C++ extend a vector with another vector

C++Vector

C++ Problem Overview


I'm a C/Python programmer in C++ land working with the STL for the first time.

In Python, extending a list with another list uses the .extend method:

>>> v = [1, 2, 3]
>>> v_prime = [4, 5, 6]
>>> v.extend(v_prime)
>>> print(v)
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

I currently use this algorithmic approach to extend vectors in C++:

v.resize(v.size() + v_prime.size());
copy(v_prime.begin(), v_prime.end(), v.rbegin());

Is this the canonical way of extending vectors, or if there is a simpler way that I'm missing?

C++ Solutions


Solution 1 - C++

From here

// reserve() is optional - just to improve performance
v.reserve(v.size() + distance(v_prime.begin(),v_prime.end()));
v.insert(v.end(),v_prime.begin(),v_prime.end());

Solution 2 - C++

copy(v_prime.begin(), v_prime.end(), back_inserter(v));

Solution 3 - C++

There are multiple ways to achieve your target.

> std::vector::insert

The vector can be extended by inserting new elements before the element at the specified position, effectively increasing the container size by the number of elements inserted. You can follow one of below approaches. The second version uses C++11 and it can be considered as a more generic answer, as b could also be an array.

a.insert(a.end(), b.begin(), b.end());
a.insert(std::end(a), std::begin(b), std::end(b));

Sometimes in usage it is a best practice to use reserve function before using std::vector::insert. std::vector::reserve function increases the capacity of the container to a value that's greater or equal to new_cap. If new_cap is greater than the current capacity(), new storage is allocated, otherwise the method does nothing.

a.reserve(a.size() + distance(b.begin(), b.end()));

Use of reserve function is not required but may be advisable. And it is best practive to use reserve if you are repeatedly inserting into a vector for which you know the final size, and that size is large. Otherwise, it is better to let the STL grow your vector as needed.

> std::copy

std::copy is the second option that you can consider to achieve your target. This function copies the elements in the range (first,last) into the range beginning at result.

std::copy (b.begin(), b.end(), std::back_inserter(a));

However use of std::copy is slower than use of std::vector::insert(), because std::copy() can't reserve enough space before-hand (it doesn't have access to the vector itself, only to an iterator which has), while std::vector::insert(), being a member function, can. Due to that std::copy is indeed slower than using std::vector::insert. Most of the people, over use std::copy without knowing this scenario.

> boost::push_back

The third option that you can consider is the use of boost's push_back function.

boost::push_back(a, b);

Solution 4 - C++

I needed two different variants of the extend function in C++14, where one supported move semantics for each element of the vector to be appended.

vec is your v, and ext is your v_prime.

/**
 * Extend a vector with elements, without destroying source one.
 */
template<typename T>
void vector_extend(std::vector<T> &vec, const std::vector<T> &ext) {
	vec.reserve(vec.size() + ext.size());
	vec.insert(std::end(vec), std::begin(ext), std::end(ext));
}

/**
 * Extend a vector with elements with move semantics.
 */
template<typename T>
void vector_extend(std::vector<T> &vec, std::vector<T> &&ext) {
	if (vec.empty()) {
		vec = std::move(ext);
	}
	else {
		vec.reserve(vec.size() + ext.size());
		std::move(std::begin(ext), std::end(ext), std::back_inserter(vec));
		ext.clear();
	}
}

Solution 5 - C++

Use only the following syntax:

a.insert(a.end(), b.begin(), b.end());

Reserve\Resize should not be used unless you know what you are doing.

Reserving can cause massive over head as it doesn't necessarily allocate an exponential increase in size, so each reserve can cause O(n) time.

This might not be extremely expensive if done only once, and might actually prove more time\memory efficient in such cases. On the other hand, if you continue to extend the array this way with relatively smaller arrays, this will prove extremely inefficient. The following example show a simple miss-usage that cause x10,000 increase in time 

example:

#include <vector>
#include <iostream>
#include <chrono>

int main() {
    std::vector<int> a, b(50);
    auto t1 = std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now();
    for (int i = 0; i < 5e4; i++) {
        a.reserve(a.size() + b.size());      // line in question.
        a.insert(a.end(), b.begin(), b.end());
    }
    auto t2 = std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now();
    auto duration = std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::nanoseconds>( t2 - t1 ).count();

    std::cout << 1.0 * duration / 1e9;
    return 0;
}

//run              time        complexity      speed up
//with reserve     114.558 s   O(N)            x1
//without reserve    0.012 s   O(N^2)          x10000 (~O(N/50))

Compiled with -O3 on gcc 17, intel i5.

Solution 6 - C++

Using std::vector::insert;

A.reserve(A.size() + B.size());
A.insert(A.end(), B.begin(), B.end());

reserve() is optional, but using it helps to improve performance.


Convienent code generator to save precious seconds:

<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script><link rel="stylesheet" href="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/materialize/0.98.0/css/materialize.min.css"><script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/materialize/0.98.0/js/materialize.min.js"></script><script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/clipboard.js/1.6.0/clipboard.min.js"></script><script>function generateCode(){codeTemplate="{0}.reserve({0}.size() + {1}.size()); \n{0}.insert({0}.end(), {1}.begin(), {1}.end());",first=document.getElementById("1").value,second=document.getElementById("2").value,""==first&&(first="A"),""==second&&(second="B"),document.getElementById("c").innerHTML=String.format(codeTemplate,first,second)}String.format||(String.format=function(a){var b=Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,1);return a.replace(/{(\d+)}/g,function(a,c){return"undefined"!=typeof b[c]?b[c]:a})});</script><div class="A" style="margin:3% 10% 1% 10%;"><label for="1">First vector name:</label><input id="1"/><br/><label for="1">Second vector name:</label><input id="2"/><div class="D"><a class="waves-effect waves-light btn red col" onclick="generateCode();" style="margin:0 0 4% 0;">Generate Code</a></div><textarea id="c" onclick="this.select()" style="border:none;height:auto;overflow: hidden;font-family:Consolas,Monaco;">A.reserve(A.size() + B.size());&#13;&#10;A.insert(A.end(), B.begin(), B.end());</textarea></div>

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestioncdlearyView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - C++Dmitry KhalatovView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - C++CTTView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - C++Tharindu KumaraView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - C++TheJJView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - C++Ido KesslerView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - C++noɥʇʎԀʎzɐɹƆView Answer on Stackoverflow