Difference between stream processing and message processing

StreamQueueRabbitmqApache KafkaMessaging

Stream Problem Overview


What is the basic difference between stream processing and traditional message processing? As people say that kafka is good choice for stream processing but essentially kafka is a messaging framework similar to ActivMQ, RabbitMQ etc.

Why do we generally not say that ActiveMQ is good for stream processing as well.

Is it the speed at which messages are consumed by the consumer determines if it is a stream?

Stream Solutions


Solution 1 - Stream

In traditional message processing, you apply simple computations on the messages -- in most cases individually per message.

In stream processing, you apply complex operations on multiple input streams and multiple records (ie, messages) at the same time (like aggregations and joins).

Furthermore, traditional messaging systems cannot go "back in time" -- ie, they automatically delete messages after they got delivered to all subscribed consumers. In contrast, Kafka keeps the messages as it uses a pull-based model (ie, consumers pull data out of Kafka) for a configurable amount of time. This allows consumers to "rewind" and consume messages multiple times -- or if you add a new consumer, it can read the complete history. This makes stream processing possible, because it allows for more complex applications. Furthermore, stream processing is not necessarily about real-time processing -- it's about processing infinite input streams (in contrast to batch processing, which is applied to finite inputs).

And Kafka offers Kafka Connect and Streams API -- so it is a stream-processing platform and not just a messaging/pub-sub system (even if it uses this in its core).

Solution 2 - Stream

If you like splitting hairs: Messaging is communication between two or more processes or components whereas streaming is the passing of event log as they occur. Messages carry raw data whereas events contain information about the occurrence of and activity such as an order. So Kafka does both, messaging and streaming. A topic in Kafka can be raw messages or and event log that is normally retained for hours or days. Events can further be aggregated to more complex events.

Solution 3 - Stream

Basically Kafka is messaging framework similar to ActiveMQ or RabbitMQ. There are some effort to take Kafka towards streaming is made by Confluent.

https://www.confluent.io/blog/introducing-kafka-streams-stream-processing-made-simple/

Then why Kafka comes into picture when talking about Stream processing?

Stream processing framework differs with input of data.In Batch processing,you have some files stored in file system and you want to continuously process that and store in some database. While in stream processing frameworks like Spark, Storm, etc will get continuous input from some sensor devices, api feed and kafka is used there to feed the streaming engine.

Solution 4 - Stream

Message Processing implies operations on and/or using individual messages. Stream Processing encompasses operations on and/or using individual messages as well as operations on collection of messages as they flow into the system. For e.g., let's say transactions are coming in for a payment instrument - stream processing can be used to continuously compute hourly average spend. In this case - a sliding window can be imposed on the stream which picks up messages within the hour and computes average on the amount. Such figures can then be used as inputs to fraud detection systems

Solution 5 - Stream

Although Rabbit supports streaming, it was actually not built for it(see Rabbit´s web site) Rabbit is a Message broker and Kafka is a event streaming platform.

Kafka can handle a huge number of 'messages' towards Rabbit. Kafka is a log while Rabbit is a queue which means that if once consumed, Rabbit´s messages are not there anymore in case you need it.

However Rabbit can specify message priorities but Kafka doesn´t.

It depends on your needs.

Solution 6 - Stream

Recently, I have come across a very good document that describe the usage of "stream processing" and "message processing"

https://developer.ibm.com/technologies/messaging/articles/difference-between-events-and-messages/

Taking the asynchronous processing in context -

Stream processing: Consider it when there is a "request for processing" I.e. client makes a request for server to process.

Message processing: Consider it when "accessing enterprise data" I.e. components within the enterprise can emit data that describe their current state. This data does not normally contain a direct instruction for another system to complete an action. Instead, components allow other systems to gain insight into their data and status.

To facilitate this evaluation, consider these key selection criteria to consider when selecting the right technology for your solution:

Event history - Kafka Fine-grained subscriptions - Kafka Scalable consumption - Kafka Transactional behavior - MQ

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionTechEnthusiastView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - StreamMatthias J. SaxView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - Streamziad.ridaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - StreamPareshView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - StreamdipanjanbView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - StreamBinyamin ElyView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - Streamsandy0093View Answer on Stackoverflow