Does it make sense to minify code used in NodeJS?

Javascriptnode.jsMinifyGoogle Closure-CompilerUglifyjs

Javascript Problem Overview


I was wondering, since Clojure Compiler and UglifyJS not only optimize code for size but also for performance (although I think size is the main priority), would my node.js app run faster if it was minified ? I know it may depend from app, but I'm asking this in general.

Javascript Solutions


Solution 1 - Javascript

Minification can improve performance.

Node's V8 optimizing compiler inlines functions according to some heuristics. Minification influences these heuristics. This can cause inlining of previously not inlined functions. Since inlined functions generally perform faster, this can lead to performance improvements.

###Node 9.0+ / V8 6.2+ (Turbofan) - minor performance improvements

If the function's unoptimized bytecode size is less than 500, it will be inlined. Minification generally reduces AST (Abstract Syntax Tree) node count. Since bytecode is directly generated from the AST, we can expect some reduction in bytecode size as well.

Source: [Turbofan] Use bytecode size for inlining heuristics.

###Node 8.3+ / V8 5.9+ (Turbofan) → minor performance improvements

If the function's AST node count is less than 196, it will be inlined. Minification generally reduces AST node count.

Source: [turbofan] Don't take into account source size for inlining heuristics.

###Node 8.2 and before / V8 5.8 (Crankshaft) and before → major performance improvements

If the function's character count - including whitespace and comments - is less than 600, it will be inlined.

Let's say we have a function which is more than 600 characters long:

function f() {
  // A long comment... bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla
  return 1;
}

Minification reduces this to function f(){return 1}.

If we now call both variants n times and compare the performance of the raw and the minified function, we get the following result:

Raw vs minified performance

Obviously, the minified function performs more than twice as fast.

Solution 2 - Javascript

In node, the main processing cost is I/O operations, not the actual JavaScript itself. So for example:

fs.readFile(myFile, function (err, data) {
    processTheFile(data);
});

Here, the gap between calling readFile and the callback being fired will be several times longer than the length of time the callback takes. (If it's the other way round, you probably shouldn't be using node.)

So optimising the processTheFile function for speed is pointless, because you're saving a small percentage of a very very small number.

Solution 3 - Javascript

No longer true.

> Yes, Node6 is now based on v8 5.1, which use TurboFan. As the v8 team > stated (https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=3354) they > dropped the character count trigger for inlining.

https://medium.com/@c2c/yes-node6-is-now-based-on-v8-5-1-7a645eb9992b https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=3354

Solution 4 - Javascript

I created a nodejs cli which generates a new app with some pre-defined classes. I think in this case, it makes sense to minify the base code. Because you want to allow the developer to use it, but not modify it (or at least make it very hard to do). This way I would be pushing the developer to download the new version and not update the class within the app.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionJoão Pinto JerónimoView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - Javascriptle_mView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - JavascriptNathan MacInnesView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - JavascriptGregView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - JavascriptKat Lim RuizView Answer on Stackoverflow