How to allocate thread local storage?

C++LinuxMultithreadingNew OperatorThread Local-Storage

C++ Problem Overview


I have a variable in my function that is static, but I would like it to be static on a per thread basis.

How can I allocate the memory for my C++ class such that each thread has its own copy of the class instance?

AnotherClass::threadSpecificAction()
{
  // How to allocate this with thread local storage?
  static MyClass *instance = new MyClass();

  instance->doSomething();
}

This is on Linux. I'm not using C++0x and this is gcc v3.4.6.

C++ Solutions


Solution 1 - C++

#include <boost/thread/tss.hpp>
static boost::thread_specific_ptr< MyClass> instance;
if( ! instance.get() ) {
	// first time called by this thread
	// construct test element to be used in all subsequent calls from this thread
	instance.reset( new MyClass);
}
    instance->doSomething();

Solution 2 - C++

It is worth noting that C++11 introduces the thread_local keyword.

Here is an example from Storage duration specifiers:

#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <thread>
#include <mutex>
 
thread_local unsigned int rage = 1; 
std::mutex cout_mutex;
 
void increase_rage(const std::string& thread_name)
{
    ++rage;
    std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(cout_mutex);
    std::cout << "Rage counter for " << thread_name << ": " << rage << '\n';
}
 
int main()
{
    std::thread a(increase_rage, "a"), b(increase_rage, "b");
    increase_rage("main");
 
    a.join();
    b.join();
 
    return 0;
}

Possible output:

Rage counter for a: 2
Rage counter for main: 2
Rage counter for b: 2

Solution 3 - C++

boost::thread_specific_ptr is the best way as it portable solution.

On Linux & GCC you may use __thread modifier.

So your instance variable will look like:

static __thread MyClass *instance = new MyClass();

Solution 4 - C++

If you're using Pthreads you can do the following:

//declare static data members
pthread_key_t AnotherClass::key_value;
pthread_once_t AnotherClass::key_init_once = PTHREAD_ONCE_INIT;

//declare static function
void AnotherClass::init_key()
{
    //while you can pass a NULL as the second argument, you 
    //should pass some valid destrutor function that can properly
    //delete a pointer for your MyClass
    pthread_key_create(&key_value, NULL);
}

void AnotherClass::threadSpecificAction()
{
  //Initialize the key value
  pthread_once(&key_init_once, init_key);

  //this is where the thread-specific pointer is obtained
  //if storage has already been allocated, it won't return NULL

  MyClass *instance = NULL;
  if ((instance = (MyClass*)pthread_getspecific(key_value)) == NULL)
  {
    instance = new MyClass;
    pthread_setspecific(key_value, (void*)instance);
  }

  instance->doSomething();
}

Solution 5 - C++

If you're working with MSVC++, you can read Thread Local Storage (TLS)

And then you can see this example.

Also, be aware of the Rules and Limitations for TLS

Solution 6 - C++

C++11 specifies a thread_local storage type, just use it.

AnotherClass::threadSpecificAction()
{
  thread_local MyClass *instance = new MyClass();
  instance->doSomething();
}

One optional optimization is to also allocate on thread local storage.

Solution 7 - C++

On Windows you can use TlsAlloc and TlsFree to allocate storage in the threads local storage.

To set and retrieve values in with TLS, you can use TlsSetValue and TlsGetValue, respectively

Here you can see an example on how it would be used.

Solution 8 - C++

Just a side note... MSVC++ supports declspec(thread) from VSC++2005

#if (_MSC_VER >= 1400)
  #ifndef thread_local     
    #define thread_local __declspec(thread)
  #endif
#endif

Main problem is(which is solved in boost::thread_specific_ptr) variables marked with it can't contain ctor or dtor.

Solution 9 - C++

Folly (Facebook Open-source Library) has a portable implementation of Thread Local Storage.

According its authors:

> Improved thread local storage for non-trivial types (similar speed as pthread_getspecific but only consumes a single pthread_key_t, and 4x faster than boost::thread_specific_ptr).

If your looking for a portable implementation of Local Storage Thread, this library is a good option.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionWilliamKFView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - C++ravenspointView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - C++DeqingView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - C++tvnView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - C++JasonView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - C++NawazView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - C++ArneView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - C++Tony The LionView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - C++Arek BalView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - C++chema989View Answer on Stackoverflow