Can I zip more than two lists together in Scala?
ScalaFunctional ProgrammingListZipScala Problem Overview
Given the following Scala List:
val l = List(List("a1", "b1", "c1"), List("a2", "b2", "c2"), List("a3", "b3", "c3"))
How can I get:
List(("a1", "a2", "a3"), ("b1", "b2", "b3"), ("c1", "c2", "c3"))
Since zip can only be used to combine two Lists, I think you would need to iterate/reduce the main List somehow. Not surprisingly, the following doesn't work:
scala> l reduceLeft ((a, b) => a zip b)
<console>:6: error: type mismatch;
found : List[(String, String)]
required: List[String]
l reduceLeft ((a, b) => a zip b)
Any suggestions one how to do this? I think I'm missing a very simple way to do it.
Update: I'm looking for a solution that can take a List of N Lists with M elements each and create a List of M TupleNs.
Update 2: As it turns out it is better for my specific use-case to have a list of lists, rather than a list of tuples, so I am accepting pumpkin's response. It is also the simplest, as it uses a native method.
Scala Solutions
Solution 1 - Scala
scala> (List(1,2,3),List(4,5,6),List(7,8,9)).zipped.toList
res0: List[(Int, Int, Int)] = List((1,4,7), (2,5,8), (3,6,9))
For future reference.
Solution 2 - Scala
I don't believe it's possible to generate a list of tuples of arbitrary size, but the transpose function does exactly what you need if you don't mind getting a list of lists instead.
Solution 3 - Scala
So this piece of code won't answer the needs of the OP, and not only because this is a four year old thread, but it does answer the title question, and perhaps someone may even find it useful.
To zip 3 collections:
as zip bs zip cs map {
case ((a,b), c) => (a,b,c)
}
Solution 4 - Scala
Yes, with zip3.
Solution 5 - Scala
transpose
does the trick. A possible algorithm is:
def combineLists[A](ss:List[A]*) = {
val sa = ss.reverse;
(sa.head.map(List(_)) /: sa.tail)(_.zip(_).map(p=>p._2 :: p._1))
}
For example:
combineLists(List(1, 2, 3), List(10,20), List(100, 200, 300))
// => List[List[Int]] = List(List(1, 10, 100), List(2, 20, 200))
The answer is truncated to the size of the shortest list in the input.
combineLists(List(1, 2, 3), List(10,20))
// => List[List[Int]] = List(List(1, 10), List(2, 20))
Solution 6 - Scala
Scala treats all of its different tuple sizes as different classes (Tuple1
, Tuple2
, Tuple3
, Tuple4
,...,Tuple22
) while they do all inherit from the Product
trait, that trait doesn't carry enough information to actually use the data values from the different sizes of tuples if they could all be returned by the same function. (And scala's generics aren't powerful enough to handle this case either.)
Your best bet is to write overloads of the zip function for all 22 Tuple sizes. A code generator would probably help you with this.
Solution 7 - Scala
I don't believe that's possible without being repetitive. For one simple reason: you can't define the returning type of the function you are asking for.
For instance, if your input was List(List(1,2), List(3,4))
, then the return type would be List[Tuple2[Int]]
. If it had three elements, the return type would be List[Tuple3[Int]]
, and so on.
You could return List[AnyRef]
, or even List[Product]
, and then make a bunch of cases, one for each condition.
As for general List transposition, this works:
def transpose[T](l: List[List[T]]): List[List[T]] = l match {
case Nil => Nil
case Nil :: _ => Nil
case _ => (l map (_.head)) :: transpose(l map (_.tail))
}
Solution 8 - Scala
If you don't want to go down the applicative scalaz/cats/(insert your favourite functional lib here) route, pattern matching is the way to go, although the (_, _)
syntax is a bit awkward with nesting, so let's change it:
import scala.{Tuple2 => &}
for (i1 & i2 & i3 & i4 <- list1 zip list2 zip list3 zip list4) yield (i1, i2, i3, i4)
The &
is an arbitrary choice here, anything that looks nice infix should do it. You'll likely get a few raised eyebrows during code review, though.
It should also work with anything you can zip
(e.g. Future
s)
Solution 9 - Scala
Scala 2.12.13 and below
If you know how long the input List is, you can join the list into a Tuple and use Tuple's .zipped
method:
val l = List(List("a1", "b1", "c1"), List("a2", "b2", "c2"), List("a3", "b3", "c3"))
println(l match {
case l1::l2::l3::_ => (l1,l2,l3).zipped.toList
case _ => throw new IllegalArgumentException("List is not the right length")
}) // List((a1,a2,a3), (b1,b2,b3), (c1,c2,c3))
>= Scala 2.13
The above solution is deprecated - use lazyZip instead:
val l = List(List("a1", "b1", "c1"), List("a2", "b2", "c2"), List("a3", "b3", "c3"))
println(l match {
case l1::l2::l3::_ => (l1 lazyZip l2 lazyZip l3).toList
case _ => throw new IllegalArgumentException("List is not the right length")
}) // List((a1,a2,a3), (b1,b2,b3), (c1,c2,c3))
Solution 10 - Scala
product-collections has aflatZip
operation up to arity 22.
scala> List(1,2,3) flatZip Seq("a","b","c") flatZip Vector(1.0,2.0,3.0) flatZip Seq(9,8,7)
res1: com.github.marklister.collections.immutable.CollSeq4[Int,String,Double,Int] =
CollSeq((1,a,1.0,9),
(2,b,2.0,8),
(3,c,3.0,7))
Solution 11 - Scala
With Scalaz:
import scalaz.Zip
import scalaz.std.list._
// Zip 3
Zip[List].ap.tuple3(List("a1", "b1"),
List("a2", "b2"),
List("a3", "b3"))
// Zip 4
Zip[List].ap.tuple4(List("a1", "b1"),
List("a2", "b2"),
List("a3", "b3"),
List("a4", "b4"))
// Zip 5
Zip[List].ap.tuple5(List("a1", "b1"),
List("a2", "b2"),
List("a3", "b3"),
List("a4", "b4"),
List("a5", "b5"))
For more than 5:
// Zip 6
Zip[List].ap.apply6(List("a1", "b1"),
List("a2", "b2"),
List("a3", "b3"),
List("a4", "b4"),
List("a5", "b5"),
List("a6", "b6"))((_, _, _, _, _, _))
// Zip 7
Zip[List].ap.apply7(List("a1", "b1"),
List("a2", "b2"),
List("a3", "b3"),
List("a4", "b4"),
List("a5", "b5"),
List("a6", "b6"),
List("a7", "b7"))((_, _, _, _, _, _, _))
...
// Zip 12
Zip[List].ap.apply12(List("a1", "b1"),
List("a2", "b2"),
List("a3", "b3"),
List("a4", "b4"),
List("a5", "b5"),
List("a6", "b6"),
List("a7", "b7"),
List("a8", "b8"),
List("a9", "b9"),
List("a10", "b10"),
List("a11", "b11"),
List("a12", "b12"))((_, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _))