How do I assert an Iterable contains elements with a certain property?

Assume I want to unit test a method with this signature:

List<MyItem> getMyItems();

Assume MyItem is a Pojo that has many properties, one of which is "name", accessed via getName().

All I care about verifying is that the List<MyItem>, or any Iterable, contains two MyItem instances, whose "name" properties have the values "foo" and "bar". If any other properties don't match, I don't really care for the purposes of this test. If the names match, it's a successful test.

I would like it to be one-liner if possible. Here is some "pseudo-syntax" of the kind of thing I would like to do.

assert(listEntriesMatchInAnyOrder(myClass.getMyItems(), property("name"), new String[]{"foo", "bar"});

Would Hamcrest be good for this type of thing? If so, what exactly would be the hamcrest version of my pseudo-syntax above?

Thank you @Razvan who pointed me in the right direction. I was able to get it in one line and I successfully hunted down the imports for Hamcrest 1.3.

the imports:

import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.is;
import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.contains;
import static org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat;
import static org.hamcrest.beans.HasPropertyWithValue.hasProperty;

the code:

assertThat( myClass.getMyItems(), contains(
    hasProperty("name", is("foo")), 
    hasProperty("name", is("bar"))
));

Try:

assertThat(myClass.getMyItems(),
                          hasItem(hasProperty("YourProperty", is("YourValue"))));

Its not especially Hamcrest, but I think it worth to mention here. What I use quite often in Java8 is something like:

assertTrue(myClass.getMyItems().stream().anyMatch(item -> "foo".equals(item.getName())));

(Edited to Rodrigo Manyari's slight improvement. It's a little less verbose. See comments.)

It may be a little bit harder to read, but I like the type and refactoring safety. Its also cool for testing multiple bean properties in combination. e.g. with a java-like && expression in the filter lambda.

AssertJ provides an excellent feature in extracting() : you can pass Functions to extract fields. It provides a check at compile time.
You could also assert the size first easily.

It would give :

import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions;

Assertions.assertThat(myClass.getMyItems())
          .hasSize(2)
          .extracting(MyItem::getName)
          .containsExactlyInAnyOrder("foo", "bar"); 

containsExactlyInAnyOrder() asserts that the list contains only these values whatever the order.

To assert that the list contains these values whatever the order but may also contain other values use contains() :

.contains("foo", "bar"); 

---

As a side note : to assert multiple fields from elements of a List , with AssertJ we do that by wrapping expected values for each element into a tuple() function :

import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions;
import static org.assertj.core.groups.Tuple;

Assertions.assertThat(myClass.getMyItems())
          .hasSize(2)
          .extracting(MyItem::getName, MyItem::getOtherValue)
          .containsExactlyInAnyOrder(
               tuple("foo", "OtherValueFoo"),
               tuple("bar", "OtherValueBar")
           ); 

Assertj is good at this.

import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat;

    assertThat(myClass.getMyItems()).extracting("name").contains("foo", "bar");

Big plus for assertj compared to hamcrest is easy use of code completion.

As long as your List is a concrete class, you can simply call the contains() method as long as you have implemented your equals() method on MyItem.

// given 
// some input ... you to complete

// when
List<MyItems> results = service.getMyItems();

// then
assertTrue(results.contains(new MyItem("foo")));
assertTrue(results.contains(new MyItem("bar")));

Assumes you have implemented a constructor that accepts the values you want to assert on. I realise this isn't on a single line, but it's useful to know which value is missing rather than checking both at once.

AssertJ 3.9.1 supports direct predicate usage in anyMatch method.

assertThat(collection).anyMatch(element -> element.someProperty.satisfiesSomeCondition())

This is generally suitable use case for arbitrarily complex condition.

For simple conditions I prefer using extracting method (see above) because resulting iterable-under-test might support value verification with better readability. Example: it can provide specialized API such as contains method in Frank Neblung's answer. Or you can call anyMatch on it later anyway and use method reference such as "searchedvalue"::equals. Also multiple extractors can be put into extracting method, result subsequently verified using tuple().

Alternatively to hasProperty you can try hamcrest-more-matchers where matcher with extracting function. In your case it will look like:

import static com.github.seregamorph.hamcrest.MoreMatchers.where;

assertThat(myClass.getMyItems(), contains(
    where(MyItem::getName, is("foo")), 
    where(MyItem::getName, is("bar"))
));

The advantages of this approach are:

• It is not always possible to verify by field if the value is computed in get-method
• In case of mismatch there should be a failure message with diagnostics (pay attention to resolved method reference MyItem.getName:

Expected: iterable containing [Object that matches is "foo" after call
MyItem.getName, Object that matches is "bar" after call MyItem.getName]
     but: item 0: was "wrong-name"

• It works in Java 8, Java 11 and Java 14

With Stream you can also do:

List<String> actual = myList.stream().map(MyClass::getName).collect(toList());
assertThat(actual, hasItem("expectedString1"));

Because with anyMatch() or allMatch(), you know some values in your list are in the list, but there is possibility that your actual list only contains 5 values while in anyMatch() you have 6; you don't know if all values are present or not. With hasItem(), you indeed check every value you want.