Clarification of meaning new JVM memory parameters InitialRAMPercentage and MinRAMPercentage
JavaDockerJvmJava Problem Overview
Reference: https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8186315
I'm really struggling to find out what MinRAMPercentage does, especially compared to InitialRAMPercentage.
I assumed that InitialRAMPercentage sets the amount of heap at startup, that MinRAMPercentage and MaxRAMPercentage set the bottom and top limit of heap that the JVM is allowed to shrink/grow to.
Apparently that is not the case. When I start a JVM (with UseContainerSupport, having these new memory setting parameters) like so:
java -XX:+UseContainerSupport -XX:InitialRAMPercentage=40.0 -XX:MinRAMPercentage=20.0 -XX:MaxRAMPercentage=80.0 -XX:+PrintFlagsFinal -version | grep Heap
InitialHeap and MaxHeap get set, there is no "Minimum Heap Size" value that I can find; Consequently, that MinRAMPercentage never seems to get used.
Super confused, and apparently, I'm not the only one; the OpenJ9 dudes seem to also not fully parse the intent of these options, as I've gathered here and here. They seem to have opted to simply not implement MinRAMPercentage afaics.
So: What is the real intended usage and effect of setting MinRAMPercentage?
Java Solutions
Solution 1 - Java
-XX:InitialRAMPercentage
is used to calculate initial heap size when InitialHeapSize
/ -Xms
is not set.
It sounds counterintuitive, but both -XX:MaxRAMPercentage
and -XX:MinRAMPercentage
are used to calculate maximum heap size when MaxHeapSize
/ -Xmx
is not set:
-
For systems with small physical memory
MaxHeapSize
is estimated asphys_mem * MinRAMPercentage / 100 (if this value is less than 96M)
-
Otherwise (non-small physical memory)
MaxHeapSize
is estimated asMAX(phys_mem * MaxRAMPercentage / 100, 96M)
The exact formula is a bit more complicated as it also takes other factors into account.
Note: the algorithm for calculating initial and maximum heap size depends on the particular JVM version. The preferred way to control the heap size is to set Xmx
and Xms
explicitly.
See also this question.