Django admin: how to sort by one of the custom list_display fields that has no database field

DjangoSortingDjango Admin

Django Problem Overview


# admin.py
class CustomerAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):  
    list_display = ('foo', 'number_of_orders')


# models.py
class Order(models.Model):
    bar = models.CharField[...]
    customer = models.ForeignKey(Customer)

class Customer(models.Model):
    foo = models.CharField[...]

    def number_of_orders(self):
        return u'%s' % Order.objects.filter(customer=self).count()  

How could I sort Customers, depending on number_of_orders they have?

admin_order_field property can't be used here, as it requires a database field to sort on. Is it possible at all, as Django relies on the underlying DB to perform sorting? Creating an aggregate field to contain the number of orders seems like an overkill here.

The fun thing: if you change url by hand in the browser to sort on this column - it works as expected!

Django Solutions


Solution 1 - Django

I loved Greg's solution to this problem, but I'd like to point that you can do the same thing directly in the admin:

from django.db import models

class CustomerAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
    list_display = ('number_of_orders',)

    def get_queryset(self, request):
    # def queryset(self, request): # For Django <1.6
        qs = super(CustomerAdmin, self).get_queryset(request)
        # qs = super(CustomerAdmin, self).queryset(request) # For Django <1.6
        qs = qs.annotate(models.Count('order'))
        return qs

    def number_of_orders(self, obj):
        return obj.order__count
    number_of_orders.admin_order_field = 'order__count'

This way you only annotate inside the admin interface. Not with every query that you do.

Solution 2 - Django

I haven't tested this out (I'd be interested to know if it works) but what about defining a custom manager for Customer which includes the number of orders aggregated, and then setting admin_order_field to that aggregate, ie

from django.db import models 


class CustomerManager(models.Manager):
    def get_query_set(self):
        return super(CustomerManager, self).get_query_set().annotate(models.Count('order'))

class Customer(models.Model):
    foo = models.CharField[...]

    objects = CustomerManager()
    
    def number_of_orders(self):
        return u'%s' % Order.objects.filter(customer=self).count()
    number_of_orders.admin_order_field = 'order__count'

EDIT: I've just tested this idea and it works perfectly - no django admin subclassing required!

Solution 3 - Django

The only way I can think of is to denormalize the field. That is - create a real field that get's updated to stay in sync with the fields it is derived from. I usually do this by overriding save on eith the model with the denormalized fields or the model it derives from:

# models.py
class Order(models.Model):
    bar = models.CharField[...]
    customer = models.ForeignKey(Customer)
    def save(self):
        super(Order, self).save()
        self.customer.number_of_orders = Order.objects.filter(customer=self.customer).count()
        self.customer.save()

class Customer(models.Model):
    foo = models.CharField[...]
    number_of_orders = models.IntegerField[...]

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
Questionmike_kView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - DjangobbrikView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - DjangoGregView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - DjangoAndy BakerView Answer on Stackoverflow