There is no way to share private repository among non-Github users.

You need the Github account and be [added as collaborator to the project](https://help.github.com/articles/adding-collaborators-to-a-personal-repository/).

You can use [gitfront.io][1] for this purpose. 
You can give users to read-only access to keep your secure 


  [1]: https://gitfront.io

I am trying to create custom validation for a model, to check that its `start_date` is before its `end_date` and it is proving near impossible.

Stuff I&#39;ve tried:

- built-in Django validators: none check for this

- writing my own, like so:

    
        def validate_date(self):
           if self.start_date &lt; self.end_date:
                raise serializers.ValidationError(&quot;End date must be after start date.&quot;)


That bit of code I have added to the Serializer class (and then the model), but it does not seem to get called in either location.

I also found [this][1] bit of code that might be of use, but I don&#39;t know how to integrate in my method- it seems that it would work to validate one model attribute, but I need to check between two attributes.

My model:

    class MyModel(models.Model):

        created = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)
        relation_model = models.ForeignKey(RelationModel, related_name=&quot;mymodels&quot;)
        priority = models.IntegerField(
            validators = [validators.MinValueValidator(0), validators.MaxValueValidator(100)])
        start_date = models.DateField()
    end_date = models.DateField()
    
        @property
        def is_active(self):
            today = datetime.date.today()
            return (today &gt;= self.start_date) and (today &lt;= self.end_date)
    
        def __unicode__(self):
            ...
    
        class Meta:
            unique_together = (&#39;relation_model&#39;, &#39;priority&#39;, &#39;start_date&#39;, &#39;end_date&#39;)

Fyi, all the other validations work!

My serializer:

    class MyModelSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):

        relation_model = RelationModelSerializer
        is_active = serializers.Field(source=&#39;is_active&#39;)

        def validate_date(self):
            if self.start_date &gt; self.end_date:
                raise serializers.ValidationError(&quot;End date must be after start date.&quot;)   
 
        class Meta:
            model = MyModel
            fields = (
                &#39;id&#39;, &#39;relation_model&#39;, &#39;priority&#39;, &#39;start_date&#39;, &#39;end_date&#39;, &#39;is_active&#39;
            )

My view:

    class MyModelList(generics.ListCreateAPIView):
        permission_classes = (IsAdminUser,)
        queryset = MyModel.objects.all()
        serializer_class = MyModelSerializer
        ordering = (&#39;priority&#39;)

  [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26119672/django-rest-framework-field-level-validation-in-serializer


Django REST Framework custom fields validation

I&#39;m new with React and I understand the benefits of the component based, inline styles. But I&#39;m wondering if there is a decent way to have some sort of global style. For instance, I&#39;d like to use the same Text and Button coloring throughout my app. 

Rather than repeat in every component(and subsequently have to change it in x places if need be), my initial thought is to create a &#39;base&#39; StyleSheet class in it own file and import it in my components.

Is there a better or more &#39;React&#39; way?

React Native global styles

I have a Java application in a private repository on GitHub and I would like to share it with someone who doesn&#39;t have an account. I didn&#39;t find any option on the site for this.

Is there a way to do this? Collaborators can be only GitHub users.

Can I share my private GitHub repository by link?

<p>I have a Java application in a private repository on GitHub and I would like to share it with someone who doesn't have an account. I didn't find any option on the site for this.</p>
<p>Is there a way to do this? Collaborators can be only GitHub users.</p>


Is it possible to shallow clone a specific commit in a repository, i.e. with depth 1? Something like

    git clone http://myrepo.git 728a4d --depth 1

to get the repository state as it is at the commit with SHA `728a4d...`?

The motivation is to avoid having to clone the whole repository, then check out that specific commit, when we&#39;re only interested in the state of the repository at that specific commit.

How to shallow clone a specific commit with depth 1?

I&#39;m trying to undo local changes to a specific file. Nothing has been committed.

When I want to revert all changes, I can perform `git revert --reset HEAD`. However, in this case, I don&#39;t want to revert all changes to all files.

Its not clear or obvious to me how to revert just a file, even after reading the `git-revert(3)` man page:

    NAME
           git-revert - Revert some existing commits
    
    SYNOPSIS
           git revert [--[no-]edit] [-n] [-m parent-number] [-s] &lt;commit&gt;...
           git revert --continue
           git revert --quit
           git revert --abort
    ...

This is similar to [How to revert a specific file in a old commit on git](https://stackoverflow.com/q/27388076), but no commits have been performed. And unlike OP, who wants to go back to an arbitrary commit, I just want the file to return to MASTER&#39;s copy of it.

Under SVN, I would just delete the file in question and then perform a `svn update`.

How do I revert changes to a single file?

How to undo local changes to a specific file

I recently began using two-factor authentication on GitHub, and I am now unable to use git over https on private repos in the usual way:

    peter@computer:~$ git clone https://github.com/[...]/MyPrivateRepo
    Cloning into &#39;MyPrivateRepo&#39;...
    Username for &#39;https://github.com&#39;: [...]
    Password for &#39;https://[...]@github.com&#39;: 
    remote: Invalid username or password.
    fatal: Authentication failed for &#39;https://github.com/[...]/MyPrivateRepo/&#39;

If I disable two-factor authentication I can use it as before:

    peter@computer:~$ git clone https://github.com/[...]/MyPrivateRepo
    Cloning into &#39;MyPrivateRepo&#39;...
    Username for &#39;https://github.com&#39;: [...]
    Password for &#39;https://[...]@github.com&#39;: 
    remote: Counting objects: 147, done.
    remote: Total 147 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 147
    Receiving objects: 100% (147/147), 22.70 KiB | 0 bytes/s, done.
    Resolving deltas: 100% (87/87), done.
    Checking connectivity... done.

I know I can use SSH and everything works, but is there a way I can keep two-factor authentication while still being able to use GitHub over HTTPS, for example by sending an auth token with my request?

Git Clone from GitHub over https with two-factor authentication

I&#39;m on a branch with some changes.  Changing branch is a pain as some files are locked by processes, so to change branch I&#39;d have to stop all the processes which have locks, then `stash` the changes before checking out the other branch to see its log.

Is it possible to view the log for a different branch, without having to check it out?

How can I print the log for a branch other than the current one?

I have read relevant questions about git merge and git rebase on SO, but I still cannot fully understand what is happening under the hood.

Here is our branching situation:

    MASTER------------------------
            \        \
             \        \----Feature B---
              \                        \
               \-----Feature A----------\---Feature A+B

Given 2 feature branches that stem from master at different times, we now want to combine the 2 branches. We want to follow the `first rebase then merge` practice, but when we rebase Feature A onto Feature B, we get conflicts. That&#39;s expected, because both features (and master) have changes in the same areas. But the strange thing is that the same conflict keeps reappearing after `git rebase --continue`. This drives us crazy, so we end up aborting the rebase, and use `git merge`. It turns out the conflicts are actually easy to resolve.

My question is two-fold:

 1. Is `git rebase` suitable for our situation? Or is rebase only good for pulling in a few (e.g., 1 or 2) changes?
 2. What is happening under the hood that causes the same conflict to reappear again and again? My understanding is `rebase` resolves conflicts one at a time, but which commit does it compare, and what does it compare it to?

Relavant posts on SO:

 - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/13825079/git-rebase-why-i-have-to-resolve-the-same-conflict-over-and-over
 - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7241678/how-to-prevent-lot-of-git-conflicts-when-git-rebasing-lot-of-commits\
 - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3516899/git-rebase-resolve-conflicts-again-and-again


Why does the same conflict reappear when I use git rebase?

I want to do a `git pull` but only till a specific commit.

     A-&gt;B-&gt;C-&gt;D-&gt;E-&gt;F (Remote master HEAD)

so suppose my `local master` HEAD points to `B`, and I want to pull till `E`. What should I do ?

This is not pulling a specific commit, this is pulling upto a specific commit.

Git pull till a particular commit

When I created a GitHub project I chose None.

How can I now add a GPL license to my already added project?

[![screenshot][1]][1]

  [1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/BCJoL.png

How to add license to an existing GitHub project

I would like to publish a npm package that contains my source as well as distribution files. My Github repository contains `src` folder which contains JavaScript source files. The build process generates `dist` folder that contains the distribution files. Of course, the `dist` folder is not checked into the Github repository.

How do I publish a npm package in a way that when someone does `npm install`, they get `src` as well as `dist` folder? Currently when I run `npm publish` from my git repository, it results in only `src` folder being published.

My package.json looks like this:

    {
      &quot;name&quot;: &quot;join-js&quot;,
      &quot;version&quot;: &quot;0.0.1&quot;,
      &quot;homepage&quot;: &quot;https://github.com/archfirst/joinjs&quot;,
      &quot;repository&quot;: {
        &quot;type&quot;: &quot;git&quot;,
        &quot;url&quot;: &quot;https://github.com/archfirst/joinjs.git&quot;
      },
      &quot;main&quot;: &quot;dist/index.js&quot;,
      &quot;scripts&quot;: {
        &quot;test&quot;: &quot;gulp&quot;,
        &quot;build&quot;: &quot;gulp build&quot;,
        &quot;prepublish&quot;: &quot;npm run build&quot;
      },
      &quot;dependencies&quot;: {
        ...
      },
      &quot;devDependencies&quot;: {
        ...
      }
    }


How to publish an npm package with distribution files?

Is it possible to have some data stored somewhere on your personal github page?

For example a button that triggers a counter. When you click on the button , counter increments by 1. When other user visits that page and clicks the button , counter gets incremented by 1 once again.

So it would be a sum of all click across all visitors that would be displayed on the page.

Content Type	Original Author	Original Content on Stackoverflow
Question	gaRos	View Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - Git	Tomas Votruba	View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - Git	Karthik SWOT	View Answer on Stackoverflow

Can I share my private GitHub repository by link?

Git Problem Overview

Git Solutions

Solution 1 - Git

Solution 2 - Git

React Native global styles

Django REST Framework custom fields validation

Attributions