git push vs git push origin <branchname>

I'm quite new to Git.

I'm creating a branch and then want to push it to origin.

I think that simply issuing git push (while standing on my branch) should be sufficient.

Is it possible/reasonable to do that (by specifying push.default simple)?

The first push should be a:

git push -u origin branchname

That would make sure:

• your local branch has a remote tracking branch of the same name referring an upstream branch in your remote repo 'origin',
• this is compliant with the default push policy 'simple'

Any future git push will, with that default policy, only push the current branch, and only if that branch has an upstream branch with the same name.
that avoid pushing all matching branches (previous default policy), where tons of test branches were pushed even though they aren't ready to be visible on the upstream repo.

First, you need to create your branch locally

git checkout -b your_branch

After that, you can work locally in your branch, when you are ready to share the branch, push it. The next command push the branch to the remote repository origin and tracks it

git push -u origin your_branch

Your Teammates/colleagues can push to your branch by doing commits and then push explicitly

... work ...
git commit
... work ...
git commit
git push origin HEAD:refs/heads/your_branch