Haskell "do nothing" IO, or if without else

HaskellSyntaxIo

Haskell Problem Overview


I want to do something in Haskell that looks like this:

main1 = do s <- getLine
           if s == "foo" then putStr "You entered foo"

Obviously this isn't legal since there's no else. One alternative I've thought of:

nop :: IO ()
nop = sequence_ []

main2 = do s <- getLine
           if s == "foo" then putStr "You entered foo" else nop

This is a little verbose, but I would settle for it if necessary. I would be surprised if there weren't a built-in version of nop, though.

Alternatively:

doIf :: Bool -> IO () -> IO ()
doIf b m = if b then m else nop

main3 = do s <- getLine
           doIf (s == "foo") (putStr "You entered foo")

This is more concise, but the syntax is not particularly nice. Again, I wouldn't be surprised to find something built-in that already exists.

What's the preferred way to do this?

Haskell Solutions


Solution 1 - Haskell

The easiest way to do a no-op in a monad is:

return ()

Equivalently:

pure ()

However, for the particular idiom you're doing, there's a combinator already made for you:

import Control.Monad
main = do s <- getLine
          when (s == "foo") $ putStr "You entered foo"

This when combinator behaves exactly like your doIf combinator :)

Solution 2 - Haskell

You can use Hoogle to find functions, in this case: when.

In Hoogle, you can enter the type signature, and it will try to find matching functions in the standard libraries by unifying the types and reordering arguments.

In your case, you can simply enter the type of your doIf function: Bool -> IO () -> IO () . when is the third answer here, its reverse unless is there also.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionDave BView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - HaskellbdonlanView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - HaskellTom LokhorstView Answer on Stackoverflow