Does the order of columns matter in a group by clause?
SqlSql ServerGroup BySql Problem Overview
If I have two columns, one with very high cardinality and one with very low cardinality (unique # of values), does it matter in which order I group by?
Here's an example:
select
dimensionName,
dimensionCategory,
sum(someFact)
from SomeFact f
join SomeDim d on f.dimensionKey = d.dimensionKey
group by
d.dimensionName, -- large number of unique values
d.dimensionCategory -- small number of unique values
Are there situations where it matters?
Sql Solutions
Solution 1 - Sql
No, the order doesn't matter for the GROUP BY clause.
MySQL and SQLite are the only databases I'm aware of that allow you to select columns which are omitted from the group by (non-standard, not portable) but the order doesn't matter there either.
Solution 2 - Sql
SQL is declarative.
In this case, you have told the optimiser how you want the data grouped and it works out how to do it.
It won't evaluate line by line (procedural) and look at one column first
The main place column order matters is for indexes. col1, col2
is not the same as col2, col1
. At all.
Solution 3 - Sql
There's a legacy, non-standard feature of Microsoft SQL Server called ROLLUP. ROLLUP is an extension to the GROUP BY syntax and when it is used the order of the GROUP BY columns determines which columns should be grouped in the result. ROLLUP is deprecated however. The standard SQL alternative is to use grouping sets, which is supported by SQL Server 2008 and later versions.
Solution 4 - Sql
Since this has not been mentioned here. The answers above are correct i.e. the order of the columns after the "group by" clause will not affect the correctness of the query (i.e. the sum amount).
However, the order of the rows being retrieved will vary based on the order of the columns specified after the "group by" clause. For example consider Table A
with the following rows:
Col1 Col2 Col3
1 xyz 100
2 abc 200
3 xyz 300
3 xyz 400
SELECT *, SUM(Col3) FROM A GROUP BY Col2, Col1
will retrieve rows ordered by the Col2
in ascending order.
Col1 Col2 Col3 sum(Col3)
2 abc 200 200
1 xyz 100 100
3 xyz 300 700
Now change the ordering of column in group by to Col1, Col2
. The retrieved rows are ordered asc by Col1
.
i.e. select *, sum(Col3) from A group by Col1, Col2
Col1 Col2 Col3 sum(Col3)
1 xyz 100 100
2 abc 200 200
3 xyz 300 700
Note: The the summation amount (i.e. the correctness of the query) remains exactly the same.
Solution 5 - Sql
If I have two columns, one with very high cardinality and one with very low cardinality (unique # of values), does it matter in which order I group by?
Query-1
SELECT spec_id, catid, spec_display_value, COUNT(*) AS cnt FROM tbl_product_spec
GROUP BY spec_id, catid, spec_display_value ;
Query-2
SELECT spec_id, catid, spec_display_value, COUNT(*) AS cnt FROM tbl_product_spec FORCE INDEX(idx_comp_spec_cnt)
GROUP BY catid, spec_id,spec_display_value;
Both are equal , order doesn't work in group by clause.