Difference between git pull --rebase and git pull --ff-only

GitGit RebaseGit Pull

Git Problem Overview


Let's say origin/master has commit A--B--C and my local/master has commit A--B--D.

What will happen if I use git pull --rebase ?

What will happen if I use git pull --ff-only ?

Is there any difference in the resulting commit tree ?

Git Solutions


Solution 1 - Git

> What will happen if I use git pull --rebase ?

git pull --rebase is roughly equivalent to

git fetch
git rebase origin/master

i.e. your remote changes (C) will be applied before the local changes (D), resulting in the following tree

A -- B -- C -- D

> What will happen if I use git pull --ff-only ?

It will fail.

git pull --ff-only corresponds to

git fetch
git merge --ff-only origin/master

--ff-only applies the remote changes only if they can be fast-forwarded. From the man:

> Refuse to merge and exit with a non-zero status unless the current HEAD is already up-to-date or the merge can be resolved as a fast-forward

Since your local and remote branches have diverged, they cannot be resolved by a fast-forward and git pull --ff-only would fail.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionNicoView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - GitGabriele PetronellaView Answer on Stackoverflow