AWS - What are the exact differences between EC2, Beanstalk and LightSail?

Amazon Web-ServicesAmazon Ec2CloudAmazon Elastic-BeanstalkAmazon Lightsail

Amazon Web-Services Problem Overview


What are the exact differences between EC2, Beanstalk and LightSail in AWS?

What are good real time scenarios in which I should use these services?

Amazon Web-Services Solutions


Solution 1 - Amazon Web-Services

They are all based on EC2, the compute service from AWS allowing you to create EC2 instances (virtual machines in the cloud).

Lightsail is packaged in a similar way than Virtual Private Server, making it easy for anyone to start with their own server. It has a simplified management console and many options are tuned with default values that maximize availability and security.

Elastic Beanstalk is a service for application developers that provisions an EC2 instance and a load balancer automatically. It creates the EC2 instance, it installs an execution environment on these machines and will deploy your application for you (Elastic Beanstalk support Java, Node, Python, Docker and many others)

Behind the scenes, Elastic Beanstalk creates regular EC2 instances that you will see in your AWS Console.

And EC2 is the bare service that allows the other to be possible. If you choose to create an EC2 instance, you will have to choose your operating system, manage your ssh key, install your application runtime and configure security settings by yourself. You have full control of that virtual machine.

Solution 2 - Amazon Web-Services

In simple terms:

EC2 - virtual host or an image. which you can use it to install apps and have a machine to do whatever you like.

Lightsail - is similar but more user friendly management option and good for small applications.

Beanstalk - an orchestration tool, which does all the work to create an EC2, install application, software and give you freedom from manual tasks in creating an environment.

More details at - https://stackshare.io/stackups/amazon-ec2-vs-amazon-lightsail-vs-aws-elastic-beanstalk

Solution 3 - Amazon Web-Services

I don't know if my scenario is typical in any way, but here are the differences that were critical for me. I'm happier EC2 than EB:

EC2:
  • just a remote linux machine with shell (command line) access
  • tracable application-level errors, easy to see what is wrong with your application
  • you can use AWS web console panel or AWS command line tool to manage
  • you will need repeated steps if you want to reproduce same environment
  • some effort to get proper shell access (eg fix security rule to your IP only)
  • no load balancer provided by default
Elastic Beanstalk
  • a service that creates a EC2 instance with a programming language of your choice (eg Python, PHP, etc)
  • runs one application on that machine (for python - application.py)
  • upload applications as .zip file, extra effort needed to use your git source
  • need to get used to environment vs applications mental model
  • application level errors hidden deep in the server logs, logs downloaded in separate menu
  • can be managed by web console, but also needs another CLI tool in addition to AWS CLI (you end up installing two CLI tools)
  • provides load balancer and other server-level services, takes away the manual setup part
  • great for scaling stable appications, not so much for trial-and-see experimentaion
  • probably more expensive than just an EC2 instance

Solution 4 - Amazon Web-Services

Amazon EC2 is a virtual host, in other words, it is a server where you can SSH configure your application, install dependencies and so on, like in your local machine. EC2 has a dozen of AMI (Amazon Machine Image: it is some kind of operating system of your EC2 server, for instance, you can have EC2 running on Linux based OS or in windows OS). To summarize, it is a great idea if you need a machine in your hands.

Amazon Lightsail is a simple tool that you can deploy and manage application with small management of servers. You can find it very practical if your application is small, For instance, it will perfectly fit your application if you use Wordpress or other CMS.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk is an orchestration tool. You can manage your application within that service, it is more elevated then AWS Light Sail.

If you still do not understand the differences, you can take a look at each service overview.

There is also an answer in Quora

Solution 5 - Amazon Web-Services

I have spent only 10 mins on these technologies but here is my first take.

  1. EC2 - a baremetal service. It gives you a server with an OS. That is it. There is nothing else installed on it. So if you need a webserver (nginx) or python, you'll need to do it yourself.
  2. Beanstalk - helps you deploy your applications. Say you have a python/flask application which you want to run on a server. Traditionally you'll have to build the app, move the deployable package to another machine where a web server should be installed, then move the package into some directory in the web server. Beanstalk does all this for you automatically.
  3. LightSail - I haven't tried it but it seem to be an even simpler option to create a server with pre-installed os/software.

In summary, these seem to make application deployment more easier by pre-configuring the server/EC2s with the required software packages and security policies (eg. port nos. etc.).

I am not an expert so I could be wrong.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionAar ManView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - Amazon Web-ServicesSébastien StormacqView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - Amazon Web-ServicesKrunal BarotView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - Amazon Web-ServicesEvgenyView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - Amazon Web-ServicesGor KotikyanView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - Amazon Web-ServicesManu ChadhaView Answer on Stackoverflow