Express: How to pass app-instance to routes from a different file?

node.jsExpress

node.js Problem Overview


I want to split up my routes into different files, where one file contains all routes and the other one the corresponding actions. I currently have a solution to achieve this, however I need to make the app-instance global to be able to access it in the actions. My current setup looks like this:

app.js:

var express   = require('express');
var app       = express.createServer();
var routes    = require('./routes');

var controllers = require('./controllers');
routes.setup(app, controllers);

app.listen(3000, function() {
  console.log('Application is listening on port 3000');
});

routes.js:

exports.setup = function(app, controllers) {

  app.get('/', controllers.index);
  app.get('/posts', controllers.posts.index);
  app.get('/posts/:post', controllers.posts.show);
  // etc.

};

controllers/index.js:

exports.posts = require('./posts');

exports.index = function(req, res) {
  // code
};

controllers/posts.js:

exports.index = function(req, res) {
  // code
};

exports.show = function(req, res) {
  // code
};

However, this setup has a big issue: I have a database- and an app-instance I need to pass to the actions (controllers/*.js). The only option I could think of, is making both variables global which isn't really a solution. I want to separate routes from the actions because I have a lot of routes and want them in a central place.

What's the best way to pass variables to the actions but separate the actions from the routes?

node.js Solutions


Solution 1 - node.js

Use req.app, req.app.get('somekey')

The application variable created by calling express() is set on the request and response objects.

See: https://github.com/visionmedia/express/blob/76147c78a15904d4e4e469095a29d1bec9775ab6/lib/express.js#L34-L35

Solution 2 - node.js

Node.js supports circular dependencies.
Making use of circular dependencies instead of require('./routes')(app) cleans up a lot of code and makes each module less interdependent on its loading file:


app.js

var app = module.exports = express(); //now app.js can be required to bring app into any file

//some app/middleware setup, etc, including 
app.use(app.router);

require('./routes'); //module.exports must be defined before this line


routes/index.js

var app = require('../app');

app.get('/', function(req, res, next) {
  res.render('index');
});

//require in some other route files...each of which requires app independently
require('./user');
require('./blog');


-----04/2014 update-----
Express 4.0 fixed the usecase for defining routes by adding an express.router() method!
documentation - http://expressjs.com/4x/api.html#router

Example from their new generator:
Writing the route:
https://github.com/expressjs/generator/blob/master/templates/js/routes/index.js
Adding/namespacing it to the app: https://github.com/expressjs/generator/blob/master/templates/js/app.js#L24

There are still usecases for accessing app from other resources, so circular dependencies are still a valid solution.

Solution 3 - node.js

Like I said in the comments, you can use a function as module.exports. A function is also an object, so you don't have to change your syntax.

app.js

var controllers = require('./controllers')({app: app});

controllers.js

module.exports = function(params)
{
    return require('controllers/index')(params);
}

controllers/index.js

function controllers(params)
{
  var app = params.app;

  controllers.posts = require('./posts');

  controllers.index = function(req, res) {
    // code
  };
}

module.exports = controllers;

Solution 4 - node.js

Or just do that:

var app = req.app

inside the Middleware you are using for these routes. Like that:

router.use( (req,res,next) => {
    app = req.app;
    next();
});

Solution 5 - node.js

Let's say that you have a folder named "contollers".

In your app.js you can put this code:

console.log("Loading controllers....");
var controllers = {};

var controllers_path = process.cwd() + '/controllers'

fs.readdirSync(controllers_path).forEach(function (file) {
    if (file.indexOf('.js') != -1) {
        controllers[file.split('.')[0]] = require(controllers_path + '/' + file)
    }
});

console.log("Controllers loaded..............[ok]");

... and ...

router.get('/ping', controllers.ping.pinging);

in your controllers forlder you will have the file "ping.js" with this code:

exports.pinging = function(req, res, next){
    console.log("ping ...");
}

And this is it....

Solution 6 - node.js

  1. To make your db object accessible to all controllers without passing it everywhere: make an application-level middleware which attachs the db object to every req object, then you can access it within in every controller.
// app.js
let db = ...;  // your db object initialized
const contextMiddleware = (req, res, next) => {
  req.db=db;
  next();
};
app.use(contextMiddleware);
  1. to avoid passing app instance everywhere, instead, passing routes to where the app is
// routes.js  It's just a mapping.
exports.routes = [  ['/', controllers.index],
  ['/posts', controllers.posts.index],
  ['/posts/:post', controllers.posts.show]
];

// app.js
var { routes }    = require('./routes');
routes.forEach(route => app.get(...route));
// You can customize this according to your own needs, like adding post request

The final app.js:

// app.js
var express   = require('express');
var app       = express.createServer();

let db = ...;  // your db object initialized
const contextMiddleware = (req, res, next) => {
  req.db=db;
  next();
};
app.use(contextMiddleware);

var { routes }    = require('./routes');
routes.forEach(route => app.get(...route));

app.listen(3000, function() {
  console.log('Application is listening on port 3000');
});

Another version: you can customize this according to your own needs, like adding post request

// routes.js  It's just a mapping.
let get = ({path, callback}) => ({app})=>{
  app.get(path, callback);
}
let post = ({path, callback}) => ({app})=>{
  app.post(path, callback);
}
let someFn = ({path, callback}) => ({app})=>{
  // ...custom logic
  app.get(path, callback);
}
exports.routes = [
  get({path: '/', callback: controllers.index}),
  post({path: '/posts', callback: controllers.posts.index}),
  someFn({path: '/posts/:post', callback: controllers.posts.show}),
];

// app.js
var { routes }    = require('./routes');
routes.forEach(route => route({app}));

Solution 7 - node.js

If you want to pass an app-instance to others in Node-Typescript :

Option 1: With the help of import (when importing)

//routes.ts
import { Application } from "express";
import { categoryRoute } from './routes/admin/category.route'
import { courseRoute } from './routes/admin/course.route';

const routing = (app: Application) => {
    app.use('/api/admin/category', categoryRoute)
    app.use('/api/admin/course', courseRoute)
}
export { routing }

Then import it and pass app:

import express, { Application } from 'express';

const app: Application = express();
import('./routes').then(m => m.routing(app))

Option 2: With the help of class

// index.ts
import express, { Application } from 'express';
import { Routes } from './routes';


const app: Application = express();
const rotues = new Routes(app)
...

Here we will access the app in the constructor of Routes Class

// routes.ts
import { Application } from 'express'
import { categoryRoute } from '../routes/admin/category.route'
import { courseRoute } from '../routes/admin/course.route';

class Routes {
    constructor(private app: Application) {
        this.apply();
    }

    private apply(): void {
       this.app.use('/api/admin/category', categoryRoute)
       this.app.use('/api/admin/course', courseRoute)
    }
}

export { Routes }

Solution 8 - node.js

var express = require('express');

var router = express.Router();

router.get('/', function(req, res, next) {
   console.log(req.app); // use req.app to get app instance ;

   res.render('index', { title: 'Express' });

});

module.exports = router;

Solution 9 - node.js

For database separate out Data Access Service that will do all DB work with simple API and avoid shared state.

Separating routes.setup looks like overhead. I would prefer to place a configuration based routing instead. And configure routes in .json or with annotations.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionClaudio AlbertinView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - node.jsFengView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - node.jsWill SternView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - node.jsmihaiView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - node.jsasanchezView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - node.jsRadu GheorghiesView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - node.jsIcebergView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - node.jsAbolfazlRView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - node.jswintzhView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - node.jsEldar DjafarovView Answer on Stackoverflow