Decimal precision and scale in EF Code First

C#.NetEntity FrameworkEf Code-FirstDecimal

C# Problem Overview


I'm experimenting with this code-first approach, but I'm find out now that a property of type System.Decimal gets mapped to a sql column of type decimal(18, 0).

How do I set the precision of the database column?

C# Solutions


Solution 1 - C#

The answer from Dave Van den Eynde is now out of date. There are 2 important changes, from EF 4.1 onwards the ModelBuilder class is now DbModelBuilder and there is now a DecimalPropertyConfiguration.HasPrecision Method which has a signature of:

public DecimalPropertyConfiguration HasPrecision(
byte precision,
byte scale )

where precision is the total number of digits the db will store, regardless of where the decimal point falls and scale is the number of decimal places it will store.

Therefore there is no need to iterate through properties as shown but the can just be called from

public class EFDbContext : DbContext
{
   protected override void OnModelCreating(System.Data.Entity.DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
   {
       modelBuilder.Entity<Class>().Property(object => object.property).HasPrecision(12, 10);

       base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);
   }
}

Solution 2 - C#

If you want to set the precision for all decimals in EF6 you could replace the default DecimalPropertyConvention convention used in the DbModelBuilder:

protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
    modelBuilder.Conventions.Remove<DecimalPropertyConvention>();
    modelBuilder.Conventions.Add(new DecimalPropertyConvention(38, 18));
}

The default DecimalPropertyConvention in EF6 maps decimal properties to decimal(18,2) columns.

If you only want individual properties to have a specified precision then you can set the precision for the entity's property on the DbModelBuilder:

protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
    modelBuilder.Entity<MyEntity>().Property(e => e.Value).HasPrecision(38, 18);
}

Or, add an EntityTypeConfiguration<> for the entity which specifies the precision:

protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
    modelBuilder.Configurations.Add(new MyEntityConfiguration());
}

internal class MyEntityConfiguration : EntityTypeConfiguration<MyEntity>
{
    internal MyEntityConfiguration()
    {
        this.Property(e => e.Value).HasPrecision(38, 18);
    }
}

Solution 3 - C#

I had a nice time creating an Custom Attribute for this:

[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Property, Inherited = false, AllowMultiple = false)]
public sealed class DecimalPrecisionAttribute : Attribute
{
    public DecimalPrecisionAttribute(byte precision, byte scale)
    {
        Precision = precision;
        Scale = scale;
    
    }

    public byte Precision { get; set; }
    public byte Scale { get; set; }
    
}

using it like this

[DecimalPrecision(20,10)]
public Nullable<decimal> DeliveryPrice { get; set; }

and the magic happens at model creation with some reflection

protected override void OnModelCreating(System.Data.Entity.ModelConfiguration.ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
    foreach (Type classType in from t in Assembly.GetAssembly(typeof(DecimalPrecisionAttribute)).GetTypes()
                                   where t.IsClass && t.Namespace == "YOURMODELNAMESPACE"
                                   select t)
     {
         foreach (var propAttr in classType.GetProperties(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance).Where(p => p.GetCustomAttribute<DecimalPrecisionAttribute>() != null).Select(
                p => new { prop = p, attr = p.GetCustomAttribute<DecimalPrecisionAttribute>(true) }))
         {

             var entityConfig = modelBuilder.GetType().GetMethod("Entity").MakeGenericMethod(classType).Invoke(modelBuilder, null);
             ParameterExpression param = ParameterExpression.Parameter(classType, "c");
             Expression property = Expression.Property(param, propAttr.prop.Name);
             LambdaExpression lambdaExpression = Expression.Lambda(property, true,
                                                                      new ParameterExpression[]
                                                                          {param});
             DecimalPropertyConfiguration decimalConfig;
             if (propAttr.prop.PropertyType.IsGenericType && propAttr.prop.PropertyType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(Nullable<>))
             {
                 MethodInfo methodInfo = entityConfig.GetType().GetMethods().Where(p => p.Name == "Property").ToList()[7];
                 decimalConfig = methodInfo.Invoke(entityConfig, new[] { lambdaExpression }) as DecimalPropertyConfiguration;
             }
             else
             {
                 MethodInfo methodInfo = entityConfig.GetType().GetMethods().Where(p => p.Name == "Property").ToList()[6];
                 decimalConfig = methodInfo.Invoke(entityConfig, new[] { lambdaExpression }) as DecimalPropertyConfiguration;
             }

             decimalConfig.HasPrecision(propAttr.attr.Precision, propAttr.attr.Scale);
        }
    }
}

the first part is to get all classes in the model (my custom attribute is defined in that assembly so i used that to get the assembly with the model)

the second foreach gets all properties in that class with the custom attribute, and the attribute itself so i can get the precision and scale data

after that i have to call

modelBuilder.Entity<MODEL_CLASS>().Property(c=> c.PROPERTY_NAME).HasPrecision(PRECISION,SCALE);

so i call the modelBuilder.Entity() by reflection and store it in the entityConfig variable then i build the "c => c.PROPERTY_NAME" lambda expression

After that, if the decimal is nullable i call the

Property(Expression<Func<TStructuralType, decimal?>> propertyExpression) 

method (i call this by the position in the array, it's not ideal i know, any help will be much appreciated)

and if it's not nullable i call the

Property(Expression<Func<TStructuralType, decimal>> propertyExpression)

method.

Having the DecimalPropertyConfiguration i call the HasPrecision method.

Solution 4 - C#

Using the DecimalPrecisonAttribute from KinSlayerUY, in EF6 you can create a convention which will handle individual properties which have the attribute (as opposed to setting the DecimalPropertyConvention like in this answer which will affect all decimal properties).

[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Property, Inherited = false, AllowMultiple = false)]
public sealed class DecimalPrecisionAttribute : Attribute
{
    public DecimalPrecisionAttribute(byte precision, byte scale)
    {
        Precision = precision;
        Scale = scale;
    }
    public byte Precision { get; set; }
    public byte Scale { get; set; }
}

public class DecimalPrecisionAttributeConvention
    : PrimitivePropertyAttributeConfigurationConvention<DecimalPrecisionAttribute>
{
    public override void Apply(ConventionPrimitivePropertyConfiguration configuration, DecimalPrecisionAttribute attribute)
    {
        if (attribute.Precision < 1 || attribute.Precision > 38)
        {
            throw new InvalidOperationException("Precision must be between 1 and 38.");
        }

        if (attribute.Scale > attribute.Precision)
        {
            throw new InvalidOperationException("Scale must be between 0 and the Precision value.");
        }

        configuration.HasPrecision(attribute.Precision, attribute.Scale);
    }
}

Then in your DbContext:

protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
    modelBuilder.Conventions.Add(new DecimalPrecisionAttributeConvention());
}

Solution 5 - C#

Apparently, you can override the DbContext.OnModelCreating() method and configure the precision like this:

protected override void OnModelCreating(System.Data.Entity.ModelConfiguration.ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
    modelBuilder.Entity<Product>().Property(product => product.Price).Precision = 10;
    modelBuilder.Entity<Product>().Property(product => product.Price).Scale = 2;
}

But this is pretty tedious code when you have to do it with all your price-related properties, so I came up with this:

    protected override void OnModelCreating(System.Data.Entity.ModelConfiguration.ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
    {
        var properties = new[]
        {
            modelBuilder.Entity<Product>().Property(product => product.Price),
            modelBuilder.Entity<Order>().Property(order => order.OrderTotal),
            modelBuilder.Entity<OrderDetail>().Property(detail => detail.Total),
            modelBuilder.Entity<Option>().Property(option => option.Price)
        };

        properties.ToList().ForEach(property =>
        {
            property.Precision = 10;
            property.Scale = 2;
        });

        base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);
    }

It's good practice that you call the base method when you override a method, even though the base implementation does nothing.

Update: This article was also very helpful.

Solution 6 - C#

[Column(TypeName = "decimal(18,2)")]

this will work with EF Core code first migrations as described here.

Solution 7 - C#

Entity Framework Ver 6 (Alpha, rc1) has something called Custom Conventions. To set decimal precision:

protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
    modelBuilder.Properties<decimal>().Configure(config => config.HasPrecision(18, 4));
}

Reference:

Solution 8 - C#

this code line could be a simpler way to acomplish the same:

 public class ProductConfiguration : EntityTypeConfiguration<Product>
    {
        public ProductConfiguration()
        {
            this.Property(m => m.Price).HasPrecision(10, 2);
        }
    }

Solution 9 - C#

EDIT, from .NET 6, this has been replaced with tag

use [Precision(precision, scale)]

- FOR EF CORE - with using System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations;

use [Column(TypeName = "decimal(precision, scale)")]

Precision = Total number of characters used

Scale = Total number after the dot. (easy to get confused)

Example:

public class Blog
{
    public int BlogId { get; set; }
    [Column(TypeName = "varchar(200)")]
    public string Url { get; set; }
    [Column(TypeName = "decimal(5, 2)")]
    public decimal Rating { get; set; }
}

More details here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/ef/core/modeling/relational/data-types

Solution 10 - C#

From .NET EF Core 6 onwards you can use the Precision attribute.

    [Precision(18, 2)]
    public decimal Price { get; set; }

make sure that you need to install EF Core 6 and do following using line

using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;

Solution 11 - C#

You can always tell EF to do this with conventions in the Context class in the OnModelCreating function as follows:

protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
    // <... other configurations ...>
    // modelBuilder.Conventions.Remove<PluralizingTableNameConvention>();
    // modelBuilder.Conventions.Remove<ManyToManyCascadeDeleteConvention>();
    // modelBuilder.Conventions.Remove<OneToManyCascadeDeleteConvention>();

    // Configure Decimal to always have a precision of 18 and a scale of 4
    modelBuilder.Conventions.Remove<DecimalPropertyConvention>();
    modelBuilder.Conventions.Add(new DecimalPropertyConvention(18, 4));

    base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);
}

This only applies to Code First EF fyi and applies to all decimal types mapped to the db.

Solution 12 - C#

In EF6

modelBuilder.Properties()
    .Where(x => x.GetCustomAttributes(false).OfType<DecimalPrecisionAttribute>().Any())
    .Configure(c => {
        var attr = (DecimalPrecisionAttribute)c.ClrPropertyInfo.GetCustomAttributes(typeof (DecimalPrecisionAttribute), true).FirstOrDefault();

        c.HasPrecision(attr.Precision, attr.Scale);
    });

Solution 13 - C#

Using

System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations;

You can simply put that attribute in your model :

[DataType("decimal(18,5)")]

Solution 14 - C#

You can found more information on MSDN - facet of Entity Data Model. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee382834.aspx Full recommended.

Solution 15 - C#

Actual for EntityFrameworkCore 3.1.3:

some solution in OnModelCreating:

var fixDecimalDatas = new List<Tuple<Type, Type, string>>();
foreach (var entityType in builder.Model.GetEntityTypes())
{
    foreach (var property in entityType.GetProperties())
    {
        if (Type.GetTypeCode(property.ClrType) == TypeCode.Decimal)
        {
            fixDecimalDatas.Add(new Tuple<Type, Type, string>(entityType.ClrType, property.ClrType, property.GetColumnName()));
        }
    }
}

foreach (var item in fixDecimalDatas)
{
    builder.Entity(item.Item1).Property(item.Item2, item.Item3).HasColumnType("decimal(18,4)");
}

//custom decimal nullable:
builder.Entity<SomePerfectEntity>().Property(x => x.IsBeautiful).HasColumnType("decimal(18,4)");

Solution 16 - C#

KinSlayerUY's custom attribute worked nicely for me but I had issues with ComplexTypes. They were being mapped as entities in the attribute code so couldn't then be mapped as a ComplexType.

I therefore extended the code to allow for this:

public static void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
    {
        foreach (Type classType in from t in Assembly.GetAssembly(typeof(DecimalPrecisionAttribute)).GetTypes()
                                   where t.IsClass && t.Namespace == "FA.f1rstval.Data"
                                   select t)
        {
            foreach (var propAttr in classType.GetProperties(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance).Where(p => p.GetCustomAttribute<DecimalPrecisionAttribute>() != null).Select(
                   p => new { prop = p, attr = p.GetCustomAttribute<DecimalPrecisionAttribute>(true) }))
            {

                ParameterExpression param = ParameterExpression.Parameter(classType, "c");
                Expression property = Expression.Property(param, propAttr.prop.Name);
                LambdaExpression lambdaExpression = Expression.Lambda(property, true,
                                                                         new ParameterExpression[] { param });
                DecimalPropertyConfiguration decimalConfig;
                int MethodNum;
                if (propAttr.prop.PropertyType.IsGenericType && propAttr.prop.PropertyType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(Nullable<>))
                {
                    MethodNum = 7;
                }
                else
                {
                    MethodNum = 6;
                }

                //check if complextype
                if (classType.GetCustomAttribute<ComplexTypeAttribute>() != null)
                {
                    var complexConfig = modelBuilder.GetType().GetMethod("ComplexType").MakeGenericMethod(classType).Invoke(modelBuilder, null);
                    MethodInfo methodInfo = complexConfig.GetType().GetMethods().Where(p => p.Name == "Property").ToList()[MethodNum];
                    decimalConfig = methodInfo.Invoke(complexConfig, new[] { lambdaExpression }) as DecimalPropertyConfiguration;
                }
                else
                {
                    var entityConfig = modelBuilder.GetType().GetMethod("Entity").MakeGenericMethod(classType).Invoke(modelBuilder, null);
                    MethodInfo methodInfo = entityConfig.GetType().GetMethods().Where(p => p.Name == "Property").ToList()[MethodNum];
                    decimalConfig = methodInfo.Invoke(entityConfig, new[] { lambdaExpression }) as DecimalPropertyConfiguration;
                }

                decimalConfig.HasPrecision(propAttr.attr.Precision, propAttr.attr.Scale);
            }
        }
    }

Solution 17 - C#

@Mark007, I have changed the type selection criteria to ride of the DbSet<> properties of the DbContext. I think this is safer because there are times when you have classes in the given namespace that shouldn't be part of the model definition or they are but are not entities. Or your entities could reside in separate namespaces or separate assemblies and be pulled together into once Context.

Also, even though unlikely, I do not think it's safe to rely on ordering of method definitions, so it's better to pull them out with by Parameter list. (.GetTypeMethods() is an extension method I built to work with the new TypeInfo paradigm and can flatten class hierarchies when looking for methods).

Do note that OnModelCreating delegates to this method:

	private void OnModelCreatingSetDecimalPrecisionFromAttribute(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
	{
		foreach (var iSetProp in this.GetType().GetTypeProperties(true))
		{
			if (iSetProp.PropertyType.IsGenericType
					&& (iSetProp.PropertyType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(IDbSet<>) || iSetProp.PropertyType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(DbSet<>)))
			{
				var entityType = iSetProp.PropertyType.GetGenericArguments()[0];

				foreach (var propAttr in entityType
										.GetProperties(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance)
										.Select(p => new { prop = p, attr = p.GetCustomAttribute<DecimalPrecisionAttribute>(true) })
										.Where(propAttr => propAttr.attr != null))
				{
					var entityTypeConfigMethod = modelBuilder.GetType().GetTypeInfo().DeclaredMethods.First(m => m.Name == "Entity");
					var entityTypeConfig = entityTypeConfigMethod.MakeGenericMethod(entityType).Invoke(modelBuilder, null);

					var param = ParameterExpression.Parameter(entityType, "c");
					var lambdaExpression = Expression.Lambda(Expression.Property(param, propAttr.prop.Name), true, new ParameterExpression[] { param });

					var propertyConfigMethod =
						entityTypeConfig.GetType()
							.GetTypeMethods(true, false)
							.First(m =>
							{
								if (m.Name != "Property")
									return false;

								var methodParams = m.GetParameters();

								return methodParams.Length == 1 && methodParams[0].ParameterType == lambdaExpression.GetType();
							}
							);

					var decimalConfig = propertyConfigMethod.Invoke(entityTypeConfig, new[] { lambdaExpression }) as DecimalPropertyConfiguration;

					decimalConfig.HasPrecision(propAttr.attr.Precision, propAttr.attr.Scale);
				}
			}
		}
	}



	public static IEnumerable<MethodInfo> GetTypeMethods(this Type typeToQuery, bool flattenHierarchy, bool? staticMembers)
	{
		var typeInfo = typeToQuery.GetTypeInfo();

		foreach (var iField in typeInfo.DeclaredMethods.Where(fi => staticMembers == null || fi.IsStatic == staticMembers))
			yield return iField;

		//this bit is just for StaticFields so we pass flag to flattenHierarchy and for the purpose of recursion, restrictStatic = false
		if (flattenHierarchy == true)
		{
			var baseType = typeInfo.BaseType;

			if ((baseType != null) && (baseType != typeof(object)))
			{
				foreach (var iField in baseType.GetTypeMethods(true, staticMembers))
					yield return iField;
			}
		}
	}

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionDave Van den EyndeView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - C#AlexCView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - C#kjbartelView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - C#KinSlayerUYView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - C#kjbartelView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - C#Dave Van den EyndeView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - C#ElnoorView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - C#mxasimView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - C#armadillo.mxView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - C#sofsntpView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 10 - C#Lahiru GambheeraView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 11 - C#GeckoView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 12 - C#user3332875View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 13 - C#VinnyGView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 14 - C#JaiderView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 15 - C#AzamatView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 16 - C#Mark007View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 17 - C#EniolaView Answer on Stackoverflow