Default argument in the middle of parameter list?

C++Default Arguments

C++ Problem Overview


I saw a function declaration in our code that looked as follows

void error(char const *msg, bool showKind = true, bool exit);

I thought first that this is an error because you cannot have default arguments in the middle of functions, but the compiler accepted this declaration. Has anyone seen this before? I'm using GCC4.5. Is this a GCC extension?

The weird thing is, if I take this out in a separate file and try to compile, GCC rejects it. I've double checked everything, including the compiler options used.

C++ Solutions


Solution 1 - C++

That code would work if in the very first declaration of the function, the last parameter has default value, something like this:

//declaration
void error(char const *msg, bool showKind, bool exit = false);

And then in the same scope you can provide default values for other arguments (from right side), in the later declaration, as:

void error(char const *msg, bool showKind = true, bool exit); //okay

//void error(char const *msg = 0 , bool showKind, bool exit); // error

which can called as:

error("some error messsage");
error("some error messsage", false);
error("some error messsage", false, true);

Online Demo : http://ideone.com/aFpUn

Note if you provide default value for the first parameter (from left), without providing default value for the second, it wouldn't compile (as expected) : http://ideone.com/5hj46


§8.3.6/4 says,

> For non-template functions, default > arguments can be added in later > declarations of a function in the same > scope.

Example from the Standard itself:

void f(int, int);
void f(int, int = 7);

The second declaration adds default value!

Also see §8.3.6/6.

Solution 2 - C++

The answer might be in 8.3.6:

8.3.6 Default Arguments

> 6 Except for member functions of class > templates, the default arguments in a > member function definition that > appears outside of the class > definition are added to the set of > default arguments provided by the > member function declaration in the > class definition. Default arguments > for a member function of a class > template shall be specified on the > initial declaration of the member > function within the class template.

> Example:

> class C { void f(int i = 3); void g(int i, int j = 99); }; void C::f(int i = 3) // error: default argument already { } // specified in class scope void C::g(int i = 88, int j) // in this translation unit, { } // C::g can be called with no argument

After reading this, I found that MSVC10 accepted the following with compiler extensions turned off:

void error(char const* msg, bool showKind, bool exit = false);

void error(char const* msg, bool showKind = false, bool exit)
{
	msg;
	showKind;
	exit;
}

int main()
{
	error("hello");
}

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionJohannes Schaub - litbView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - C++NawazView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - C++John DiblingView Answer on Stackoverflow