How to check if a Javascript function is a constructor

Javascript

Javascript Problem Overview


I noticed not all the Javascript functions are constructors.

var obj = Function.prototype;
console.log(typeof obj === 'function'); //true
obj(); //OK
new obj(); //TypeError: obj is not a constructor

Question 1: How do I check if a function is a constructor so that it can be called with new keyword?

Question 2: When I create a function, is it possible to make it NOT a constructor?

Javascript Solutions


Solution 1 - Javascript

A little bit of background:

ECMAScript 6+ distinguishes between callable (can be called without new) and constructable (can be called with new) functions:

  • Functions created via the arrow functions syntax or via a method definition in classes or object literals are not constructable.
  • Functions created via the class syntax are not callable.
  • Functions created in any other way (function expression/declaration, Function constructor) are callable and constructable.
  • Built-in functions are not constructrable unless explicitly stated otherwise.

About Function.prototype

Function.prototype is a so called built-in function that is not constructable. From the spec:

> Built-in function objects that are not identified as constructors do not implement the [[Construct]] internal method unless otherwise specified in the description of a particular function.

The value of Function.prototype is create at the very beginning of the runtime initialization. It is basically an empty function and it is not explicitly stated that it is constructable.


> How do I check if an function is a constructor so that it can be called with a new?

There isn't a built-in way to do that. You can try to call the function with new, and either inspect the error or return true:

function isConstructor(f) {
  try {
    new f();
  } catch (err) {
    // verify err is the expected error and then
    return false;
  }
  return true;
}

However, that approach is not failsafe since functions can have side effects, so after calling f, you don't know which state the environment is in.

Also, this will only tell you whether a function can be called as a constructor, not if it is intended to be called as constructor. For that you have to look at the documentation or the implementation of the function.

Note: There should never be a reason to use a test like this one in a production environment. Whether or not a function is supposed to be called with new should be discernable from its documentation.

> When I create a function, how do I make it NOT a constructor?

To create a function is truly not constructable, you can use an arrow function:

var f = () => console.log('no constructable');

Arrow functions are by definition not constructable. Alternatively you could define a function as a method of an object or a class.

Otherwise you could check whether a function is called with new (or something similar) by checking it's this value and throw an error if it is:

function foo() {
  if (this instanceof foo) {
    throw new Error("Don't call 'foo' with new");
  }
}

Of course, since there are other ways to set the value of this, there can be false positives.


Examples

function isConstructor(f) {
  try {
    new f();
  } catch (err) {
    if (err.message.indexOf('is not a constructor') >= 0) {
      return false;
    }
  }
  return true;
}

function test(f, name) {
  console.log(`${name} is constructable: ${isConstructor(f)}`);
}

function foo(){}
test(foo, 'function declaration');
test(function(){}, 'function expression');
test(()=>{}, 'arrow function');

class Foo {}
test(Foo, 'class declaration');
test(class {}, 'class expression');

test({foo(){}}.foo, 'object method');

class Foo2 {
  static bar() {}
  bar() {}
}
test(Foo2.bar, 'static class method');
test(new Foo2().bar, 'class method');

test(new Function(), 'new Function()');

Solution 2 - Javascript

You are looking for if a function has a [[Construct]] internal method. The internal method IsConstructor details the steps:

> IsConstructor(argument) > > > > ReturnIfAbrupt(argument). // (Check if an exception has been thrown; Not important.)
> If Type(argument) is not Object, return false. // argument === Object(argument), or (typeof argument === 'Object' || typeof argument === 'function')
> If argument has a [[Construct]] internal method, return true.
> Return false.

Now we need to find places where IsConstructor is used, but [[Construct]] isn't called (usually by the Construct internal method.)

I found that it is used in the String function's newTarget (new.target in js), which can be used with Reflect.construct:

function is_constructor(f) {
  try {
    Reflect.construct(String, [], f);
  } catch (e) {
    return false;
  }
  return true;
}

(I could have used anything really, like Reflect.construct(Array, [], f);, but String was first)

Which yields the following results:

// true
is_constructor(function(){});
is_constructor(class A {});
is_constructor(Array);
is_constructor(Function);
is_constructor(new Function);

// false
is_constructor();
is_constructor(undefined);
is_constructor(null);
is_constructor(1);
is_constructor(new Number(1));
is_constructor(Array.prototype);
is_constructor(Function.prototype);
is_constructor(() => {})
is_constructor({method() {}}.method)

<note>

The only value that I found it didn't work for is Symbol, which, although new Symbol throws a TypeError: Symbol is not a constructor in Firefox, is_constructor(Symbol) === true. This is technically the correct answer, as Symbol does have a [[Construct]] internal method (Which means it can also be subclassed), but using new or super is special cased for Symbol to throw an error (So, Symbol is a constructor, the error message is wrong, it just can't be used as one.) You can just add if (f === Symbol) return false; to the top though.

The same for something like this:

function not_a_constructor() {
  if (new.target) throw new TypeError('not_a_constructor is not a constructor.');
  return stuff(arguments);
}

is_constructor(not_a_constructor);  // true
new not_a_constructor;  // TypeError: not_a_constructor is not a constructor.

So the intentions of the function of being a constructor can't be gotton like this (Until somthing like Symbol.is_constructor or some other flag is added).

</note>

Solution 3 - Javascript

There is a quick and easy way of determining if function can be instantiated, without having to resort to try-catch statements (which can not be optimized by v8)

function isConstructor(obj) {
  return !!obj.prototype && !!obj.prototype.constructor.name;
}
  1. First we check if object is part of a prototype chain.
  2. Then we exclude anonymous functions

There is a caveat, which is: functions named inside a definition will still incur a name property and thus pass this check, so caution is required when relying on tests for function constructors.

In the following example, the function is not anonymous but in fact is called 'myFunc'. It's prototype can be extended as any JS class.

let myFunc = function () {};

Solution 4 - Javascript

With ES6+ Proxies, one can test for [[Construct]] without actually invoking the constructor. Here's a snippet:

const handler={construct(){return handler}} //Must return ANY object, so reuse one
const isConstructor=x=>{
    try{
        return !!(new (new Proxy(x,handler))())
    }catch(e){
        return false
    }
}

If the passed item isn't an object, the Proxy constructor throws an error. If it's not a constructable object, then new throws an error. But if it's a constructable object, then it returns the handler object without invoking its constructor, which is then not-notted into true.

As you might expect, Symbol is still considered a constructor. That's because it is, and the implementation merely throws an error when [[Construct]] is invoked. This could be the case on ANY user-defined function that throws an error when new.target exists, so it doesn't seem right to specifically weed it out as an additional check, but feel free to do so if you find that to be helpful.

Solution 5 - Javascript

If the function is a constructor then it will have a "prototype" member which in turn has a "constructor" member that is equal to the function itself.

function isConstructor(func) {
    return typeof func === 'function' && !!func.prototype && func.prototype.constructor === func;
}

Solution 6 - Javascript

There is a quick and easy way of determining if function can be instantiated, without having to resort to try-catch statements (which can not be optimized by v8)

function isConstructor(value) {
    return !!value && !!value.prototype && !!value.prototype.constructor;
}
  1. First, we check value is truthy.
  2. Then checks if value is part of a prototype chain.
  3. At last, simply checks if constructor is set ;-)

>Note that above is named isConstructor not is isConstructable, I mean, this will return false for Bound-constructors as said in comments, because "bound" means to redirect to something, instead of being a real constructor directly. > >So this answers title's "check ... is constructor" question, but not later "check ... can be called with new" question. > >Example: > >const myClazz = {method() {}}; >myClazz.method = myClazz.method.bind(myClazz); > >// We can call above with new keyword. >new (myClazz.method); > >// But it's just a callback. >if (isConstructor(myClass)) > throw new Error('expected to return false for arrow-functions and similar.'); >

Unit-testing

Below is based on Jasmine.

// Change import to wherever your common functions are 
// (for me they're in src directory, outside of tests directory).
import * as common from '../common-tools';

let isMyClassCalled = false;
class MyClass {
  constructor() {
      isMyClassCalled = true;
  }
}

describe('App isConstructor tool', () => {
    it('should detect constructor', function () {
        detect(class A {});
        detect(Array);
        detect(Function);
        detect(new Function);
        detect({method() {}}.method);
    });

    it('should NOT detect as constructor', function () {
        noDetect();
        noDetect(undefined);
        noDetect(null);
        noDetect(1);
        noDetect(new Number(1));
        noDetect(new (function(){}));
        noDetect(Array.prototype);
        noDetect(Function.prototype);
        // Commented because optimizations convert below into function.
        //noDetect((() => {}));
    });

    it('should NOT detect bound constructors', function () {
        const clazz = {method() {}};
        clazz.method = clazz.method.bind(clazz);
        noDetect(clazz.method);
    });

    it('should never call constructor', function () {
        common.isConstructor(MyClass);
        expect(isMyClassCalled).toBe(false);
    });

    function detect(value, expecting = true) {
        expect(common.isConstructor(value))
            .withContext('For "' + value + '" value')
            .toBe(expecting);
    }

    function noDetect(value) {
        detect(value, false);
    }
});

Alternative

All above tests pass with below as well.

function isConstructor(value) {
    return typeof value === 'function' && !!value.prototype && value.prototype.constructor === value;
}

Solution 7 - Javascript

For question 1, what about this helper?

Function.isConstructor = ({ prototype }) => Boolean(prototype) && Boolean(prototype.constructor)

Function.isConstructor(class {}); // true
Function.isConstructor(function() {}); // true
Function.isConstructor(() => {}); // false
Function.isConstructor("a string"); // false

For question 2, the arrow function is the solution. It cannot be used as a constructor since it does not rely on the same scope as a regular function and does not have a prototype (definition of instances, similar to class definition for real OOP)

const constructable = function() { console.log(this); };
const callable = () => { console.log(this); };

constructable(); // Window {}
callable(); // Window {}
new constructable(); // aConstructableFunction {}
new callable(); // Uncaught TypeError: callable is not a constructor

Solution 8 - Javascript

I tried many workarounds but it didn't satisfy my needs, So i made my own workaround by using reflection metadata.

GOAL: Check if the current Function has it's own __class__ metadata which represent if this function is a constructor or not.

  • npm install reflect-metadata
  • Create class decorator factory @Class()
  • Create a helper function to check __class__ metadata attached to the current function or not.

NOTE: The only way in this workaround to distinguish between Constructor Function and Normal Function or Class is by using Class Decorator @Class()

import 'reflect-metadata';

type Constructor<T = any> = new (...args: any[]) => T;

function Class() {
    return function (target: Constructor) {
        if (!!Reflect.getOwnMetadata('__class__', target)) {
            throw new Error(`Cannot apply @Class decorator on ${target.name} multiple times.`);
        }
        Reflect.defineMetadata('__class__', target, target);
    };
}

function isConstructor<T>(type: Constructor<T>): boolean {
    if (typeof type !== 'function') return false;
    return !!Reflect.getOwnMetadata('__class__', type);
}

/*
 * ------------------
 * Example
 * ------------------
 */

@Class()
class ServiceClass1 {}

class ServiceClass2 {}

function Test() {}

console.log(isConstructor(ServiceClass1)) // true
console.log(isConstructor(ServiceClass2)) // false
console.log(isConstructor(Test)) // false

Solution 9 - Javascript

As an addition to Felix Kling's answer, even if a function is not constructable, we can still use it like a constructor if it has a prototype property. We can do this with the help of Object.create(). Example:

// The built-in object Symbol is not constructable, even though it has a "prototype" property:
new Symbol
// TypeError: Symbol is not a constructor.
Object.create(Symbol.prototype);
// Symbol {}
//   description: (...)
//   __proto__: Symbol

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionMingtao SunView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - JavascriptFelix KlingView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - JavascriptArtyerView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - JavascriptDmitry MatveevView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - JavascriptRyan HanekampView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - JavascriptmoomooView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - JavascriptTop-MasterView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - JavascriptThierry ParentView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - JavascriptMohabView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - JavascriptUtkuView Answer on Stackoverflow