How to check if a Ruby object is a Boolean

RubyTypechecking

Ruby Problem Overview


I can't seem to check if an object is a boolean easily. Is there something like this in Ruby?

true.is_a?(Boolean)
false.is_a?(Boolean)

Right now I'm doing this and would like to shorten it:

some_var = rand(1) == 1 ? true : false
(some_var.is_a?(TrueClass) || some_var.is_a?(FalseClass))

Ruby Solutions


Solution 1 - Ruby

Simplest way I can think of:

# checking whether foo is a boolean
!!foo == foo

Solution 2 - Ruby

I find this to be concise and self-documenting:

[true, false].include? foo

If using Rails or ActiveSupport, you can even do a direct query using in?

foo.in? [true, false]

Checking against all possible values isn't something I'd recommend for floats, but feasible when there are only two possible values!

Solution 3 - Ruby

There is no Boolean class in Ruby, the only way to check is to do what you're doing (comparing the object against true and false or the class of the object against TrueClass and FalseClass). Can't think of why you would need this functionality though, can you explain? :)

If you really need this functionality however, you can hack it in:

module Boolean; end
class TrueClass; include Boolean; end
class FalseClass; include Boolean; end

true.is_a?(Boolean) #=> true
false.is_a?(Boolean) #=> true

Solution 4 - Ruby

As stated above there is no boolean class just TrueClass and FalseClass however you can use any object as the subject of if/unless and everything is true except instances of FalseClass and nil

Boolean tests return an instance of the FalseClass or TrueClass

(1 > 0).class #TrueClass

The following monkeypatch to Object will tell you whether something is an instance of TrueClass or FalseClass

class Object
  def boolean?
    self.is_a?(TrueClass) || self.is_a?(FalseClass) 
  end
end

Running some tests with irb gives the following results

?> "String".boolean?
=> false
>> 1.boolean?
=> false
>> Time.now.boolean?
=> false
>> nil.boolean?
=> false
>> true.boolean?
=> true
>> false.boolean?
=> true
>> (1 ==1).boolean?
=> true
>> (1 ==2).boolean?
=> true

Solution 5 - Ruby

If your code can sensibly be written as a case statement, this is pretty decent:

case mybool
when TrueClass, FalseClass
  puts "It's a bool!"
else
  puts "It's something else!"
end

Solution 6 - Ruby

An object that is a boolean will either have a class of TrueClass or FalseClass so the following one-liner should do the trick

mybool = true
mybool.class == TrueClass || mybool.class == FalseClass
=> true

The following would also give you true/false boolean type check result

mybool = true    
[TrueClass, FalseClass].include?(mybool.class)
=> true

Solution 7 - Ruby

So try this out (x == true) ^ (x == false) note you need the parenthesis but this is more beautiful and compact.

It even passes the suggested like "cuak" but not a "cuak"... class X; def !; self end end ; x = X.new; (x == true) ^ (x == false)

Note: See that this is so basic that you can use it in other languages too, that doesn't provide a "thing is boolean".

Note 2: Also you can use this to say thing is one of??: "red", "green", "blue" if you add more XORS... or say this thing is one of??: 4, 5, 8, 35.

Solution 8 - Ruby

This gem adds a Boolean class to Ruby with useful methods.

https://github.com/RISCfuture/boolean

Use:

require 'boolean'

Then your

true.is_a?(Boolean)
false.is_a?(Boolean)

will work exactly as you expect.

Solution 9 - Ruby

No. Not like you have your code. There isn't any class named Boolean. Now with all the answers you have you should be able to create one and use it. You do know how to create classes don't you? I only came here because I was just wondering this idea myself. Many people might say "Why? You have to just know how Ruby uses Boolean". Which is why you got the answers you did. So thanks for the question. Food for thought. Why doesn't Ruby have a Boolean class?

NameError: uninitialized constant Boolean

Keep in mind that Objects do not have types. They are classes. Objects have data. So that's why when you say data types it's a bit of a misnomer.

Also try rand 2 because rand 1 seems to always give 0. rand 2 will give 1 or 0 click run a few times here. https://repl.it/IOPx/7

Although I wouldn't know how to go about making a Boolean class myself. I've experimented with it but...

class Boolean < TrueClass
  self
end

true.is_a?(Boolean) # => false
false.is_a?(Boolean) # => false

At least we have that class now but who knows how to get the right values?

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionLanceView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - RubyKonstantin HaaseView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - RubymahemoffView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - RubyhorseyguyView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - RubySteve WeetView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - RubyHenrik NView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - Rubyuser1966234View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - Rubytyoc213View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - RubyConvincibleView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - RubyDouglas G. AllenView Answer on Stackoverflow