How find all unused classes in Intellij Idea?

JavaIntellij IdeaDead Code

Java Problem Overview


There is an inspection "Unused declaration" which can find all unused code in Intellij Idea. (see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6587729/how-to-use-intellij-idea-to-find-all-unused-code) But I want to find all unused classes, not methods, variables etc. Only classes. (it is difficult to find only classes in 3000 result list). How I can do that?

Java Solutions


Solution 1 - Java

  • Press Ctrl+Shift+A (in Mac Command+Shift+A)
  • Enter "unused declar"
  • Double-click on "Unused declaration"

Settings will pop up

  • Click on Java/Declaration redundancy/Unused declaration
  • on the right bottom select "On the fly editor settings"
  • untick check fields, ..., check parameters. Only Check Classes should be ticked.
  • Press OK

Settings closes

  • On the menu bar, click on Analyze / Run Inspection by Name (or Ctrl+Alt+Shift+I - in Mac Command+Option+Shift+I)
  • Insert text "Unused decla"
  • Select "Unused declaration Java|Declaration redundancy"

Search starts

  • Check the job state on bottom of Idea, when finished: enjoy the results and the great feeling of cleaning up the messed code. :)

Solution 2 - Java

I don't think this is doable. I suspect this feature is intentionally left out of IDEs because it can't be used safely the way that other "remove unused XXX" refactorings can.

The unused declarations IDEA (and AFAIK, NetBeans) looks for are for private members and local variables: things that are not accessible, even dynamically, from outside that class or scope. (Well, at least without doing things with Reflection or JVM hacking that you're not supposed to.) No matter what outside code does with your library, it won't cause those things to be used, because their scope is limited and the IDE can see all of it. The compiler can determine this by looking at just your code.

For classes, even if they don't have public access, they can be referenced dynamically with Class.forName(), and this actually happens in live code. So even if they're not apparently used within the code of your project, they might be used depending on what you or external code using your library runs. So the IDE can't guarantee that removing those classes won't change externally observable behavior.

Which is why I think IDEA just doesn't provide this behavior: it might give users false expectations of safety, and removing them is not a safe refactoring.

Solution 3 - Java

Maybe you should look into the Unused Symbol inspection with the following settings:

enter image description here

Solution 4 - Java

I am not sure if this will answer your question but I used a tool in past as Fortify to run code review rules on the project, that precisely points to the unused imports, dead code, unused classes etc. It is a paid software but I am sure there will be some free plugins/software will be available for same.

Solution 5 - Java

I have found that intellij will declared classes that are not instantiated as unused even if they are actually used in declarations. So what I typically do is Analyze and then in Unused declaration I right click each one and click find usages. If a popup shows up saying "no usages" then can safe deleted from the problems menu directly as shown below. This is the quickest way I've found - otherwise IntelliJ autodelte will remove classes that are used, just not instantiated.

enter image description here

Note in gif you cannot see the popup that informed me that there were no usages of this class that I chose to delete.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionCherryView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - JavaBlondCodeView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - JavaAndrew JankeView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - JavaVicView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - JavasunnyView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - JavaAdam HughesView Answer on Stackoverflow