How to preview git-pull?

GitVersion Control

Git Problem Overview


Is it even possible?

Basically, there's a remote repository from which I pull using just:

git pull

Now, I'd like to preview what this pull would change (a diff) without touching anything on my side. The reason is that thing I'm pulling might not be "good" and I want someone else to fix it before making my repository "dirty".

Git Solutions


Solution 1 - Git

After doing a git fetch, do a git log HEAD..origin/master to show the log entries between your last common commit and the origin's master branch. To show the diffs, use either git log -p HEAD..origin/master to show each patch, or git diff HEAD...origin/master (three dots not two) to show a single diff.

There normally isn't any need to undo a fetch, because doing a fetch only updates the remote branches and none of your branches. If you're not prepared to do a pull and merge in all the remote commits, you can use git cherry-pick to accept only the specific remote commits you want. Later, when you're ready to get everything, a git pull will merge in the rest of the commits.

Update: I'm not entirely sure why you want to avoid the use of git fetch. All git fetch does is update your local copy of the remote branches. This local copy doesn't have anything to do with any of your branches, and it doesn't have anything to do with uncommitted local changes. I have heard of people who run git fetch in a cron job because it's so safe. (I wouldn't normally recommend doing that, though.)

Solution 2 - Git

I think git fetch is what your looking for.

It will pull the changes and objects without committing them to your local repo's index.

They can be merged later with git merge.

Man Page

Edit: Further Explination

Straight from the Git- SVN Crash Course link

> Now, how do you get any new changes from a remote repository? You fetch them:

> git fetch http://host.xz/path/to/repo.git/

>At this point they are in your repository and you can examine them using:

> git log origin > You can also diff the changes. You can also use git log HEAD..origin to see just the changes you don't have in your branch. Then if would like to merge them - just do:

> git merge origin

>Note that if you don't specify a branch to fetch, it will conveniently default to the tracking remote.

Reading the man page is honestly going to give you the best understanding of options and how to use it.

I'm just trying to do this by examples and memory, I don't currently have a box to test out on. You should look at:

git log -p //log with diff

A fetch can be undone with git reset --hard (link) , however all uncommitted changes in your tree will be lost as well as the changes you've fetched.

Solution 3 - Git

You can fetch from a remote repo, see the differences and then pull or merge.

This is an example for a remote repo called origin and a branch called master tracking the remote branch origin/master:

git checkout master                                                  
git fetch                                        
git diff origin/master
git pull --rebase origin master

Solution 4 - Git

I created a custom git alias to do that for me:

alias.changes=!git log --name-status HEAD..

with that you can do this:

$git fetch
$git changes origin

This will get you a nice and easy way to preview changes before doing a merge.

Solution 5 - Git

I may be late to the party, but this is something which bugged me for too long. In my experience, I would rather want to see which changes are pending than update my working copy and deal with those changes.

This goes in the ~/.gitconfig file:

[alias]
        diffpull=!git fetch && git diff HEAD..@{u}

It fetches the current branch, then does a diff between the working copy and this fetched branch. So you should only see the changes that would come with git pull.

Solution 6 - Git

I use these two commands and I can see the files to change.

  1. First executing git fetch, it gives output like this (part of output):

    ...
    72f8433..c8af041  develop -> origin/develop
    ...

This operation gives us two commit IDs, first is the old one, and second will be the new.

  1. Then compare these two commits using git diff

    git diff 72f8433..c8af041 | grep "diff --git"

This command will list the files that will be updated:

diff --git a/app/controller/xxxx.php b/app/controller/xxxx.php
diff --git a/app/view/yyyy.php b/app/view/yyyy.php

For example app/controller/xxxx.php and app/view/yyyy.php will be updated.

Comparing two commits using git diff prints all updated files with changed lines, but with grep it searches and gets only the lines contains diff --git from output.

Solution 7 - Git

This useful commands below I picked from this link https://gist.github.com/jtdp/5443297. Thanks to https://gist.github.com/jtdp

git fetch origin

# show commit logs of changes
git log master..origin/master

# show diffs of changes
git diff master..origin/master

# apply the changes by merge..
git merge origin/master

# .. or just pull the changes
git pull

Solution 8 - Git

If you don't want git-fetch to update your local .git, just copy your local repo to a temp dir and do a pull there. Here is a shor-hand:

$ alias gtp="tar -c . | (cd /tmp && mkdir tp && cd tp && tar -x && git pull; rm -rf /tmp/tp)"

Ex.:

$ git status
# On branch master
nothing to commit (working directory clean)

$ gtp
remote: Finding sources: 100% (25/25)
remote: Total 25 (delta 10), reused 25 (delta 10)
Unpacking objects: 100% (25/25), done.
From ssh://my.git.domain/reapO
   32d61dc..05287d6  master     -> origin/master
Updating 32d61dc..05287d6
Fast-forward
 subdir/some.file       |    2 +-
 .../somepath/by.tes    |    3 ++-
 .../somepath/data      |   11 +++++++++++
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

$ git status
# On branch master
nothing to commit (working directory clean)

$ git fetch
remote: Finding sources: 100% (25/25)
remote: Total 25 (delta 10), reused 25 (delta 10)
Unpacking objects: 100% (25/25), done.
From ssh://my.git.domain/reapO
   32d61dc..05287d6  master     -> origin/master

$ git status
# On branch master
# Your branch is behind 'origin/master' by 3 commits, and can be fast-forwarded.
#
nothing to commit (working directory clean)

Solution 9 - Git

13 years later, you now have With a prefetch task in "git maintenance"(man)

> The prefetch task updates the object directory with the latest objects from all registered remotes. > > For each remote, a git fetch command is run.
The refmap is custom to avoid updating local or remote branches (those in refs/heads or refs/remotes).
Instead, the remote refs are stored in refs/prefetch/<remote>/.
Also, tags are not updated. > > This is done to avoid disrupting the remote-tracking branches.
> The end users expect these refs to stay unmoved unless they initiate a fetch.
> > With prefetch task, however, the objects necessary to complete a later real fetch would already be obtained, so the real fetch would go faster.
In the ideal case, it will just become an update to a bunch of remote-tracking branches without any object transfer.

And you can also do, since Git 2.32 (Q2 2021) a git fetch --prefetch, again without modifying your last fetch state.

See commit 32f6788, commit cfd781e, commit 2e03115 (16 Apr 2021), and commit a039a1f (06 Apr 2021) by Derrick Stolee (derrickstolee).
(Merged by Junio C Hamano -- gitster -- in commit d250f90, 30 Apr 2021)

> ## fetch: add --prefetch option
> Helped-by: Tom Saeger
> Helped-by: Ramsay Jones
> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee

> The --prefetch option will be used by the 'prefetch' maintenance task instead of sending refspecs explicitly across the command-line.
> The intention is to modify the refspec to place all results in refs/prefetch/ instead of anywhere else.
> > Create helper method filter_prefetch_refspec() to modify a given refspec to fit the rules expected of the prefetch task: > * Negative refspecs are preserved. > * Refspecs without a destination are removed. > * Refspecs whose source starts with "refs/tags/" are removed. > * Other refspecs are placed within "refs/prefetch/".
> > Finally, we add the 'force' option to ensure that prefetch refs are replaced as necessary.
> > There are some interesting cases that are worth testing.
> > An earlier version of this change dropped the "i--" from the loop that deletes a refspec item and shifts the remaining entries down.
> This allowed some refspecs to not be modified.
> The subtle part about the first --prefetch test is that the refs/tags/* refspec appears directly before the refs/heads/bogus/* refspec.
> Without that "i--", this ordering would remove the "refs/tags/*" refspec and leave the last one unmodified, placing the result in "refs/heads/*".
> > It is possible to have an empty refspec.
> This is typically the case for remotes other than the origin, where users want to fetch a specific tag or branch.
> To correctly test this case, we need to further remove the upstream remote for the local branch.
> Thus, we are testing a refspec that will be deleted, leaving nothing to fetch.

fetch-options now includes in its man page: > ## --prefetch > > Modify the configured refspec to place all refs into the > refs/prefetch/ namespace.

Solution 10 - Git

What about cloning the repo elsewhere, and doing git log on both the real checkout and the fresh clone to see if you got the same thing.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionMilan BabuškovView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - GitGreg HewgillView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - GitBrian GianforcaroView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - GitAntonio BardazziView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - GitMatthiasView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - GitAndy PView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - GitcowboycbView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - GitSuperNovaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - GitAXE LabsView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - GitVonCView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - GitEd GreenbergView Answer on Stackoverflow