Conditions for automatic generation of default/copy/move ctor and copy/move assignment operator?

C++Copy ConstructorDefault ConstructorMove ConstructorMove Assignment-Operator

C++ Problem Overview


I want to refresh my memory on the conditions under which a compiler typically auto generates a default constructor, copy constructor and assignment operator.

I recollect there were some rules, but I don't remember, and also can't find a reputable resource online. Can anyone help?

C++ Solutions


Solution 1 - C++

In the following, "auto-generated" means "implicitly declared as defaulted, but not defined as deleted". There are situations where the special member functions are declared, but defined as deleted.

  • The default constructor is auto-generated if there is no user-declared constructor (§12.1/5).
  • The copy constructor is auto-generated if there is no user-declared move constructor or move assignment operator (because there are no move constructors or move assignment operators in C++03, this simplifies to "always" in C++03) (§12.8/8).
  • The copy assignment operator is auto-generated if there is no user-declared move constructor or move assignment operator (§12.8/19).
  • The destructor is auto-generated if there is no user-declared destructor (§12.4/4).
C++11 and later only:
  • The move constructor is auto-generated if there is no user-declared copy constructor, copy assignment operator or destructor, and if the generated move constructor is valid (§12.8/10).
  • The move assignment operator is auto-generated if there is no user-declared copy constructor, copy assignment operator or destructor, and if the generated move assignment operator is valid (e.g. if it wouldn't need to assign constant members) (§12.8/21).

Solution 2 - C++

I've found the diagram below very useful.

[![C++ rules for automatic constructors and assignment operators][1]][1] [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/CVtPu.jpg

from Sticky Bits - Becoming a Rule of Zero Hero

Solution 3 - C++

C++17 N4659 standard draft

For a quick cross standard reference, have a look at the "Implicitly-declared" sections of the following cppreference entries:

The same information can of course be obtained from the standard. E.g. on C++17 N4659 standard draft:

15.8.1 "Copy/move constructors" says for for copy constructor:

> 6 If the class definition does not explicitly declare a copy constructor, a non-explicit one is declared implicitly. If the class definition declares a move constructor or move assignment operator, the implicitly declared copy constructor is defined as deleted; otherwise, it is defined as defaulted (11.4). The latter case is deprecated if the class has a user-declared copy assignment operator or a user-declared destructor.

and for move constructor:

> 8 If the definition of a class X does not explicitly declare a move constructor, a non-explicit one will be implicitly > declared as defaulted if and only if > > - (8.1) > — X does not have a user-declared copy constructor, > > - (8.2) > — X does not have a user-declared copy assignment operator, > > - (8.3) > — X does not have a user-declared move assignment operator, and > > - (8.4) > — X does not have a user-declared destructor.

15.8.2 "Copy/move assignment operator" says for copy assignment:

> 2 If the class definition does not explicitly declare a copy assignment operator, one is declared implicitly. If the class definition declares a move constructor or move assignment operator, the implicitly declared copy assignment operator is defined as deleted; otherwise, it is defined as defaulted (11.4). The latter case is deprecated if the class has a user-declared copy constructor or a user-declared destructor.

and for move assignment:

> 4 If the definition of a class X does not explicitly declare a move assignment operator, one will be implicitly > declared as defaulted if and only if > > - (4.1) — X does not have a user-declared copy constructor, > - (4.2) — X does not have a user-declared move constructor, > - (4.3) — X does not have a user-declared copy assignment operator, and > - (4.4) — X does not have a user-declared destructor.

15.4 "Destructors" says it for destructors:

> 4 If a class has no user-declared destructor, a destructor is implicitly declared as defaulted (11.4). An implicitly-declared destructor is an inline public member of its class.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionoompahloompahView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - C++PhilippView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - C++Marco M.View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - C++Ciro Santilli Путлер Капут 六四事View Answer on Stackoverflow