Your quotes only need to surround the value part of the [attribute-equals selector][1], `[attr=&#39;val&#39;]`, like this:

    $(&#39;a#check_var&#39;).click(function() {
      alert($(&quot;input:radio[name=&#39;r&#39;]:checked&quot;).val()+ &#39; &#39;+
            $(&quot;input:radio[name=&#39;s&#39;]:checked&quot;).val());
    });​

[You can see the working version here][2].


  [1]: http://api.jquery.com/attribute-equals-selector/
  [2]: http://jsfiddle.net/nick_craver/c857P/

I have List `List&lt;MyType&gt;`, my type contains `Age` and `RandomID`

Now I want to find the maximum age from this list.

What is the simplest and most efficient way?

Get Max value from List&lt;myType&gt;

I am interested in learning more about how people inject logging with dependency injection platforms.  Although the links below and my examples refer to log4net and Unity, I am not necessarily going to use either of those.  For dependency injection/IOC, I will probably use MEF as that is the standard that the rest of the project (large) is settling on.

I am very new to dependency injection/ioc and am pretty new to C# and .NET (have written very little production code in C#/.NET after the past 10 years or so of VC6 and VB6).  I have done a lot of investigation into the various logging solutions that are out there, so I think that I have a decent handle on their feature sets.  I am just not familiar enough the with actual mechanics of getting one dependency injected (or, maybe more &quot;correctly&quot;, getting an abstracted version of one dependency injected).

I have seen other posts related to logging and/or dependency injection like:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/522370/dependency-injection-and-logging-interfaces

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/576185/logging-best-practices

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/166438/what-would-a-log4net-wrapper-class-look-like

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1320844/again-about-log4net-and-unity-ioc-config

My question does not have specifically to do with &quot;How to I inject logging platform xxx using ioc tool yyy?&quot;  Rather, I am interested in how people have handled wrapping the logging platform (as is often, but not always recommended) and configuration (i.e. app.config).  For example, using log4net as an example, I could configure (in app.config) a number of loggers and then get those loggers (without dependency injection) in the standard way of using code like this:

    private static readonly ILog logger = LogManager.GetLogger(MethodBase.GetCurrentMethod().DeclaringType);


Alternatively, if my logger is not named for a class, but rather, for a functional area, I could do this:

    private static readonly ILog logger = LogManager.GetLogger(&quot;Login&quot;);
    private static readonly ILog logger = LogManager.GetLogger(&quot;Query&quot;);
    private static readonly ILog logger = LogManager.GetLogger(&quot;Report&quot;);


So, I guess that my &quot;requirements&quot; would be something like this:

1.  I would like to insulate my product&#39;s source from a direct dependency on a logging platform.

2.  I would like to be able to resolve a specific named logger instance (probably sharing the same instance among all requesters of the same named instance) either directly or indirectly by some kind of dependency injection, probably MEF.

3.  I don&#39;t know if I would call this a hard requirement, but I would like the ability to get a named logger (different than the class logger) on demand.  For example, I might create a logger for my class based on the class name, but one method needs particulary heavy diagnostics that I would like to control separately.  In other words, I might want a single class to &quot;depend&quot; on two separate logger instances.

Let&#39;s start with number 1.  I have read a number of articles, primarily here on stackoverflow, about whether or not it is a good idea to wrap.  See the &quot;best practices&quot; link above and go to [jeffrey hantin][1]&#39;s comment for one view about why it is bad to wrap log4net.  If you did wrap (and if you could wrap effectively) would you wrap strictly for the purpose of injection/removal of direct depdency?  Or would you also try to abstract away some or all of the log4net app.config information?  

Let&#39;s say I want to use System.Diagnostics, I would probably want to implement an interface-based logger (maybe even using the &quot;common&quot; ILogger/ILog interface), probably based on TraceSource, so that I could inject it.  Would you implement the interface, say over TraceSource, and just use the System.Diagnostics app.config information as is?

Something like this:

    public class MyLogger : ILogger
    {
      private TraceSource ts;
      public MyLogger(string name)
      {
        ts = new TraceSource(name);
      }
    
      public void ILogger.Log(string msg)
      {
        ts.TraceEvent(msg);
      }
    }
And use it like this:

    private static readonly ILogger logger = new MyLogger(&quot;stackoverflow&quot;);
    logger.Info(&quot;Hello world!&quot;)

Moving on to number 2 ... How to resolve a particular named logger instance?  Should I just leverage the app.config information of the logging platform that I choose (i.e. resolve the loggers based on the naming scheme in the app.config)?  So, in the case of log4net, might I prefer to &quot;inject&quot; LogManager (note that I know this is not possible since it is a static object)?  I could wrap LogManager (call it MyLogManager), give it an ILogManager interface, and then resolve MyLogManager.ILogManager interface.  My other objects could have a depenency (Import in MEF parlance) on ILogManager (Export from the assembly where it is implemented).  Now I could have objects like this:

    public class MyClass
    {
      private ILogger logger;
      public MyClass([Import(typeof(ILogManager))] logManager)
      {
        logger = logManager.GetLogger(&quot;MyClass&quot;);
      }
    }

Any time ILogManager is called, it would directly delegate to log4net&#39;s LogManager.  Alternatively, could the wrapped LogManager take the ILogger instances that it gets based on the app.config and add them to the(a ?) MEF container by name.  Later, when a logger of the same name is requested, the wrapped LogManager is queried for that name.  If the ILogger is there, it is resolved that way.  If this is possible with MEF, is there any benefit do doing so?

In this case, really, only ILogManager is &quot;injected&quot; and it can hand out ILogger instances in the way that log4net normally does.  How does this type of injection (essentially of a factory) compare to injecting the named logger instances?  This does allow for more easy leveraging of log4net&#39;s (or other logging platform) app.config file.

I know that I can get named instances out of the MEF container like this:

    var container = new CompositionContainer(&lt;catalogs and other stuff&gt;);
    ILogger logger = container.GetExportedValue&lt;ILogger&gt;(&quot;ThisLogger&quot;);

But how do I get the named instances into the container?  I know about the attribute based model where I could have different implementations of ILogger, each of which is named (via a MEF attribute), but that doesn&#39;t really help me.  Is there a way to create something like an app.config (or a section therein) that would list the loggers (all of the same implementation) by name and that MEF could read?  Could/should there be a central &quot;manager&quot; (like MyLogManager) that resolves named loggers via the underlying app.config and then inserts the resolved logger into the MEF container?  This way it would be available to someone else that has access to the same MEF container (although without the MyLogManager&#39;s knowledge of how to use log4net&#39;s app.config information, it seems that the container would be unable to resolve any named loggers directly).

This has already gotten pretty long.  I hope it that it is coherent.  Please feel free to share any specific information about how you dependency injected a logging platform (we are most likely considering log4net, NLog, or something (hopefully thin) built on System.Diagnostics) into your application.  

Did you inject the &quot;manager&quot; and have it return logger instances?  

Did you add some of your own config information in your own config section or in your DI platform&#39;s config section to make it easier/possible to inject logger instances directly (i.e. make your dependencies be on ILogger rather than ILogManager).  

What about having a static or global container that has either the ILogManager interface in it or the set of named ILogger instances in it.  So, rather than injecting in the conventional sense (via constructor, property, or member data), the logging dependency is explicitly resolved on demand.  Is this a good or bad way to dependency inject.

I am marking this as a community wiki since it doesn&#39;t seem like a question with a definite answer.  If anyone feels otherwise, feel free to change it.

Thanks for any help!

  [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/users/55637/jeffrey-hantin






Dependency injection and named loggers

I&#39;m trying to get the value of two radio button groups using the jQuery syntax as given below. When the code below is run I get the value selected from the first radio button group twice instead of getting the value of each individual group.

Am I doing something obviously wrong here? Thanks for any help :)

    &lt;a href=&#39;#&#39; id=&#39;check_var&#39;&gt;Check values&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
    &lt;script&gt;
      $(&#39;a#check_var&#39;).click(function() {
        alert($(&quot;input:radio[&#39;name=r&#39;]:checked&quot;).val()+ &#39; &#39; +
              $(&quot;input:radio[&#39;name=s&#39;]:checked&quot;).val());
      });
    &lt;/script&gt;
    Group 1&lt;br/&gt;
    &lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot;  name=&quot;r&quot; value=&quot;radio1&quot;/&gt; radio1
    &lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot;  name=&quot;r&quot; value=&quot;radio2&quot;/&gt; radio2
    &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
    Group 2&lt;br/&gt;
    &lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot;  name=&quot;s&quot; value=&quot;radio3&quot;/&gt; radio3
    &lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot;  name=&quot;s&quot; value=&quot;radio4&quot;/&gt; radio4


Get Value of Radio button group

I'm trying to get the value of two radio button groups using the jQuery syntax as given below. When the code below is run I get the value selected from the first radio button group twice instead of getting the value of each individual group.
Am I doing something obviously wrong here? Thanks for any help :)
<pre><code class="hljs language-php-template">&#x3C;a href='#' id='check_var'>Check values&#x3C;/a>&#x3C;br/>&#x3C;br/>
&#x3C;script>
 $('a#check_var').click(function() {
 alert($("input:radio['name=r']:checked").val()+ ' ' +
 $("input:radio['name=s']:checked").val());
 });
&#x3C;/script>
Group 1&#x3C;br/>
&#x3C;input type="radio" name="r" value="radio1"/> radio1
&#x3C;input type="radio" name="r" value="radio2"/> radio2
&#x3C;br/>&#x3C;br/>
Group 2&#x3C;br/>
&#x3C;input type="radio" name="s" value="radio3"/> radio3
&#x3C;input type="radio" name="s" value="radio4"/> radio4
</code></pre>

What is the difference between jquery.min.js and jquery.js?

Which one has support for all functions?

What&#39;s the difference between jquery.js and jquery.min.js?

Is there a way that when I click on my browser, and give it focus, to run a method once? And then when the browser loses focus and then gets the focus back to again run that method only once, again.

Is there a browser event for the window getting focus?

I may be an idiot, but how do you keep multiple sections in jQuery UI&#39;s accordion open?  The demos all have only one open at a time... I&#39;m looking for a collapseable menu type system.

jQuery UI accordion that keeps multiple sections open?

How do you test if the browser has focus?

JavaScript / jQuery: Test if window has focus

I have a shopping cart that displays product options in a dropdown menu and if they select &quot;yes&quot;, I want to make some other fields on the page visible. 

The problem is that the shopping cart also includes the price modifier in the text, which can be different for each product. The following code works:

    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(&#39;select[id=&quot;Engraving&quot;]&#39;).change(function() {
            var str = $(&#39;select[id=&quot;Engraving&quot;] option:selected&#39;).text();
            if (str == &quot;Yes (+ $6.95)&quot;) {
                $(&#39;.engraving&#39;).show();
            } else {
                $(&#39;.engraving&#39;).hide();
            }
        });
    });

However I would rather use something like this, which doesn&#39;t work:

    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(&#39;select[id=&quot;Engraving&quot;]&#39;).change(function() {
            var str = $(&#39;select[id=&quot;Engraving&quot;] option:selected&#39;).text();
            if (str *= &quot;Yes&quot;) {
                $(&#39;.engraving&#39;).show();
            } else {
                $(&#39;.engraving&#39;).hide();
            }
        });
    });

I only want to perform the action if the selected option contains the word &quot;Yes&quot;, and would ignore the price modifier.

How do I check if string contains substring?


I am wanting to allow the user of my android application the ability to set some parameters.  The radio button is ideal for this situation.  However, I don&#39;t like the radio buttons are rendered.  

Is it possible to change the radio button icon?  For example, is it possible to create a custom layout for each row and in that layout reference my own icon and change the font et al.

Is it possible to change the radio button icon in an android radio button group

The radio button does not show up as `checked` by default. I started off without a default choice doing some very simple js validation and it wasn&#39;t working. So I opted to just use default values until I figured that out and discovered that something weird is going on. 

The markup is valid and I&#39;ve tried in FF, Safari and Chrome. Nothing works. 

I think it&#39;s a conflict with the `jQuery` library because the problem goes away when I remove the call script.

&lt;!-- begin snippet: js hide: false console: true babel: false --&gt;

&lt;!-- language: lang-html --&gt;

    &lt;label&gt;Do you want to accept American Express?&lt;/label&gt; Yes
    &lt;input id=&quot;amex&quot; style=&quot;width: 20px;&quot; type=&#39;radio&#39; name=&#39;Contact0_AmericanExpress&#39; value=&#39;1&#39; /&gt; No
    &lt;input style=&quot;width: 20px;&quot; type=&#39;radio&#39; name=&#39;Contact0_AmericanExpress&#39; class=&#39;check&#39; value=&#39;0&#39; checked=&quot;checked&quot; /&gt;

&lt;!-- end snippet --&gt;



Radio Buttons &quot;Checked&quot; Attribute Not Working

I am using this code to get the value of currently selected radio button, but it doesn&#39;t work.

    var mailcopy = document.getElementById(&#39;mailCopy&#39;).value; 

How to get the currently selected radio button value using Javascript?

How to get the selected radio button value using js

I have an app that uses radio buttons. The default for this button is set in the main.xml file, ie: 

    android:id=&quot;@+id/rb_sat1E&quot;
    android:checked=&quot;true&quot;

In the Java file I have:

    final RadioButton radio1 = (RadioButton)findViewById(R.id.rb_sat1E);

I have also created a &#39;Reset&#39; button in the main Java file and can use the following code to reset TextView information ie.

    pos1_deg.setText(&quot;0.0&quot;);

But how do I reset a radio button? I would have thought it to be something like

    radio1.setBoolean(&quot;TRUE&quot;);

But that does not work at all.

Any help greatly appreciated. Thanks.

How to set a radio button in Android

Is there please a simple way to make a radio button toggle - when a text near it is clicked - without introducing any big Javascript Framework into my smal PHP project?

The web form looks like this:

    &lt;html&gt;
    &lt;body&gt;
    &lt;form method=&quot;post&quot;&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;Mode:&lt;br /&gt; 
    &lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;mode&quot; value=&quot;create&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;create table&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;mode&quot; value=&quot;select&quot; checked&gt;select records (can specify id)&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;mode&quot; value=&quot;insert&quot;&gt;insert 1 record (must specify all)&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;mode&quot; value=&quot;delete&quot;&gt;delete records (must specify id)&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;mode&quot; value=&quot;drop&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;drop table&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;Id: &lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; name=&quot;id&quot; size=32 maxlength=32 /&gt; (32 hex chars)&lt;/p&gt;
    
    &lt;p&gt;Latitude: &lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; name=&quot;lat&quot; size=10 /&gt; (between -90 and 90)&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;Longitude: &lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; name=&quot;lng&quot; size=10 /&gt; (between -90 and 90)&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;Speed: &lt;input type=&quot;text&quot; name=&quot;spd&quot; size=10 /&gt; (not negative)&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;submit&quot; value=&quot;OK&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;/form&gt;
    &lt;/body&gt;
    &lt;/html&gt;



Content Type	Original Author	Original Content on Stackoverflow
Question	Parampal Pooni	View Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - Jquery	Nick Craver	View Answer on Stackoverflow

Get Value of Radio button group

Jquery Problem Overview

Jquery Solutions

Solution 1 - Jquery

Dependency injection and named loggers

Get Max value from List<myType>

Attributions