Found an unexpected Mach-O header code: 0x72613c21 in Xcode 7

ValidationDynamicFrameworksStore

Validation Problem Overview


I have a Swift project that uses a ObjC dynamic framework, the framework had to be linked with and embedded into my project. The project runs OK in devices, when submitted to App Store, the error occurred during validation: Found an unexpected Mach-O header code: 0x72613c21

Below are the validation logs:

2015-10-12 02:32:33 +0000 [MT] Beginning distribution assistant for archive: MusicFans, task: Validate
2015-10-12 02:32:33 +0000 [MT] Automatically selecting the only availaable distribution method <IDEDistributionMethodiOSAppStoreValidation: 0x7f851c1d96c0>
2015-10-12 02:32:34 +0000 [MT] [OPTIONAL] Didn't find archived user entitlements for <DVTFilePath:0x7f851b42db10:'/Users/panzhansheng/Library/Developer/Xcode/Archives/2015-10-11/MusicFans 11-10-15 上午8.29.xcarchive/Products/Applications/MusicFans.app/Frameworks/libswiftDispatch.dylib'>: Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=4 "Item at "/Users/panzhansheng/Library/Developer/Xcode/Archives/2015-10-11/MusicFans 11-10-15 上午8.29.xcarchive/Products/Applications/MusicFans.app/Frameworks/libswiftDispatch.dylib" did not contain a "archived-expanded-entitlements.xcent" resource." UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=Item at "/Users/panzhansheng/Library/Developer/Xcode/Archives/2015-10-11/MusicFans 11-10-15 上午8.29.xcarchive/Products/Applications/MusicFans.app/Frameworks/libswiftDispatch.dylib" did not contain a "archived-expanded-entitlements.xcent" resource.}
2015-10-12 02:32:34 +0000 [MT] [OPTIONAL] Didn't find archived user entitlements for <DVTFilePath:0x7f8529a08050:'/Users/panzhansheng/Library/Developer/Xcode/Archives/2015-10-11/MusicFans 11-10-15 上午8.29.xcarchive/Products/Applications/MusicFans.app/wavpack.framework'>: Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=4 "Item at "/Users/panzhansheng/Library/Developer/Xcode/Archives/2015-10-11/MusicFans 11-10-15 上午8.29.xcarchive/Products/Applications/MusicFans.app/wavpack.framework" did not contain a "archived-expanded-entitlements.xcent" resource." UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=Item at "/Users/panzhansheng/Library/Developer/Xcode/Archives/2015-10-11/MusicFans 11-10-15 上午8.29.xcarchive/Products/Applications/MusicFans.app/wavpack.framework" did not contain a "archived-expanded-entitlements.xcent" resource.}
2015-10-12 02:32:34 +0000 [MT] [OPTIONAL] Didn't find archived user entitlements for <DVTFilePath:0x7f850da13de0:'/Users/panzhansheng/Library/Developer/Xcode/Archives/2015-10-11/MusicFans 11-10-15 上午8.29.xcarchive/Products/Applications/MusicFans.app/FLAC.framework'>: Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=4 "Item at "/Users/panzhansheng/Library/Developer/Xcode/Archives/2015-10-11/MusicFans 11-10-15 上午8.29.xcarchive/Products/Applications/MusicFans.app/FLAC.framework" did not contain a "archived-expanded-entitlements.xcent" resource." UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=Item at "/Users/panzhansheng/Library/Developer/Xcode/Archives/2015-10-11/MusicFans 11-10-15 上午8.29.xcarchive/Products/Applications/MusicFans.app/FLAC.framework" did not contain a "archived-expanded-entitlements.xcent" resource.}
2015-10-12 02:33:07 +0000 [MT] Canceled distribution assistant

If I remove the dynamic framework from the project’s Embedded frameworks section, then it can pass the validation, but crashes when run in devices due to the missing image of my dynamic framework, any idea? BTW, dynamic framework has bitcode disabled, so my project also disables bitcode, and is not codesigned.

Validation Solutions


Solution 1 - Validation

Check two things for every framework:

  1. The Mach-O type of the framework (in Build Settings of the framework target)

Mach-O

  1. Whether you copy the framework by putting it in Build Phases -> Embed Frameworks (or Copy Bundle Resources as mentioned by a. brooks hollar)

Embed frameworks

If the Mach-O type of the framework is "static library", it should not be put in embed frameworks; if the Mach-O type is "dynamic library", it should be put in embed frameworks.

In my case it was SocketRocket I added manually which has both a static library target and a dynamic library target with the same framework name. After deleting the static library target and only embed the dynamic library framework, the problem disappears.


Note:

If you don't have access to the source project, you can manually check if it's a dynamic or static framework using this approach: https://stackoverflow.com/a/32591983/308315

Solution 2 - Validation

I don't know why but somehow pods appeared to become an embedded binary. So I had to remove it, pod install once more, and the issue disappeared.

enter image description here

On Xcode 11 you need to change it to Do Not Embed in the Frameworks, Libraries, and Embedded Content.

Solution 3 - Validation

Double check Build Phases -> Copy Bundle Resources for a framework or other binary that shoundn't be there.

In my case, it was a 3rd party library (Parse) that I had added.

Solution 4 - Validation

In my case, I have a framework manually dragged into my project, and it is listed in General->Embedded Binaries, which cause error Found an unexpected Mach-O header code: 0x72613c21. After i moved it from Embedded Binaries to Linked Frameworks and Libraries, problem solved.

Solution 5 - Validation

If you (potentially but not necessarily) used FirebaseSDK (especially Analytics) and get Mach-O error while running, archiving and uploading, try this:

Add this as a build post-actions script.

rm -rf "${TARGET_BUILD_DIR}/${TARGET_NAME}.app/Frameworks/FirebaseAnalytics.framework"
rm -rf "${TARGET_BUILD_DIR}/${TARGET_NAME}.app/Frameworks/GoogleAppMeasurement.framework"
rm -rf "${TARGET_BUILD_DIR}/${TARGET_NAME}.app/Frameworks/FIRAnalyticsConnector.framework"

if you added widgets and/or other plugin extensions add these lines as well:

rm -rf "${TARGET_BUILD_DIR}/${TARGET_NAME}.app/PlugIns/FirebaseAnalytics.framework"
rm -rf "${TARGET_BUILD_DIR}/${TARGET_NAME}.app/PlugIns/GoogleAppMeasurement.framework"
rm -rf "${TARGET_BUILD_DIR}/${TARGET_NAME}.app/PlugIns/FIRAnalyticsConnector.framework"

enter image description here

Brief explanation: The below quote is from the relevant discussion under https://github.com/firebase/firebase-ios-sdk/issues/6472 explains the reason behind this problem.

> ... so right now the firebase framework artifacts are being copied into > the /Frameworks folder of the ipa and are embedded. The frameworks > themselves are static frameworks.... If you delete them from the > xcarchive manually, everything works as expected.

Basically many of the answers here point to the right direction, but the problem remains because the solution is to remove the unwanted artifacts every single time. Currently (Jan 2021) AFAIK there is no other way to solve it.

Solution 6 - Validation

Scheme->Edit Scheme->Archive->Post Action->Click '+' -> New Run Script Action-> paste below code

LOGFILE="${ARCHIVE_PATH}/static-frameworks.log"
echo "Removing static frameworks from ${WRAPPER_NAME} archive" > $LOGFILE
find "${ARCHIVE_PRODUCTS_PATH}/Applications/${WRAPPER_NAME}" -name '*.framework' -print0 | while IFS= read -r -d '' fm; do
    name=$(basename "${fm}" .framework)
    target="${fm}/${name}"
    echo "Checking: ${fm}" >> $LOGFILE
    if file "${target}" | grep -q "current ar archive"; then
        rm -rf "${fm}"
        echo "Removed static framework: ${fm}" >> $LOGFILE
    fi
done

enter image description here

Solution 7 - Validation

I had a same issue. I did a couple of things and my issue went away. I believe My issue was related to Cocoapods version but you can try couple of things here.

First clean DerivedData by:

> 1.Turn off Xcode > > 2.Go to ./Users/YourFile/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData > > 3.Delete everything from this folder > > 4.Run Xcode > > 5.Build&Clean

Second for some reason, with latest cocoa pods version 0.39, I was getting following warning when I ran pod install > >[!] The MY_TARTGET target overrides the EMBEDDED_CONTENT_CONTAINS_SWIFT build setting defined in `Pods/Target Support Files/Pods/Pods.release.xcconfig'. This can lead to problems with the CocoaPods installation

I've downgraded cocoapods by removing all installed cocoapods:

> sudo gem uninstall cocoapods

then install older version:

> sudo gem install cocoapods -v 0.38.1

This removed the warning and I was able to remove the error, "unexpected Mach-O header code: 0x72613c21"

Solution 8 - Validation

For me, I had Fabric binaries in my Carthage /usr/local/bin/carthage copy-frameworks run script.

After removing those, it fixed the issue.

I'm using Xcode Version 9.4.1 (9F2000)

Solution 9 - Validation

In XCode 11, click on the project file, select your target, then on General tab expand Frameworks, Libraries, and Embedded Content, change Embed & Sign to Do Not Embed.

Solution 10 - Validation

Edit: This looks to be fixed in Xcode 8 Beta 3.

I'm currently experiencing this issue with Xcode 8 Beta 2 and Swift 3 with pure-swift Pods (which seems to be causing the issue).

Adding the following to my Podfile has fixed the problem.

post_install do |installer|
  installer.pods_project.targets.each do |target|
    target.build_configurations.each do |config|
      config.build_settings['ALWAYS_EMBED_SWIFT_STANDARD_LIBRARIES'] = 'NO'
    end
  end
end

Credit goes to this comment by YuAo on GitHub.

Solution 11 - Validation

Take a look at this Apple documentation Embedding Frameworks in An App go to the section Embedded Static Libraries they explain this error like this:

> This is caused by placing a static library in a bundle structure that looks like a framework; this packaging is sometimes referred to by third party framework developers as a static framework. Since the binary in these situations is a static library, apps cannot embed it in the app bundle.

They also provide a way to fixed:

> you can solve this error by identifying the static framework and removing it from the Embedded Binaries section.

You accomplish this by following the instructions in Inspecting A Binary's Linkage

Solution 12 - Validation

2021! UPDATED

Here is the hack for this:

  1. Build the app with the Pods_Runner.framework marked as Embed & Sign

enter image description here

  1. Once it's built. Go to the same place and set the Pods_Runner.framework to Do Not Embed.

enter image description here

  1. Go to Product -> Archive -> Submit the archive and it will all work as expected.

credits: lifenautjoe

Solution 13 - Validation

Adding below script into Post-Actions of Archive helped me overcome this issue. It removes static-frameworks which are unrelated.

# https://github.com/firebase/firebase-ios-sdk/issues/6472
LOGFILE="${ARCHIVE_PATH}/static-frameworks.log"
echo "Removing static frameworks from ${WRAPPER_NAME} archive" > $LOGFILE
find "${ARCHIVE_PRODUCTS_PATH}/Applications/${WRAPPER_NAME}" -name '*.framework' -print0 | while IFS= read -r -d '' fm; do
    name=$(basename "${fm}" .framework)
    target="${fm}/${name}"
    echo "Checking: ${fm}" >> $LOGFILE
    if file "${target}" | grep -q "current ar archive"; then
        rm -rf "${fm}"
        echo "Removed static framework: ${fm}" >> $LOGFILE
    fi
done

A comment from Firebase issue: https://github.com/firebase/firebase-ios-sdk/issues/6472#issuecomment-771351512

Solution 14 - Validation

Remove them from Embedded Binaries and add them to Linked Frameworks and Libaries, then Archive again and upload to store.

Solution 15 - Validation

In my case in xcode 11, i resovle issue to set do not embeded in genral -> frameworks,libraies and embedded content enter image description here

Solution 16 - Validation

Check and looking for duplicate frameworks and Libraries in Link Binary With Libraries and Embed Frameworks in Build Phases tab of your project.

Only should be in one side ...

Solution 17 - Validation

I ran into this error with a FacebookSDK framework. I removed it from the Embed frameworks list in Build Phases and it solved the issue. Inspect the log and find the framework causing the error as mentioned by others.

Solution 18 - Validation

I encountered this issue in a very simple Framework project. I only had one target in my project for the framework and it was building fine. I wanted to add some unit tests, so I added two new targets: an iOS Unit Testing Bundle target, and a Single View Application target (to act as a host app for the tests). However, both new targets were throwing this error.

I discovered that the problem was caused by the Mach-O Type build setting on the new targets being set to Static Library. Apparently the new targets were inheriting the Mach-O type from the parent Project. When I set the Mach-O Type to the correct settings ("Bundle" for unit tests and "Executable" for the host app) it all worked! I also had to clean build, delete derived data and reset the simulator to get the new settings to take.

Solution 19 - Validation

In my case, I selected the copy when installing and worked for me

enter image description here

Solution 20 - Validation

In my case it was caused by change of Developer certificate/team.

I start project with personal Dev Apple ID and by the time I changed it to my work ID. When we try to export .xcarchive then "Match-O header" fail did appear. Nothing described here or at other sites don't change anything.

When I change Team back to my personal ID, error logs shows missing .xcent files for only few frameworks now (most recently added). So I start whole new project, paste all the sources and files, then run cocoapod and everything works as expect.

Solution 21 - Validation

My way of fixing this was to get back to Fabric/Crashlytics installation via Cocoapods instead of fancy Carthage setup (which appeared buggy).

Solution 22 - Validation

I had this problem with a manually-added PFFacebookUtils framework in a Swift 2.3 non-CocoaPods project. I fixed it by removing said framework from the embedded frameworks section of the "General" page of the build target and linked it in Build Phases -> Link Binary With Libraries

Solution 23 - Validation

Given the amount of time I've poured into finding this problem, it was caused by Cocoapods. I was working on a Workspace that had both iOS apps and a command line tool to kick off some pipelines and stuff. My file looked like this:

target 'AppPipe' do
  platform :osx, '10.14'
  project 'AppPipe/AppPipe.xcodeproj'
  pod 'Yams'

  post_install do |installer|
    installer.pods_project.targets.each do |target|
      target.build_configurations.each do |config|
        config.build_settings['MACH_O_TYPE'] = 'staticlib'
      end
    end
  end
end

I thought the pods_install hook was local to the scope I was writing it in, but it wasn't! It actually turned all of my target's configs into staticlibs! This fixed it:

target 'AppPipe' do
  platform :osx, '10.14'
  project 'AppPipe/AppPipe.xcodeproj'
  pod 'Yams'
end

post_install do |installer|
  installer.pods_project.targets.each do |target|
    target.build_configurations.each do |config|
        # Only AppPipe always gets staticlib
        if target.name == 'AppPipe'
          config.build_settings['MACH_O_TYPE'] = 'staticlib'
        end
    end
  end
end

Solution 24 - Validation

If you have an Xcode project for a static framework, your test target must have "Bundle" value for MACH_O_TYPE build setting:

enter image description here

Solution 25 - Validation

When embedding bundles from library targets they may produce executables even with Mach-O Type = Bundle. So we can simply delete these executables from xcarchive (Products/Applications/APP_NAME/YourBundle.bundle/YourBundle)

Solution 26 - Validation

Use this code as a script build-phase instead of a scheme post-build action. I found out of all the answers, this works the best:

# Fixes binary framework bug, see:
# https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode-release-notes/xcode-12_4-release-notes#Swift-Packages
# https://github.com/firebase/firebase-ios-sdk/issues/6472

echo "Removing static frameworks from ${TARGET_NAME}.app"
find "${BUILT_PRODUCTS_DIR}/${TARGET_NAME}.app/" -name '*.framework' -print0 | while IFS= read -r -d '' fm; do
    name=$(basename "${fm}" .framework)
    target="${fm}/${name}"
    echo "Checking: ${fm}"
    if file "${target}" | grep -q "current ar archive"; then
        rm -rf "${fm}"
        echo "Removed static framework: ${fm}"
    fi
done

Solution 27 - Validation

I encountered the same problem days ago, the root cause of this problem is:

** Some static libraries was wrongly embeded in the .app bundle. **

You can search .a or static .framework in the Products/*.app bundle in Xcode, and check out the project carefully, remove redundant static libraries.

Solution 28 - Validation

One of the possible reason is nested framework.

Inspired by Golang, I recently refactored my project's code from:

App(with all the code in one target)

to ("->" means link with, ABCD means framework)

B -> C
A -> B

App -> A
App -> B
App -> C

It turns out that nested framework is not officially supported by Apple. So I had to flatten the dependency tree to:

App -> D

D -> A
D -> B
D -> C

Solution 29 - Validation

I had same issue in Xcode 8 beta 3. I fixed it removing Fabric and Crashlytics from Linked frameworks (Project => Target => General page) (source)

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
Questionpzs7602View Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - ValidationCosynView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - ValidationJorge CasariegoView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - Validationa. brooks hollarView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - ValidationKe YangView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - ValidationRufat MirzaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - ValidationRaees MadathilView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - ValidationCodeOverRideView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - ValidationJacobView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - ValidationDisplay NameView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - ValidationKilianView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 11 - ValidationandreskwanView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 12 - ValidationAkbar PulatovView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 13 - ValidationiamburakView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 14 - ValidationNguyễn Anh TuấnView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 15 - ValidationGhanshyam DoifodeView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 16 - ValidationJirson TaveraView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 17 - ValidationAdam MendozaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 18 - ValidationshockingView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 19 - ValidationzeytinView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 20 - ValidationPacyjentView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 21 - ValidationSoftDesignerView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 22 - ValidationjohncederholmView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 23 - ValidationLucas van DongenView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 24 - ValidationViktor MalyiView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 25 - Validationschmidt9View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 26 - ValidationEthan AllenView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 27 - ValidationJoeyView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 28 - ValidationrpstwView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 29 - ValidationtopasczView Answer on Stackoverflow