Force line-buffering of stdout in a pipeline

UnixBufferPipeStdoutTee

Unix Problem Overview


Usually, stdout is line-buffered. In other words, as long as your printf argument ends with a newline, you can expect the line to be printed instantly. This does not appear to hold when using a pipe to redirect to tee.

I have a C++ program, a, that outputs strings, always \n-terminated, to stdout.

When it is run by itself (./a), everything prints correctly and at the right time, as expected. However, if I pipe it to tee (./a | tee output.txt), it doesn't print anything until it quits, which defeats the purpose of using tee.

I know that I could fix it by adding a fflush(stdout) after each printing operation in the C++ program. But is there a cleaner, easier way? Is there a command I can run, for example, that would force stdout to be line-buffered, even when using a pipe?

Unix Solutions


Solution 1 - Unix

you can try stdbuf

$ stdbuf --output=L ./a | tee output.txt

(big) part of the man page:

  -i, --input=MODE   adjust standard input stream buffering
  -o, --output=MODE  adjust standard output stream buffering
  -e, --error=MODE   adjust standard error stream buffering

If MODE is 'L' the corresponding stream will be line buffered.
This option is invalid with standard input.

If MODE is '0' the corresponding stream will be unbuffered.

Otherwise MODE is a number which may be followed by one of the following:
KB 1000, K 1024, MB 1000*1000, M 1024*1024, and so on for G, T, P, E, Z, Y.
In this case the corresponding stream will be fully buffered with the buffer
size set to MODE bytes.

keep this in mind, though:

NOTE: If COMMAND adjusts the buffering of its standard streams ('tee' does
for e.g.) then that will override corresponding settings changed by 'stdbuf'.
Also some filters (like 'dd' and 'cat' etc.) dont use streams for I/O,
and are thus unaffected by 'stdbuf' settings.

you are not running stdbuf on tee, you're running it on a, so this shouldn't affect you, unless you set the buffering of a's streams in a's source.

Also, stdbuf is not POSIX, but part of GNU-coreutils.

Solution 2 - Unix

Try unbuffer which is part of the expect package. You may already have it on your system.

In your case you would use it like this:

./a | unbuffer -p tee output.txt

(-p is for pipeline mode where unbuffer reads from stdin and passes it to the command in the rest of the arguments)

Solution 3 - Unix

You may also try to execute your command in a pseudo-terminal using the script command (which should enforce line-buffered output to the pipe)!

script -q /dev/null ./a | tee output.txt     # Mac OS X, FreeBSD
script -c "./a" /dev/null | tee output.txt   # Linux

Be aware the script command does not propagate back the exit status of the wrapped command.

Solution 4 - Unix

You can use setlinebuf from stdio.h.

setlinebuf(stdout);

This should change the buffering to "line buffered".

If you need more flexibility you can use setvbuf.

Solution 5 - Unix

The unbuffer command from the expect package at the @Paused until further notice answer did not worked for me the way it was presented.

Instead of using:

./a | unbuffer -p tee output.txt

I had to use:

unbuffer -p ./a | tee output.txt

> (-p is for pipeline mode where unbuffer reads from stdin and passes it to the command in the rest of the arguments)

The expect package can be installed on:

  1. MSYS2 with pacman -S expect
  2. Mac OS with brew install expect

Update

I recently had buffering problems with python inside a shell script (when trying to append timestamp to its output). The fix was to pass -u flag to python this way:

  1. run.sh with python -u script.py
  2. unbuffer -p /bin/bash run.sh 2>&1 | tee /dev/tty | ts '[%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S]' >> somefile.txt
  3. This command will put a timestamp on the output and send it to a file and stdout at the same time.
  4. The ts program (timestamp) can be installed with the moreutils package.

Update 2

Recently, also had problems with grep buffering the output, when I used the argument grep --line-buffered on grep to it stop buffering the output.

Solution 6 - Unix

If you use the C++ stream classes instead, every std::endl is an implicit flush. Using C-style printing, I think the method you suggested (fflush()) is the only way.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionhoubysoftView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - Unixc00kiemon5terView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - UnixDennis WilliamsonView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - UnixjonView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - UnixDenys RtveliashviliView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - UnixuserView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - UnixKevin GrantView Answer on Stackoverflow