Get a list from Pandas DataFrame column headers

PythonPandasDataframe

Python Problem Overview


I want to get a list of the column headers from a Pandas DataFrame. The DataFrame will come from user input, so I won't know how many columns there will be or what they will be called.

For example, if I'm given a DataFrame like this:

>>> my_dataframe
    y  gdp  cap
0   1    2    5
1   2    3    9
2   8    7    2
3   3    4    7
4   6    7    7
5   4    8    3
6   8    2    8
7   9    9   10
8   6    6    4
9  10   10    7

I would get a list like this:

>>> header_list
['y', 'gdp', 'cap']

Python Solutions


Solution 1 - Python

You can get the values as a list by doing:

list(my_dataframe.columns.values)

Also you can simply use (as shown in Ed Chum's answer):

list(my_dataframe)

Solution 2 - Python

There is a built-in method which is the most performant:

my_dataframe.columns.values.tolist()

.columns returns an Index, .columns.values returns an array and this has a helper function .tolist to return a list.

If performance is not as important to you, Index objects define a .tolist() method that you can call directly:

my_dataframe.columns.tolist()

The difference in performance is obvious:

%timeit df.columns.tolist()
16.7 µs ± 317 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100000 loops each)

%timeit df.columns.values.tolist()
1.24 µs ± 12.3 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1000000 loops each)

For those who hate typing, you can just call list on df, as so:

list(df)

Solution 3 - Python

I did some quick tests, and perhaps unsurprisingly the built-in version using dataframe.columns.values.tolist() is the fastest:

In [1]: %timeit [column for column in df]
1000 loops, best of 3: 81.6 µs per loop

In [2]: %timeit df.columns.values.tolist()
10000 loops, best of 3: 16.1 µs per loop

In [3]: %timeit list(df)
10000 loops, best of 3: 44.9 µs per loop

In [4]: % timeit list(df.columns.values)
10000 loops, best of 3: 38.4 µs per loop

(I still really like the list(dataframe) though, so thanks EdChum!)

Solution 4 - Python

It gets even simpler (by Pandas 0.16.0):

df.columns.tolist()

will give you the column names in a nice list.

Solution 5 - Python

Extended Iterable Unpacking (Python 3.5+): [*df] and Friends

Unpacking generalizations (PEP 448) have been introduced with Python 3.5. So, the following operations are all possible.

df = pd.DataFrame('x', columns=['A', 'B', 'C'], index=range(5))
df

   A  B  C
0  x  x  x
1  x  x  x
2  x  x  x
3  x  x  x
4  x  x  x

If you want a list....

[*df]
# ['A', 'B', 'C']

Or, if you want a set,

{*df}
# {'A', 'B', 'C'}

Or, if you want a tuple,

*df,  # Please note the trailing comma
# ('A', 'B', 'C')

Or, if you want to store the result somewhere,

*cols, = df  # A wild comma appears, again
cols
# ['A', 'B', 'C']

... if you're the kind of person who converts coffee to typing sounds, well, this is going consume your coffee more efficiently ;)

> P.S.: if performance is important, you will want to ditch the > solutions above in favour of > > df.columns.to_numpy().tolist() > # ['A', 'B', 'C'] > > > This is similar to Ed Chum's answer, but updated for > v0.24 where .to_numpy() is preferred to the use of .values. See > this answer (by me) for more information.

Visual Check

Since I've seen this discussed in other answers, you can use iterable unpacking (no need for explicit loops).

print(*df)
A B C

print(*df, sep='\n')
A
B
C

Critique of Other Methods

Don't use an explicit for loop for an operation that can be done in a single line (list comprehensions are okay).

Next, using sorted(df) does not preserve the original order of the columns. For that, you should use list(df) instead.

Next, list(df.columns) and list(df.columns.values) are poor suggestions (as of the current version, v0.24). Both Index (returned from df.columns) and NumPy arrays (returned by df.columns.values) define .tolist() method which is faster and more idiomatic.

Lastly, listification i.e., list(df) should only be used as a concise alternative to the aforementioned methods for Python 3.4 or earlier where extended unpacking is not available.

Solution 6 - Python

>>> list(my_dataframe)
['y', 'gdp', 'cap']

To list the columns of a dataframe while in debugger mode, use a list comprehension:

>>> [c for c in my_dataframe]
['y', 'gdp', 'cap']

By the way, you can get a sorted list simply by using sorted:

>>> sorted(my_dataframe)
['cap', 'gdp', 'y']

Solution 7 - Python

That's available as my_dataframe.columns.

Solution 8 - Python

A DataFrame follows the dict-like convention of iterating over the “keys” of the objects.

my_dataframe.keys()

Create a list of keys/columns - object method to_list() and the Pythonic way:

my_dataframe.keys().to_list()
list(my_dataframe.keys())

Basic iteration on a DataFrame returns column labels:

[column for column in my_dataframe]

Do not convert a DataFrame into a list, just to get the column labels. Do not stop thinking while looking for convenient code samples.

xlarge = pd.DataFrame(np.arange(100000000).reshape(10000,10000))
list(xlarge) # Compute time and memory consumption depend on dataframe size - O(N)
list(xlarge.keys()) # Constant time operation - O(1)

Solution 9 - Python

It's interesting, but df.columns.values.tolist() is almost three times faster than df.columns.tolist(), but I thought that they were the same:

In [97]: %timeit df.columns.values.tolist()
100000 loops, best of 3: 2.97 µs per loop

In [98]: %timeit df.columns.tolist()
10000 loops, best of 3: 9.67 µs per loop

Solution 10 - Python

In the Notebook

For data exploration in the IPython notebook, my preferred way is this:

sorted(df)

Which will produce an easy to read alphabetically ordered list.

In a code repository

In code I find it more explicit to do

df.columns

Because it tells others reading your code what you are doing.

Solution 11 - Python

%%timeit
final_df.columns.values.tolist()
948 ns ± 19.2 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1000000 loops each)
%%timeit
list(final_df.columns)
14.2 µs ± 79.1 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100000 loops each)
%%timeit
list(final_df.columns.values)
1.88 µs ± 11.7 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1000000 loops each)
%%timeit
final_df.columns.tolist()
12.3 µs ± 27.4 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100000 loops each)
%%timeit
list(final_df.head(1).columns)
163 µs ± 20.6 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10000 loops each)

Solution 12 - Python

As answered by Simeon Visser, you could do

list(my_dataframe.columns.values)

or

list(my_dataframe) # For less typing.

But I think most the sweet spot is:

list(my_dataframe.columns)

It is explicit and at the same time not unnecessarily long.

Solution 13 - Python

For a quick, neat, visual check, try this:

for col in df.columns:
    print col

Solution 14 - Python

I feel the question deserves an additional explanation.

As fixxxer noted, the answer depends on the Pandas version you are using in your project. Which you can get with pd.__version__ command.

If you are for some reason like me (on Debian 8 (Jessie) I use 0.14.1) using an older version of Pandas than 0.16.0, then you need to use:

df.keys().tolist() because there isn’t any df.columns method implemented yet.

The advantage of this keys method is that it works even in newer version of Pandas, so it's more universal.

Solution 15 - Python

n = []
for i in my_dataframe.columns:
    n.append(i)
print n

Solution 16 - Python

If the DataFrame happens to have an Index or MultiIndex and you want those included as column names too:

names = list(filter(None, df.index.names + df.columns.values.tolist()))

It avoids calling reset_index() which has an unnecessary performance hit for such a simple operation.

I've run into needing this more often because I'm shuttling data from databases where the dataframe index maps to a primary/unique key, but is really just another "column" to me. It would probably make sense for pandas to have a built-in method for something like this (totally possible I've missed it).

Solution 17 - Python

The simplest option would be: list(my_dataframe.columns) or my_dataframe.columns.tolist()

No need for the complex stuff above :)

Solution 18 - Python

Even though the solution that was provided previously is nice, I would also expect something like frame.column_names() to be a function in Pandas, but since it is not, maybe it would be nice to use the following syntax. It somehow preserves the feeling that you are using pandas in a proper way by calling the "tolist" function: frame.columns.tolist()

frame.columns.tolist()

Solution 19 - Python

import pandas as pd

# create test dataframe
df = pd.DataFrame('x', columns=['A', 'B', 'C'], index=range(2))

list(df.columns)

Returns

['A', 'B', 'C']

Solution 20 - Python

listHeaders = [colName for colName in my_dataframe]

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
Questionnatsuki_2002View Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - PythonSimeon VisserView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - PythonEdChumView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - PythonteganView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - PythonfixxxerView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - Pythoncs95View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - PythonAlexanderView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - PythonBrenBarnView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - PythonSascha GottfriedView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - PythonAnton ProtopopovView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - PythonfirelynxView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 11 - Pythonrohit singhView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 12 - PythonVivek PuurkayasthaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 13 - PythonJoseph TrueView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 14 - PythonStefanKView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 15 - Pythonuser21988View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 16 - PythontotalhackView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 17 - PythonGrégoireView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 18 - PythonIgor JakovljevicView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 19 - PythongremurView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 20 - PythonSpeshView Answer on Stackoverflow