How do I check for null values in JavaScript?

JavascriptNullCompareComparisonEquality

Javascript Problem Overview


How can I check for null values in JavaScript? I wrote the code below but it didn't work.

if (pass == null || cpass == null || email == null || cemail == null || user == null) {      

    alert("fill all columns");
    return false;  

}   

And how can I find errors in my JavaScript programs?

Javascript Solutions


Solution 1 - Javascript

JavaScript is very flexible with regards to checking for "null" values. I'm guessing you're actually looking for empty strings, in which case this simpler code will work:

if(!pass || !cpass || !email || !cemail || !user){

Which will check for empty strings (""), null, undefined, false and the numbers 0 and NaN.

Please note that if you are specifically checking for numbers, it is a common mistake to miss 0 with this method, and num !== 0 is preferred (or num !== -1 or ~num (hacky code that also checks against -1)) for functions that return -1, e.g. indexOf).

Solution 2 - Javascript

To check for null SPECIFICALLY you would use this:

if (variable === null)

This test will ONLY pass for null and will not pass for "", undefined, false, 0, or NaN.

Additionally, I've provided absolute checks for each "false-like" value (one that would return true for !variable).

Note, for some of the absolute checks, you will need to implement use of the absolutely equals: === and typeof.

I've created a JSFiddle here to show all of the individual tests working

Here is the output of each check:

Null Test:

if (variable === null)

- variable = ""; (false) typeof variable = string

- variable = null; (true) typeof variable = object

- variable = undefined; (false) typeof variable = undefined

- variable = false; (false) typeof variable = boolean

- variable = 0; (false) typeof variable = number

- variable = NaN; (false) typeof variable = number



Empty String Test:

if (variable === '')

- variable = ''; (true) typeof variable = string

- variable = null; (false) typeof variable = object

- variable = undefined; (false) typeof variable = undefined

- variable = false; (false) typeof variable = boolean

- variable = 0; (false) typeof variable = number

- variable = NaN; (false) typeof variable = number




Undefined Test:

if (typeof variable == "undefined")

-- or --

if (variable === undefined)

- variable = ''; (false) typeof variable = string

- variable = null; (false) typeof variable = object

- variable = undefined; (true) typeof variable = undefined

- variable = false; (false) typeof variable = boolean

- variable = 0; (false) typeof variable = number

- variable = NaN; (false) typeof variable = number



False Test:

if (variable === false)

- variable = ''; (false) typeof variable = string

- variable = null; (false) typeof variable = object

- variable = undefined; (false) typeof variable = undefined

- variable = false; (true) typeof variable = boolean

- variable = 0; (false) typeof variable = number

- variable = NaN; (false) typeof variable = number



Zero Test:

if (variable === 0)

- variable = ''; (false) typeof variable = string

- variable = null; (false) typeof variable = object

- variable = undefined; (false) typeof variable = undefined

- variable = false; (false) typeof variable = boolean

- variable = 0; (true) typeof variable = number

- variable = NaN; (false) typeof variable = number



NaN Test:

if (typeof variable == 'number' && !parseFloat(variable) && variable !== 0)

-- or --

if (isNaN(variable))

- variable = ''; (false) typeof variable = string

- variable = null; (false) typeof variable = object

- variable = undefined; (false) typeof variable = undefined

- variable = false; (false) typeof variable = boolean

- variable = 0; (false) typeof variable = number

- variable = NaN; (true) typeof variable = number

As you can see, it's a little more difficult to test against NaN;

Solution 3 - Javascript

just replace the == with === in all places.

== is a loose or abstract equality comparison

=== is a strict equality comparison

See the MDN article on Equality comparisons and sameness for more detail.

Solution 4 - Javascript

Strict equality operator:-

We can check null by ===

if ( value === null ){

}

Just by using if

if( value ) {

}

will evaluate to true if value is not:

  • null
  • undefined
  • NaN
  • empty string ("")
  • false
  • 0

Solution 5 - Javascript

You can check if some value is null as follows

[pass,cpass,email,cemail,user].some(x=> x===null) 

let pass=1;
let cpass=2;
let email=3;
let cemail=null;
let user=5;

if ( [pass,cpass,email,cemail,user].some(x=> x===null) ) {     
    alert("fill all columns");
    //return false;  
}   

BONUS: Why === is more clear than == (source)

a == b

Enter image description here

a === b

Enter image description here

Solution 6 - Javascript

At first sight, it looks like a simple trade-off between coverage and strictness.

  • == covers multiple values, can handle more scenarios in less code.
  • === is the most strict, and that makes it predictable.

Predictability always wins, and that appears to make === a one-fits-all solution.

enter image description here

But it is wrong. Even though === is predictable, it does not always result in predictable code, because it overlooks scenarios.

const options = { };
if (options.callback !== null) {
  options.callback();      // error --> callback is undefined.
}

In general == does a more predictable job for null checks:

  • In general, null and undefined both mean the same thing: "something's missing". For predictability, you need to check both values. And then == null does a perfect job, because it covers exactly those 2 values. (i.e. == null is equivalent to === null && === undefined)

  • In exceptional cases you do want a clear distinction between null and undefined. And in those cases you're better of with a strict === undefined or === null. (e.g. a distinction between missing/ignore/skip and empty/clear/remove.) But it is rare.

It is not only rare, it's something to avoid. You can't store undefined in a traditional database. And you shouldn't rely on undefined values in your API designs neither, due to interopability reasons. But even when you don't make a distinction at all, you can't assume that undefined won't happen. People all around us indirectly take actions that generalize null/undefined (which is why questions like this are closed as "opinionated".).

So, to get back to your question. There's nothing wrong with using == null. It does exactly what it should do.

// FIX 1 --> yes === is very explicit
const options = { };
if (options.callback !== null && 
    options.callback !== undefined) {
  options.callback();
}


// FIX 2 --> but == covers both
const options = { };
if (options.callback != null) {
  options.callback();
}

// FIX 3 --> optional chaining also covers both.
const options = { };
options.callback?.();

Solution 7 - Javascript

Improvement over the accepted answer by explicitly checking for null but with a simplified syntax:

if ([pass, cpass, email, cemail, user].every(x=>x!==null)) {
    // your code here ...
}

// Test
let pass=1, cpass=1, email=1, cemail=1, user=1; // just to test

if ([pass, cpass, email, cemail, user].every(x=>x!==null)) {
    // your code here ...
    console.log ("Yayy! None of them are null");
} else {
    console.log ("Oops! At-lease one of them is null");
}

Solution 8 - Javascript

Firstly, you have a return statement without a function body. Chances are that that will throw an error.

A cleaner way to do your check would be to simply use the ! operator:

if (!pass || !cpass || !email || !cemail || !user) {
  
    alert("fill all columns");
  
}

Solution 9 - Javascript

you can use try catch finally

 try {
     document.getElementById("mydiv").innerHTML = 'Success' //assuming "mydiv" is undefined
 } catch (e) {

     if (e.name.toString() == "TypeError") //evals to true in this case
     //do something

 } finally {}   

you can also throw your own errors. See this.

Solution 10 - Javascript

to check for undefined and null in javascript you need just to write the following :

if (!var) {
		console.log("var IS null or undefined");
} else {
		console.log("var is NOT null or undefined");
}

Solution 11 - Javascript

In JavaScript, no string is equal to null.

Maybe you expected pass == null to be true when pass is an empty string because you're aware that the loose equality operator == performs certain kinds of type coercion.

For example, this expression is true:

'' == 0

In contrast, the strict equality operator === says that this is false:

'' === 0

Given that '' and 0 are loosely equal, you might reasonably conjecture that '' and null are loosely equal. However, they are not.

This expression is false:

'' == null

The result of comparing any string to null is false. Therefore, pass == null and all your other tests are always false, and the user never gets the alert.

To fix your code, compare each value to the empty string:

pass === ''

If you're certain that pass is a string, pass == '' will also work because only an empty string is loosely equal to the empty string. On the other hand, some experts say that it's a good practice to always use strict equality in JavaScript unless you specifically want to do the type coercion that the loose equality operator performs.

If you want to know what pairs of values are loosely equal, see the table "Sameness comparisons" in the Mozilla article on this topic.

Solution 12 - Javascript

Actually I think you may need to use if (value !== null && value !== undefined) because if you use if (value) you may also filter 0 or false values.

Consider these two functions:

const firstTest = value => {
    if (value) {
        console.log('passed');
    } else {
        console.log('failed');
    }
}
const secondTest = value => {
    if (value !== null && value !== undefined) {
        console.log('passed');
    } else {
        console.log('failed');
    }
}

firstTest(0);            // result: failed
secondTest(0);           // result: passed

firstTest(false);        // result: failed
secondTest(false);       // result: passed

firstTest('');           // result: failed
secondTest('');          // result: passed

firstTest(null);         // result: failed
secondTest(null);        // result: failed

firstTest(undefined);    // result: failed
secondTest(undefined);   // result: failed

In my situation, I just needed to check if the value is null and undefined and I did not want to filter 0 or false or '' values. so I used the second test, but you may need to filter them too which may cause you to use first test.

Solution 13 - Javascript

This is a comment on WebWanderer's solution regarding checking for NaN (I don't have enough rep yet to leave a formal comment). The solution reads as

if(!parseInt(variable) && variable != 0 && typeof variable === "number")

but this will fail for rational numbers which would round to 0, such as variable = 0.1. A better test would be:

if(isNaN(variable) && typeof variable === "number")

Solution 14 - Javascript

You can use lodash module to check value is null or undefined

_.isNil(value)
Example 

 country= "Abc"
    _.isNil(country)
    //false
    
   state= null
    _.isNil(state)
    //true
    
city= undefined
    _.isNil(state)
    //true
    
   pin= true
    _.isNil(pin)
    // false   

Reference link: https://lodash.com/docs/#isNil

Solution 15 - Javascript

AFAIK in JAVASCRIPT when a variable is declared but has not assigned value, its type is undefined. so we can check variable even if it would be an object holding some instance in place of value.

create a helper method for checking nullity that returns true and use it in your API.

helper function to check if variable is empty:

function isEmpty(item){
	if(item){
    	return false;
    }else{
    	return true;
    }
}

try-catch exceptional API call:

try {

	var pass, cpass, email, cemail, user; // only declared but contains nothing.

	// parametrs checking
	if(isEmpty(pass) || isEmpty(cpass) || isEmpty(email) || isEmpty(cemail) || isEmpty(user)){
		console.log("One or More of these parameter contains no vlaue. [pass] and-or [cpass] and-or [email] and-or [cemail] and-or [user]");
	}else{
		// do stuff
	}

} catch (e) {
    if (e instanceof ReferenceError) {
    	console.log(e.message); // debugging purpose
        return true;
    } else {
    	console.log(e.message); // debugging purpose
        return true;
    }
}

some test cases:

var item = ""; // isEmpty? true
var item = " "; // isEmpty? false
var item; // isEmpty? true
var item = 0; // isEmpty? true
var item = 1; // isEmpty? false
var item = "AAAAA"; // isEmpty? false
var item = NaN; // isEmpty? true
var item = null; // isEmpty? true
var item = undefined; // isEmpty? true

console.log("isEmpty? "+isEmpty(item));

Solution 16 - Javascript

I found a another way to test if the value is null:

if(variable >= 0 && typeof variable === "object")

null acts as a number and object at the same time. Comparing null >= 0 or null <= 0 results in true. Comparing null === 0 or null > 0 or null < 0 will result in false. But as null is also an object we can detect it as a null.

I made a more complex function natureof witch will do better than typeof and can be told what types to include or keep grouped

/* function natureof(variable, [included types]) included types are null - null will result in "undefined" or if included, will result in "null" NaN - NaN will result in "undefined" or if included, will result in "NaN" -infinity - will separate negative -Inifity from "Infinity" number - will split number into "int" or "double" array - will separate "array" from "object" empty - empty "string" will result in "empty" or empty=undefined - empty "string" will result in "undefined" / function natureof(v, ...types){ /null/ if(v === null) return types.includes('null') ? "null" : "undefined"; /NaN/ if(typeof v == "number") return (isNaN(v)) ? types.includes('NaN') ? "NaN" : "undefined" : /-infinity*/ (v+1 === v) ? (types.includes('-infinity') && v === Number.NEGATIVE_INFINITY) ? "-infinity" : "infinity" : /number/ (types.includes('number')) ? (Number.isInteger(v)) ? "int" : "double" : "number"; /array/ if(typeof v == "object") return (types.includes('array') && Array.isArray(v)) ? "array" : "object"; /empty/ if(typeof v == "string") return (v == "") ? types.includes('empty') ? "empty" : /empty=undefined/ types.includes('empty=undefined') ? "undefined" : "string" : "string"; else return typeof v }

// DEMO let types = [null, "", "string", undefined, NaN, Infinity, -Infinity, false, "false", true, "true", 0, 1, -1, 0.1, "test", {var:1}, [1,2], {0: 1, 1: 2, length: 2}]

for(i in types){ console.log("natureof ", types[i], " = ", natureof(types[i], "null", "NaN", "-infinity", "number", "array", "empty=undefined")) }

Solution 17 - Javascript

I made this very simple function that works wonders:

function safeOrZero(route) {
  try {
    Function(`return (${route})`)();
  } catch (error) {
    return 0;
  }
  return Function(`return (${route})`)();
}

The route is whatever chain of values that can blow up. I use it for jQuery/cheerio and objects and such.

Examples 1: a simple object such as this const testObj = {items: [{ val: 'haya' }, { val: null }, { val: 'hum!' }];};.

But it could be a very large object that we haven't even made. So I pass it through:

let value1 = testobj.items[2].val;  // "hum!"
let value2 = testobj.items[3].val;  // Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'val' of undefined

let svalue1 = safeOrZero(`testobj.items[2].val`)  // "hum!"
let svalue2 = safeOrZero(`testobj.items[3].val`)  // 0

Of course if you prefer you can use null or 'No value'... Whatever suit your needs.

Usually a DOM query or a jQuery selector may throw an error if it's not found. But using something like:

const bookLink = safeOrZero($('span.guidebook > a')[0].href);
if(bookLink){
  [...]
}

Solution 18 - Javascript

What about optional check with operator ?

for example:

// check mother for null or undefined and 
// then if mother exist check her children also
// this 100% sure it support and valid in JS today.
// Apart of that C# have almost the same operator using the same way
if (mother?.children) {

}
else {
 // it is null, undefined, etc...

}

Solution 19 - Javascript

Try this:

if (!variable && typeof variable === "object") {
    // variable is null
}

Solution 20 - Javascript

This will not work in case of Boolean values coming from DB for ex:

 value = false

 if(!value) {
   // it will change all false values to not available
   return "not available"
 }

Solution 21 - Javascript

Checking error conditions:

// Typical API response data
let data = {
  status: true,
  user: [],
  total: 0,
  activity: {sports: 1}
}

// A flag that checks whether all conditions were met or not
var passed = true;

// Boolean check
if (data['status'] === undefined || data['status'] == false){
  console.log("Undefined / no `status` data");
  passed = false;
}

// Array/dict check
if (data['user'] === undefined || !data['user'].length){
  console.log("Undefined / no `user` data");
  passed = false;
}

// Checking a key in a dictionary
if (data['activity'] === undefined || data['activity']['time'] === undefined){
   console.log("Undefined / no `time` data");
   passed = false;
}

// Other values check
if (data['total'] === undefined || !data['total']){
  console.log("Undefined / no `total` data");
  passed = false;
}

// Passed all tests?
if (passed){
  console.log("Passed all tests");
}

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionMahdi_NineView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - JavascriptNoneView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - JavascriptWebWandererView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - Javascriptic3b3rgView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - JavascriptArshid KVView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - JavascriptKamil KiełczewskiView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - JavascriptbvdbView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - JavascriptDeekshithView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - JavascriptJoey C.View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - JavascriptDrStrangeLoveView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - JavascriptNejmeddine JammeliView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 11 - JavascriptMichael LaszloView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 12 - JavascriptNaeem BaghiView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 13 - JavascriptGabrielView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 14 - JavascriptAshita.guptaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 15 - JavascriptKaleem UllahView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 16 - JavascriptTarmo SalusteView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 17 - JavascriptNeithan MaxView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 18 - JavascriptPitView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 19 - Javascriptuser5520516View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 20 - JavascriptCodieeView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 21 - JavascriptP-SView Answer on Stackoverflow