How can I make a div not larger than its contents?

HtmlCssWidth

Html Problem Overview


I have a layout similar to:

<div>
    <table>
    </table>
</div>

I would like for the div to only expand to as wide as my table becomes.

Html Solutions


Solution 1 - Html

The solution is to set your div to display: inline-block.

Solution 2 - Html

You want a block element that has what CSS calls shrink-to-fit width and the spec does not provide a blessed way to get such a thing. In CSS2, shrink-to-fit is not a goal, but means to deal with a situation where browser "has to" get a width out of thin air. Those situations are:

  • float
  • absolutely positioned element
  • inline-block element
  • table element

when there are no width specified. I heard they think of adding what you want in CSS3. For now, make do with one of the above.

The decision not to expose the feature directly may seem strange, but there is a good reason. It is expensive. Shrink-to-fit means formatting at least twice: you cannot start formatting an element until you know its width, and you cannot calculate the width w/o going through entire content. Plus, one does not need shrink-to-fit element as often as one may think. Why do you need extra div around your table? Maybe table caption is all you need.

Solution 3 - Html

I think using

display: inline-block;

would work, however I'm not sure about the browser compatibility.


Another solution would be to wrap your div in another div (if you want to maintain the block behavior):

HTML:

<div>
    <div class="yourdiv">
        content
    </div>
</div>

CSS:

.yourdiv
{
    display: inline;
}

Solution 4 - Html

display: inline-block adds an extra margin to your element.

I would recommend this:

#element {
    display: table; /* IE8+ and all other modern browsers */
}

Bonus: You can also now easily center that fancy new #element just by adding margin: 0 auto.

Solution 5 - Html

You can try fit-content (CSS3):

div {
  width: fit-content; 
  /* To adjust the height as well */ 
  height: fit-content;
}

Solution 6 - Html

There are two better solutions

  1. display: inline-block;

OR

  1. display: table;

Out of these two display:table; is better, because display: inline-block; adds an extra margin.

For display:inline-block; you can use the negative margin method to fix the extra space

Solution 7 - Html

What works for me is:

display: table;

in the div. (Tested on Firefox and Google Chrome).

Solution 8 - Html

display: -moz-inline-stack;
display: inline-block;
zoom: 1;
*display: inline;

Foo Hack – Cross Browser Support for inline-block Styling (2007-11-19).

Solution 9 - Html

Not knowing in what context this will appear, but I believe the CSS-style property float either left or right will have this effect. On the other hand, it'll have other side effects as well, such as allowing text to float around it.

Please correct me if I'm wrong though, I'm not 100% sure, and currently can't test it myself.

Solution 10 - Html

The answer for your question lays in the future my friend ...

namely "intrinsic" is coming with the latest CSS3 update

width: intrinsic;

unfortunately IE is behind with it so it doesn't support it yet

More about it: CSS Intrinsic & Extrinsic Sizing Module Level 3 and Can I Use?: Intrinsic & Extrinsic Sizing.

For now you have to be satisfied with <span> or <div> set to

display: inline-block;

Solution 11 - Html

width:1px;
white-space: nowrap;

works fine for me :)

Solution 12 - Html

A CSS2 compatible solution is to use:

.my-div
{
    min-width: 100px;
}

You can also float your div which will force it as small as possible, but you'll need to use a clearfix if anything inside your div is floating:

.my-div
{
    float: left;
}

Solution 13 - Html

OK, in many cases you even don't need to do anything as by default div has height and width as auto, but if it's not your case, applying inline-block display gonna work for you... look at the code I create for you and it's do what you looking for:

div {
  display: inline-block;
}

<div>
  <table>
    <tr>
      <td>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Morbi ultrices feugiat massa sed laoreet. Maecenas et magna egestas, facilisis purus quis, vestibulum nibh.</td>
      <td>Nunc auctor aliquam est ac viverra. Sed enim nisi, feugiat sed accumsan eu, convallis eget felis. Pellentesque consequat eu leo nec pharetra. Aenean interdum enim dapibus diam.</td>
      <td>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Morbi ultrices feugiat massa sed laoreet. Maecenas et magna egestas, facilisis purus quis, vestibulum nibh.</td>
    </tr>
  </table>
</div>

Solution 14 - Html

This has been mentioned in comments and is hard to find in one of the answers so:

If you are using display: flex for whatever reason, you can instead use:

div {
    display: inline-flex;
}

This is also widely supported across browsers.

Solution 15 - Html

You can try this code. Follow the code in the CSS section.

div {
  display: inline-block;
  padding: 2vw;
  background-color: green;
}

table {
  width: 70vw;
  background-color: white;
}

<div>
    <table border="colapsed">
      <tr>
        <td>Apple</td>
        <td>Banana</td>
        <td>Strawberry</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Apple</td>
        <td>Banana</td>
        <td>Strawberry</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Apple</td>
        <td>Banana</td>
        <td>Strawberry</td>
      </tr>

    </table>
</div>

Solution 16 - Html

Just put a style into your CSS file

div { 
    width: fit-content; 
}

Solution 17 - Html

Try to use width: max-content property to adjust the width of the div by it's content size.

Try this example,

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<style>
div.ex1 {
  width:500px;
  margin: auto;
  border: 3px solid #73AD21;
}

div.ex2 {
  width: max-content;
  margin: auto;
  border: 3px solid #73AD21;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>

<div class="ex1">This div element has width 500px;</div>
<br>
<div class="ex2">Width by content size</div>

</body>
</html>

Solution 18 - Html

<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0">
    <tr>
        <td>
            <div id="content_lalala">
	            this content inside the div being inside a table, needs no inline properties and the table is the one expanding to the content of this div =)
            </div>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table>

I know people don't like tables sometimes, but I gotta tell you, I tried the css inline hacks, and they kinda worked in some divs but in others didn't, so, it was really just easier to enclose the expanding div in a table...and...it can have or not the inline property and still the table is the one that's gonna hold the total width of the content. =)

Solution 19 - Html

You can do it simply by using display: inline; (or white-space: nowrap;).

I hope you find this useful.

Solution 20 - Html

You can use inline-block as @user473598, but beware of older browsers..

/* Your're working with */
display: inline-block;

/* For IE 7 */
zoom: 1;
*display: inline;

/* For Mozilla Firefox < 3.0 */
display:-moz-inline-stack;

Mozilla doesn’t support inline-block at all, but they have -moz-inline-stack which is about the same

Some cross-browser around inline-block display attribute: https://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/cross-browser-inline-block/

You can see some tests with this attribute in: https://robertnyman.com/2010/02/24/css-display-inline-block-why-it-rocks-and-why-it-sucks/

Solution 21 - Html

just set the width and height to fit-content. it is very simple.

div {

    width: fit-content;
    height: fit-content;
    padding: 10px;

}

> I am adding padding: 10px;. if it is left out, the div element will completely stick with the table and it will look a bit clumsy. Padding will create the given space between the border of the element and it's contents. But it is your wish not compulsory.

Solution 22 - Html

An working demo is here-

.floating-box {
    display:-moz-inline-stack;
    display: inline-block;

    width: fit-content; 
    height: fit-content;

    width: 150px;
    height: 75px;
    margin: 10px;
    border: 3px solid #73AD21;  
}

<h2>The Way is using inline-block</h2>

Supporting elements are also added in CSS.

<div>
   <div class="floating-box">Floating box</div>
   <div class="floating-box">Floating box</div>
   <div class="floating-box">Floating box</div>
   <div class="floating-box">Floating box</div>
   <div class="floating-box">Floating box</div>
   <div class="floating-box">Floating box</div>
   <div class="floating-box">Floating box</div>
   <div class="floating-box">Floating box</div>
</div>

Solution 23 - Html

My CSS3 flexbox solution in two flavors: The one on top behaves like a span and the one at the bottom behaves like a div, taking all the width with the help of a wrapper. Their classes are "top", "bottom" and "bottomwrapper" respectively.

body {
    font-family: sans-serif;
}
.top {
    display: -webkit-inline-flex;
    display: inline-flex;
}
.top, .bottom {
    background-color: #3F3;
    border: 2px solid #FA6;
}
/* bottomwrapper will take the rest of the width */
.bottomwrapper {
    display: -webkit-flex;
    display: flex;
}
table {
    border-collapse: collapse;
}
table, th, td {
    width: 280px;
    border: 1px solid #666;
}
th {
    background-color: #282;
    color: #FFF;
}
td {
    color: #444;
}
th, td {
    padding: 0 4px 0 4px;
}

Is this
<div class="top">
	<table>
        <tr>
            <th>OS</th>
            <th>Version</th> 
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td>OpenBSD</td>
            <td>5.7</td> 
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td>Windows</td>
            <td>Please upgrade to 10!</td> 
        </tr>
    </table>
</div>
what you are looking for?
<br>
Or may be...
<div class="bottomwrapper">
    <div class="bottom">
    	<table>
            <tr>
                <th>OS</th>
                <th>Version</th> 
            </tr>
            <tr>
                <td>OpenBSD</td>
                <td>5.7</td> 
            </tr>
            <tr>
                <td>Windows</td>
                <td>Please upgrade to 10!</td> 
            </tr>
        </table>
    </div>
</div>
this is what you are looking for.

Solution 24 - Html

Tampering around with Firebug I found the property value -moz-fit-content which exactly does what the OP wanted and could be used as follow:

width: -moz-fit-content;

Although it only works on Firefox, I couldn't find any equivalent for other browsers such as Chrome.

Solution 25 - Html

<div class="parentDiv" style="display:inline-block">
    // HTML elements
</div>

This will make parent div width same as the largest element width.

Solution 26 - Html

Try display: inline-block;. For it to be cross browser compatible please use the below css code.

div {
  display: inline-block;
  display:-moz-inline-stack;
  zoom:1;
  *display:inline;
  border-style: solid;
  border-color: #0000ff;
}

<div>
  <table>
    <tr>
      <td>Column1</td>
      <td>Column2</td>
      <td>Column3</td>
    </tr>
  </table>
</div>

Solution 27 - Html

div{
width:fit-content;
}

<div>
    <table>
    </table>
</div>

Solution 28 - Html

    .outer{
          width:fit-content;   
          display: flex;
          align-items: center;
    }
    .outer .content{
         width: 100%;
    }
        
        
        
        
<div class=outer>
    <div class=content>
       Add your content here


    </div>
        
</div>

Solution 29 - Html

I have solved a similar problem (where I didn't want to use display: inline-block because the item was centered) by adding a span tag inside the div tag, and moving the CSS formatting from the outer div tag to the new inner span tag. Just throwing this out there as another alternative idea if display: inline block isn't a suitable answer for you.

Solution 30 - Html

We can use any of the two ways on the div element:

display: table;

or,

display: inline-block; 

I prefer to use display: table;, because it handles, all extra spaces on its own. While display: inline-block needs some extra space fixing.

Solution 31 - Html

div{
  width:auto;
  height:auto;
}

Solution 32 - Html

Revised (works if you have multiple children): You can use jQuery (Look at the JSFiddle link)

var d= $('div');
var w;
 

d.children().each(function(){
 w = w + $(this).outerWidth();
 d.css('width', w + 'px')
});

Do not forget to include the jQuery...

See the JSfiddle here

Solution 33 - Html

If you have containers breaking lines, after hours looking for a good CSS solution and finding none, I now use jQuery instead:

$('button').click(function(){

  $('nav ul').each(function(){
    
    $parent = $(this).parent();
    
    $parent.width( $(this).width() );
    
  });
});

nav {
  display: inline-block;
  text-align: left; /* doesn't do anything, unlike some might guess */
}
ul {
  display: inline;
}

/* needed style */
ul {
  padding: 0;
}
body {
  width: 420px;
}

/* just style */
body {
  background: #ddd;
  margin: 1em auto;
}
button {
  display: block;
}
nav {
  background: #bbb;
  margin: 1rem auto;
  padding: 0.5rem;
}
li {
  display: inline-block;
  width: 40px;
  height: 20px;
  border: solid thin #777;
  margin: 4px;
  background: #999;
  text-align: center;
}

<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>

<button>fix</button>

<nav>
  <ul>
    <li>3</li>
    <li>.</li>
    <li>1</li>
    <li>4</li>
  </ul>
</nav>

<nav>
  <ul>
    <li>3</li>
    <li>.</li>
    <li>1</li>
    <li>4</li>
    <li>1</li>
    <li>5</li>
    <li>9</li>
    <li>2</li>
    <li>6</li>
    <li>5</li>
    <li>3</li>
    <li>5</li>
  </ul>
</nav>

Solution 34 - Html

I tried div.classname{display:table-cell;} and it worked!

Solution 35 - Html

You could use display: flex for parent element

#parentElement {
   display: flex;
   flex-direction: column;
   align-items: flex-start;
 }

Solution 36 - Html

I would just set padding: -whateverYouWantpx;

Solution 37 - Html

I've a span inside a div and just setting margin: auto to the container div worked for me.

Solution 38 - Html

Personnaly, I simply do this :

HTML code:

<div>
    <table>
    </table>
</div>

CSS code:

div {
    display: inline;
}

If you apply a float on your div, it works too but obviously, you need to apply a "clear both" CSS rules at the next HTML element.

Solution 39 - Html

Simply

<div style="display: inline;">
    <table>
    </table>
</div>

Solution 40 - Html

What if we define a global variable and use that for both.

:root {
    --table-width: 400px;
}

.container{
     width:var(--table-width);
     border: 1px solid black;   // easy visualization
}
.inner-table {
     width:var(--table-width);
     border: 1px solid red;   // easy visualization
}

<div class="container">
    <table class="inner-table">
       <tr>
           <td>abc</td>
       </tr>
    </table>
</div>

Solution 41 - Html

This seems to work fine for me on all browsers. Example is an actual ad i use online and in newsletter. Just change the content of the div. It will adjust and shrinkwrap with the amount of padding you specify.

<div style="float:left; border: 3px ridge red; background: aqua; padding:12px">
    <font color=red size=4>Need to fix a birth certificate? Learn <a href="http://www.example.com">Photoshop in a Day</a>!
    </font>
</div>

Solution 42 - Html

You can use height: 100% and width for your choice. This makes the div not larger than its content.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionGeorge SniderView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - Htmluser473598View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - Htmlbuti-oxaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - HtmlmbillardView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - HtmlSalman von AbbasView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - HtmlVitalii FedorenkoView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - HtmlShuvo HabibView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - HtmlSony SantosView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - Htmlnikib3roView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - HtmlfalstroView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - HtmltrojanView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 11 - HtmlDaft WullieView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 12 - HtmlSoviutView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 13 - HtmlAlirezaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 14 - HtmlyoungrrrrView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 15 - HtmlShowrin BaruaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 16 - HtmlHamzaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 17 - HtmlCodemakerView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 18 - HtmlEdwardView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 19 - HtmlmiksiiiView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 20 - HtmlRPichioliView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 21 - HtmlCoder_NaveedView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 22 - HtmlAbrar JahinView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 23 - Htmluser6558785View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 24 - Html2hamedView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 25 - HtmlJaimin DaveView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 26 - HtmlJamesView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 27 - HtmlAwabil GeorgeView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 28 - HtmlTrupti M PanchalView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 29 - HtmlJessica BrownView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 30 - HtmlNoviceView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 31 - HtmlAJchanduView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 32 - HtmlBondsmithView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 33 - HtmlcregoxView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 34 - HtmlunlocoView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 35 - HtmlZhenyaUsenkoView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 36 - HtmlNathanielSantleyView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 37 - HtmlVinay MehtaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 38 - HtmlNicolas TalichetView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 39 - HtmlZekeView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 40 - HtmlHarshanaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 41 - HtmlDearWebbyView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 42 - HtmlRehan RabbaniView Answer on Stackoverflow