How to execute a raw update sql with dynamic binding in rails

Ruby on-RailsActiverecordRawsql

Ruby on-Rails Problem Overview


I want to execute one update raw sql like below:

update table set f1=? where f2=? and f3=?

This SQL will be executed by ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute, but I don't know how to pass the dynamic parameter values into the method.

Could someone give me any help on it?

Ruby on-Rails Solutions


Solution 1 - Ruby on-Rails

It doesn't look like the Rails API exposes methods to do this generically. You could try accessing the underlying connection and using it's methods, e.g. for MySQL:

st = ActiveRecord::Base.connection.raw_connection.prepare("update table set f1=? where f2=? and f3=?")
st.execute(f1, f2, f3)
st.close

I'm not sure if there are other ramifications to doing this (connections left open, etc). I would trace the Rails code for a normal update to see what it's doing aside from the actual query.

Using prepared queries can save you a small amount of time in the database, but unless you're doing this a million times in a row, you'd probably be better off just building the update with normal Ruby substitution, e.g.

ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute("update table set f1=#{ActiveRecord::Base.sanitize(f1)}")

or using ActiveRecord like the commenters said.

Solution 2 - Ruby on-Rails

ActiveRecord::Base.connection has a quote method that takes a string value (and optionally the column object). So you can say this:

ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute(<<-EOQ)
  UPDATE  foo
  SET     bar = #{ActiveRecord::Base.connection.quote(baz)}
EOQ

Note if you're in a Rails migration or an ActiveRecord object you can shorten that to:

connection.execute(<<-EOQ)
  UPDATE  foo
  SET     bar = #{connection.quote(baz)}
EOQ

UPDATE: As @kolen points out, you should use exec_update instead. This will handle the quoting for you and also avoid leaking memory. The signature works a bit differently though:

connection.exec_update(<<-EOQ, "SQL", [[nil, baz]])
  UPDATE  foo
  SET     bar = $1
EOQ

Here the last param is a array of tuples representing bind parameters. In each tuple, the first entry is the column type and the second is the value. You can give nil for the column type and Rails will usually do the right thing though.

There are also exec_query, exec_insert, and exec_delete, depending on what you need.

Solution 3 - Ruby on-Rails

You should just use something like:

YourModel.update_all(
  ActiveRecord::Base.send(:sanitize_sql_for_assignment, {:value => "'wow'"})
)

That would do the trick. Using the ActiveRecord::Base#send method to invoke the sanitize_sql_for_assignment makes the Ruby (at least the 1.8.7 version) skip the fact that the sanitize_sql_for_assignment is actually a protected method.

Solution 4 - Ruby on-Rails

None of the other answers showed me how to use named parameters, so I ended up combining exec_update with sanitize_sql:

User.connection.exec_update(
  User.sanitize_sql(
    [
      "update users set name = :name where id = :id and name <> :name",
      {
        id: 123,
        name: 'My Name'
      }
    ]
  )
)

This works for me on Rails 5, and it executes this SQL:

update users set name = 'My Name' where id = 123 and name <> 'My Name'

You need to use an existing Rails model instead of User if you don't have that.

I wanted to use named parameters to avoid issues with the ordering when I use ? or $1/$2,etc. Positional ordering is kind of frustrating when I have more than a handful of parameters, but named parameters allow me to refactor the SQL command without having to update the parameters.

Solution 5 - Ruby on-Rails

Sometime would be better use name of parent class instead name of table:

# Refers to the current class
self.class.unscoped.where(self.class.primary_key => id).update_all(created _at: timestamp)

For example "Person" base class, subclasses (and database tables) "Client" and "Seller" Instead using:

Client.where(self.class.primary_key => id).update_all(created _at: timestamp)
Seller.where(self.class.primary_key => id).update_all(created _at: timestamp)

You can use object of base class by this way:

person.class.unscoped.where(self.class.primary_key => id).update_all(created _at: timestamp)

Solution 6 - Ruby on-Rails

Here's a trick I recently worked out for executing raw sql with binds:

binds = SomeRecord.bind(a_string_field: value1, a_date_field: value2) +
        SomeOtherRecord.bind(a_numeric_field: value3)
SomeRecord.connection.exec_query <<~SQL, nil, binds
  SELECT *
  FROM some_records
  JOIN some_other_records ON some_other_records.record_id = some_records.id
  WHERE some_records.a_string_field = $1
    AND some_records.a_date_field < $2
    AND some_other_records.a_numeric_field > $3
SQL

where ApplicationRecord defines this:

# Convenient way of building custom sql binds
def self.bind(column_values)
  column_values.map do |column_name, value|
    [column_for_attribute(column_name), value]
  end
end

and that is similar to how AR binds its own queries.

Solution 7 - Ruby on-Rails

I needed to use raw sql because I failed at getting composite_primary_keys to function with activerecord 2.3.8. So in order to access the sqlserver 2000 table with a composite primary key, raw sql was required.

sql = "update [db].[dbo].[#{Contacts.table_name}] " +
      "set [COLUMN] = 0 " +
      "where [CLIENT_ID] = '#{contact.CLIENT_ID}' and CONTACT_ID = '#{contact.CONTACT_ID}'"
st = ActiveRecord::Base.connection.raw_connection.prepare(sql)
st.execute

If a better solution is available, please share.

Solution 8 - Ruby on-Rails

In Rails 3.1, you should use the query interface:

  • new(attributes)
  • create(attributes)
  • create!(attributes)
  • find(id_or_array)
  • destroy(id_or_array)
  • destroy_all
  • delete(id_or_array)
  • delete_all
  • update(ids, updates)
  • update_all(updates)
  • exists?

update and update_all are the operation you need.

See details here: http://m.onkey.org/active-record-query-interface

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionywenboView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - Ruby on-RailsBrian DeterlingView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - Ruby on-RailsPaul A JungwirthView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - Ruby on-RailsleandroicoView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - Ruby on-RailspsmithView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - Ruby on-RailsmikowiecView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - Ruby on-RailsspumeView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - Ruby on-RailsdonvnielsenView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - Ruby on-RailsactivarsView Answer on Stackoverflow