherNumbers = x.substring(0,x.length-3);
        if(otherNumbers != '')
            lastThree = ',' + lastThree;
        var res = otherNumbers.replace(/\B(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, ",") + lastThree;
        if(isPoint != -1){
            res = res+"."+lastPointValue;
        }
        $('input[id$="'+fid+'"]').val(res);
    }
}else{
    $('input[id$="'+fid+'"]').val('');
 }
}

> Use this code and pass only function name with id and value in input field and see the result on your screen. As well as you can apply multiple places in same form just calling the function only. No need to extra code for multiple input field.

> Output - Output -

Solution 53 - Javascript

This should work now ... edited to add decimal places if the number is a decimal.

<script>
  function makedollars(mynumber)
      {
       mynumber = mynumber.toString();
    var numberend="";

  if(mynumber.split('.').length>1){
       var mynumbersplit = mynumber.split('.');
     mynumber = mynumbersplit[0];
   numberend= mynumbersplit[1];

  }
       
      var  mn = mynumber.length;

      if (mn <= 3) { return mynumber + numberend; }
      var grps = [];

        while (mn > 3)
        {  
            grps.push(mynumber.substring(mn,mn - 3));
            mn = mn - 3;
        }
        grps.push(mynumber.substring(mn,mn - 3));
      grps.reverse();

        grps.join(",");
        if(numberend!=""){ grps =  grps +"."+numberend;}
       
        return grps; 
              }


 </script>

Solution 54 - Javascript

>

function addCommas(nStr) {
    nStr += '';
    var x = nStr.split('.');
    var x1 = x[0];
    var x2 = x.length > 1 ? '.' + x[1] : '';
    var rgx = /(\d+)(\d{3})/;
    while (rgx.test(x1)) {
            x1 = x1.replace(rgx, '$1' + ',' + '$2');
    }
    return x1 + x2;
}

addCommas(parseFloat("1099920.23232").toFixed(2)); //Output  1,099,920.23

Solution 55 - Javascript

You can use for loops to add commas to the number

function convertNumber(){
    var _cash = cash.toString()
    var _formattedCash = ''
    var count = 0

    for (let i = _cash.length; i >= 0; i--) {
        _formattedCash += _cash.substring(i,i+1)

        if(count == 3 && i > 0){
            _formattedCash += ','
            count = 0
        }
        count++
    }
        
    var _format = ''

    for (let i = _formattedCash.length; i >= 0; i--) {
        _format += _formattedCash.substring(i, i + 1)
    }

    return 'Ksh ' + _format;
}

Solution 56 - Javascript

maybe it can solve it in a simple way:

console.log(parseFloat(parseFloat(n.split(',').join('.')).toFixed(2)))

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionElias ZamariaView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - JavascriptElias ZamariaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - JavascriptuKolkaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - JavascriptvsyncView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - JavascriptKerry JonesView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - Javascriptuser1437663View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - JavascriptTutankhamenView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - JavascriptTính Ngô QuangView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - JavascriptDustin SunView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - JavascriptJavier ElicesView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - JavascriptNoneView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 11 - Javascriptuser3664916View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 12 - JavascriptSinanView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 13 - Javascriptphette23View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 14 - JavascriptDulacosteView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 15 - JavascriptShital ShahView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 16 - JavascriptIce_mankView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 17 - JavascriptNoah FreitasView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 18 - JavascriptrunsunView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 19 - JavascriptBathri NathanView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 20 - JavascriptOliverView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 21 - JavascriptKiry MeasView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 22 - JavascriptLonnie BestView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 23 - JavascriptMMMahdy-PAPIONView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 24 - JavascriptRonnie OverbyView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 25 - JavascriptdjulienView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 26 - JavascriptFelipe BuccioniView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 27 - JavascriptBeder Acosta BorgesView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 28 - JavascriptIgor BykovView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 29 - JavascriptAbhinavRanjanView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 30 - JavascriptRobo RobokView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 31 - Javascriptjasonmp85View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 32 - JavascriptbartburkhardtView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 33 - JavascriptWayneView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 34 - JavascriptКонстантин ВанView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 35 - JavascriptPaulo BuchsbaumView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 36 - JavascriptSverrissonView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 37 - Javascriptareg_noidView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 38 - JavascriptMosiurView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 39 - JavascriptElunyView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 40 - JavascriptEthan ChenView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 41 - JavascriptaleclarsonView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 42 - JavascriptMaor BenView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 43 - JavascriptThe Lazy Dev OtakuView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 44 - JavascriptZakharView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 45 - Javascriptxd6_View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 46 - JavascriptSakshamView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 47 - JavascriptMarcin ZukowskiView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 48 - JavascriptMatt ScheurichView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 49 - JavascriptarosolinoView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 50 - JavascriptNadir AbbasView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 51 - JavascriptBlackView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 52 - JavascriptShubham GuptaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 53 - JavascriptPeter S McIntyreView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 54 - JavascriptWaruna ManjulaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 55 - JavascriptGeoffrey KimaniView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 56 - JavascriptanarchistView Answer on Stackoverflow