Does element width include padding?

Css Problem Overview

It seems that in Internet Explorer (IE) width includes padding while in Firefox (FF) it does not.

How can I make both behave the same?

Css Solutions

Solution 1 - Css

IE used to use the more-convenient-but-non-standard "border-box" box model. In this model, the width of an element includes the padding and borders. For example:
#foo { width: 10em; padding: 2em; border: 1em; }
would be 10em wide.
In contrast, all standards-fearing browsers default to the "content-box" box model. In this model, the width of an element does not include padding or borders. For example:
#foo { width: 10em; padding: 2em; border: 1em; }
will actually be 16em wide: 10em + 2em padding for each side, + 1em border for each edge.

If you use a modern version of IE with valid markup, a good doctype, and appropriate headers it will adhere to the standard. Otherwise, you can force modern standards-compliant browsers to use "border-box" via:

* {
  box-sizing: border-box;
  -moz-box-sizing: border-box;
  -webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
}

The first declaration is needed for Opera, the second is for Firefox, the third is for Webkit and Chrome.

Here's a simple test I made years ago for testing what box-sizing declaration your browser supports: http://phrogz.net/CSS/boxsizing.html

Note that Webkit (Safari and Chrome) do not support the padding-box box model via any declaration.

Solution 2 - Css

A simple rule is to try to avoid using padding/margin and width property for same element. i.e. Use something similar to this

<div class="width-div">
     <div class="padding-div">
     ...........
     ...........
     </div>
 </div>

Solution 3 - Css

I bumped into this question and even though it's a couple of years old, I thought I might add this in case anyone bumps into this thread.

CSS3 now has a box-sizing property. If you set, say,

.bigbox {
    box-sizing: border-box; 
    width: 1000px; 
    border: 5px solid #333;
    padding: 10px;
}

your class will be 1000px wide, instead of 1030px. This is, of course, incredibly useful for anyone who uses pixel-sized border with liquid divs, because it solves an otherwise insoluble problem.

Even better, box-sizing is supported by all major browsers except IE7 and below. To include all items within the width or height dimension, set box-sizing to border-box. To aggregate other items to the width and/or height, which is the default, you can set box-sizing to "content-box".

I'm not sure of the current state of browser syntax, but I still include -moz and -webkit prefixes:

.bigbox{
    -moz-box-sizing: border-box;
    -webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
    box-sizing: border-box;
}

Solution 4 - Css

Do you have a doctype declared? When I started coding html I had this problem, and it was from not having a doctype declared. My favorite is:

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
       "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> 
 
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
...
</html>

Solution 5 - Css

for those who would still have the problem, jQuery provided two property outerWidth () and innerWitdh () to know the width of an object with or without borders ...

Content Type	Original Author	Original Content on Stackoverflow
Question	Jake	View Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - Css	Phrogz	View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - Css	shankhan	View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - Css	Mason Barge	View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - Css	tybro0103	View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - Css	Patrick	View Answer on Stackoverflow