Difference between concat and push?

JavascriptConcatenationPush

Javascript Problem Overview


Why does a return of the push method cause

> Uncaught TypeError: acc.push is not a function

But a return concat results in the correct solution?

[1, 2, 3, 4].reduce(function name(acc, curr) {
  if (even(curr)) {
    return acc.push(curr);
  }
  return acc;
}, []);


function even(number) {
  if (number % 2 === 0) {
    return true;
  }
  return false;
}

[1, 2, 3, 4].reduce(function name(acc, curr) {
  if (even(curr)) {
    return acc.concat(curr);
  }
  return acc;
}, []);


function even(number) {
  if (number % 2 === 0) {
    return true;
  }
  return false;
}

Javascript Solutions


Solution 1 - Javascript

The push() adds elements to the end of an array and returns the new length of the array. Thus your return here is invalid.

The concat() method is used to merge arrays. Concat does not change the existing arrays, but instead returns a new array.

Better to filter, if you want a NEW array like so:

var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
var filtered = arr.filter(function(element, index, array) {
  return (index % 2 === 0);
});

Note that assumes the array arr is complete with no gaps - all even indexed values. If you need each individual, use the element instead of index

var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
var filtered = arr.filter(function(element, index, array) {
  return (element% 2 === 0);
});

Solution 2 - Javascript

According to the MDN document say that:

  • push() method: adds one or more elements to the end of an array and returns the new length of the array.
const count = ['pigs', 'goats'].push('cows');
console.log(count); // expected output: 3
  • concat() method is used to merge two or more arrays. This method does not change the existing arrays but instead returns a new array
console.log(['a'].concat(['b']));// expected output: Array ["a", "b"]

And combined with the final Array#reduce's parameter is the array initialize []), which means that you want to return an array result.

==> So that's the reason why in case that you use concat working well.


Refactor code

  1. If you still want to use Array#reduce and Array#push

const even = (number) => number%2 === 0;
const result = [1, 2, 3, 4].reduce(function name(acc, curr) {
  if(even(curr)) acc.push(curr); // Just add one more item instead of return
  return acc;
}, []);

console.log(result);

  1. The simpler way is to use Array#filter

const even = (number) => number%2 === 0;
console.log([1, 2, 3, 4].filter(even));

Solution 3 - Javascript

acc should not be an array. Look at the documentation. It can be one, but..

It makes no sense at all to reduce an array to an array. What you want is filter. I mean, reduce using an array as the accumulator and concating each element to it technically does work, but it is just not the right approach.

var res = [1, 2, 3, 4].filter(even);

console.log(res);

function even(number) {
  return (number % 2 === 0);
}

Solution 4 - Javascript

https://dev.to/uilicious/javascript-array-push-is-945x-faster-than-array-concat-1oki Concat is 945x slower than push only because it has to create a new array.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionThe cows are in the MeadowView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - JavascriptMark SchultheissView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - JavascriptNguyễn Văn PhongView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - JavascriptKarl ReidView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - Javascriptshiv gargView Answer on Stackoverflow