How do I determine the target architecture of static library (.a) on Mac OS X?

IphoneMacosLinkerBsdUniversal Binary

Iphone Problem Overview


I'm interested in verifying if a given iPhone static library has been built for ARM or Intel.

It's more curiosity than anything. Is there some kind of Mac OS X or BSD specific tool to do this? This post gives an example in Linux.

Iphone Solutions


Solution 1 - Iphone

Another option is lipo; its output is brief and more readable than otool's.

An example:

% lipo -info /usr/lib/libiodbc.a 
Architectures in the fat file: /usr/lib/libiodbc.a are: x86_64 i386 ppc
% lipo -info libnonfatarchive.a
input file libnonfatarchive.a is not a fat file
Non-fat file: libnonfatarchive.a is architecture: i386
%

Solution 2 - Iphone

file will probably tell you. otool certainly should be able to. But I'd try file first, e.g.

logan:/Users/logan% file d2
d2: Mach-O executable ppc

Example with archive:

logan:/Users/logan% file /usr/lib/libMallocDebug.a
/usr/lib/libMallocDebug.a: Mach-O universal binary with 2 architectures
/usr/lib/libMallocDebug.a (for architecture i386):      current ar archive random library
/usr/lib/libMallocDebug.a (for architecture ppc):       current ar archive

Solution 3 - Iphone

As mentioned earlier, file does not always work. otool -hv -arch all is probably the closest thing that is guaranteed to work - it gives architecture information for every single object file in the library.

Example:

% otool -hv /sw/lib/libfftw3.a
Archive : /sw/lib/libfftw3.a
/sw/lib/libfftw3.a(align.o):
Mach header
magic cputype cpusubtype  caps    filetype ncmds sizeofcmds      flags
MH_MAGIC_64  X86_64        ALL  0x00      OBJECT     3        336 SUBSECTIONS_VIA_SYMBOLS
/sw/lib/libfftw3.a(alloc.o):
Mach header
magic cputype cpusubtype  caps    filetype ncmds sizeofcmds      flags
MH_MAGIC_64  X86_64        ALL  0x00      OBJECT     3        416 SUBSECTIONS_VIA_SYMBOLS
...

Solution 4 - Iphone

This bash script will help you programmatically get a list of architectures into a variable.

list_archs.sh:

#! /bin/bash
lipo -info $1 | sed -En -e 's/^(Non-|Architectures in the )fat file: .+( is architecture| are): (.*)$/\3/p'

Usage example:

./list_archs.sh /usr/lib/libc.dylib
x86_64 i386

Solution 5 - Iphone

If anyone comes here looking for answers about how to tell whether a library (or the object files in it) are intended for Mac Catalyst, use otool -l to dump the load commands. Find the LC_BUILD_VERSION section for any object. Mac Catalyst is identified by platform 6 rather than platform 1.

Solution 6 - Iphone

As an alternative, I've found objdump can work well. As an example, in my environment I build library archives with vxWorks and need to link those into other projects. To test whether the archive is the correct architecture, I could do something like the following (bash syntax):

if [ "$(objdumpsparc -a ${ARCHIVE_FILE} 2>&1 | ggrep -cvP 'elf32-sparc-vxworks')" -ne "0" ]; then
  echo "Cannot build with ${ARCHIVE_FILE}, it contains one or more non-sparc components"
fi;

This example isn't precisely correct, because some lines DO show up that don't say elf32-sparc-vxworks, but it's easy enough to adapt this.

One nice benefit of this is that objdump, or a similarly named variant, is installed on most *nix operating systems, whereas tools suggested in other responses aren't.

edit It just occurred to me the OP was asking on OSX. My apologies.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionJusticleView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - IphoneVáclav SlavíkView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - IphoneLogan CapaldoView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - IphoneJiahao ChenView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - IphonebleaterView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - IphoneshaheenView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - IphoneBrian VandenbergView Answer on Stackoverflow