Efficient list of unique strings C#

C#Unique Values

C# Problem Overview


What is the most efficient way to store a list of strings ignoring any duplicates? I was thinking a dictionary may be best inserting strings by writing dict[str] = false; and enumerating through the keys as a list. Is that a good solution?

C# Solutions


Solution 1 - C#

If you are using .NET 3.5, the HashSet should work for you.

> The HashSet<(Of <(T>)>) class provides > high performance set operations. A set > is a collection that contains no > duplicate elements, and whose elements > are in no particular order.

Solution 2 - C#

You can look to do something like this

var hash = new HashSet<string>();
var collectionWithDup = new []{"one","one","two","one","two","zero"}; 
        
// No need to check for duplicates as the Add method
// will only add it if it doesn't exist already
foreach (var str in collectionWithDup)
    hash.Add(str);   

Solution 3 - C#

I'm not sure if this counts as a good answer, but when faced with the need for a unique set that maintains insertion order, I compromised with a HashSet and a List side-by-side. In this case, whenever you add to the set, do the following:

if(hashSet.Add(item))
	orderList.Add(item);

When removing items, make sure to remove them from both. Thus, as long as you can be sure that nothing else added items to the list, you'll have an insertion-ordered unique set!

Solution 4 - C#

You could also use Linq as in:

using System.Linq;

var items = new List<string>() { "one", "one", "two", "one", "two", "zero" };

List<string> distinctItems = items.Distinct().ToList();

Solution 5 - C#

Use HashSet, no need to check .Contains() , just add your items in list and if its duplicate it will not add it.

   HashSet<int> uniqueList = new HashSet<int>();
   uniqueList.Add(1); // List has values 1
   uniqueList.Add(2);  // List has values 1,2
   uniqueList.Add(1);  // List has values 1,2
   Console.WriteLine(uniqueList.Count); // it will return 2

Solution 6 - C#

This is not part of the the system namespace but have used the Iesi.Collections from http://www.codeproject.com/KB/recipes/sets.aspx with NHibernate. It has support for hashed set along with sorted set, dictionary set, and so on. Since it has been used with NHibernate it has been used extensively and very stable. This also does not require .Net 3.5

Solution 7 - C#

Here is another solution without using the HashSet.

var items = new List<string>() { "one", "one", "two", "one", "two", "zero" };
var uniqueItems = items.Where((item, index) => items.IndexOf(item) == index);

It was adopted from this thread: javascript - Unique values in an array

Test:

using FluentAssertions;

uniqueItems.Count().Should().Be(3);
uniqueItems.Should().BeEquivalentTo("one", "two", "zero");

Performance test for List, HashSet and SortedSet. 1 million iterations:

List: 564 ms
HashSet: 487 ms
SortedSet: 1932 ms

Test source code (gist)

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
Questionuser34537View Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - C#JP AliotoView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - C#PerpetualcoderView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - C#sconeView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - C#Dave HollingsworthView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - C#PriyangView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - C#AndrewBView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - C#Alexey SolonetsView Answer on Stackoverflow