Google webfonts render choppy in Chrome on Windows

CssGoogle ChromeSvgFontsGoogle Webfonts

Css Problem Overview


I use the Google Webfonts service on my website and rely heavily on it. It renders fine on most browsers, but in Chrome on Windows it renders especially bad. Very choppy and pixelated.

What i have found out so far is that Chrome requires the .svg format font to be loaded first. The font i am using however, called Asap, was only available in .woff. I converted it to .svg using a free online service, but when i added that to my stylesheet (before the .woff), it didn't change anything.

I've also tried:

-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased;
text-shadow: 0px 0px 0px;

Hoping that either would help the text render more smoothly.

Right now i've run out of ideas and i would hate to change fonts. Does anyone have an idea how i can solve this problem? I've been using the Adobe Browserlab to test the rendering, seeing as how i only own a mac. The link to the site is: www.symvoli.nl/about

Thanks in advance!

Edit April 11th, 2013:

Chrome 35 Beta seems to have finally solved this issue:

enter image description here

Css Solutions


Solution 1 - Css

##Update August 2014

> Google finally fixes this issue in Chrome 37 natively!!!. But for historical reasons I won't delete this answer.

###Problem

The issue is created because chrome actually cannot render TrueType fonts with correct anti-aliasing. However, chrome still renders SVG files well. If you move the call for your svg file up in your syntax above the woff, chrome will download the svg and use it instead of the woff file. Some tricks like you propose work well, but only on certain font sizes.

But this bug is very well known to the Chrome developer team, and has been in fixing since July 2012. See the official bug report thread here: https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=137692

###Update Oct 2013 (Thanks to @Catch22)

Apparently some websites may experience intermittent spacing issues when rendering the svg. So there is a better way to skin it. If you call the svg with a media query specific to Chrome, the spacing issues disappear:

@media screen and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio:0) {
  @font-face {
      font-family: 'MyWebFont';
      src: url('webfont.svg#svgFontName') format('svg');
  }
}

###First approach solution:

The Fontspring bulletproof syntax modified to serve the svg first:

@font-face {
	font-family: 'MyWebFont';
	src: url('webfont.eot'); 
	src: url('webfont.eot?#iefix') format('embedded-opentype'),
		 url('webfont.svg#svgFontName') format('svg'),
		 url('webfont.woff') format('woff'),
		 url('webfont.ttf')  format('truetype');
}

###Further reading:

Solution 2 - Css

-webkit-text-stroke: 0.5px;

use it only on large text, since it will affect your page performance.

Solution 3 - Css

A fix has been suggested here by calling the .svg file first, http://www.adtrak.co.uk/blog/font-face-chrome-rendering/

Solution 4 - Css

I've tried a number of solutions and finally came up with one that works with newer versions of Chrome which don't fall for changing the order of the files:

Essentially, I moved the TTF file into a Mozilla specific section.

@font-face {
    font-family: 'MyWebFont';
    src: url('webfont.eot'); 
    src: url('webfont.eot?#iefix') format('embedded-opentype'),
         url('webfont.svg#svgFontName') format('svg'),
         url('webfont.woff') format('woff');
}
@-moz-font-face {
    font-family: 'MyWebFont';    
    src: url('webfont.ttf')  format('truetype');
}

Solution 5 - Css

Answer by Tom & font-spring didn't do it for me for some reason. This fix by Sam Goddard did though :

> After experimenting myself, I stumbled across what appears to be a decent, very easy fix for this issue. It appears that Chrome utilises the .svg file in the @font-face kit, and doesn’t like being called last. Below is the standard call for @font-face using CSS:

// font-face inclusion
@font-face {
  font-family: 'font-name';
                src: url('path-to-font/font-name.eot');
                src: url('path-to-font/font-name.eot?#iefix') format('eot'),
                url('path-to-font/font-name.woff') format('woff'),
                url('path-to-font/font-name.ttf') format('truetype'),
                url('path-to-font/font-name.svg') format('svg');
  font-weight: normal;
  font-style: normal;
}

> As can be seen in the example, the .svg file comes last in the list of called URLs. If we amend the code to target webkit browsers, then tell them to solely utilize the .svg file.

// Usage
@media screen and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio:0) {
  @font-face {
    font-family: ‘font-name';
    src: url(‘path-to-font/font-name.svg’) format(‘svg’);
    }
}

Solution 6 - Css

It could just be the font your using "asap" doesn't render all that well at certain sizes. I changed the size of your h1 from 3.5em to 50px and it looks a little better. May not be the perfect solution but I have noticed that a lot of google webfonts can be unpredictable

Solution 7 - Css

I develop in Firefox. My experience is that FF displays ttf fonts very well without any extra rules (beyond the @font-face calling the url for the font file). Chrome, however, is a different story. Even with with the -webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; rule it still displays any font quite raggedly. Safari doesn't seem to have that problem, so it's not inherently Webkit that can't render a font cleanly, it's a Chrome problem.

I haven't tried adding the -webkit-text-stroke: 0.5px; rule, but will.

Of the answers above I really like Tom Sarduy's answer best. Aside from a good description of the problem, he gives a great @font-face stack to use to cover all the major browsers.

Solution 8 - Css

Another link reference for web font rendering in chrome -

http://www.fontspring.com/blog/smoother-web-font-rendering-chrome

Solution 9 - Css

Had the same thing guys. Good in all browsers except chrome - even IE10 and 9 were fine. Dreamwaeevr CS6 also uses a similar version of fontsprings code, but has the svg at the end. Change it round for SVG before woff and ttf and all in the world is good. Tom is bang on with hos example there, in fact past that into your code and map paths to the fonts you need, and you're in business!

Solution 10 - Css

It seems that Google might serve different woff files depending on the browser and OS.

I found that if I download the font from IE, it's about 10k bigger than if done on Safari from the Mac for a particular font. 43k vs 33k. Also, the IE version seems to look fine on the Mac, but the Mac version doesn't seem to work fine on the PC. The Mac version looks the worst in Mozilla Firefox on the PC.

Try this: http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Source+Sans+Pro:400,600,400italic,600italic

SourceSansPro-Regular.woff PC version 27k

SourceSansPro-Regular.woff Apple version 24k

Solution 11 - Css

i have tried many ways: -loading the svg with font-face -webkit-font-smoothening ...

after

-webkit-transform: rotate(-4.7deg) translate3d( 0, 0, 0);

the rotating was smoother but the main problem hasnt gone.

For me the solution was adding:

-webkit-text-stroke: 0.5px;

Solution 12 - Css

https://www.gettingthingstech.com/how-to-fix-jagged-font-rendering-in-google-chrome/

This post explains a little about google chromes experimental functions. Apparently enabling the "DisableWrite" option fixes the jagged fonts. This is obviously a fix PER machine and not on a full scale.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionJoeyView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - CssTom SarduyView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - CssDaniel SachsView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - CsscmccarraView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - CssJosh BrownView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - CssPraeView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - CssKeithView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - CssMax WestView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - CssVGruenhagenView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - CssSimon PointerView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - CssRick PaulView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 11 - Cssxs1337gxView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 12 - CsszakpucciView Answer on Stackoverflow